The scale and value of surface roughness affect the wetting, fatigue, damping, emissivity, heat transfer, and aesthetic characteristics leading to applications in food, chemical, medical, and traditional mechanical industries. Starting with the definitions of roughness parameters, in this work, we presented a comprehensive review of various aspects required to characterize surface roughness. Subsequently, a well-arranged literature survey on the use of several roughness-sensing methods for various machining processes was presented. In tandem, the theoretical aspects of sensing and their limits on resolution, sensitivity, range, and accuracy have been described. Thereafter, mathematical models to reconstruct surface profiles were outlined. We also presented the ways for online measurements of roughness and integration of the former with the standards of Industry 4.0. With details on all aspects of roughness, this work is expected to assist the researchers and engineers in the selection of appropriate roughness measurement techniques that lead to application in various industries.
GuptaA, SundriyalP, BasuA, . Nano-finishing of MEMS-based platforms for optimum optical sensing. J Micromanufacturing2020; 3(1): 39–53. DOI: 10.1177/2516598419862676
2.
KumarS, EdacheryV, VelpulaS, . Influence of surface roughness, friction coefficient, and wrap angle on clinching joint strength and its correlation with belt friction phenomenon. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J J Eng Tribol2022; 236(2): 326–337. DOI: 10.1177/13506501211025362.
3.
SchmidtG, HauserC, TremplerP, . Ultra thin films of yttrium iron garnet with very low damping: A review. Phys Status Solidi B2020; 257(7): 1900644. DOI: 10.1002/pssb.201900644.
4.
JonesBJ, McHaleJP, and GarimellaSV.The influence of surface roughness on nucleate pool boiling heat transfer. J Heat Transfer2009; 131(12). DOI: 10.1115/1.3220144.
5.
ManoharanK and BhattacharyaS.Superhydrophobic surfaces review: Functional application, fabrication techniques and limitations. J Micromanufacturing2019; 2(1): 59–78. DOI: 10.1177/2516598419836345.
6.
LiB, MoY, ZouL, . Influence of surface roughness on fluid flow and solute transport through 3D crossed rock fractures. J Hydrol2020; 582: 124284. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124284
7.
NagdeveL, JainVK, and RamkumarJ.Development of inverse replica fixture for nanofinishing of knee joint using R-MRAFF process. J Micromanufacturing2019; 2(1): 35–41. DOI: 10.1177/2516598418811460.
8.
BuscaG.Chapter three-structural, surface, and catalytic properties of aluminas. In: Jentoft FC (ed). Advances in catalysis. Vol. 57. London:Academic Press, 2014, pp. 319–404. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800127-1.00003-5.
9.
PonsonnetL, ComteV, OthmaneA, . Effect of surface topography and chemistry on adhesion, orientation and growth of fibroblasts on nickel–titanium substrates. Mater Sci Eng C2002; 21(1): 157–165. DOI: 10.1016/S0928-4931(02)00097-8.
10.
HolahJ and ThorpeR.Cleanability in relation to bacterial retention on unused and abraded domestic sink materials. J Appl Bacteriol1990; 69(4): 599–608. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1990.tb01554.x.
11.
KorberD, ChoiA, WolfaardtG, . Substratum topography influences susceptibility of Salmonella enteritidis biofilms to trisodium phosphate. Appl Environ Microbiol1997; 63(9): 3352–3358. DOI: 10.1128/aem.63.9.3352-3358.1997.
12.
British Standards Institution (BSI). BS 1134:2010 Assessment of surface texture: Guidance and general information. London: British Standards Institution; 2010. https://www.en-standard.eu/bs-1134-2010-assessment-of-surface-texture-guidance-and
13.
SmithJR, BreakspearS and CampbellSA.AFM in surface finishing: Part II. Surface roughness. Trans Int Monetary Fund2003; 81(3): B55–B58. DOI:10.1080/00202967.2003.11871499.
14.
KleinbichlerA, PfeifenbergerM, ZechnerJ, . Scratch induced thin film buckling for quantitative adhesion measurements. Mater Des2018; 155: 203–211. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.062.
15.
HanT, ChoiY, NaKM, . Enhanced condensation on a biphilic-zigzag surface due to self-arrangement of crystals on a micro-structured surface. Int J Heat Mass Transf2021; 179: 121710. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121710.
16.
C-AChen, S-YJian, C-HLu, . Evaluation of microstructural effects on corrosion behavior of AZ31B magnesium alloy with a MAO coating and electroless Ni-P plating. J Mater Res Technol2020; 9(6): 13902–13913. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.09.099
17.
GhazaliMH, MazlanAZA, WeiLM, . Effect of machining parameters on the surface roughness for different types of materials. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2019; 530(1): 012008. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/530/1/012008.
18.
PuertoP, FernándezR, MadariagaJ, . Evolution of surface roughness in grinding and its relationship with the dressing parameters and the radial wear. Procedia Eng2013; 63: 174–182. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.08.181.
19.
AmranM, SalmahS, HusseinN, . Effects of machine parameters on surface roughness using response surface method in drilling process. Procedia Eng2013; 68: 24–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.142.
20.
TlhabadiraI, DaniyanI, MasuL, . Process design and optimization of surface roughness during M200 TS milling process using the Taguchi method. Procedia CIRP2019; 84: 868–873. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.200
21.
LeveilleT, ValiorgueF, ClaudinC, . Influence of the reaming process on hole’s surface integrity and geometry in a martensitic stainless steel 15-5PH. In: 6th CIRP Conference on Surface Integrity, 2022; Procedia CIRP 108: 384–389. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2022.03.062.
22.
SankarMR, JainV and RamkumarJ.Abrasive flow machining (AFM): an overview. In: Proceedings of the INDO-US Workshop on Smart Machine Tools, Intelligent Machining Systems and Multi-Scale Manufacturing, Tamil Nadu, India; 2008. p. 10.
23.
KomaraiahM, MananM, Narasimha ReddyP, . Investigation of surface roughness and accuracy in ultrasonic machining. Precision Eng1988; 10(2): 59–65. DOI: 10.1016/0141-6359(88)90001-3.
24.
GoswamiR, MitraS and SarkarS.Experimental investigation on electrochemical grinding (ECG) of alumina-aluminum interpenetrating phase composite. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2009; 40: 729–741. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-008-1382-z.
ZhouX, WangF, ZhangX, . Electrochemical polishing of microfluidic moulds made of tungsten using a bi-layer electrolyte. J Mater Process Technol2021; 292: 117055. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117055.
27.
BelkinP, KusmanovS, ParfenovE, . Mechanism and technological opportunity of plasma electrolytic polishing of metals and alloys surfaces. Appl Surf Sci Adv2020; 1: 100016. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsadv.2020.100016.
28.
GeY, ZhuZ, MaZ, . Large allowance electrochemical turning of revolving parts using a universal cylindrical electrode. J Mater Process Technol2018; 258: 89–96. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.03.013.
29.
LeeS and LiX.Study of the effect of machining parameters on the machining characteristics in electrical discharge machining of tungsten carbide. J Mater Process Technol2001; 115(3): 344–358. DOI: 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00992-X.
30.
AbdoBMA, AhmedN, El-TamimiAM, . Laser beam machining of zirconia ceramic: An investigation of micro-machining geometry and surface roughness. J Mech Sci Technol2019; 33: 1817–1831. DOI: 10.1007/s12206-019-0334-x.
31.
YadavHNS, KumarM, KumarA, . Plasma polishing processes applied on optical materials: A review. J Micromanufacturing2023; 6(1): 27–39. DOI: 10.1177/25165984211038882.
32.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 21920-2: Geometrical product specifications (GPS) surface texture: Profile part 2: Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters. 2021. Available from:https://www.iso.org/standard/72226.html
33.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 21920-3: Geometrical product specifications (GPS) surface texture: Profile part 3: Specification operators. 2021. Available from:https://www.iso.org/standard/72228.html
34.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 16610-21: Geometrical product specifications (GPS) — filtration — part 21: Linear profile filters: Gaussian filters. 2011. Available from:https://www.iso.org/standard/50176.html
35.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 16610-62: Geometrical product specifications (GPS) — filtration — part 62: Linear areal filters: spline filters. 2023. Available from:https://www.iso.org/standard/79790.html
36.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 25178-2: Geometrical product specifications (GPS) surface texture: Areal part 2: Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters. 2021. Available from:https://www.iso.org/standard/74591.html
37.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 21920-1: Geometrical product specifications (GPS) surface texture: Profile part 1: Indication of surface texture. 2021. Available from:https://www.iso.org/standard/72196.html
38.
NwaoguU, TiedjeN and HansenH. A.non-contact 3D method to characterize the surface roughness of castings. J Mater Process Technol2013; 213(1): 59–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.08.008.
39.
AbouelattaOB.3D surface roughness measurement using a light sectioning vision system. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, Vol. 1, 2010, pp. 698–703.
40.
MagsipocE, ZhaoQ and GrasselliG.2d and 3d roughness characterization. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00603-019-01977-4.
41.
D AntoV, RongoR, AmetranoG, . Evaluation of surface roughness of orthodontic wires by means of atomic force microscopy. Angle Orthod2012; 82: 922–928.
42.
GadelmawlaE, KouraMM, MaksoudTM, . Roughness parameters. J Mater Process Technol2002; 123(1): 133–145. DOI: 10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00060-2.
43.
ThomasT.Characterization of surface roughness. Precision Eng1981; 3(2): 97–104. DOI: 10.1016/0141-6359(81)90043-X.
44.
WhitehouseDJ, ArchardJF, and TaborD.The properties of random surfaces of significance in their contact. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci1970; 316(1524): 97–121. DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1970.0068.
45.
HirstW, HollanderAE, and AlliboneTE.Surface finish and damage in sliding. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci1974; 337(1610): 379–394. DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1974.0056.
46.
BartaryaG and ChoudhurySK.Influence of machining parameters on forces and surface roughness during finish hard turning of EN 31 steel. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf2014; 228(9): 1068–1080. DOI: 10.1177/0954405413500492.
47.
QuinsatY and TournierC.In situ non-contact measurements of surface roughness. Precision Eng2012; 36(1): 97–103. DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2011.07.011.
48.
PollerF, Salazar BloiseF, JakobiM, . Non-contact roughness measurement in sub-micron range by considering depolarization effects. Sensors2019; 19. DOI: 10.3390/s19102215.
49.
GrandyD, KoshyP and KlockeF.Pneumatic non-contact roughness assessment of moving surfaces. CIRP Ann2009; 58: 515–518. DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.121.
50.
SongJF, and VorburgerTV.Stylus profiling at high resolution and low force. Appl Opt1991; 30(1): 42–50. DOI: 10.1364/AO.30.000042.
51.
TosiD, KorganbayevS, MolardiC, . High spatial resolution fiber optic sensors and their impact in biomedical measurements and diagnostic. In: Daniele and Korganbayev, 2018. DOI: 10.1364/CLEOPR.2018.Tu3K.2.
52.
RomeroI, UrbanM and PunyasenaS.Airyscan superresolution microscopy: A high-throughput alternative to electron microscopy for the visualization and analysis of fossil pollen. Rev Palaeobot Palynol2020; 276: 104192. DOI: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2020.104192.
53.
FujiiT, YamaguchiM and SuzukiM.Scanning tunneling microscope with three-dimensional interferometer for surface roughness measurement. Rev Sci Instrum1995; 66(3): 2504–2507. DOI: 10.1063/1.1145648.
54.
SudarsanV.Chapter 4 - Materials for hostile chemical environments. In: Tyagi A and Banerjee S (eds). Materials under extreme conditions. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2017, pp. 129–158. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-801300-7.00004-8.
55.
SzynkowskaM.Microscopy techniques | Scanning electron microscopy. In: Worsfold P, Townshend A and Poole C (eds). Encyclopedia of analytical science(Second Edition). Oxford: Elsevier, 2005, pp. 134–143. DOI: 10.1016/B0-12-369397-7/00385-X.
56.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 3274: Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—Surface texture: Profile method—Nominal characteristics of contact (stylus) instruments. 1996. Available from:https://www.iso.org/standard/1916.html
57.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 12179: Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—Surface texture: Profile method—Calibration of contact (stylus) instruments. 2021. Available from:https://www.iso.org/standard/72758.html
58.
SaylesR and ThomasT.Rough surfaces. Tech rep. Thomas TR, ed. Longman, London, 1982.
59.
ElsonJM, and BennettJM.Relation between the angular dependence of scattering and the statistical properties of optical surfaces. J Opt Soc Am1979; 69(1): 31–47. DOI: 10.1364/JOSA.69.000031.
60.
JunglesJ and WhitehouseD.An investigation of the shape and dimensions of some diamond styli. J Phys E: Sci Instrum1970; 3(6): 437. DOI: 10.1088/0022-3735/3/6/307.
61.
unglesJ and WhitehouseD.An investigation of the shape and dimensions of some diamond styli. J Phys E: Sci Instrum1970; 3(6): 437. DOI: 10.1088/0022-3735/3/6/307.
62.
TholtB, Miranda-JúniorWG, PrioliR, . Surface roughness in ceramics with different finishing techniques using atomic force microscope and profilometer. Oper Dent2006; 31(4): 442–449. DOI: 10.2341/05-54.
63.
VanaD, PodhorskyS, HurajtM, . Surface properties of the stainless steel X10 CrNi 18/10 after application of plasma polishing in electrolyte. Int J Mod Eng Res2013; 3: 788–792.
64.
HutyrováZ, HarnicˇarováM, ZajacJ, . Experimental study of surface roughness of wood plastic composites after turning. Adv Mater Res2014; 856: 108–112. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.856.108.
65.
MatrasA, ZebalaW and KowalczykR.Precision milling of hardened steel with CBN tools. Key Eng Mater2014; 581: 182–187. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.581.182.
66.
Muñoz-EscalonaP and MaropoulosPG.A geometrical model for surface roughness prediction when face milling Al 7075-T7351 with square insert tools. J Manuf Syst2015; 36: 216–223. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2014.06.011.
67.
GuptaA, SundriyalP, BasuA, . Nano-finishing of MEMS-based platforms for optimum optical sensing. J Micromanufacturing2020; 3(1): 39–53. DOI: 10.1177/2516598419862676.
68.
BelkinP, SilkinS, D’yakovI, . Influence of plasma electrolytic polishing conditions on surface roughness of steel. Surf Eng Appl Electrochem2020; 56(1): 55–62. DOI: 10.3103/S1068375520010032.
69.
PatelDR, KiranMVision based prediction of surface roughness for end milling. Mater Today Proc2021; 44: 792–796. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.709.
70.
MurugayanS, DS, ChandaS, . Studies on fabrication of protruded multi-shaped micro-feature array on AA 6063 by laser micromachining. J Micromanufacturing2024; 7(1): 66–81. DOI: 10.1177/25165984231196354.
71.
BhushanB, WyantJC, and KoliopoulosCL.Measurement of surface topography of magnetic tapes by Mirau interferometry. Appl Opt1985; 24(10): 1489–1497. DOI: 10.1364/AO.24.001489.
72.
WyantJC, KoliopoulosCL, BhushanB, . Development of a three-dimensional noncontact digital optical profiler. J Tribol1986; 108(1): 1–8. DOI: 10.1115/1.3261137.
WangS, TianY, TayCJ, . Development of a laser-scattering-based probe for online measurement of surface roughness. Appl Opt2003; 42(7): 1318–1324. DOI: 10.1364/AO.42.001318.
75.
HillD, BergD, RasoV, . Evaluation of a laser scanner for surface topography. In: AlainTanguy BP (ed.) Research into spinal deformities 3. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2002, pp. 90–94. DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-932-5-90.
76.
García-SellésD, FaliveneO, ArbuésP, . Supervised identification and reconstruction of near-planar geological surfaces from terrestrial laser scanning. Comput Geosci2011; 37(10): 1584–1594. DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2011.03.007.
77.
ChefneuxL, RenauldY, DaubyB, . Ten years of laser texturing in Cockerill Sambre. In: METEC Congress 94. 2nd European Continuous Casting Conference. 6th International Rolling Conference. Vol. 2, 1994, pp. 356–362.
78.
Mital’G, DobránskyJ, RužbarskyJ, . Application of laser profilometry to evaluation of the surface of the workpiece machined by abrasive waterjet technology. Appl Sci2019; 9(10): 2134. DOI: 10.3390/app9102134.
79.
BeckmannP and SpizzichinoA.The scattering of electromagnetic waves from rough surfaces. Part I: Theory. 1963.
80.
WelfordW.Optical estimation of statistics of surface roughness from light scattering measurements. Opt Quantum Electron1977; 9(4): 269–287. DOI: 10.1007/BF00619527.
81.
LuR-S and TianGY.On-line measurement of surface roughness by laser light scattering. Meas Sci Technol2006; 17(6): 1496. DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/17/6/030.
82.
LégerD and PerrinJC.Real-time measurement of surface roughness by correlation of speckle patterns. J Opt Soc Am1976; 66(11): 1210–1217. DOI: 10.1364/JOSA.66.001210
83.
JayabarathiSB, and RatnamMM.Correlation study of 3D surface roughness of milled surfaces with laser speckle pattern. Sensors2022; 22(8): 2842. DOI: 10.3390/s22082842.
84.
Al-NawasB, GrötzK, GötzH, . Validation of three-dimensional surface characterising methods: Scanning electron microscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Scanning2001; 23(4): 227–231. DOI: 10.1002/sca.4950230401.
85.
FujiiH and AsakuraT.Roughness measurements of metal surfaces using laser speckle. J Opt Soc Am1977; 67(9): 1171–1176. DOI: 10.1364/JOSA.67.001171.
86.
OstafievV, SakhnoS, TymchikG, . Laser diffraction method of surface roughness measurement. J Mater Process Technol1997; 63(1–3): 871–874. DOI: 10.1016/S0924-0136(96)02741-0.
87.
LeonardLC, and ToalV.Roughness measurement of metallic surfaces based on the laser speckle contrast method. Opt Lasers Eng1998; 30(5): 433–440. DOI: 10.1016/S0143-8166(98)00036-0.
88.
WangS, TayC, QuanC, . Laser integrated measurement of surface roughness and micro-disaddressment. Meas Sci Technol2000; 11(5): 454. DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/11/5/302.
89.
KimH, ShenY and AhnJ.Development of a surface roughness measurement system using reflected laser beam. J Mater Process Technol2002; 130: 662–667. DOI: 10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00731-8.
90.
LuR-S, TianG-Y, GledhillD, . Grinding surface roughness measurement based on the co-occurrence matrix of speckle pattern texture. Appl Opt2006; 45(35): 8839–8847. DOI: 10.1364/AO.45.008839.
91.
TsaiHH, and FengHP.On-line inspection of the surface roughness of workpiece in ultraprecision machining. In: Adv Mater Res. Vol. 126, 2010, pp. 744–751. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.126-128.744.
92.
CornelsenM, DeutschC and SeitzH.Influence of the velocity and the number of polishing passages on the roughness of electrolytic plasma polished pipe inner surfaces. Metals2018; 8(5): 330. DOI: 10.3390/met8050330.
93.
CahillB and El BaradieM.LED-based fibre-optic sensor for measurement of surface roughness. J Mater Process Technol2001; 119(1-3): 299–306. DOI: 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00954-2.
LiuJ.A study on fractal & chaos characterization of engineering surface topography. PhD thesis, Himeji Institute of Technology, 1996. DOI: 10.11501/3109340
96.
AlnoushW, SayedA, SollingTI, . Impact of calcite surface roughness in wettability assessment: Interferometry and atomic force microscopy analysis. J Petrol Sci Eng2021; 203: 108679. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108679.
BennettJ and MattssonL.Introduction to surface roughness and scattering. Washington, D.C.: Optical Society of America, 1989.
99.
BeckmannP and SpizzichinoA.The scattering of electromagnetic waves from rough surfaces. Norwood: Artech House, 1987.
100.
JonesBE.Optical fibre sensors and systems for industry. J Phys E Sci Instrum1985; 18(9): 770–782. DOI: 10.1088/0022-3735/18/9/007.
101.
BradleyC, BohlmannJ and KuradaS.A fiber optic sensor for surface roughness measurement. J Manuf Sci Eng1998;120(2): 359–367. DOI: 10.1115/1.2830135.
102.
BradleyC, BohlmannJ and KuradaS.A fiber optic sensor for surface roughness measurement. J Manuf Sci Eng1998; 120(2): 359–367. DOI: 10.1115/1.2830135.
103.
DomanskiA and WolinskiT.Surface roughness measurement with optical fibers. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas1992; 41(6): 1057–1061. DOI: 10.1109/19.199391.
104.
GobiG, SastikumarD, GaneshAB, . Fiber-optic sensor to estimate surface roughness of corroded metals. Optica Appl2009; 39(1).
105.
RahmanH, RahimH, AhmadH, . Fiber optic disaddressment sensor for imaging of tooth surface roughness. Measurement2013; 46(1): 546–551. DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2012.08.013.
106.
Nan-nanZ and JunZ.Surface roughness measurement based on fiber optic sensor. Measurement2016; 86: 239–245. DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2016.02.051.
107.
LiaparinosP and DavidS.The surface-roughness effects on light beam interactions between the CsI phosphor and optical sensing materials. Crystals2020; 10(3): 0174. DOI: 10.3390/cryst10030174.
108.
MaradudinAA (ed.). Light Scattering and Nanoscale Surface Roughness. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, 2010. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-35659-4.
109.
LianM, LiuH, ZhouL, . Ultrasonic roughness measurement based on scattering attenuation. Surf Topogr Metrol Prop2019; 7(1): 015001. DOI: 10.1088/2051-672X/aafa4f.
110.
KrautkramerJ and KrautkramerH.Ultrasonic Testing of Materials. 4th ed.Berlin: Springer, 1969. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-10680-8.
111.
BlessingGV, and EitzenD.Ultrasonic sensor for measuring surface roughness. In: Surface Measurement and Characterization. Vol. 1009. SPIE, 1989, pp. 281–289. DOI: 10.1117/12.949180.
112.
OhSJ, ShinYC, and FurgasonES.Surface roughness evaluation via ultrasonic scanning. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control1994; 41(6): 863–871. DOI: 10.1109/58.330267.
113.
SukmanaDD, and IharaI.Application of air-coupled ultrasound to noncontact surface roughness evaluation. Jpn J Appl Phys2005; 44(6B): 4417–4420. DOI: 10.1143/jjap.44.4417.
114.
BirtEA, SmithRA, ScrubyCB, . Improved ultrasonic spectroscopy procedure for roughness measurement of hidden corroded surfaces. Insight Non-Destr Test Cond Monit2004; 46(3): 151–156. DOI: 10.1784/insi.46.3.151.55519.
115.
BuiGT, ChenYZ and PangD-C.Pang Polymer-based capacity micromachined ultrasonic transducer for surface roughness measurement. In: Key Eng Mater2015; 661: 22–28. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.661.22
116.
WangZ and ChengJ.Numerical and analytical study for ultrasonic testing of internal delamination defects considering surface roughness. Ultrasonics2021; 110: 106290. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2020.106290.
117.
ZhaoP, ZhaoY, KharbasH, . In-situ ultrasonic characterization of microcellular injection molding. J Mater Process Technol2019; 270: 254–264. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.03.012.
118.
OhSJ, ShinY and FurgasonE.Surface roughness evaluation via ultrasonic scanning. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control1994; 41(6): 863–871. DOI: 10.1109/58.330267.
119.
ShinYC, OhSJ, and CokerSA.Surface roughness measurement by ultrasonic sensing for in-process monitoring. J Eng Ind1995; 117(3): 439–447. DOI: 10.1115/1.2804352.
120.
LopezAB, SantosJ, SousaJP, . Phased array ultrasonic inspection of metal additive manufacturing parts. J Nondestruct Eval2019; 38(3): 1–11. DOI: 10.1007/s10921-019-0600-y.
121.
MaZ, LuoZ, LinL, . Quantitative characterization of the interfacial roughness and thickness of inhomogeneous coatings based on ultrasonic reflection coefficient phase spectrum. NDT E Int2019; 102: 16–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.10.010.
122.
Gallego-JuarezJ.Piezoelectric ceramics and ultrasonic transducers. J Phys E Sci Instrum1989; 22(10): 804. DOI: 10.1088/0022-3735/22/10/001
123.
MolesDC.Introduction to phased array ultrasonic technology applications. In; Waltham MA 02453, USA: Olympus NDT, 2004, pp. 39–40.
SauerbreyG.Use of oscillating crystals for weighing thin layers and for micro-weighing. J Phys1959; 155(2): 206–222. DOI: 10.1007/BF01337937.
126.
WattsE, KrimJ and WidomA.Experimental observation of interfacial slippage at the boundary of molecularly thin films with gold substrates. Phys Rev B1990; 41(6): 3466. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.3466.
127.
QiaoX, ZhangX, TianY, . Progresses on the theory and application of quartz crystal microbalance. Appl Phys Rev2016; 3(3): 031106. DOI: 10.1063/1.4963312.
128.
UrbakhM and DaikhinL.Roughness effect on the frequency of a quartz-crystal resonator in contact with a liquid. Phys Rev B1994; 49(7): 4866. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.4866.
129.
DaikhinL and UrbakhM.Influence of surface roughness on the quartz crystal microbalance response in a solution: New configuration for QCM studies. Faraday Discuss1997; 107: 27–38. DOI: 10.1039/A703124F.
130.
DaikhinL, GileadiE, KatzG, . Influence of roughness on the admittance of the quartz crystal microbalance immersed in liquids. Anal Chem2002; 74(3): 554–561. DOI: 10.1021/ac0107610.
131.
McHaleG and NewtonM.Surface roughness and interfacial slip boundary condition for quartz crystal microbalances. J Appl Phys2004; 95(1): 373–380. DOI: 10.1063/1.1630373
132.
RechendorffK, HovgaardMB, FossM, . Influence of surface roughness on quartz crystal microbalance measurements in liquids. J Appl Phys2007; 101(11). DOI: 10.1063/1.2735399.
133.
RechendorffK, HovgaardM, FossM, . Influence of surface roughness on quartz crystal microbalance measurements in liquids. J Appl Phys2007; 101(11): 114502. DOI: 10.1063/1.2735399.
134.
SaktiSP, RahmawatiE and RobiandiF.Solvent effect on polystyrene surface roughness on top of QCM sensor. In: AIP Conf Proc2016; 1719: 030017. DOI: 10.1063/1.4943712.
135.
DjokoD, RahayuS, SaktiS, . Viscoelastic and morphological behavior of stearic acid layer on top of polystyrene as immobilization matrix for QCM sensor. In: Mater Sci Forum2016; 848: 757–762. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.848.757.
BinnigG and RohrerH.Scanning tunneling microscopy—from birth to adolescence. Rev Mod Phys1987; 59(3): 615. DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.59.615.
138.
RuskaE.Press release for the 1986 Nobel Prize in Physics. Ernst1986. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1986/press-release/
139.
YangM and TalkeF.Surface roughness investigation of magnetic recording disks using STM and profilometry measurements. Wear1993; 170(1): 15–24. DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(93)90346-N.
140.
GarcíaN, BaróAM, MirandaR, . Surface roughness standards obtained with the scanning tunneling microscope operated at atmospheric air pressure. Metrologia1985; 21 (3): 135–138. DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/21/3/005.
SchitterG, SteiningerJ, HeuckFC, . Towards fast AFM-based nanometrology and nanomanufacturing. Int J Nanomanufacturing8 (5-6) (2012) 392–418. DOI: 10.1504/IJNM.2012.051109.
143.
BinnigG, QuateCF, and GerberC.Atomic force microscope. Phys Rev Lett56 (1986) 930–933. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.930.
144.
ZhouX, WangF, ZhangX, . Electrochemical polishing of microfluidic moulds made of tungsten using a bi-layer electrolyte. J Mater Process Technol292 (2021) 117055. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117055.
145.
KumarV and SamuelG.Modelling and validation of surface roughness in micro-turned nickel-based alloys (nimonic 90). J Micromanufacturing2023; 6(2): 83–92. DOI: 10.1177/25165984221128519.
146.
YilbasZ and HasmiM.Surface roughness measurement using an optical system. J Mater Process Technol1999; 88(1-3): 10–22. DOI: 10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00356-2.
147.
GrajowerM, LevyU and KhurginJB.The role of surface roughness in plasmonic-assisted internal photoemission Schottky photodetectors. Acs Photonics2018; 5(10): 4030–4036. DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.8b00643.
148.
WuR, WangM, XuJ, . Long low-loss lithium niobate on insulator waveguides with sub-nanometer surface roughness. Nanomaterials2018; 8(11): 910. DOI: 10.3390/nano8110910.
149.
NečasD and KlapetekP.One-dimensional autocorrelation and power spectrum density functions of irregular regions. Ultramicroscopy2013; 124: 13–19. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.08.002.
150.
GoranaV, JainV and LalG.Prediction of surface roughness during abrasive flow machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2006; 31: 258–267. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-005-0197-4.
151.
JhaS and JainV.Modeling and simulation of surface roughness in magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process. Wear2006; 261(7): 856–866. DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2006.01.043.
152.
JainRK, JainVK, and DixitP.Modeling of material removal and surface roughness in abrasive flow machining process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf1999; 39(12): 1903–1923. DOI: 10.1016/S0890-6955(99)00038-3.
153.
JainSCJ, and DixitPM.Modeling and simulation of surface roughness in magnetic abrasive finishing using non-uniform surface profiles. Mater Manuf Process2007; 22(2): 256–270. DOI: 10.1080/10426910601134096.
154.
JhaS, JainV and KomanduriR.Effect of extrusion pressure and number of finishing cycles on surface roughness in magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2007; 33: 725–729. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-006-0502-x.
155.
BartaryaG and ChoudhuryS.A regression model for force and surface roughness estimation during hard turning. Adv Mater Res2011; 299: 1167–1170. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.299-300.1167.
156.
KumarS and ChoudhuryS.Prediction of wear and surface roughness in electro-discharge diamond grinding. J Mater Process Technol2007; 191(1): 206–209. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.03.032.
157.
PawarS and DolasD.Effect of process parameters on flexural strength and surface roughness in fused deposition modeling of PC-ABS material. J Micromanufacturing2022; 5(2): 164–170. DOI: 10.1177/25165984211031115.
158.
KumarJ, MishraV and BaghelPK.Modeling and experimental study of surface roughness in smart MR fluid-based finishing process. J Micromanufacturing2020; 0(0): 25165984241239754. DOI: 10.1177/25165984241239754.
159.
MajumdarA and BhushanB.Role of fractal geometry in roughness characterization and contact mechanics of surfaces. J Tribol1990; 112(2): 205–216. DOI: 10.1115/1.2920243.
160.
GagnepainJ and Roques-CarmesC.Fractal approach to two-dimensional and three-dimensional surface roughness. Wear1986; 109(1): 119–126. DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(86)90257-7.
161.
MajumdarA and TienC.Fractal characterization and simulation of rough surfaces. Wear1990; 136(2): 313–327. DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(90)90154-3.
162.
LaiL and IreneE.Area evaluation of microscopically rough surfaces. J Vac Sci Technol B1999; 17(1): 33–39. DOI: 10.1116/1.590513.
163.
PeitgenDS.The Science of Fractal Images. New York: Springer, 1988. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-3784-6.
164.
SeoH-K and UmJ-G.Generation of roughness using the random midpoint disaddressment method and its application to quantification of joint roughness. Tunnel Underground Space2012; 22(3): 196–204. DOI: 10.7474/TUS.2012.22.3.196.
165.
TsangL, GuX and BraunischH.Effects of random rough surface on absorption by conductors at microwave frequencies. IEEE Microw Wirel Compon Lett2006; 16(4): 221–223. DOI: 10.1109/LMWC.2006.872109.
166.
TsangL, BraunischH, DingR, . Random rough surface effects on wave propagation in interconnects. IEEE Trans Adv Packag2010; 33(4): 839–856. DOI: 10.1109/TADVP.2010.2089789.
167.
HammerstadE and JensenO.Accurate models for microstrip computer-aided design. In: 1980 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, 1980, pp. 407–409. DOI: 10.1109/MWSYM.1980.1124303.
168.
GroissS, BardiI, BiroO, . Parameters of lossy cavity resonators calculated by the finite element method. IEEE Trans Magn1996; 32(3): 894–897. DOI: 10.1109/20.497385.
169.
HornAF, ReynoldsJW and RautioJC.Conductor profile effects on the propagation constant of microstrip transmission lines. In 2010 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium, 2010, pp. 868–871. DOI: 10.1109/MWSYM.2010.5515933.
170.
KarayelD.Prediction and control of surface roughness in CNC lathe using artificial neural network. J Mater Process Technol2009; 209(7): 3125–3137. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.07.023.
171.
MasoudiS, MirabdolahiM, DayyaniM, . Development of an intelligent model to optimize heat-affected zone, kerf, and roughness in 309 stainless steel plasma cutting by using experimental results. Mater Manuf Processes2019; 34(3): 345–356. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2018.1532579.
172.
DavimJP, GaitondeV and KarnikS.Investigations into the effect of cutting conditions on surface roughness in turning of free machining steel by ANN models. J Mater Process Technol2008; 205(1): 16–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.082.
173.
ChaiSS, GohKL, ChangYHR, . Coupling normalization with moving window in backpropagation neural network (BNN) for passive microwave soil moisture retrieval. Int J Comput Intell Syst2021; 14: 1–11. DOI: 10.1007/s44196-021-00034-9.
GuvencMA, BilgicHH, CakirM, . The prediction of surface roughness and tool vibration by using metaheuristic-based ANFIS during dry turning of Al alloy (AA6013). J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2022; 44(10): 474. DOI: 10.1007/s40430-022-03798-z.
176.
DingRTsang L and Braunisch H. Random rough surface effects in interconnects studied by small perturbation theory in waveguide model. In: 2011 IEEE 20th Conference on Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging and Systems, 2011, pp. 161–164. DOI: 10.1109/EPEPS.2011.6100215.
177.
DingR, BraunischH, TsangL, . Simulation and measurement correlation of random rough surface effects in interconnects. In: 2012 IEEE 21st Conference on Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging and Systems, 2012, pp. 272–275. DOI: 10.1109/EPEPS.2012.6457894.
178.
SureshP, Venkateswara RaoP and DeshmukhS.A genetic algorithmic approach for optimization of surface roughness prediction model. Int J Mach Tools Manuf2002; 42(6): 675–680. DOI: 10.1016/S0890-6955(02)00005-6.
179.
TienC-L, YangH-M and LiuM-C.The measurement of surface roughness of optical thin films based on fast Fourier transform. Thin Solid Films2009; 517(17): 5110–5115. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.03.193.
180.
PatrikarRM.Modeling and simulation of surface roughness. Appl Surf Sci2004; 228(1): 213–220. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.01.010.
181.
LinCS, YangSW, LinHL, . Measurement of surface profile and surface roughness of fibre-optic interconnect by fast Fourier transform. Metrol Meas Syst2017; 24(2). DOI: 10.1515/mms-2017-0028.
182.
DongW and StoutK.Two-dimensional fast Fourier transform and power spectrum for surface roughness in three dimensions. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B1995; 209(5): 381–391. DOI: 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1995_209_097_02.
183.
StavropoulosP, ChantzisD, DoukasC, . Monitoring and control of manufacturing processes: A review. Procedia CIRP2013; 8: 421–425. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.127.
184.
LiZ, ZhangZ, ShiJ, . Prediction of surface roughness in extrusion-based additive manufacturing with machine learning. Robotics Comput-Integr Manuf2019; 57: 488–495. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2019.01.004.
185.
BurnsTCosgrove J and Doyle F. A review of interoperability standards for industry 4.0. Procedia Manuf2019; 38: 646–653. DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.083.
186.
TlustyJ and AndrewsG.A critical review of sensors for unmanned machining. CIRP Ann1983; 32(2): 563–572. DOI: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60184-X.
187.
KovacˇP, MankovaI, Gostimirovic´M, . A review of machining monitoring systems. J Prod Eng2011; 14(1): 1–6.
KongL, PengX, ChenY, . Multi-sensor measurement and data fusion technology for manufacturing process monitoring: A literature review. Int J Extreme Manuf2020; 2(2): 022001. DOI: 10.1088/2631-7990/ab7ae6.
191.
NegriE, FumagalliL and MacchiM.A review of the roles of digital twin in CPS-based production systems. Procedia Manuf2017; 11: 939–948. 27th International Conference on Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing, FAIM2017, 27–30 June 2017, Modena, Italy. DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.198.
