At a time when patient-centered care is a goal and patient safety is a paramount concern across the spectrum of health care, renewed and rigorous attention to interpersonal communication skills makes good sense. In this interdisciplinary article, we share lessons from communication science that can help clinicians communicate more appropriately and effectively with each other and with their patients in healthcare encounters.
HannawaAFWuAJuhaszR.New horizons in patient safety: understanding communication – case studies for physicians.
Berlin:
Walter de Gruyter, 2018.
2.
HannawaAFWendtALDayL.New horizons in patient safety: safe communication – evidence-based core competencies with case studies from nursing practice.
Berlin:
Walter de Gruyter, 2018.
3.
KestenKS.Role-play using SBAR technique to improve observed communication skills in senior nursing students. J Nurs Educ2010;
50: 79–87.
4.
EisenbergWMMurphyAGSutcliffeK, et al.
Communication in emergency medicine: implications for patient safety. Commun Monogr2005;
72: 390–413.
5.
KlipfelJMGettmanMTJohnsonKM, et al.
Using high-fidelity simulation to develop nurse-physician teams. J Contin Educ Nurs2011;
42: 347–357.
6.
PfrimmerD.Teamwork and communication. J Contin Educ Nurs2009;
40: 294–295.
7.
SchirmerJMMaukschKLangF, et al.
Assessing communication competence: a review of current tools. Fam Med2005;
37: 184–192.
8.
RoblesTFKiecolt-GlaserJK.The physiology of marriage: pathways to health. Physiol Behav2003;
79: 409–416.
9.
HealeyBJMcGowanM.The enormous cost of medical errors.Acad Care Manag J2010;
6: 17–24.
10.
Australian Institute of Health & Welfare and the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Sentinel events in Australian public hospitals 2004–05 (AIHW cat. No. HSE 51).
Canberra, ACT, Australia:
Australian Institute of Health & Welfare and the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, 2007.
WakefieldJ.Patient safety: from learning to action – first Queensland health report on clinical incidents and sentinel events.
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia:
Queensland Health, 2007.
13.
VincentCYoungMPhillipsA.Why do people sue doctors? A study of patients and relatives taking legal action. Lancet1994;
343: 1609–1613.
14.
BeyerMRoheJNicklinPJ, et al.Communication and patient safety. In: SandarsJ (ed) ABC of patient safety.
Hoboken, NJ:
BMJ Books, 2009, pp.16–19.
15.
BryantJPribanic-SmithEJ.A historical overview of research in communication science. In: BergerCRRoloffMERoskos-EwoldsenDR (eds) The handbook of communication science.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage, 2010, pp.2–36.
16.
HarrisTCBarnes-FarrellJL.Components of teamwork: impact on evaluations of contributions to work team effectiveness. J Appl Social Pyschol1997;
27: 1694–1715.
17.
RabølLIMcPhailMAOstergaardD, et al.
Promoters and barriers in hospital team communication: a focus group study. J Commun Healthcare2012;
5: 129–139.
18.
GalliersJWilsonSRandellR, et al.
Safe use of symbols in handover documentation for medical teams. Behav Info Tech2011;
30: 499–506.
19.
DixonJFLarisonKZabariM.Skilled communication: making it real. Aacn Adv Crit Care2006;
17: 376–382.
20.
Institute of Medicine.Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.
Washington, DC:
National Academies Press, 2001.
21.
Mesmer-MagnusJRDeChurchLA.Information sharing and team performance: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol2009;
94: 535–546.
22.
WatzlawickPBeavin BavelasJJacksonDD.Pragmatics of human communication: a study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes.
New York:
Norton & Company, 1967.
23.
ShannonCEWeaverW.The mathematical model of communication.
Urbana, IL:
University of Illinois Press, 1964.
24.
HannawaAF.Miscommunication and error. In: HannawaAFSpitzbergBH (eds) Handbook of communication competence.
Berlin, Germany:
Walter de Gruyter, 2015, pp.683–710.
25.
SillarsA. For better or for worse: rethinking the role of misperception” and communication in close relationships and families. 17th annual B. Aubrey Fisher Memorial Lecture, University of Utah. 2002.
26.
HannawaAF.SACCIA safe communication: five core competencies for safe and high quality care. J Pat Safety Risk Manag2018;
23: 99–107.
27.
WildenA.System and structure: essays in communication and exchange.
London:
Tavistock Publications Limited, 1972.
28.
MehrabianAFerrisSR.Inference of attitudes from nonverbal communication in two channels. J Consult Psychol1967;
31: 248–258.
EkmanPFriesenWV.The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica1969;
1: 49–98.
31.
SchrammW.The science of human communication.
New York:
Basic Books, 1964.
32.
AbrahamJNguyenVAlmoosaKF, et al. Falling through the cracks: information breakdowns in critical care handoff communication. AMIA … Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium vol. 2011 (2011): 28–37.
33.
LingardLEspinSWhyteS, et al.
Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects. Qual Saf Health Care2004;
13: 330–334.
34.
NagpalKVatsAAhmedK, et al.
A systematic quantitative assessment of risks associated with poor communication in surgical care. Arch Surg2010;
145: 582–588.
35.
SoletDJNorvelJMRutanGH, et al.
Lost in translation: challenges and opportunities in physician-to-physician communication during patient handoffs. Acad Med2005;
80: 1094–1099.
36.
DiMatteoMRTarantaA.Nonverbal communication and physician-patient rapport: an empirical study. Prof Psychol1979;
10: 540–547.
37.
EgbertLDBattitGEWelchCE, et al.
Reduction of postoperative pain by encouragement and instructions of patients. A study of doctor–patient rapport. N Engl J Med1964;
270: 825–827.
38.
Ben-SiraZ.The function of the professional’s affective behavior in client satisfaction: a revised approach to social interaction theory. J Health Soc Behav1976;
17: 3–11.
39.
WittgensteinL.The blue and brown books: preliminary studies for the “philosophical investigations.”New York, NY:
Harper & Row, 1958.
40.
EssersGDielissenPvan WeelC, et al.
How do trained raters take context factors into account when assessing GP trainee communication performance? An exploratory, qualitative study. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract2015;
20: 131–147.
