The Healthcare Complaints Analysis Tool (HCAT) is a coding taxonomy developed to interrogate patient complaints for quality and safety improvement lessons. The reliability of the tool has been tested in whole-of-system and whole-of-service settings. We sought to assess whether the taxonomy is functional at the level of a single hospital department.
Objectives
To demonstrate the feasibility of applying HCAT in the setting of a large maternity department with a view to using it to inform quality and safety improvement opportunities.
Methods
All 200 de-identified complaints made between 1 April 2011 and 30 April 2016 to a multi-site maternity service were collated. Each complaint entry included a summary of complaint content, complaint report date, complaint closure date and an incident severity rating (ISR). HCAT was applied to the analysis of complaints using a previously validated content analysis framework. A coding flowchart was developed to aid classification.
Results
The 200 complaints involved 567 issues, an average of 2.8 issues per complaint. The most common issues were rude behaviour (n = 46), poor communication (n = 38), complaints relating to the quality of medical care (n = 36), nursing care (n = 35), surgical/medical complications (n = 28) and complaints relating to the attitude of staff members (n = 23). Complaints in the clinical domain made up the greatest proportion of both severe (ISR 1 – 66.7%) and moderate (ISR 2 – 64.5%) incidents.
Conclusions
Using a reliable taxonomy, we were able to successfully interrogate patient complaints, identifying quality improvement targets within a single maternity service. The taxonomy appears suitable for adoption and application across health jurisdictions.
LyonsM.Should patients have a role in patient safety? A safety engineering view. Qual Saf Heal Care2007;
16: 140–142.
2.
MurffHJFranceDJBlackfordJ, et al.
Relationship between patient complaints and surgical complications. Qual Saf Heal Care2006;
15: 13–16.
3.
VincentC.Patient safety: what about the patient?BMJ Qual Saf2002;
11: 76–80.
4.
GallagherTHMazorKM.Taking complaints seriously: using the patient safety lens. BMJ Qual Saf2015;
24: 352–355.
5.
PichertJWHicksonGMooreI.Using patient complaints to promote patient safety. In: HenricksenKBattlesJKeyesM, et al. (eds) Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 2: Culture and Redesign).
Rockville, MD:
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2008. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK43703/ (accessed 31/07/2019).
6.
De VosMSHammingJFMarang-Van De MheenPJ.The problem with using patient complaints for improvement. BMJ Qual Saf2018;
27: 758–762.
7.
GreyEKennedyI.The report of the independent review of children’s cardiac services in Bristol.
Bristol: NHS, 2016.
8.
FrancisR.Report of the mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust public inquiry executive summary.
London: NHS, 2013.
9.
KirkupB.The report of the Morecambe Bay investigation.
London:
NHS, 2015.
10.
DaviesG.Queensland public hospitals commission of inquiry report.
Brisbane:
QPHCI, 2005.
11.
DuckettSCuddihyMNewnhamH.Targeting zero. Supporting the Victorian hospital system to eliminate avoidable harm and strengthen quality of care. Report of the review of hospital safety and quality assurance in Victoria.
Melbourne:
DHHS, 2016.
12.
HicksonGB.Patient complaints and malpractice risk. JAMA2002;
287: 2951.
13.
BismarkMDauerEPatersonR, et al.
Accountability sought by patients following adverse events from medical care: the New Zealand experience. CMAJ2006;
175: 889–894.
14.
VincentCPhillipsAKentP.Why do people sue doctors ? A study of patients and relatives. Lancet1994;
343: 1609–1613.
15.
BarkPVincentCJonesA, et al.
Clinical complaints: a means of improving quality of care. Qual Saf Heal Care1994;
3: 123–132.
16.
BismarkMMSpittalMJGogosAJ, et al.
Remedies sought and obtained in healthcare complaints. BMJ Qual Saf2011;
20: 806–810.
17.
PichertJWFederspielCFHicksonGB, et al.
Identifying medical center units with disproportionate shares of patient complaints. Jt Comm J Qual Improv1999;
25: 288–299.
18.
BismarkMMSpittal MatthewJStuddertDM.Prevalence and characteristics of complaint-prone doctors in private practice in Victoria. Med J Aust2011;
195: 25–28.
19.
BismarkMMSpittalMJGurrinLC, et al.
Identification of doctors at risk of recurrent complaints: a national study of healthcare complaints in Australia. BMJ Qual Saf2013;
22: 532–540.
20.
SpittalMJBismarkMMStuddertDM.The PRONE score: an algorithm for predicting doctors’ risks of formal patient complaints using routinely collected administrative data. BMJ Qual Saf2015;
24: 360–368.
21.
HsiehSY.The use of patient complaints to drive quality improvement: an exploratory study in Taiwan. Health Serv Manage Res2010;
23: 5–11.
22.
JanglandEGunningbergLCarlssonM.Patients’ and relatives’ complaints about encounters and communication in health care: evidence for quality improvement. Patient Educ Couns2009;
75: 199–204.
23.
Lloyd-BostockSMulcahyL.The social psychology of making and responding to hospital complaints: an account model of complaint processes. Law Policy1994;
16: 123–147.
24.
KällbergA-SGöranssonKEÖstergrenJ, et al.
Medical errors and complaints in emergency department care in Sweden as reported by care providers, healthcare staff, and patients – a national review. Eur J Emerg Med2013;
20: 33–38.
25.
GillespieAReaderTW.The Healthcare Complaints Analysis Tool: development and reliability testing of a method for service monitoring and organisational learning. BMJ Qual Saf2016;
25: 937–946.
26.
ReaderTWGillespieARobertsJ.Patient complaints in healthcare systems: a systematic review and coding taxonomy. BMJ Qual Saf2014;
23: 678–689.
27.
ReaderTWGillespieA.Patient neglect in healthcare institutions: a systematic review and conceptual model. BMC Health Serv Res2013;
13: 156.
28.
MontiniTNobleAAStelfoxHT.Content analysis of patient complaints. Int J Qual Heal Care2008;
20: 412–420.
29.
GillespieAReaderTW.Patient-centered insights: using health care complaints to reveal hot spots and blind spots in quality and safety. Milbank Q2018;
96: 530–567.
30.
HarrisonRWaltonMHealyJ, et al.
Patient complaints about hospital services: applying a complaint taxonomy to analyse and respond to complaints. Int J Qual Health Care2016;
28: 240–245.
31.
MattarozziKSfrisiFCanigliaF, et al.
What patients’ complaints and praise tell the health practitioner: implications for health care quality. A qualitative research study. Int J Qual Heal Care2017;
29: 83–89.
32.
MackJWJacobsonJFrankD, et al.
Evaluation of patient and family outpatient complaints as a strategy to prioritize efforts to improve cancer care delivery. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf2017;
43: 498–507.
33.
Fredericks-YoungerJMHandelman-YellinMLYorkJA.Developing a relevant taxonomy to assess dental school clinic patient complaints. J Dent Educ2017;
81: 318–325.
34.
BouwmanRBomhoffMRobbenP, et al.
Classifying patients’ complaints for regulatory purposes: a pilot study. J Patient Saf2016;
00: 1–8.
35.
BouwmanRBomhoffMRobbenP, et al.
Patients’ perspectives on the role of their complaints in the regulatory process. Health Expect2016;
19: 483–496.
36.
Australian Council for Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC). Lessons from the inquiry into obstetrics and gynaecological services at King Edward memorial hospital 1990–2000.
Canberra:
Author, 2002.
37.
AndersonA.Ten years of maternity claims: an analysis of the NHS Litigation Authority data – key findings. Clin Risk2013;
19: 24–31.
38.
Victorian Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Maternity capability framework levels and health services alignment 2016 – 17.
vol. 2.
Melbourne:
Author, 2016.
39.
Victorian Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Defining levels of care for Victorian newborn services.
Melbourne:
Author, 2015.
Victorian Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Victorian health incident management policy guide.
Melbourne:
Author, 2011.
42.
ZhangYWildemuthB. Qualitative analysis of content. In: Wildemuth B (ed.) Appl. Soc. Res. methods to Quest. Inf. Libr. Sci. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited, 2009, p.421.
43.
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research.
Canberra:
Author, 2007.
44.
AndersonKAllanDFinucaneP.A 30-month study of patient complaints at a major Australian hospital. J Qual Clin Pract2001;
21: 109–111.
45.
SiyambalapitiyaSCauntJHarrisonN, et al.
A 22 month study of patient complaints at a National Health Service hospital. Int J Nurs Pract2007;
13: 107–110.
46.
NowotnyBMLohELorenzK, et al.
Sharing the pain: lessons from missed opportunities for healthcare improvement from patient complaints and litigation in the Australian health system. Aust Heal Rev2018.
TaibIAMcIntoshASCaponecchiaC, et al.
A review of medical error taxonomies: a human factors perspective. Saf Sci2011;
49: 607–615.
50.
WaltonM.Health complaint commissions in Australia: time for a national approach to data collection. Aust Rev Public Aff2012;
11: 1–18.
51.
TaylorDMWolfeRSCameronPA.Analysis of complaints lodged by patients attending Victorian hospitals, 1997–2001. Med J Aust2004;
181: 31–35.
52.
BrookesGBakerP.What does patient feedback reveal about the NHS? A mixed methods study of comments posted to the NHS Choices online service. BMJ Open2017;
7: 1–11.
53.
TaylorDMWolfeRCameronPA.Complaints from emergency department patients largely result from treatment and communication problems. Emerg Med Australas2002;
14: 43–49.
54.
Health Complaints Commission (VIC) 2017 Annual Report. Melbourne: Author, 2017.
55.
KuosmanenLKaltiala-HeinoRSuominenS, et al.
Patient complaints in Finland 2000–2004: a retrospective register study. J Med Ethics2008;
34: 788–792.
56.
WongLLGohOLinYL, et al.
Patients’ complaints in a hospital emergency department in Singapore. Singapore Med J2007;
48: 990–995.
57.
LawrencePJarugulaRHazelwoodS, et al.
Wait times are not the problem! Detailed analysis of unsolicited patient complaints from a metropolitan Australian emergency department. Emerg Med Australas2018; 672–677.
58.
HarrisonRWaltonMManiasE, et al.
The missing evidence: a systematic review of patients’ experiences of adverse events in health care. Int J Qual Health Care2015;
27: 424–442.
59.
HarrisonRWaltonMKellyP, et al.
Hospitalization from the patient perspective: a data linkage study of adults in Australia. Int J Qual Heal Care2018;
30: 358–365.
60.
HirstC.Re-birthing. Report of the review of maternity services in Queensland.
Brisbane, QLD: DHHS, 2005.
61.
HeatleyMLWatsonBGalloisC, et al.
Women’s perceptions of communication in pregnancy and childbirth : influences on participation and satisfaction with care. J Health Commun2015;
20: 827–834.
62.
WilliamsSWeinmanJDaleJ, et al.
Patient expectations: what do primary care patients want from their general practitioner and how far does meeting expectations affect patient satisfaction?Fam Pract1995;
12: 193–201.
63.
StewartMBrownJBoonH, et al.
Evidence on patient-doctor communication. Cancer Prev Control1999;
3: 25–30.
64.
LevinsonW.Physician-patient communication. A key to malpractice prevention. JAMA1994;
272: 1619–1620.
65.
LevinsonWRoterDLJohnP, et al.
Physician-patient communication relationship with malpractice claims. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. JAMA2015;
277: 553–559.
66.
IedemaRSorensenRManiasE, et al.
Patients’ and family members’ experiences of open disclosure following adverse events. Int J Qual Heal Care2008;
20: 421–432.
67.
MazorKMSimonSRYoodRA, et al.
Health plan members’ views on forgiving medical errors. Am J Manag Care2005;
11: 49–52.
68.
YanJLiuKZhangL, et al.
Patient reporting of undesirable events: a pilot study in China. Int J Qual Heal Care2017;
29: 360–365.
69.
ArcherJC.State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback. Med Educ2010;
44: 101–108.
70.
FidlerHLockyerJMToewsJ, et al.
Changing physicians’ practices: the effect of individual feedback. Acad Med1999;
74: 702–714.
71.
AshJSBergMCoieraE.Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. J Am Med Informatics Assoc2004;
11: 104–112.
72.
De LusignanS.Codes, classifications, terminologies and nomenclatures: definition, development and application in practice.Inform Prim Care2005;
13: 65–69.
73.
De LusignanSLiawSTMichalakidisG, et al.
Defining datasets and creating data dictionaries for quality improvement and research in chronic disease using routinely collected data: an ontology-driven approach. Inform Prim Care2012;
19: 127–134.
74.
NavatheSBKerschbergL.Role of data dictionaries in information resource management. Inf Manag1986;
10: 21–46.
75.
OlsenNS.Reliability studies of incident coding systems in high hazard industries: a narrative review of study methodology. Appl Ergon2013;
44: 175–184.
76.
KeoghB.Review into the quality of care and treatment provided by 14 hospital trusts in England: overview report.
London:
NHS, 2013.
77.
SedlockEWOttosenMNetherK, et al.
Creating a comprehensive, unit-based approach to detecting and preventing harm in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Patient Saf Risk Manag2018;
23: 167–175.
78.
NowotnyBMLohEDavies-TuckM, et al.
Using patient factors to predict obstetric complaints and litigation: a mixed methods approach to quality improvement. J Patient Saf Risk Manag2018;
23: 185–199.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
