Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The lipid droplet (LD) is a cytoplasmic organelle, but it also exists in the nucleus under some conditions or in some cell types. New studies have revealed that nuclear LDs do not occur by haphazard entry of cytoplasmic LDs. Instead, they are generated by specific mechanisms that are increasingly understood. The inner nuclear membrane (INM) plays a critical role in nuclear LD formation in both mammalian hepatocytes and budding yeast, although in significantly different ways. Hepatocyte nuclear LDs derive from precursors of very low-density lipoprotein lacking apolipoprotein B-100, which form in the endoplasmic reticulum lumen and accumulate in intranuclear extensions of the perinuclear space called type I nucleoplasmic reticulum. In contrast, nuclear LDs in yeast are generated by triglyceride synthesized in the INM. Nuclear LDs in hepatocytes and budding yeast are both instrumental in the regulation of phospholipid synthesis; however, again they function in different ways. As the full functional importance is as yet unknown, the close relationship of nuclear LDs and the INM is an attractive target of research from both physiological and pathological perspectives.

Keywords

lipid droplet nuclear membrane phospholipid seipin hepatocyte

Introduction

Lipid droplets (LDs) were long considered to be sedentary inclusions, like glycogen particles (Fawcett, 1981). Research over the past two decades has drastically changed this view, and LDs are currently considered to be cytoplasmic organelles that interact with other organelles in a regulated manner, with various physiological functions (Fujimoto and Parton, 2011; Gao and Goodman, 2015; Olzmann and Carvalho, 2019). LDs in the nucleus have not garnered much attention, mainly because they are few in number. Nuclear LDs might occur by chance entrapment of cytoplasmic LDs, but this presumption was challenged by two observations. The first was the frequent occurrence of nuclear LDs in some cell types, for example hepatocytes, which are not necessarily correlated with an abundance of cytoplasmic LDs. In contrast, adipose cells and steroidogenic cells (e.g., adrenocortical cells) contain abundant cytoplasmic LDs, but have few nuclear LDs (Ohsaki et al., 2016). Second, budding yeast deficient in Sei1 (Fld1), a homolog of mammalian seipin, contain a significant number of nuclear LDs (Cartwright et al., 2015; Wolinski et al., 2015). Seipin is a protein essential for normal LD formation (Walther and Farese, 2012; Olzmann and Carvalho, 2019) and its mutations cause severe lipodystrophy (Magre et al., 2001). Nuclear LDs in seipin-deficient yeast are likely a consequence of defects in LD biogenesis and might have pathological implications.

Two papers on hepatocyte nuclear LDs from our group (Ohsaki et al., 2016; Sołtysik et al., 2019) and one paper on budding yeast nuclear LDs from the Köhler lab (Romanauska and Köhler, 2018) showed that nuclear LD formation occurs independently from that of cytoplasmic LDs. These studies indicated that the inner nuclear membrane (INM) plays crucial roles in nuclear LD formation in both hepatocytes and budding yeast, although in drastically different ways. Yeast nuclear LDs appear to form in the INM, whereas most, if not all, hepatocyte nuclear LDs derive from LDs in the lumen of type I nucleoplasmic reticulum (NR), which is the inward extension of the perinuclear space (Figure 1(a); see the following text for detailed explanation of NR). Despite these differences, nuclear LDs in both hepatocytes and budding yeast are involved in the regulation of membrane lipid synthesis.

Figure 1.

Nuclear LD formation in hepatocytes. (a) NR: Type I NR is made by intranuclear extension of the inner nuclear membrane (INM) alone, whereas type II NR is a protrusion of the cytoplasm covered by both the inner and the ONMs. (b) Under normal conditions, two VLDL precursors, ApoB-free lumenal LDs and lipidated ApoB, are generated in the ER lumen and form mature VLDL in the ER or in post-ER compartments. MTP is necessary for generation of both VLDL precursors, whereas ApoB is required only for lipidated ApoB. Under ER stress, ApoB decreases by degradation, whereas the MTP level is maintained and ApoB-free lumenal LDs thus increase. Lumenal LDs accumulate in the lumen of type I NR and eventually trespass into the nucleoplasm through defects in the INM. NR = nucleoplasmic reticulum; INM = inner nuclear membrane; ONM = outer nuclear membrane; LD = lipid droplet; ER = endoplasmic reticulum; VLDL = very low-density lipoprotein; MTP = microsomal triglyceride transfer protein; ApoB = apolipoprotein B.

In subsequent sections, we will first look over the past literature on nuclear LDs and then discuss the mechanism of nuclear LD biogenesis in hepatocytes and budding yeast with a particular focus on their relationship with the INM including the type I NR membrane. The function of nuclear LDs, which is largely an unexplored territory at present, will also be discussed.

Nuclear LDs in Liver Cells

Early Studies

Presence of nuclear LDs, termed as nuclear inclusions, was initially reported in hepatoma cells by light microscopy using Sudan staining (Leduc and Wilson, 1959). Those LDs might be actually located in cytoplasmic invaginations deep into the nucleus, but electron microscopic (EM) studies that followed demonstrated that LDs were present within the nucleoplasm. The EM studies revealed LDs in four situations: (i) the nucleolus of rat liver cells during thioacetamide-induced carcinogenesis (Thoenes, 1964), (ii) LDs in the nucleoplasm and in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)/nuclear envelope/NR in rat liver treated with carcinogenic N, N′-dimethyl-4-aminoazobenzene (Karasaki, 1969, 1973), (iii) nuclear LDs in mouse liver treated with hepatotoxic polybrominated biphenyl (Martino et al., 1981), and (iv) nuclear LDs in mouse embryonic cells with lethal mutations (Hillman et al., 1970; Hillman and Hillman, 1975).

Study of nuclear LDs in liver cells has been expanded using sophisticated methods, including confocal laser-scanning microscopy and EM of serial sections, to include normal rat liver (Layerenza et al., 2013), human liver infected with hepatitis C (Uzbekov and Roingeard, 2013), mouse liver treated with perfluorooctanoic acid (a chemical structurally resembling fatty acids but showing hepatotoxicity and carcinogenicity; Wang et al., 2013), and in HepG2 cells treated with a cytotoxic clay (Maisanaba et al., 2013).

Mechanisms Underlying Nuclear LD Formation in Hepatocytes

The early studies suggested that nuclear LDs may occur in hepatocytes under unfavorable conditions, but the mechanism of nuclear LD formation and its functional significance were not known. Hepatocytes also contain many cytoplasmic LDs, reflecting their high lipogenic capacity. Active lipogenesis, however, does not necessarily lead to nuclear LD formation (Ohsaki et al., 2016), suggesting that hepatocytes may have some specific mechanism to form nuclear LDs.

Hepatocytes synthesize and secrete very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL; Kulinski et al., 2002; Hussain et al., 2012; Lehner et al., 2012). In the process of VLDL formation, two lipidic particles are synthesized in the ER lumen: lipidated apolipoprotein B-100 (ApoB) and ApoB-free lumenal LDs. They collaborate to generate mature VLDL in post-ER compartments (Figure 1(b)). The formation of lipidated ApoB requires ApoB and microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP), which transfers lipids to the nascent ApoB polypeptide. In contrast, the formation of ApoB-free lumenal LDs requires MTP, but not ApoB. When cells are exposed to ER stress, ApoB decreases due to co- and posttranslational degradation, downregulating VLDL synthesis (Ginsberg and Fisher, 2009), whereas the MTP level is maintained (Qiu et al., 2005; Sołtysik et al., 2019). As a result, lipidated ApoB and VLDL decrease, whereas ApoB-free LDs increase in the ER lumen, which includes the perinuclear space. Eventually, large ApoB-free lumenal LDs accumulate in the type I NR lumen and then appear to enter the nucleoplasm through the NR membrane, which is disrupted, becoming nuclear LDs (Figure 1(b)). The formation of nuclear LDs concomitant with defective VLDL secretion is prominent in hepatocarcinoma cell lines and also occurs in mouse hepatocyte lacking lamina-associated polypeptide 1 (LAP1; Shin et al., 2019). MTP is crucial for the entire process, and thus MTP inhibition suppresses nuclear LD formation. The direct relationship between a lipoprotein precursor and nuclear LDs was unexpected, but it explains how nuclear LDs exist abundantly in hepatocytes (Lehner et al., 2012; Hussain, 2014).

Involvement of INM in Nuclear LD Formation in Hepatocyte

Disruption of normal VLDL synthesis does not fully account for nuclear LD formation in hepatocytes under ER stress. Another important factor is the development of the type I NR. The type I NR is a thin sheet-like or tubular structure made by intranuclear extensions of the perinuclear space, also known as the nuclear envelope, covered by the INM. This is different from type II NR, which refers to nuclear invaginations of the cytoplasm that include both the outer nuclear membrane (ONM) and the INM (Malhas et al., 2011; Figure 1(a)). The NR has been observed in various cell types and may increase in several pathological conditions, including cancer (Drozdz and Vaux, 2017). Several functions have been proposed for the NR, but it remains unclear if type I NR has any function distinct from type II NR. For example, one putative NR function is to regulate Ca²⁺ concentration deep inside the nucleus, which may affect gene transcription, but this function can be exerted by either type I or type II NR. In contrast, the mechanisms proposed for NR formation, such as pushing-in from the cytoplasm or pulling-in from the nucleoplasm, are mostly applicable only to type II NR (Malhas et al., 2011). Type I NR formation must be accompanied by separation of the INM and the ONM, which are normally bridged by the linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complex. Consistently, knockdown of SUN1, an INM transmembrane protein forming the LINC complex, induces type I NR increase (Ohsaki et al., 2016).

NR formation may be correlated with de novo phospholipid synthesis. Overexpression of CTP:phosphocholine cytidylyltransferase α (CCTα), the rate-limiting enzyme of the Kennedy pathway for phosphatidylcholine (PC) synthesis, causes NR elongation (Lagace and Ridgway, 2005). Moreover, de novo synthesized phospholipids were shown to be incorporated preferentially to NR and contribute to NR growth (Drozdz et al., 2017). These studies did not necessarily distinguish between type I and type II NR, but in cells deficient in proteolytic maturation of lamin A, which accumulate prelamin A, prominent elongation of both type I and type II NR was demonstrated to occur in a CCTα-dependent manner (Goulbourne et al., 2011). These results indicated that increased PC synthesis by CCTα activation promotes NR development.

Expression of the catalytic-dead mutant of CCTα can also induce NR development, probably through deforming the INM by insertion of the amphipathic domain (Lagace and Ridgway, 2005; Gehrig and Ridgway, 2011). It is not known, however, to what extent this nonenzymatic mechanism contributes to NR formation in cells (see later for a further discussion).

In hepatocytes under ER stress, type I NR increases in both number and length (Sołtysik et al., 2019). This change occurs even when MTP is inhibited, indicating that it is not directly related to VLDL synthesis. Because ER stress in nonhepatocyte cell lines does not induce type I NR, it appears that type I NR is regulated by a cell-type-specific mechanism. The close relationship between nuclear LDs and NR is most evident during mitosis of hepatocytes (Sołtysik et al., 2019). When a hepatocyte with many nuclear LDs divides, the daughter cells initially have no nuclear LDs but gradually regain them thereafter. In contrast, NR is already present immediately after mitosis. The new nuclear LDs appear to emerge from those NR membranes in an MTP-dependent manner.

The NR in hepatocytes appears to be related to two different stages of nuclear LD formation. The first is at the stage when ApoB-free lumenal LDs grow in the type I NR lumen and eventually escape into the nucleoplasm through defects in the NR membrane (Sołtysik et al., 2019). The NR membrane is generally associated with lamins (Gehrig et al., 2008), but curiously, the type I NR membrane around large ApoB-free lumenal LDs is devoid of lamins (Sołtysik et al., 2019). This deficiency is likely to make the membrane mechanically weak, so that expansion of ApoB-free lumenal LDs by MTP-mediated lipid accretion may physically cause the disruption. Here, how a local lamin deficiency arises is not known, but promyelocytic leukemia (PML) protein-II (PML-II), which is crucial for nuclear LD formation in hepatocytes, binds linearly along the INM when overexpressed and induces local lamin depletion (Jul-Larsen et al., 2010; Ohsaki et al., 2016). The PML-II domain necessary for binding to INM is enriched with positive charges, suggesting that the interaction of PML-II and acidic residues in the INM might be involved.

The NR–nuclear LD connection in hepatocytes also exists when nuclear LDs grow. This growth is not sensitive to MTP inhibition, but is suppressed by triacsin C, an inhibitor of acyl-CoA synthase (Sołtysik et al., 2019). Diacylglycerol acyltransferase 2 (DGAT2), which distributes in the NR and nuclear LDs (Ohsaki et al., 2016), is likely to be involved in this phase of nuclear LD growth. DGAT2 is thought to take a hairpin-like configuration and move from the ER to cytoplasmic LDs via a membrane bridge (Wilfling et al., 2013). The distribution of DGAT2 suggests that nuclear LDs are connected to the NR membrane at a certain stage.

Nuclear LDs in Other Mammalian Cell Types

Small intestinal epithelial cells harbor LDs in the ER lumen and the perinuclear space in apolipoprotein B deficiency (Hamilton et al., 1998) and after oil feeding (Palay, 1960). These observations indicate that small intestinal epithelial cells, which secrete chylomicrons, may form nuclear LDs by a mechanism similar to those in hepatocytes.

Other types of cells that are not thought to secrete lipoproteins also contain nuclear LDs. Stromal cells in the human sclera in vivo and U2OS, an osteosarcoma cell line, may belong to this category (Ohsaki et al., 2016; Petrea et al., 2018). Still others, such as HeLa, can also harbor nuclear LDs, albeit much fewer in number. The mechanism of nuclear LD formation in these cells is not known, but the presence of lipid-synthesizing enzymes in the INM (Agarwal et al., 2011; Prasad et al., 2011; Tsai et al., 2016) suggests that nuclear LDs in mammalian cells may be generated in the INM as shown in yeast (Romanauska and Köhler, 2018; see later).

Nuclear LDs in Budding Yeast

Nuclear LDs in Seipin-Deficient Yeast

Budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) does not appear to have nuclear LDs under normal culture conditions, but yeast lacking either the yeast seipin Sei1 (Fld1) or its partner Ldb16 exhibit LDs in the nucleus, along with small, clustered LDs and a few supersized LDs in the cytoplasm (Cartwright et al., 2015; Wolinski et al., 2015). Deficiency of seipin homologs in Arabidopsis thaliana also induces nuclear LD formation (Taurino et al., 2018). Seipin exists as undecamer (human; Yan et al., 2018) or dodecamer (Drosophila melanogaster; Sui et al., 2018) in the ER membrane; seipin of budding yeast was also suggested to adopt a similar configuration (Binns et al., 2010). Although the molecular function of seipin remains an open question, it is located at the ER–LD junction (Szymanski et al., 2007; Fei et al., 2008; Figure 2(A)) and is thought to be involved in the initial process of LD formation by properly partitioning neutral lipids and proteins between the ER and LDs and also in the subsequent stage of LD maturation (Grippa et al., 2015; Salo et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016; Salo et al., 2019). One notable property of the seipin molecule is its strong affinity to acidic phospholipids, especially phosphatidic acid (PA; Yan et al., 2018). A number of studies found that seipin deficiency induces an increase of PA in the total cells (Fei et al., 2011b; Sim et al., 2012; Jiang et al., 2014; Wolinski et al., 2015; Pagac et al., 2016) and in the microsome (Fei et al., 2011b; Pagac et al., 2016), suggesting that seipin may play a critical role in PA metabolism.

Figure 2.

Nuclear LD formation in budding yeast. (A) Wild-type yeast. (a) Seipin (Sei1) exists as oligomers at the ER–LD junction and aids in the orderly transport of proteins and lipids from the ER to budding LDs. Sei1 plays a critical role in the regulation of PA in the ER/ONM, probably by binding PA and also by affecting PA-synthesizing enzyme activity. (b) Sei1 may also localize to the INM and support the budding of nuclear LDs, but how the Sei1 oligomer reaches the INM remains unclear. The INM has its own pool of PA and DAG, and the downregulation of phospholipid synthesis channels more PA to the synthesis of DAG and triacylglycerol (TAG) that facilitates nuclear LD formation. (B) Sei1-deficient yeast. (a) Cytoplasmic LDs form in irregular sizes. PA accumulates at the ER–LD junction. Free PA in the ER/ONM may increase through the absence of Sei1 binding and the aberrant activation of PA synthesis. (b) Nuclear LDs exist more frequently than in wild-type yeast, but the nuclear LDs and the INM might not form a normal bridge. The increase of nuclear LD formation might be caused by an increase of PA in the INM. INM = inner nuclear membrane; ONM = outer nuclear membrane; ER = endoplasmic reticulum; PA = phosphatidic acid; DAG = diacylglycerol.

It is not clear why seipin deficiency induces nuclear LD formation in budding yeast. If seipin exists only in the ER/ONM and not in the INM (see otherwise later), it is reasonable to assume that nuclear LDs occur because the normal seipin functionality in the ER/ONM is lost.

We speculate that an increase of free PA in the INM might be involved: namely, that a significant portion of PA may be sequestered by the seipin oligomer in the ER/ONM normally (Yan et al., 2018), but when seipin is absent, that PA may become freely diffusible and an increased amount can reach the INM. PA in the INM can be converted to diacylglycerol (DAG) by Pah1, a PA phosphatase (Santos-Rosa et al., 2005). Dga1 and Lro1, which are DAG-acyl transferases, may be present in the INM and synthesize TAG to generate nuclear LDs (Figure 2(B)).

The increase of free PA in seipin-deficient cells may also arise because seipin has an inhibitory effect on glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase (GPAT; Pagac et al., 2016). Seipin in human cells was also suggested to bind 1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate-O-acyltransferase 2 (AGPAT2) and lipin-1 (Talukder et al., 2015), but the interaction of Sei1 with the yeast homolog of these enzymes has not been detected (Pagac et al., 2016).

Nuclear LD Formation in the INM

The INM of budding yeast appears to have an innate ability to produce lipid esters. In wild-type yeast, fluorescence biosensors detected a low level of PA and abundant DAG in the INM (Figure 2(B); Romanauska and Köhler, 2018). In the absence of Cds1 and Ino4, nuclear LDs formed with intense PA signals on their surface (Romanauska and Köhler, 2018). Cds1 is an enzyme that converts PA to CDP-DAG, which is a precursor for all glycerophospholipids in budding yeast. Ino4 is part of the Ino2-Ino4 complex that upregulates transcription of Cds1 and other genes encoding phospholipid synthetic enzymes, by binding a UAS_INO sequence in their promoters (Henry et al., 2012). The result suggests that PA increases as a result of decrease in the conversion of PA to CDP-DAG, and thus more PA is channeled to the synthesis of DAG and triacylglycerol (TAG) in the INM. Consistently, Cds1 was shown to localize in the INM (Romanauska and Köhler, 2018).

Notably, co-depletion of Sei1 and Ino4 caused abnormal LD–membrane adherence in both the INM and the ER/ONM. Furthermore, bimolecular fluorescence complementation with Nup60, a nucleoplasmic basket protein in the nuclear pore complex, suggested that Sei1 may also exist in the INM (Romanauska and Köhler, 2018). This result led authors to speculate that Sei1 may be involved in the membrane bridge formation between the INM and nuclear LDs, as it probably does between the ER and cytoplasmic LDs (Salo et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016; Figure 2(B)). This suggests that the INM might be able to generate nuclear LDs by a mechanism similar to the cytoplasmic LD formation in the ER/ONM. Nuclear LDs form only rarely, however, even when budding yeast is cultured with oleic acid (Romanauska and Köhler, 2018). Moreover, TAG generated in the INM predominantly gives rise to cytoplasmic LDs (Barbosa et al., 2019). These results suggest that nuclear LD formation in the yeast INM is not an efficient process.

With regards to the aforementioned scenario, it is intriguing how Sei1 reaches the INM. The seipin oligomer is estimated to be 22 nm in diameter and 7 nm in height (human; Yan et al., 2018) and 15 nm in diameter and 8 nm in height (Drosophila melanogaster; Sui et al., 2018), the size of which might limit diffusion through the nuclear pore. TorsinA, which also forms a large oligomer (Demircioglu et al., 2019), is thought to reach the INM by undergoing disassembly and reassembly, which is assisted by two cofactors, luminal domain-like LAP1 (LULL1) in the ER and LAP1 in the INM (Goodchild et al., 2015). It is not known whether Sei1 utilizes a similar mechanism. In addition, although the abnormal LD–membrane adherence in Sei1-deficient cells is consistent with Sei1’s putative function in membrane bridge formation (Salo et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016), it was not observed in previous studies on budding yeast deficient in Sei1 alone (Szymanski et al., 2007; Fei et al., 2008, 2011a; Wolinski et al., 2011; Cartwright et al., 2015; Wolinski et al., 2015). This discrepancy suggests that the abnormal LD–membrane adherence may occur only when Ino4 is also deficient, causing general perturbation of membrane lipids (Romanauska and Köhler, 2018).

The formation of nuclear LDs in budding yeast does not appear to be accompanied by NR formation, whether it is induced by the Sei1/Ino4 deficiency or by suppression of phospholipid synthesis (Romanauska and Köhler, 2018). This is different not only from nuclear LD formation in hepatocytes (Ohsaki et al., 2016) but also from that in seipin-deficient plant cells (Taurino et al., 2018), which are not likely to synthesize lipoprotein. The role played by type I NR in nuclear LD formation remains to be studied.

Function of Nuclear LDs

Regulation of Phospholipid Synthesis

Nuclear LDs in hepatocytes recruit CCTα, the major CCT isoform, thereby activating PC synthesis (Ohsaki et al., 2016; Sołtysik et al., 2019). ApoB-free lumenal LDs contain abundant phosphatidylethanolamine, a cone-shaped phospholipid (Wang et al., 2007), so its direct descendant, nuclear LDs, are likely to be the same. The propensity of cone-shaped phospholipids to form phospholipid packing defects may facilitate the binding of CCTα to nuclear LDs through an amphipathic helix (Prevost et al., 2018).

Inactive CCTα is present in the soluble phase and, upon binding to membranes, becomes activated through a conformational change (Cornell and Ridgway, 2015). The INM and the cytoplasmic LD have been reported as locations of CCTα recruitment and activation (Watkins and Kent, 1992; Lagace and Ridgway, 2005; Krahmer et al., 2011; Aitchison et al., 2015; Haider et al., 2018). In hepatocytes, nuclear LDs appear to be a major platform of CCTα activation, because significant changes in PC synthesis were caused by an increase and a decrease of CCTα recruitment to nuclear LDs by manipulating the expression level of perilipin-3 (Sołtysik et al., 2019). Here, perilipin-3 competes with CCTα in nuclear LD binding and appears to function as a regulator of CCTα (Figure 3(a)). The increase of nuclear LDs in hepatocytes under ER stress is thought to be a feedback mechanism to upregulate PC synthesis (Sołtysik et al., 2019), leading to mitigation of the stress through expansion of the ER lumenal capacity (Schuck et al., 2009).

Figure 3.

Nuclear LD and regulation of phospholipid synthesis. (a) Hepatocytes. CCTα and perilipin-3 bind to nuclear LDs in a competitive manner. An increase in perilipin-3 expression decreases CCTα bound to nuclear LDs and downregulates PC synthesis, whereas a decrease in perilipin-3 exerts the opposite effect. (b) Budding yeast. Sequestration of Opi1 to nuclear LDs, cytoplasmic LDs, and the ER/ONM allows the Ino2-Ino4 activator complex to bind UAS_INO, causing transcriptional activation of genes related to phospholipid synthesis. Nuclear LDs might have a different significance than the other Opi1-binding structures because they are located close to the gene transcription site. PC = phosphatidylcholine; CCTα = CTP:phosphocholine cytidylyltransferase α.

Nuclear LDs in budding yeast are also involved in the regulation of lipid synthesis by Opi1 sequestration. Opi1 is the repressor of the Ino2-Ino4 activator complex (Henry et al., 2012). When the PA level in the ER is relatively high (e.g., yeast in exponential growth in the absence of added inositol), Opi1 is retained in the ER through interaction with both PA and Scs2, which leads to active transcription of UAS_INO-containing genes (Loewen et al., 2004). Opi1 sequestration to nuclear LDs likely works similarly, increasing phospholipid synthesis in response to lipid overload (Figure 3(b)), but in this respect the more abundant cytoplasmic LDs, may be more important (Romanauska and Köhler, 2018). Proximity to the location of gene transcription is speculated to impart additional significance to nuclear LDs. Selective abrogation of nuclear LD formation without affecting cytoplasmic LDs may be needed to clarify this point.

Other Possible Functions

The close association of nuclear LDs with the PML nuclear body (PML-NB; Ohsaki et al., 2016) suggests a tantalizing possibility that nuclear LDs may modify PML-NB functions (Bernardi and Pandolfi, 2007; Lallemand-Breitenbach and de The, 2018). PML-NBs are thought to be made by ring-like shells of PML protein oligomers, and they recruit many partner proteins to the center of the ring mainly through SUMO–SUMO interactions (Sahin et al., 2014). Interestingly, nuclear LDs are often located right in the middle of PML-NBs (Ohsaki et al., 2016) and may thus obliterate the space for partner proteins. It is also intriguing that PML-NBs have been suggested to be membrane-less organelles generated through phase separating condensation (Banani et al., 2017). This means that a lipid droplet (a nuclear LD) exists in the middle of a liquid droplet (PML-NB); this arrangement may influence the structural property of PML-NBs.

Functionally, PML potently activates fatty acid oxidation through the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) signaling pathway (Carracedo et al., 2012; Ito et al., 2012). Nuclear LDs may play a role in fine-tuning this PML-NB function by regulating the fatty acid concentration in its vicinity. In a similar vein, the cholesterol synthesis intermediate 14-demethyl-14-dehydrolanosterol (also called follicular fluid meiosis-activating sterol, FF-MAS), which is a ligand for liver X receptor α, was shown to be stored as an ester in nuclear LDs (Gatticchi et al., 2017). Nuclear LDs may also be involved in proteasomal protein degradation in PML-NBs, in a similar manner as cytoplasmic LDs (Ohsaki et al., 2006; Welte and Gould, 2017). It is currently unknown whether nuclear LDs in mammalian cells interact directly with genomic DNA or DNA-binding proteins, as reported in bacteria (Zhang and Liu, 2017) and Drosophila melanogaster (Li et al., 2012).

Another possible significance of the nuclear LD and PML-NB association is related to virus infection. On one hand, PML-NBs play a major role in intrinsic and innate immune defense against virus infection (Scherer and Stamminger, 2016). On the other hand, cytoplasmic LDs are exploited by viruses as a site of replication, a lipid source, and other purposes (Cheung et al., 2010; Heaton and Randall, 2010; Meyers et al., 2016; Viktorova et al., 2018; Laufman et al., 2019). In this respect, it is of note that several viruses appear to target and affect nuclear LDs. Human adenovirus type 5 dissolves PML-NB using its E4 Orf3 protein, which directly interacts with the PML-II domain that is crucial for nuclear LD formation (Leppard et al., 2009). Hepatitis C virus core protein, which distributes to LDs when expressed alone, binds PML-NBs and inactivates their apoptosis-inducing function (Herzer et al., 2005). Expression of VP8, a tegument protein of bovine herpesvirus 1, targets PML-NBs and increases nuclear LDs (Zhang et al., 2015, 2019). These results suggest that nuclear LDs may be utilized by viruses to evade host defense mechanisms.

Concluding Remarks

In this article, we discussed nuclear LDs and their close relationship with INM, considering both hepatocytes and budding yeast in parallel. Little is known about not only nuclear LDs but also type I NR, which is difficult to study by conventional methods. Moreover, the wide heterogeneity of the nuclear membrane proteome in different tissues (Korfali et al., 2012) and the difference between budding yeast and mammalian cells, including phospholipid distribution (Tsuji et al., 2019), preclude the extrapolation of results between cells/species. Nevertheless, just as split GFP technology made it possible to identify proteins in the INM (Smoyer et al., 2016), the development of new methodology should solve the mysteries of nuclear LDs. More surprises are expected to come in this understudied realm.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society of the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI) to Y. O. (18K06829) and T. F. (15H05902 and 18H04023).

ORCID iD

Toyoshi Fujimoto

References

Agarwal

Sukumaran

Cortes

Tunison

Mizrachi

Sankella

Gerard

Horton

Garg

(2011). Human 1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase isoforms 1 and 2: biochemical characterization and inability to rescue hepatic steatosis in Agpat2(-/-) gene lipodystrophic mice. J Biol Chem 286, 37676–37691. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.250449

Aitchison

Arsenault

Ridgway

(2015). Nuclear-localized CTP:phosphocholine cytidylyltransferase alpha regulates phosphatidylcholine synthesis required for lipid droplet biogenesis. Mol Biol Cell 26, 2927–2938. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E15-03-0159

Banani

Lee

Hyman

Rosen

(2017). Biomolecular condensates: organizers of cellular biochemistry. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 18, 285–298. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.7

Barbosa

Lim

Mari

Edgar

Gal

Sterk

Jenkins

Koulman

Savage

Schuldiner

, et al. (2019). Compartmentalized synthesis of triacylglycerol at the inner nuclear membrane regulates nuclear organization. Dev Cell doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.07.009

Bernardi

Pandolfi

(2007). Structure, dynamics and functions of promyelocytic leukaemia nuclear bodies. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8, 1006–1016. doi: 10.1038/nrm2277

Binns

Lee

Hilton

Jiang

Goodman

(2010). Seipin is a discrete homooligomer. Biochemistry 49, 10747–10755. doi: 10.1021/bi1013003

Carracedo

Weiss

Leliaert

Bhasin

de Boer

Laurent

Adams

Sundvall

Song

Ito

, et al. (2012). A metabolic prosurvival role for PML in breast cancer. J Clin Invest 122, 3088–3100. doi: 10.1172/JCI62129

Cartwright

Binns

Hilton

Han

Gao

Goodman

(2015). Seipin performs dissectible functions in promoting lipid droplet biogenesis and regulating droplet morphology. Mol Biol Cell 26, 726–739. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E14-08-1303

Cheung

Gill

Esposito

Kaminski

Courousse

Chwetzoff

Trugnan

Keshavan

Lever

Desselberger

(2010). Rotaviruses associate with cellular lipid droplet components to replicate in viroplasms, and compounds disrupting or blocking lipid droplets inhibit viroplasm formation and viral replication. J Virol 84, 6782–6798. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01757-09

10.

Cornell

Ridgway

(2015). CTP:phosphocholine cytidylyltransferase: function, regulation, and structure of an amphitropic enzyme required for membrane biogenesis. Prog Lipid Res 59, 147–171. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2015.07.001

11.

Demircioglu

Zheng

McQuown

Maier

Watson

Cheeseman

Denic

Egelman

Schwartz

(2019). The AAA + ATPase TorsinA polymerizes into hollow helical tubes with 8.5 subunits per turn. Nat Commun 10, 3262. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11194-w

12.

Drozdz

Jiang

Pytowski

Grovenor

Vaux

(2017). Formation of a nucleoplasmic reticulum requires de novo assembly of nascent phospholipids and shows preferential incorporation of nascent lamins. Sci Rep 7, 7454. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07614-w

13.

Drozdz

Vaux

(2017). Shared mechanisms in physiological and pathological nucleoplasmic reticulum formation. Nucleus 8, 34–45. doi: 10.1080/19491034.2016.1252893

14.

Fawcett

(1981). The Cell. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders.

15.

Fei

Shui

Kapterian

Bielby

Brown

Wenk

Liu

Yang

(2011a). Molecular characterization of seipin and its mutants: implications for seipin in triacylglycerol synthesis. J Lipid Res 52, 2136–2147. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M017566

16.

Fei

Shui

Gaeta

Kuerschner

Brown

Wenk

Parton

Yang

(2008). Fld1p, a functional homologue of human seipin, regulates the size of lipid droplets in yeast. J Cell Biol 180, 473–482. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200711136

17.

Fei

Shui

Zhang

Krahmer

Ferguson

Kapterian

Lin

Dawes

Brown

, et al. (2011b). A role for phosphatidic acid in the formation of “supersized” lipid droplets. PLoS Genet 7, e1002201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002201

18.

Fujimoto

Parton

(2011). Not just fat: the structure and function of the lipid droplet. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a004838

19.

Gao

Goodman

(2015). The lipid droplet-a well-connected organelle. Front Cell Dev Biol 3, 49. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2015.00049

20.

Gatticchi

Cerra

Scarpelli

Macchioni

Sebastiani

Gioiello

Roberti

(2017). Selected cholesterol biosynthesis inhibitors produce accumulation of the intermediate FF-MAS that targets nucleus and activates LXRalpha in HepG2 cells. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids 1862, 842–852. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2017.05.004

21.

Gehrig

Cornell

Ridgway

(2008). Expansion of the nucleoplasmic reticulum requires the coordinated activity of lamins and CTP:phosphocholine cytidylyltransferase alpha. Mol Biol Cell 19, 237–247. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E07-02-0179

22.

Gehrig

Ridgway

(2011). CTP:phosphocholine cytidylyltransferase alpha (CCTalpha) and lamins alter nuclear membrane structure without affecting phosphatidylcholine synthesis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1811, 377–385. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2011.04.001

23.

Ginsberg

Fisher

(2009). The ever-expanding role of degradation in the regulation of apolipoprotein B metabolism. J Lipid Res 50 Suppl, S162–S166. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R800090-JLR200

24.

Goodchild

Buchwalter

Naismith

Holbrook

Billion

Dauer

Liang

Dear

Hanson

(2015). Access of torsinA to the inner nuclear membrane is activity dependent and regulated in the endoplasmic reticulum. J Cell Sci 128, 2854–2865. doi: 10.1242/jcs.167452

25.

Goulbourne

Malhas

Vaux

(2011). The induction of a nucleoplasmic reticulum by prelamin A accumulation requires CTP:phosphocholine cytidylyltransferase-alpha. J Cell Sci 124, 4253–4266. doi: 10.1242/jcs.091009

26.

Grippa

Buxo

Mora

Funaya

Idrissi

Mancuso

Gomez

Muntanya

Sabido

Carvalho

(2015). The seipin complex Fld1/Ldb16 stabilizes ER-lipid droplet contact sites. J Cell Biol 211, 829–844. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201502070

27.

Haider

Wei

Lim

Barbosa

Liu

Weber

Mlodzik

Oras

Collier

Hussain

, et al. (2018). PCYT1A regulates phosphatidylcholine homeostasis from the inner nuclear membrane in response to membrane stored curvature elastic stress. Dev Cell 45, 481–495 e488. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.04.012

28.

Hamilton

Wong

Cham

Nielsen

Young

(1998). Chylomicron-sized lipid particles are formed in the setting of apolipoprotein B deficiency. J Lipid Res 39, 1543–1557.

29.

Heaton

Randall

(2010). Dengue virus-induced autophagy regulates lipid metabolism. Cell Host Microbe 8, 422–432. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2010.10.006

30.

Henry

Kohlwein

Carman

(2012). Metabolism and regulation of glycerolipids in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 190, 317–349. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.130286

31.

Herzer

Weyer

Krammer

Galle

Hofmann

(2005). Hepatitis C virus core protein inhibits tumor suppressor protein promyelocytic leukemia function in human hepatoma cells. Cancer Res 65, 10830–10837. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0880

32.

Hillman

(1975). Ultrastructural studies of tw32/tw32 mouse embryos. J Embryol Exp Morphol 33, 685–695.

33.

Hillman

Wileman

(1970). Ultrastructural studies on cleavage stage t12-t12 mouse embryos. Am J Anat 128, 311–340. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001280304

34.

Hussain

(2014). Intestinal lipid absorption and lipoprotein formation. Curr Opin Lipidol 25, 200–206. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000084

35.

Hussain

Rava

Walsh

Rana

Iqbal

(2012). Multiple functions of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein. Nutr Metab (Lond) 9, 14. doi: 10.1186/1743-7075-9-14

36.

Ito

Carracedo

Weiss

Arai

Ala

Avigan

Schafer

Evans

Suda

Lee

Pandolfi

(2012). A PML-PPAR-delta pathway for fatty acid oxidation regulates hematopoietic stem cell maintenance. Nat Med 18, 1350–1358. doi: 10.1038/nm.2882

37.

Jiang

Gao

Guo

Zhou

Yang

Xiao

Liu

Sha

(2014). Lack of testicular seipin causes teratozoospermia syndrome in men. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111, 7054–7059. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1324025111

38.

Jul-Larsen

Grudic

Bjerkvig

Boe

(2010). Subcellular distribution of nuclear import-defective isoforms of the promyelocytic leukemia protein. BMC Mol Biol 11, 89. doi: 10.1186/1471-2199-11-89

39.

Korfali

Wilkie

Swanson

Srsen

de Las Heras

Batrakou

Malik

Zuleger

Kerr

Florens

Schirmer

(2012). The nuclear envelope proteome differs notably between tissues. Nucleus 3, 552–564. doi: 10.4161/nucl.22257

40.

Karasaki S (1969). The fine structure of proliferating cells in preneoplastic rat livers during azo-dye carcinogenesis. J Cell Biol 40, 322–335. doi: 10.1083/jcb.40.2.322

41.

Karasaki S (1973). Passage of cytoplasmic lipid into interphase nuclei in preneoplastic rat liver. J Ultrastruct Res 42, 463-478. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(73)80020-6

42.

Krahmer

Guo

Wilfling

Hilger

Lingrell

Heger

Newman

Schmidt-Supprian

Vance

Mann

, et al. (2011). Phosphatidylcholine synthesis for lipid droplet expansion is mediated by localized activation of CTP:phosphocholine cytidylyltransferase. Cell Metab 14, 504–515. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.07.013

43.

Kulinski

Rustaeus

Vance

(2002). Microsomal triacylglycerol transfer protein is required for lumenal accretion of triacylglycerol not associated with ApoB, as well as for ApoB lipidation. J Biol Chem 277, 31516–31525. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M202015200

44.

Lagace

Ridgway

(2005). The rate-limiting enzyme in phosphatidylcholine synthesis regulates proliferation of the nucleoplasmic reticulum. Mol Biol Cell 16, 1120–1130. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e04-10-0874

45.

Lallemand-Breitenbach

de The

(2018). PML nuclear bodies: from architecture to function. Curr Opin Cell Biol 52, 154–161. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2018.03.011

46.

Laufman

Perrino

Andino

(2019). Viral generated inter-organelle contacts redirect lipid flux for genome replication. Cell 178, 275–289.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.030

47.

Layerenza

Gonzalez

Garcia de Bravo

Polo

Sisti

Ves-Losada

(2013). Nuclear lipid droplets: a novel nuclear domain. Biochim Biophys Acta 1831, 327–340. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2012.10.005

48.

Leduc

Wilson

(1959). A histochemical study of intranuclera inclusions in mouse liver and hepatoma. J Histochem Cytochem 7, 8–16. doi: 10.1177/7.1.8

49.

Lehner

Lian

Quiroga

(2012). Lumenal lipid metabolism: implications for lipoprotein assembly. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 32, 1087–1093. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.241497

50.

Leppard

Emmott

Cortese

Rich

(2009). Adenovirus type 5 E4 Orf3 protein targets promyelocytic leukaemia (PML) protein nuclear domains for disruption via a sequence in PML isoform II that is predicted as a protein interaction site by bioinformatic analysis. J Gen Virol 90, 95–104. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.005512-0

51.

Thiel

Thul

Beller

Kuhnlein

Welte

(2012). Lipid droplets control the maternal histone supply of Drosophila embryos. Curr Biol 22, 2104–2113. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.018

52.

Loewen

Gaspar

Jesch

Delon

Ktistakis

Henry

Levine

(2004). Phospholipid metabolism regulated by a transcription factor sensing phosphatidic acid. Science 304, 1644–1647. doi: 10.1126/science.1096083

53.

Magre

Delepine

Khallouf

Gedde-Dahl

Jr Van Maldergem

Sobel

Papp

Meier

Megarbane

Bachy

, et al. (2001). Identification of the gene altered in Berardinelli-Seip congenital lipodystrophy on chromosome 11q13. Nat Genet 28, 365–370. doi: 10.1038/ng585

54.

Maisanaba

Puerto

Pichardo

Jorda

Moreno

Aucejo

Jos

(2013). In vitro toxicological assessment of clays for their use in food packaging applications. Food Chem Toxicol 57, 266–275. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.03.043

55.

Malhas

Goulbourne

Vaux

(2011). The nucleoplasmic reticulum: form and function. Trends Cell Biol 21, 362–373. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2011.03.008

56.

Martino

Wilson-Martino

Benitz

(1981). The presence of intranuclear lipid inclusions in hepatocytes of mice after chronic ingestion of polybrominated biphenyl. Arch Toxicol 47, 155–158. doi: 10.1007/bf00332357

57.

Meyers

Fontaine

Kumar

Ott

(2016). Entangled in a membranous web: ER and lipid droplet reorganization during hepatitis C virus infection. Curr Opin Cell Biol 41, 117–124. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2016.05.003

58.

Ohsaki

Cheng

Fujita

Tokumoto

Fujimoto

(2006). Cytoplasmic lipid droplets are sites of convergence of proteasomal and autophagic degradation of apolipoprotein B. Mol Biol Cell 17, 2674–2683. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e05-07-0659

59.

Ohsaki

Kawai

Yoshikawa

Cheng

Jokitalo

Fujimoto

(2016). PML isoform II plays a critical role in nuclear lipid droplet formation. J Cell Biol 212, 29–38. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201507122

60.

Olzmann

Carvalho

(2019). Dynamics and functions of lipid droplets. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 20, 137–155. doi: 10.1038/s41580-018-0085-z

61.

Pagac

Cooper

Lukmantara

Mak

Tian

Liu

Lei

, et al. (2016). SEIPIN regulates lipid droplet expansion and adipocyte development by modulating the activity of glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase. Cell Rep 17, 1546–1559. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.037

62.

Palay

(1960). On the appearance of absorbed fat droplets in the nuclear envelope. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 7, 391–392. doi: 10.1083/jcb.7.2.391

63.

Petrea

Craitoiu

Vrapciu

Manoiu

Rusu

(2018). The telopode- and filopode-projecting heterogeneous stromal cells of the human sclera niche. Ann Anat 218, 129–140. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2017.12.013

64.

Prasad

Garg

Agarwal

(2011). Enzymatic activities of the human AGPAT isoform 3 and isoform 5: localization of AGPAT5 to mitochondria. J Lipid Res 52, 451–462. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M007575

65.

Prevost

Sharp

Kory

Lin

Voth

Farese

Jr Walther

(2018). Mechanism and determinants of amphipathic helix-containing protein targeting to lipid droplets. Dev Cell 44, 73–86.e74. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.12.011

66.

Qiu

Kohen-Avramoglu

Mhapsekar

Tsai

Austin

Adeli

(2005). Glucosamine-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress promotes ApoB100 degradation: evidence for Grp78-mediated targeting to proteasomal degradation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 25, 571–577. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000154142.61859.94

67.

Romanauska

Köhler

(2018). The inner nuclear membrane is a metabolically active territory that generates nuclear lipid droplets. Cell 174, 700–715.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.047

68.

Sahin

Ferhi

Jeanne

Benhenda

Berthier

Jollivet

Niwa-Kawakita

Faklaris

Setterblad

de The

Lallemand-Breitenbach

(2014). Oxidative stress-induced assembly of PML nuclear bodies controls sumoylation of partner proteins. J Cell Biol 204, 931–945. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201305148

69.

Salo

Belevich

Karhinen

Vihinen

Vigouroux

Magre

Thiele

Holtta-Vuori

Jokitalo

Ikonen

(2016). Seipin regulates ER-lipid droplet contacts and cargo delivery. EMBO J 35, 2699–2716. doi: 10.15252/embj.201695170

70.

Salo

Vihinen

Holtta-Vuori

Szkalisity

Horvath

Belevich

Peranen

Thiele

Somerharju

, et al. (2019). Seipin facilitates triglyceride flow to lipid droplet and counteracts droplet ripening via endoplasmic reticulum contact. Dev Cell. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.05.016

71.

Santos-Rosa

Leung

Grimsey

Peak-Chew

Siniossoglou

(2005). The yeast lipin Smp2 couples phospholipid biosynthesis to nuclear membrane growth. EMBO J 24, 1931–1941. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600672

72.

Scherer

Stamminger

(2016). Emerging role of PML nuclear bodies in innate immune signaling. J Virol 90, 5850–5854. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01979-15

73.

Schuck

Prinz

Thorn

Voss

Walter

(2009). Membrane expansion alleviates endoplasmic reticulum stress independently of the unfolded protein response. J Cell Biol 187, 525–536. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200907074

74.

Shin

Hernandez-Ono

Fedotova

Ostlund

Lee

Gibeley

Liang

Dauer

Ginsberg

Worman

(2019). Nuclear envelope-localized torsinA-LAP1 complex regulates hepatic VLDL secretion and steatosis. J Clin Invest 130. doi: 10.1172/JCI129769

75.

Sim

Dennis

Aubry

Ramanathan

Sembongi

Saudek

Ito

O'Rahilly

Siniossoglou

Rochford

(2012). The human lipodystrophy protein seipin is an ER membrane adaptor for the adipogenic PA phosphatase lipin 1. Mol Metab 2, 38–46. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2012.11.002

76.

Smoyer

Katta

Gardner

Stoltz

McCroskey

Bradford

McClain

Smith

Slaughter

Unruh

Jaspersen

(2016). Analysis of membrane proteins localizing to the inner nuclear envelope in living cells. J Cell Biol 215, 575–590. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201607043

77.

Sołtysik

Ohsaki

Tatematsu

Cheng

Fujimoto

(2019). Nuclear lipid droplets derive from a lipoprotein precursor and regulate phosphatidylcholine synthesis. Nat Commun 10, 473. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08411-x

78.

Sui

Arlt

Brock

Lai

DiMaio

Marks

Liao

Farese

Jr Walther

(2018). Cryo-electron microscopy structure of the lipid droplet-formation protein seipin. J Cell Biol 217, 4080–4091. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201809067

79.

Szymanski

Binns

Bartz

Grishin

Agarwal

Garg

Anderson

Goodman

(2007). The lipodystrophy protein seipin is found at endoplasmic reticulum lipid droplet junctions and is important for droplet morphology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104, 20890–20895. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704154104

80.

Talukder

Sim

O'Rahilly

Edwardson

Rochford

(2015). Seipin oligomers can interact directly with AGPAT2 and lipin 1, physically scaffolding critical regulators of adipogenesis. Mol Metab 4, 199–209. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2014.12.013

81.

Taurino

Costantini

De Domenico

Stefanelli

Ruano

Delgadillo

Sanchez-Serrano

Sanmartin

Santino

Rojo

(2018). SEIPIN proteins mediate lipid droplet biogenesis to promote pollen transmission and reduce seed dormancy. Plant Physiol 176, 1531–1546. doi: 10.1104/pp.17.01430

82.

Thoenes

(1964). Fett im Nucleolus. J Ultrastruct Res 10, 194–206. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(64)80004-6

83.

Tsai

Zhao

Turner

Schlieker

(2016). The Lamin B receptor is essential for cholesterol synthesis and perturbed by disease-causing mutations. Elife 5. doi: 10.7554/eLife.16011

84.

Tsuji

Cheng

Tatematsu

Ebata

Kamikawa

Fujita

Gyobu

Segawa

Arai

Taguchi

, et al. (2019). Predominant localization of phosphatidylserine at the cytoplasmic leaflet of the ER, and its TMEM16K-dependent redistribution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116, 13368–13373. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1822025116

85.

Uzbekov

Roingeard

(2013). Nuclear lipid droplets identified by electron microscopy of serial sections. BMC Res Notes 6, 386. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-386

86.

Viktorova

Nchoutmboube

Ford-Siltz

Iverson

Belov

(2018). Phospholipid synthesis fueled by lipid droplets drives the structural development of poliovirus replication organelles. PLoS Pathog 14, e1007280. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007280

87.

Walther

Farese

Jr (2012). Lipid droplets and cellular lipid metabolism. Annu Rev Biochem 81, 687–714. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-061009-102430

88.

Wang

Becuwe

Housden

Chitraju

Porras

Graham

Liu

Thiam

Savage

Agarwal

, et al. (2016). Seipin is required for converting nascent to mature lipid droplets. Elife 5. doi: 10.7554/eLife.16582

89.

Wang

Gilham

Lehner

(2007). Proteomic and lipid characterization of apolipoprotein B-free luminal lipid droplets from mouse liver microsomes: implications for very low density lipoprotein assembly. J Biol Chem 282, 33218–33226. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M706841200

90.

Wang

Liang

Liu

Zhang

Jiang

(2013). Specific accumulation of lipid droplets in hepatocyte nuclei of PFOA-exposed BALB/c mice. Sci Rep 3, 2174. doi: 10.1038/srep02174

91.

Watkins

Kent

(1992). Immunolocalization of membrane-associated CTP:phosphocholine cytidylyltransferase in phosphatidylcholine-deficient Chinese hamster ovary cells. J Biol Chem 267, 5686–5692.

92.

Welte

Gould

(2017). Lipid droplet functions beyond energy storage. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids 1862, 1260–1272. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2017.07.006

93.

Wilfling

Wang

Haas

Krahmer

Gould

Uchida

Cheng

Graham

Christiano

Frohlich

, et al. (2013). Triacylglycerol synthesis enzymes mediate lipid droplet growth by relocalizing from the ER to lipid droplets. Dev Cell 24, 384–399. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.01.013

94.

Wolinski

Hofbauer

Hellauer

Cristobal-Sarramian

Kolb

Radulovic

Knittelfelder

Rechberger

Kohlwein

(2015). Seipin is involved in the regulation of phosphatidic acid metabolism at a subdomain of the nuclear envelope in yeast. Biochim Biophys Acta 1851, 1450–1464. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2015.08.003

95.

Wolinski

Kolb

Hermann

Koning

Kohlwein

(2011). A role for seipin in lipid droplet dynamics and inheritance in yeast. J Cell Sci 124, 3894–3904. doi: 10.1242/jcs.091454

96.

Yan

Qian

Lukmantara

Gao

Yan

Yang

(2018). Human SEIPIN binds anionic phospholipids. Dev Cell 47, 248–256.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.09.010

97.

Zhang

Liu

(2017). The lipid droplet: a conserved cellular organelle. Protein Cell 8, 796–800. doi: 10.1007/s13238-017-0467-6

98.

Zhang

Afroz

Brownlie

Snider

van Drunen Littel-van den Hurk

(2015). Regulation and function of phosphorylation on VP8, the major tegument protein of bovine herpesvirus 1. J Virol 89, 4598–4611. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03180-14

99.

Zhang

Donovan

Sucharita

Brownlie

Snider

Tikoo

van Drunen Littel-van den Hurk

(2019). US3 kinase-mediated phosphorylation of tegument protein VP8 plays a critical role in the cellular localization of VP8 and its effect on the lipid metabolism of bovine herpesvirus 1-infected cells. J Virol 93. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02151-18

Duo in a Mystical Realm—Nuclear Lipid Droplets and the Inner Nuclear Membrane

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Nuclear LDs in Liver Cells

Early Studies

Mechanisms Underlying Nuclear LD Formation in Hepatocytes

Involvement of INM in Nuclear LD Formation in Hepatocyte

Nuclear LDs in Other Mammalian Cell Types

Nuclear LDs in Budding Yeast

Nuclear LDs in Seipin-Deficient Yeast

Nuclear LD Formation in the INM

Function of Nuclear LDs

Regulation of Phospholipid Synthesis

Other Possible Functions

Concluding Remarks

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References