This study was conducted to examine how first-year engineering students conceptualize the Entrepreneurial Mindset (EM) and how that conceptualization changes over the course of their first semester of college, using the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN)’s 3Cs as a starting point. Students enrolled in an introductory, multidisciplinary design course responded to biweekly reflection prompts on their educational experiences (either in high school or as a first-year college student) and related this experience to one of the 3Cs of EM: Curiosity, Connections, or Creating Value. Results indicate that students’ conceptualization of the 3Cs often align with definitions of EM from KEEN, as well as foundational works in the entrepreneurship field, and that their interpretation of each of the 3Cs does change during their first semester in college. For instance, students were less likely to write about curiosity and more likely to write about creating value at the end of the semester compared to the beginning.
AllenM. (2017). Intercoder reliability techniques: Percent agreement. In The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483381411.n260
2.
Bell-HuffC.FernandezT.MorganK.BenkeserP.LeDouxJ. (2020, September 8). A vertically integrated portfolio process to foster entrepreneurial mindset within an undergraduate biomedical engineering curriculum. ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2–34081
3.
BerlyneD. E. (1954). A theory of human curiosity. British Journal of Psychology (London, England : 1953), 45(3), 180–191.
BlakeyS.McFadyenJ. (2015). Curiosity over conformity: the maker’s palette – A case for hands-on learning. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 14(2), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1386/adch.14.2.131_1
6.
BodnarC. A.ClarkR. M.Besterfield-SacreM. (2015). Lessons learned through sequential offerings of an innovation and entrepreneurship boot camp for sophomore engineering students. The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, 6(1), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.7814/jeenv6p5
7.
BosmanL. (2019). From doing to thinking: Developing the entrepreneurial mindset through scaffold assignments and self-regulated learning reflection. Open Education Studies, 1(1), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0007
8.
BosmanL.FernhaberS. (2018). Applying authentic learning through cultivation of the entrepreneurial mindset in the engineering classroom. Education Sciences, 9(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9010007
CarberryA. R.HardingT. S.CunninghamP. J.CsavinaK. R.AusmanM. C.LauD. (2018, June). Professional and personal use of reflection by engineering faculty, students, and practitioners. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2–30896
ChickeringA. W.GamsonZ. F. (1987). Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. American Association for Higher Education, March, 3–7. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED417056
13.
ClarkeV.BraunV. (2013). Teaching thematic analysis: Over-coming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The Psychologist, 26(2013), 120–123. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/16706434.pdf
CuiJ.SunJ.BellR. (2021). The impact of entrepreneurship education on the entrepreneurial mindset of college students in China: the mediating role of inspiration and the role of educational attributes. International Journal of Management Education, 19(1), 100296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.04.001
16.
DanielA. D. (2016). Fostering an entrepreneurial mindset by using a design thinking approach in entrepreneurship education. Industry and Higher Education, 30(3), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422216653195
DruckerP. F. (1984). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. Harper Business.
19.
Duval-CouetilN.Reed-RhoadsT.HaghighiS. (2012). Engineering students and entrepreneurship education: Involvement, attitudes and outcomes. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(2), 425–435.
20.
EdelmanL. F.ManolovaT. S.BrushC. G. (2008). Entrepreneurship education: Correspondence between practices of nascent entrepreneurs and textbook prescriptions for success. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(1), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2008.31413862
21.
EstellJ. K.ReepingD.SappH. (2016, June). Curiosity, connection, creating value: Improving service learning by applying the entrepreneurial mindset. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.26621
22.
Fraley, M., Raber, M., & Hein, G. L. (2018, July), Work-in-Progress – Entrepreneurial Mindset in First-Year Engineering Courses. Paper presented at 2018 FYEE Conference, Glassboro, New Jersey. https://www.jee.org/31436
23.
GorlewiczJ. L.JayaramS. (2020). Instilling curiosity, connections, and creating value in entrepreneurial minded engineering: Concepts for a course sequence in dynamics and controls. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 3(1), 60–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127419879469
24.
HaynieJ. M.ShepherdD.MosakowskiE.EarleyP. C. (2010). A situated metacognitive model of the entrepreneurial mindset. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(2), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.10.001
25.
Huang-SaadA.BodnarC.CarberryA. (2020). Examining current practice in engineering entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 3(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127419890828
26.
HuertaM.LondonJ.TrowbridgeA.Arévalo AvalosM.HuangW.McKennaA. (2017, June). Cultivating the entrepreneurial mindset through design: Insights from thematic analysis of first-year engineering students’ reflections.ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2–28093
27.
HyltonJ. B.MikesellD.YoderJ.-D.LeBlancH. (2020). Working to instill the entrepreneurial mindset across the curriculum. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 3(1), 86–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127419870266
28.
InkelasK. K.WeismanJ. L. (2003). Different by design: An examination of student outcomes among participants in three types of living-learning programs. Journal of College Student Development, 44(3), 335–368. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2003.0027
29.
JensenM. J.SchlegelJ. L. (2017, June). Implementing an entrepreneurial mindset design project in an introductory engineering course. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2–28480
30.
KashdanT. B.RoseP.FinchamF. D. (2004). Curiosity and exploration: Facilitating positive subjective experiences and personal growth opportunities. Journal of Personality Assessment , 82(3), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8203_05
KeeneE. O.ZimmermannS. (2007). Mosaic of thought: The power of comprehension strategy instruction. Heinemann.
33.
KlineW. A.MeltonD. (2018). Beyond problem solving to creating value: A priority for engineering educators. American Society for Engineering Education. https://peer.asee.org/29848%0A%0A
34.
LeMasneyC. A.ShusterH. M.MalloukK. (2020). First-year engineering students’ interpretation of curiosity in the entrepreneurial mindset through reflective practice. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2–34678
35.
LiguoriE.WinklerC.WinkelD.MarvelM. R.KeelsJ. K.van GelderenM.NoyesE. (2018). The entrepreneurship education imperative: Introducing EE&P.Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 1(1), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127417737290
36.
LondonJ. S.BekkiJ. M.BrunhaverS. R.CarberryA. R.MckennaA. F. (2018). A framework for entrepreneurial mindsets and behaviors in undergraduate engineering students: Operationalizing the Kern family foundation’s “3Cs.” In Advances in engineering education (Vol. 7, Issue 1). American Society for Engineering Education. http://advances.asee.org.http://engineeringunleashed
37.
Mallouk, K., Oestreich, B. D., Streiner, S., Dahm, K. D., & Bodnar, C. A. (2019, June), Fostering Curiosity, Creating Value, and Making Connections in First-Year Students Through Product Archaeology. Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--32857
McAlpineL.WestonC.BeauchampJ.WisemanC.BeauchampC. (1999). Building a metacognitive model of reflection. Higher Education, 37(2), 105–131. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003548425626
40.
McGrathR. G.MacMillanI. C. (2000). The entrepreneurial mindset: Strategies for continuously creating opportunity in an age of uncertainty. President and Fellows of Harvard College. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4845839
MilesM.HubermanM.SaldañaJ. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook: An expanded sourcebook. SAGE, p. 408.
43.
NeckH. M.CorbettA. C. (2018). The scholarship of teaching and learning entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 1(1), 8–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127417737286
44.
Oswald BeilerM. R. (2015). Integrating innovation and entrepreneurship principles into the civil engineering curriculum. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 141(3), 04014014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000233
45.
ParkC. (2017). A study on effect of entrepreneurship on entrepreneurial intention. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 11(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjie-08-2017-024
46.
PihieZ. A. L.BagheriA. (2011). Teachers’ and students’ entrepreneurial self-efficacy: Implication for effective teaching practices. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29(2011), 1071–1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.340
47.
PuscaD.NorthwoodD. O. (2018). Curiosity, creativity and engineering education. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 20(3), 152–158.
48.
Ramsden, P. (2003) Learning to Teach in Higher Education. Routledge Falmer.
49.
ReidK. J.FergusonD. M. (2011). Work in progress – Enhancing the entrepreneurial mindset of freshman engineers. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2011.6142734
50.
RodgersC. (1988). Defining reflection: Another look at john. Teachers College Record, 104(4), 416.
51.
RoyN.SchlosserF.PasekZ. (2020). Stimulating entrepreneurial interest in engineers through an experiential and multidisciplinary course collaboration. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 3(1), 14–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127419856602
52.
SchoonmakerM.GettensR.ValleeG. (2020). Building the entrepreneurial mindset through cross-functional innovation teams. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 3(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127419866429
53.
StreinerS.MalloukK. E.DahmK. D.OestreichB. D.BodnarC. A. (2020, June). Building toys for children by applying entrepreneurial-minded learning and universal design principles. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/172/papers/28692
WaltherJ.SochackaN. (2015, February). Qualifying qualitative research quality (the Q3 project): An interactive discourse around research quality in interpretive approaches to engineering education research. Proceedings – Frontiers in Education Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2014.7043988
56.
WangC. (2017, June). Teaching entrepreneurial mindset in a first-year introduction to engineering course. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2–28915
WheadonJ.Duval-CouetilN. (2016). Elements of entrepreneurially minded learning: KEEN white paper. The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, 7(3), 17–25.
59.
ZappeS. E.YoderJ. D.HyltonJ. B. (2018). Assessing curiosity in the engineering entrepreneurship context: Challenges and future research areas. Advances in Engineering Education, 7(1): 1–10.
60.
ZhangJ.PriceA. (2020). Developing the enterprise educators’ mindset to change the teaching methodology: The case of creating entrepreneurial outcomes (CEO) programme. Entrepreneurship Education, 3(3), 339–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41959-020-00037-1
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
