To better understand how neurodiversity (i.e., neurobiological/brain-related differences) is related to entrepreneurial cognition, this study draws on prior research from entrepreneurship and neuroscience to empirically examine the relationship between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and the entrepreneurial mindset. We examine differences between entrepreneurs with and without ADHD in cognitive style, entrepreneurial alertness, metacognition, and resource-induced coping heuristic (RICH). Our results suggest neurodiversity from ADHD is meaningfully related to aspects of an entrepreneurial mindset. Our results suggest entrepreneurs with ADHD employ a more intuitive cognitive style and demonstrate higher levels of entrepreneurial alertness and RICH, while no significant differences in metacognition were found.
AllinsonC. W.HayesJ. (1996). The cognitive style index: A measure of intuition-analysis for organizational research. Journal of Management Studies, 33, 119–135.
2.
AllinsonC. W.ChellE.HayesJ. (2000). Intuition and entrepreneurial behaviour. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9(1), 31–43.doi:10.1080/135943200398049
3.
AlvarezS. A.BarneyJ. B.AndersonP. (2013). Forming and exploiting opportunities: The implications of discovery and creation processes for entrepreneurial and organizational research. Organization Science, 24(1), 301–317.doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0727
4.
AlvessonM.SandbergJ. (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36, 247–271.
5.
AntshelK. M. (2018). Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(2), 243–265.doi:10.5465/amp.2016.0144
6.
ArdichviliA.CardozoR.RayS. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 105–123.doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00068-4
7.
ArdilaA. (2008). On the evolutionary origins of executive functions. Brain and Cognition, 68(1), 92–99.doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2008.03.003
8.
ArmstrongT. (2011). The power of Neurodiversity: Unleashing the advantages of your differently wired brain. Da Capo Lifelong Books.
9.
BaddeleyA. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829–839.doi:10.1038/nrn1201
10.
BarkleyR. A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 65–94.doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.65
11.
BarkleyR. A. (2011). Executive functioning and self-regulation: Integration, extended phenotype, and clinical implications. Guilford Press.
12.
BaronR. A. (2006). Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: How entrepreneurs “connect the dots” to identify new business opportunities. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(1), 104–119.doi:10.5465/amp.2006.19873412
13.
BaronR. A. (2004). The cognitive perspective: A valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship’s basic “why” questions. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 221–239.doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00008-9
14.
BaronR. A. (1998). Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: Why and when entrepreneurs think differently than other people. Journal of Business Venturing, 13(4), 275–294.
15.
BaronR. A.HmieleskiK. M.HenryR. A. (2012). Entrepreneurs’ dispositional positive affect: The potential benefits – and potential costs – of being “up”. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(3), 310–324.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.04.002
16.
BaucusD.BaucusM.MitchellR. K. (2014). Lessons from the neural foundation of entrepreneurial cognition: The case of emotion and motivation. InMitchellJ. R.MitchellR. K.Randolph-SengB. (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurial cognition (pp.254–315). Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.
17.
BeckerW. J.CropanzanoR.SanfeyA. G. (2011). Organizational neuroscience: Taking organizational theory inside the neural black box. Journal of Management, 37(4), 933–961.doi:10.1177/0149206311398955
18.
BönteW.ProcherV. D.UrbigD. (2016). Biology and selection into entrepreneurship-The relevance of prenatal testosterone exposure. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(5), 1121–1148.doi:10.1111/etap.12165
19.
BörgerN.MeereJvander.van der MeereJ. (2000). Visual behaviour of ADHD children during an attention test: An almost forgotten variable. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(4), 525–532.doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00637
20.
BrighamK. H.De CastroJ. O.ShepherdD. A. (2007). A person-organization fit model of owner-managers’ cognitive style and organizational demands. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(1), 29–51.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00162.x
21.
BrophyD. R. (2001). Comparing the attributes, activities, and performance of divergent, convergent, and combination thinkers. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3-4), 439–455.doi:10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_20
22.
BrownT. E. (2005). Attention deficit disorder: The unfocused mind in children and adults. Yale University Press.
23.
BrownT. E. (2006). Executive functions and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Implications of two conflicting views. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 53(1), 35–46.doi:10.1080/10349120500510024
24.
BrownT. E. (2009). ADD/ADHD and impaired executive function in clinical practice. Current Attention Disorders Reports, 1(1), 37–41.doi:10.1007/s12618-009-0006-3
25.
BrownT. E. (2013). A new understanding of ADHD in children and adults: Executive function impairment. Routledge.
26.
BusenitzL. W.BarneyJ. B. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1), 9–30.doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(96)00003-1
27.
CacioppoJ. T.BerntsonG. C. (1999). The affect system: Architecture and operating characteristics. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(5), 133–137.
28.
CampbellD. T.FiskeD. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105.doi:10.1037/h0046016
29.
CoteJ. A.BuckleyM. R. (1987). Estimating trait, method, and error variance: Generalizing across 70 construct validation studies. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(3), 315–318.doi:10.1177/002224378702400308
30.
DimicN.OrlovV. (2014). Entrepreneurial tendencies among people with ADHD. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 13(3), 187–204.
31.
FlavellJ. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
32.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.doi:10.1177/002224378101800104
33.
GaglioC. M.KatzJ. A. (2001). The psychological basis of opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial alertness. Small Business Economics, 16(2), 95–111.doi:10.1023/A:1011132102464
GilbertS. J.BurgessP. W. (2008). Executive function. Current Biology, 18(3), R110–R114.doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.12.014
36.
GiliadB.KaishS.RonenJ. (1988). The entrepreneurial way with information. InMaitalS. (Ed.), Applied behavioral economics (Vol. 2, pp.481–503). Wheatsheaf Books.
37.
GrégoireD. A.CorbettA. C.McMullenJ. S. (2011). The cognitive perspective in entrepreneurship: An agenda for future research. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1443–1477.doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00922.x
38.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.RabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
39.
HaynieJ. M.ShepherdD. A.PatzeltH. (2012). Cognitive adaptability and an entrepreneurial task: The role of metacognitive ability and feedback. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2), 237–265.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00410.x
40.
HaynieJ. M.ShepherdD.MosakowskiE.EarleyP. C. (2010). A situated metacognitive model of the entrepreneurial mindset. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(2), 217–229.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.10.001
41.
HaynieM.ShepherdD. A. (2009). A measure of adaptive cognition for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 695–714.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00322.x
42.
HobfollS. E. (2009). Social support: The movie. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(1), 93–101.doi:10.1177/0265407509105524
43.
HochbergY.TamhaneY. (1987). Multiple comparison procedures. John Wiley & Sons.
44.
HollandD.ShepherdD. A. (2013). Deciding to Persist: Adversity, values, and entrepreneurs’ decision policies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(2), 331–358.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00468.x
45.
IrelandR.HittM. A.SirmonD. G. (2003). A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management, 29(6), 963–989.doi:10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00086-2
46.
JaarsmaP.WelinS. (2012). Autism as a natural human variation: Reflections on the claims of the neurodiversity movement. Health Care Analysis, 20(1), 20–30.doi:10.1007/s10728-011-0169-9
47.
JacksonB.FarrugiaD. (1997). Diagnosis and treatment of adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Counseling & Development, 75(4), 312–319.doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.1997.tb02346.x
48.
KeppelG. (1993). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook. Pearson.
49.
HobfollS. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524.doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
50.
HenselerJ.RingleC. M.SarstedtM. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
51.
HobfollS. E.ShiromA. (2001). Conservation of resources theory: Applications to stress and management in the workplace. Public Administration and Public Policy, 87, 57–80.
52.
HobfollS. E.FreedyJ.LaneC.GellerP. (1990). Conservation of social resources: Social support resource theory. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7(4), 465–478.doi:10.1177/0265407590074004
53.
KesslerR. C.AdlerL.AmesM.DelmerO.FaraoneS.HiripiE. V. A.HowesM. J.JinR.SecnikK.SpencerT.UstunT. B.WaltersE. E. . .. (2005). The world Health organization adult ADHD self-report scale (ASRS): A short screening scale for use in the general population. Psychological Medicine, 35(2), 245–256.doi:10.1017/S0033291704002892
54.
KesslerR. C.AdlerL.BarkleyR.BiedermanJ.ConnersC. K.DemlerO.FaraoneS. V.GreenhillL. L.HowesM. J.SecnikK.SpencerT.UstunT. B.WaltersE. E.ZaslavskyA. M. (2006). The prevalence and correlates of adult ADHD in the United States: Results from the National comorbidity survey replication. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163(4), 716–723.doi:10.1176/ajp.2006.163.4.716
55.
KickulJ.GundryL. K.BarbosaS. D.WhitcanackL. (2009). Intuition versus analysis? testing differential models of cognitive style on Entrepreneurial self-efficacy and the new venture creation process. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(2), 439–453.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00298.x
56.
KirtonM. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(5), 622–629.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.61.5.622
57.
KirznerI. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. University of Chicago Press.
58.
KirznerI. M. (1979). Perception, Opportunity, and Profit. University of Chicago Press.
59.
KirznerI. M. (1999). Creativity and/or alertness: A reconsideration of the Schumpeterian entrepreneur. The Review of Austrian Economics, 11(1/2), 5–17.doi:10.1023/A:1007719905868
60.
KuhnT. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
61.
LanivichS. E. (2011). Use the rich: Development and validation of the resource-induced coping heuristic inventory for entrepreneurship. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 31(6), 225–239.
62.
LanivichS. E. (2015). The rich entrepreneur: Using conservation of resources theory in contexts of uncertainty. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(4), 863–894.doi:10.1111/etap.12082
63.
LernerD.VerheulI.ThurikR. (2018b). Entrepreneurship and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A large-scale study involving the clinical condition of ADHD. Small Business Economics, 50(1), 1–12.
64.
LernerD. A.HuntR. A.VerheulI. (2018a). Dueling Banjos: Harmony and discord between ADHD and entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(2), 266–286.doi:10.5465/amp.2016.0178
65.
LindellM. K.WhitneyD. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114–121.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114
66.
LynchD. (1986). Is the brain stuff still the right (or left) stuff’?Training and Development Journal, 40(2), 23–26.
67.
McGrathR. G.MacMillanI. C. (2000). The entrepreneurial mindset: Strategies for continuously creating opportunity in an age of uncertainty: Harvard Business Review.
68.
McMullenJ. S.ShepherdD. A. (2006). Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 132–152.doi:10.5465/amr.2006.19379628
69.
McMullenJ. S.WoodM. S.PalichL. (2014). Entrepreneurial cognition and social cognitive neuroscience. InMitchellJ. R.MitchellR. K.Randolph-SengB. (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurial cognition (pp.316–363). Edward Elgar.
70.
MelotA. -M. (1998). The relationship between metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive experiences: Acquisition and re-elaboration. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 13(1), 75–89.doi:10.1007/BF03172814
71.
MitchellR. K.BusenitzL. W.BirdB.Marie GaglioC.McMullenJ. S.MorseE. A.SmithJ. B. (2007). The central question in Entrepreneurial cognition research 2007. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(1), 1–27.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00161.x
72.
MurphyK.BarkleyR. A. (1996). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder adults: Comorbidities and adaptive impairments. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 37(6), 393–401.doi:10.1016/S0010-440X(96)90022-X
73.
MitchellR. K.BusenitzL.LantT.McDougallP. P.MorseE. A.SmithJ. B. (2004). The distinctive and inclusive domain of entrepreneurial cognition research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(6), 505–518.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00061.x
74.
MitchellR. K.BusenitzL.LantT.McDougallP. P.MorseE. A.SmithJ. B. (2002). Toward a theory of entrepreneurial cognition: Rethinking the people side of entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(2), 93–104.doi:10.1111/1540-8520.00001
75.
NadeauK. G. (2005). Career choices and workplace challenges for individuals with ADHD. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(5), 549–563.doi:10.1002/jclp.20119
NelsonT. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51(2), 102–116.doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.102
78.
NicolaouN.ShaneS. (2014). Biology, neuroscience, and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23(1), 98–100.doi:10.1177/1056492613485914
79.
NofalA.NicolaouN.SymeonidouN. (2017). Biology and entrepreneurship. InAhmetogluA.Chamooro-PremuzicT.KlingerB.KarciskyT. (Eds.), The wiley handbook of entrepreneurship (pp.257–272). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
80.
NormanD. A.ShalliceT. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour. InDavidsonR. J.SchwartzG. E.ShapiroD. E. (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation (pp.1–14). Plenum Press.
81.
NunallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed). McGraw-Hill.
82.
NicolaouN.ShaneS.AdiG.ManginoM.HarrisJ. (2011). A polymorphism associated with entrepreneurship: Evidence from dopamine receptor candidate genes. Small Business Economics, 36(2), 151–155.doi:10.1007/s11187-010-9308-1
83.
OlsonC. L. (1979). Practical considerations in choosing a MANOVA test statistic: A rejoinder to Stevens. Psychological Bulletin, 86(6), 1350–1352.doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.6.1350
84.
OosterlaanJ.ScheresA.SergeantJ. A. (2005). Which executive functioning deficits are associated with AD/HD, ODD/CD and comorbid AD/HD+ODD/CD?Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33(1), 69–85.doi:10.1007/s10802-005-0935-y
85.
OrtegaF. (2009). The cerebral subject and the challenge of neurodiversity. BioSocieties, 4(4), 425–445.doi:10.1017/S1745855209990287
86.
OteroT. M.BarkerL. A. (2014). The frontal lobes and executive functioning. InGoldsteinS.NaglieriJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of executive functioning (pp.29–44). Springer.
87.
PattersonR. E.EgglestonR. G. (2017). Intuitive cognition. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 11(1), 5–22.doi:10.1177/1555343416686476
88.
PattonE. (2009). When diagnosis does not always mean disability: The challenge of employees with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 24(3), 326–343.doi:10.1080/15555240903176161
89.
PhanP.WrightM. (2018). Advancing the science of human cognition and behavior. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(3), 287–289.doi:10.5465/amp.2018.0058
90.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. -Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
91.
QiuL.SuJ.NiY.BaiY.ZhangX.LiX.WanX. (2018). The neural system of metacognition accompanying decision-making in the prefrontal cortex. PLOS Biology, 16(4), e2004037.doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2004037
92.
Randolph-SengB.MitchellJ. R.MitchellR. K. (2014). Introduction: Historical context, present trends and future directions in entrepreneurial cognition research. InMitchellJ. R.MitchellR. K.Randolph-SengB. (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurial cognition (pp.1–60). Edward Elgar.
93.
RidderinkhofK. R.van den WildenbergW. P. M.SegalowitzS. J.CarterC. S. (2004). Neurocognitive mechanisms of cognitive control: The role of prefrontal cortex in action selection, response inhibition, performance monitoring, and reward-based learning. Brain and Cognition, 56(2), 129–140.doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2004.09.016
RoebersC. M. (2017). Executive function and metacognition: Towards a unifying framework of cognitive self-regulation. Developmental Review, 45, 31–51.doi:10.1016/j.dr.2017.04.001
96.
RoseS. A.FeldmanJ. F.JankowskiJ. J. (2003). The building blocks of cognition. The Journal of Pediatrics, 143(4), 54–61.doi:10.1067/S0022-3476(03)00402-5
97.
SchmeckR. R. (1988). Learning strategies and learning styles. Plenum Press.
98.
SchmidtA. M.FordJ. K. (2003). Learning within a learner control training environment: The interactive effects of goal orientation and metacognitive instruction on learning outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 56(2), 405–429.doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00156.x
99.
SchmitzT. W.Kawahara-BaccusT. N.JohnsonS. C. (2004). Metacognitive evaluation, self-relevance, and the right prefrontal cortex. NeuroImage, 22(2), 941–947.doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.02.018
100.
SchweizerT. S. (2006). The psychology of novelty-seeking, creativity and innovation: Neurocognitive aspects within a work-psychological perspective. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(2), 164–172.doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00383.x
101.
ShaneS. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship – The individual-opportunity nexus. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
102.
ShaneS.VenkataramanS. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.doi:10.5465/amr.2000.2791611
103.
SimmeringM. J.FullerC. M.RichardsonH. A.OcalY.AtincG. M. (2015). Marker variable choice, reporting, and interpretation in the detection of common method variance. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 473–511.doi:10.1177/1094428114560023
104.
SimonH. A. (1979). Rational decision making in business organizations. The American Economic Review, 69(4), 493–513.
105.
Sonuga-BarkeE. J. S. (2003). The dual pathway model of AD/HD: An elaboration of neuro-developmental characteristics. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 27(7), 593–604.doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2003.08.005
106.
Sonuga-BarkeE. J. (1994). On dysfunction and function in psychological theories of childhood disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35(5), 801–815.doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1994.tb02296.x
107.
Sonuga-BarkeE. J. S. (2002). Psychological heterogeneity in AD/HD; a dual pathway model of behavior and cognition. Behavioral Brain Research Journal, 130, 29–236.
108.
Sonuga-BarkeE. J. S.DalenL.DaleyD.RemingtonB. (2002). Are planning, working memory, and inhibition associated with individual differences in preschool ADHD symptoms?Developmental Neuropsychology, 21(3), 255–272.doi:10.1207/S15326942DN2103_3
109.
SingerJ. (1999). Why can’t you be normal for once in your life? From a “problem with no name” to the emergence of a new category of difference. InCorkerM.FrenchS. (Eds.), Disability discourse (pp.59–67). Open UP.
110.
StephanU. (2018). Entrepreneurs’ mental health and well-being: A review and research agenda. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(3), 290–322. doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0001
111.
TabachnichB. G.FidellL. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th Ed). Pearson Education.
112.
TangJ.KacmarK..BusenitzL. (2012). Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(1), 77–94.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.07.001
113.
TennantM. (1988). Psychology and adult learning. Routledge.
114.
ThurikR.KhedhaouriaA.TorrèsO.VerheulI. (2016). ADHD symptoms and entrepreneurial orientation of small firm owners. Applied Psychology, 65(3), 568–586.doi:10.1111/apps.12062
115.
Torney-PurtaJ. (1991). Schema theory and cognitive psychology: Implications for social studies. Theory & Research in Social Education, 19(2), 189–210.doi:10.1080/00933104.1991.10505636
116.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232.doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9
117.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
118.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323.doi:10.1007/BF00122574
119.
UrbanB. (2012). Applying a metacognitive perspective to entrepreneurship: Empirical evidence on the influence of metacognitive dimensions on entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 20(02), 203–225.doi:10.1142/S0218495812500094
120.
UyM. A.FooM. -D.SongZ. (2013). Joint effects of prior start-up experience and coping strategies on entrepreneurs’ psychological well-being. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(5), 583–597.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.04.003
121.
ValliereD. (2013). Towards a schematic theory of entrepreneurial alertness. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(3), 430–442.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.08.004
122.
VerheulI.BlockJ.Burmeister-LampK.ThurikR.TiemeierH.TurtureaR. (2015). ADHD-like behavior and entrepreneurial intentions. Small Business Economics, 45(1), 85–101.doi:10.1007/s11187-015-9642-4
123.
VerheulI.RietdijkW.BlockJ.FrankenI.LarssonH.ThurikR. (2016). The association between attention-deficit/hyperactivity (ADHD) symptoms and self-employment. European Journal of Epidemiology, 31(8), 793–801.doi:10.1007/s10654-016-0159-1
124.
VogelP. (2017). From venture idea to venture opportunity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6), 943–971.doi:10.1111/etap.12234
125.
WhiteH. A.ShahP. (2011). Creative style and achievement in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(5), 673–677.doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.015
126.
WiklundJ.YuW.PatzeltH. (2018). Impulsivity and Entrepreneurial action. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(3), 379–403.doi:10.5465/amp.2016.0177
127.
WiklundJ.PatzeltH.DimovD. (2016). Entrepreneurship and psychological disorders: How ADHD can be productively harnessed. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 6, 14–20.doi:10.1016/j.jbvi.2016.07.001
128.
WiklundJ.YuW.TuckerR.MarinoL. D. (2017). Adhd, impulsivity and entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(6), 627–656.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.07.002
129.
WiklundJ.HatakI.PatzeltH.ShepherdD. A. (2018). Mental disorders in the entrepreneurship context: When being different can be an advantage. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(2), 182–206.doi:10.5465/amp.2017.0063
130.
WitkinH. A.GoodenoughD. R. (1981). Cognitive styles: Essence and origins. International Universities Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
