This learning innovation offers the framework for a three-day extracurricular “Social Innovation Jam” workshop aimed at teaching design thinking to address sustainable development. As entrepreneurship educators incorporate the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals into their programs, the Social Innovation Jam can be replicated to provide local solutions to global problems using design thinking and “learning by teaching” pedagogy both in and out of the classroom.
AdamsR.JeanrenaudS.BessantJ.DenyerD.OveryP. (2016). Sustainabilty-oriented innovation. A systematic review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(2), 180–205.
2.
AllenV.FeldmanR. (1973). Learning through tutoring: Low-achieving children as tutors.The Journal of Experimental Education, 42(1), 1–5.
ApostolopoulosN.Al-DajaniH.HoltD.JonesP.NewberyR. (2018). Entrepreneurship and the sustainable development goals. Entrepreneurship and the Sustainable Development Goals (Contemporary Issues in Entrepreneurship Research, 8, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2040-724620180000008005
5.
BacqS.OfsteinL. F.KickulJ. R.GundryL. K. (2015). Bricolage in social entrepreneurship: How creative resource mobilization fosters greater social impact. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 16(4), 283–289.
6.
BahramiA.DagliC. (1993). Models of design process. In ParsaeiH.SullivanG. (Eds.), Concurrent engineering: Contemporary issues and modern design tools (pp. 113–126). Springer.
7.
BarghJ. A.SchulY. (1980). On to the cognitive effects of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(5), 593–604.
8.
BornsteinD. (2007). How to change the world: Social entrepreneurship and the power of new ideas. Oxford University Press.
9.
BrownT. (2008, June). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 1–10.
10.
BrundtlandG. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future. United Nations General Assembly document A/42/427.
11.
ChiM.SilerS.JeongH.YamauchiT.HausmannR. (2001). Learning from human tutoring.Cognitive Science, 25(4), 471–533.
12.
ChristensenC. M.BaumannH.RugglesR.SadtlerT. M. (2006). Disruptive innovation for social change. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 94–101.
13.
CohenP.KulikJ.KulikC. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 237–248.
14.
ColemanE. B.BrownA. L.RivkinI. D. (1997). The effect of instructional explanations on learning from scientific texts. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(4), 347–365.
15.
DacinP. A.DancinM. T.MatearM. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: Why We don't need a new theory and how We move forward from here. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 37–57.
16.
DenobleA. (2019, November 1). The future of entrepreneurship education: A global perspective [Introductory address]. North Carolina Entrepreneurship Educators Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
17.
DoradoS. (2006). Social entrepreneurship venture: Different values so different process of creation, no?Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 11(04), 319–343.
18.
EhlyS.KeithT. Z.BrattonB. (1987). The benefits of tutoring: An exploration of expectancy and outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 12(2), 131–134.
19.
FiorellaL.MayerR. E. (2013). The relative benefits of learning by teaching and teaching expectancy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(4), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.06.001.
20.
Ginsburg-BlockM.FantuzzoJ. (1997). Reciprocal peer tutoring: an analysis of “teacher” and “student” interactions as a function of training and experience. School Psychology Quarterly, 12(2), 134–149.
GrecoA. D.JongG. (2017). Sustainable entrepreneurship: Definitions, themes and research gaps. Centre for Sustainable Entrepreneurship, University of Groningen. http://www.rug.nl/cf/pdfs/wps6_ angela.pdf
23.
GriffinM. M.GriffinB. W. (1998). An investigation of the effects of reciprocal peer-tutoring on achievement, test anxiety, and academic self-efficacy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23(3), 298–391.
KardosM. (2012). The relationship between entrepreneurship, innovation and sustainable development. Research on European Union countries. Procedia Economics and Finance, 3, 1030–1035.
26.
KickulJ.GundryL.MitraP.BerçotL. (2018). Designing with purpose: Advocating innovation, impact, sustainability, and scale in social entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 1(2), 205–221.
27.
KlewitzJ.HansenE. G. (2014). Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 57–75.
28.
LightP. (2008). The search for social entrepreneurship. Brookings Institute Press.
MairJ.MartiI. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36–44.
31.
MorganR.ToyT. (1970). Learning by teaching: a student-to-student compensatory tutoring program in a rural school system and its relevance to the educational cooperative. The Psychological Record, 20(2), 159–169.
32.
NeckM. H.NeckP. C.MurrayL. E. (2018). Entrepreneurship: The practice and mindset. Sage.
33.
PalinscarA. S.BrownA. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175.
34.
PizarroN. (2017). Aspiring entrepreneurs need an optimum-finding process. Entrepreneurship and Management, 18(BooK 2, part II), 279–291.
35.
PlessN. (2012). Social entrepreneurship in theory and practice: An introduction. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 317–320.
36.
RazzoukR.ShuteV. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important?Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348.
37.
RobinsonD. R.SchofieldJ. W.Steers-WentzellK. L. (2005). Peer and cross-age tutoring in math: Outcomes and their design implications. Educational Psychology Review, 17(4), 327–362.
38.
RohrbeckC.Ginsburg-BlockM.FantuzzoJ.MillerT. (2003). Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 240–257.
39.
RoscoeR. D.ChiM. T. H. (2007). Understanding tutor learning: knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors’ explanations and questions. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 534–574.
40.
SchalteggerS.BeckmannM.HockertsK. (2018). Collaborative entrepreneurship for sustainability. Creating solutions in light of the UN sustainable development goals. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 10(2), 131–152.
41.
SchindehutteM.MorrisM. H. (2016). The experiential learning portfolio and entrepreneurship education. In In M. H. Morris and E.W. Liguori (Eds.) Annals of entrepreneurship education and pedagogy – 2016 (pp. 161–175). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784719166
42.
SeelosC.MairJ. (2004). Social entrepreneurship: The contribution of individual entrepreneurs to sustainable development (IESE Business Working Paper No. 553). IESE.
43.
SeelosC.MairJ. (2005). Social entrepreneurship: Creating new business models to serve the poor. Business Horizons, 48(3), 241–246.
44.
ShortJ. C.MossT. W.LumpkinG. T. (2009). Research in social entrepreneurship: past contributions and future opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(2), 161–194.
45.
Shepherd, D. A., & Patzelt, H. (2011). The New Field of Sustainable Entrepreneurship: Studying Entrepreneurial Action Linking “What is to be Sustained” with “What is to be Developed.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 137–163.
46.
SimonA. (1967). The sciences of the artificial. The MIT Press.
47.
SimonA. (1982). Models of bounded rationality. The MIT Press.
48.
WebbN. M. (1982). Peer interaction and learning in cooperative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(5), 642–655.
49.
WynnD.ClarksonP. (2005). Models of design. In P. Clarkson & C. Eckert (Eds.), Design process improvement: A review of current practice (pp. 34–59). Springer.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
