In this paper, we explore the system-level challenges found in sustainability-focused education and consider how the intersections of design thinking and emerging technologies in augmented and virtual reality (AVR) can help address these. More specifically, we highlight the role of experiences across the design thinking process for generating novel solutions to the types of “wicked” problems with which students engage in sustainability education. We then use this as motivation, along with concepts from experiential learning and design thinking research, to develop a conceptual model in which AVR can integrate with more established instructional methods to help make sustainability-related challenges more salient, proximate, and tractable to students. Our conceptual model suggests that AVR holds promise for facilitating and democratizing access to the design thinking process for sustainability-related challenges, but that it is also not a standalone solution for enabling students to engage with such complex challenges.
AbdelhameedWA (2013) Virtual reality use in architectural design studios: A case of studying structure and construction. Procedia Computer Science25: 220–230.
2.
AndersonLEllwoodPColemanC (2017) The impactful academic: Relational management education as an intervention for impact. British Journal of Management28: 14–28.
3.
AndoneDFrydenbergM (2019) Creating virtual reality in a business and technology educational context. In: tom DieckMJungT (eds) Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality. Progress in IS. Cham: Springer, 147–159.
4.
AndrewsD (2015) The circular economy, design thinking and education for sustainability. Local Economy30(3): 305–315.
5.
AvelinoFRotmansJ (2011) A dynamic conceptualization of power for sustainability research. Journal of Cleaner Production19(8): 796–804.
6.
AvelinoFWittmayerJM (2016) Shifting power relations in sustainability transitions: A multi-actor perspective. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning18(5): 628–649.
7.
AzumaRT (1997) A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments6(4): 355–385.
8.
BainbridgeWS (2007) The scientific research potential of virtual worlds. Science317(5837): 472–476.
9.
BakerACJensenPJKolbDA (2005) Conversation as experiential learning. Management Learning36(4): 411–427.
10.
BansalPDesJardineMR (2014) Business sustainability: It is about time. Strategic Organization12(1): 70–78.
11.
BeckmanSLBarryM (2007) Innovation as a learning process: Embedding design thinking. California Management Review50(1): 25–56.
12.
BennisWGO’TooleJ (2005) How business schools lost their way. Harvard Business Review83: 96–104.
13.
BillinghurstMClarkALeeG (2015) A survey of augmented reality. Foundations and Trends in Human–Computer Interaction8(2–3): 73–272.
14.
BillinghurstMDuenserA (2012) Augmented reality in the classroom. Computer45(7): 56–63.
15.
BolandRCollopyF (2004) Managing as Designing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16.
BoniAWeingartLEvensonS (2009) Innovation in an academic setting: Designing and leading a business through market-focused, interdisciplinary teams. Academy of Management Learning & Education8: 407–417.
17.
BowerMHoweCMcCredieN, et al. (2014) Augmented reality in education–cases, places and potentials. Educational Media International51(1): 1–15.
18.
BradburyH (2003) Sustaining inner and outer worlds: A whole-systems approach to developing sustainable business practices in management. Journal of Management Education27: 172–187.
BrownT (2008) Design thinking. Harvard Business Review86: 84–92.
21.
BuchananR (1992) Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues8(2): 5–21.
22.
BuhlASchmidt-KeilichMMusterV, et al. (2019) Design thinking for sustainability: Why and how design thinking can foster sustainability-oriented innovation development. Journal of Cleaner Production231: 1248–1257.
23.
ByrgeCTangC (2015) Embodied creativity training: Effects on creative self-efficacy and creative production. Thinking Skills and Creativity16: 51–61.
24.
CarenzoLBarraFLIngrassiaPL, et al. (2015) Disaster medicine through Google glass. European Journal of Emergency Medicine22(3): 222–225.
25.
ChengKHTsaiCC (2013) Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: Suggestions for future research. Journal of Science Education and Technology22(4): 449–462.
26.
ChertowMR (2007) “Uncovering” industrial symbiosis. Journal of Industrial Ecology11(1): 11–30.
27.
CleggSRRoss-SmithA (2003) Revising the boundaries: Management education and learning in a postpositivist world. Academy of Management Learning & Education2(1): 85–98.
28.
ClinebellSKClinebellJM (2008) The tension in business education between academic rigor and real-world relevance: The role of executive professors. Academy of Management Learning & Education7: 99–107.
29.
DedeC (2009) Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science323(5910): 66–69.
30.
DelmasMABurbanoVC (2011) The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review54(1): 64–87.
31.
DichevaDDichevCAgreG, et al. (2015) Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society18(3): 75–88.
32.
DorstK (2011) The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies32: 521–532.
33.
DorstKCrossN (2001) Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem–solution. Design Studies22(5): 425–437.
34.
DunneDMartinR (2006) Design thinking and how it will change management education: An interview and discussion. Academy of Management Learning & Education5(4): 512–523.
35.
EarleAGMerendaMJSedamMC, et al. (2020) Lean collaboration on campus? A social network and bricolage approach. Advances in Engineering Education8(1): 1–14.
36.
ElsbachKDStiglianiI (2018) Design thinking and organizational culture: A review and framework for future research. Journal of Management44(6): 2274–2306.
37.
FernandezM (2017) Augmented-virtual reality: How to improve education systems. Higher Learning Research Communications7(1): 3.
38.
FreemanREDunhamLFairchildG, et al. (2015) Leveraging the creative arts in business ethics teaching. Journal of Business Ethics131(3): 519–526.
39.
GeissdoerferMBockenNMHultinkEJ (2016) Design thinking to enhance the sustainable business modelling process—A workshop based on a value mapping process. Journal of Cleaner Production135: 1218–1232.
40.
GlenRSuciuCBaughnC (2014) The need for design thinking in business schools. Academy of Management Learning & Education13(4): 653–667.
41.
GordonNBrayshawMGreyS (2013) Maximising gain for minimal pain: Utilising natural game mechanics. Innovations in Teaching & Learning in Information and Computer Sciences12(1): 27–38.
42.
GruberMDe LeonNGeorgeG, et al. (2015) Managing by design. Academy of Management Journal58(1): 1–7.
43.
GülLFGuNWilliamsA (2008) Virtual worlds as a constructivist learning platform: Evaluations of 3D virtual worlds on design teaching and learning. Journal of Information Technology in Construction13(36): 578–593.
44.
HaningtonBMartinB (2012) Universal Methods of Design: 100 Ways to Research Complex Problems, Develop Innovative Ideas, and Design Effective Solutions. Beverly, MA: Rockport Publishers.
45.
HartSL (1995) A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review20(4): 986–1014.
HorbachJ (2008) Determinants of environmental innovation: New evidence from German panel data sources. Research Policy37: 163–173.
48.
HorbachJRammerCRenningsK (2012) Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact: The role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecological Economics78: 112–122.
49.
HowarthRWIngraffeaAEngelderT (2011) Should fracking stop?Nature477(7364): 271–275.
JacobsenNB (2006) Industrial symbiosis in Kalundborg, Denmark: A quantitative assessment of economic and environmental aspects. Journal of Industrial Ecology10(1–2): 239–255.
52.
JaggerSSialaHSloanD (2016) It’s all in the game: A 3D learning model for business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics137(2): 383–403.
53.
JosmanNBen-ChaimHMFriedrichS, et al. (2008) Effectiveness of virtual reality for teaching street-crossing skills to children and adolescents with autism. International Journal on Disability and Human Development7(1): 49–56.
54.
KayesDC (2002) Experiential learning and its critics: Preserving the role of experience in management learning and education. Academy of Management Learning & Education1(2): 137–149.
55.
KerawallaLLuckinRSeljeflotS, et al. (2006) “Making it real”: Exploring the potential of augmented reality for teaching primary school science. Virtual Reality10(3–4): 63–174.
56.
KirschnerPASwellerJClarkRE (2006) Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist41(2): 75–86.
57.
KoCHChangTCChenYH, et al. (2011) The application of augmented reality to design education. In International conference on technologies for E-learning and digital entertainment, September, pp.20–24. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
58.
KolbAYKolbDA (2005) Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education4(2): 193–212.
59.
KolbDA (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
60.
KolkoJ (2015) Design thinking comes of age. Harvard Business Review93(9): 66–71.
61.
LancioneMCleggSR (2015) The lightness of management learning. Management Learning46(3):280–298.
Leyva-de la HizDIHurtado-TorresNBermúdez-EdoM (2018) The heterogeneity of levels of green innovation by firms in international contexts: A study based on the home-country institutional profile. Organization & Environment32(4): 508–527.
64.
LiedtkaJ (2015) Perspective: Linking design thinking with innovation outcomes through cognitive bias reduction. Journal of Product Innovation Management32(6): 925–938.
65.
LuchsMGGriffinASwanS (2015) Design Thinking: New Product Development Essentials from the PDMA. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
66.
MarescauxJClémentJMTassettiV, et al. (1998) Virtual reality applied to hepatic surgery simulation: The next revolution. Annals of Surgery228(5): 627.
67.
MartinR (2009) The Design of Business: Why Design Thinking Is the Next Competitive Advantage. Cambridge: Harvard Business Press.
68.
MintzbergH (2004) Managers, Not MBAs: A Hard Look at the Soft Practice of Managing and Management Development. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
69.
MontielIAntolin-LopezRGalloP (2017) Emotions and sustainability: A literary genre-based framework for environmental sustainability management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education17(2): 155–183.
70.
NaumesWNaumesMJ (2014) The Art and Craft of Case Writing. New York, NY: Routledge.
71.
Painter-MorlandMSabetEMolthan-HillP, et al. (2016) Beyond the curriculum: Integrating sustainability into business schools. Journal of Business Ethics139(4): 737–754.
72.
RandsGP (2009) A principle-attribute matrix for environmentally sustainable management education and its application: The case for change-oriented service-learning projects. Journal of Management Education33(3): 296–322.
73.
ReynoldsM (2009) Wild frontiers—Reflections on experiential learning. Management Learning40(4):387–392.
74.
RiesE (2011) The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses. New York: Crown Books.
75.
RittelHWWebberMM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences4(2): 155–169.
76.
RobertsJ (2008) From experience to neo-experiential education: Variations on a theme. Journal of Experiential Education31(1): 19–35.
77.
RommeAGL (2003) Learning outcomes of microworlds for management education. Management Learning34(1): 51–61.
78.
RoozenburgNFEekelsJ (1995) Product Design: Fundamentals and Methods, vol. 2. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
79.
RusinkoCA (2010) Integrating sustainability in management and business education: A matrix approach. Academy of Management Learning & Education9(3): 507–519.
SchönDA (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
82.
SchumacherTMayerS (2018) Preparing managers for turbulent contexts: Teaching the principles of design thinking. Journal of Management Education42(4): 496–523.
83.
ShapiraHKetchieANeheM (2017) The integration of design thinking and strategic sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production140: 277–287.
84.
SharmaSHartSL (2014) Beyond “saddle bag” sustainability for business education. Organization & Environment27(1): 10–15.
85.
ShephardK (2008) Higher education for sustainability: Seeking affective learning outcomes. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education9(1): 87–98.
86.
ShrivastavaP (2010) Pedagogy of passion for sustainability. Academy of Management Learning & Education9(3): 443–455.
87.
SimõesJRedondoRDVilasAF (2013) A social gamification framework for a K-6 learning platform. Computers in Human Behavior29(2): 345–353.
88.
SpiegelJS (2018) The ethics of virtual reality technology: Social hazards and public policy recommendations. Science and Engineering Ethics24(5): 1537–1550.
89.
StarikMRandsGMarcusAA, et al. (2010) From the guest editors: In search of sustainability in management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education9(3): 377–383.
90.
StarkeyKTempestS (2009) The winter of our discontent: The design challenge for business schools. Academy of Management Learning & Education8(4): 576–586.
TomkinsLUlusE (2016) ‘Oh, was that “experiential learning”?!’ Spaces, synergies and surprises with Kolb’s learning cycle. Management Learning47(2): 158–178.
93.
United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) (2019) New #CleanSeas augmented reality experience merges the real world and the virtual. United Nations, 4November.
94.
Van GelderJLNeeCOtteM, et al. (2017) Virtual burglary: Exploring the potential of virtual reality to study burglary in action. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency54(1): 29–62.
95.
VerhulstELambrechtsW (2015) Fostering the incorporation of sustainable development in higher education. Lessons learned from a change management perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production106: 189–204.
96.
WarnerKTimmeWLowellB, et al. (2013) Oceana Study Reveals Seafood Fraud Nationwide. Washington, DC: Oceana, 1–69.
97.
WastellD (2014) Archarios: A dialogue between Socrates and a novice manager on the relevance of design to management practice and education. Academy of Management Learning & Education13(4): 641–652.
98.
WickensCD (1992) Virtual reality and education. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 18–21October, pp. 842–847. Chicago, IL, New York: IEEE.
99.
WrigleyCStrakerK (2017) Design thinking pedagogy: The educational design ladder. Innovations in Education and Teaching International54(4): 374–385.
100.
YeeN (2014) The Proteus Paradox: How Online Games and Virtual Worlds Change Us—And How They Don’t. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
101.
ZottCAmitR (2010) Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning43(2–3): 216–226.
