Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-1
Building Capacity for Creativity: Rediscovering the Inner “Superhero” as a Mechanism for Developing a Creative Mindset for Entrepreneurial Problem-Solving
This article delivers a series of activities which help participants to examine and stimulate their capacity for creativity to support entrepreneurial problem-solving. It provides a series of tools which enable entrepreneurship educators to support their students in a review, immersion and reflection of their creative capacity using the concept of childhood play, and specifically the superhero, to stimulate their imagination. Inspired by the creative mindset often found in young children, these activities help to build creative self-efficacy, challenging participants to exercise curiosity to go beyond their current resource limitations to solve problems by immersing them within a positive childhood experience. While students explore the concept of creativity and its fundamental role for entrepreneurial problem-solving, the workshop activity helps them to embody their own “superhero” and revisit their unconstrained, imaginative 5 year old selves through the use of pictures, costumes, masks, and icons. Finally, in reflecting upon the activities and acknowledging their own personal capacity for developing a creative process, participants are encouraged to use these skills for problem-solving both within the exercises of the class and throughout their entrepreneurial journey.
AdderleyS. (2019). Is it a bird? The social entrepreneurial superhero: Fact or fiction? In McAdamM.CunninghamJ. (Eds.), Entrepreneurial behaviour (pp. 283–315).
Palgrave Macmillan.
2.
AmabileT. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In StawB. M.CummingsL. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 123–167).
JAI Press.
3.
BeghettoR. A. (2006).
Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal,
18(4), 447–457.
4.
BerglundH.WennbergK. (2006).
Creativity among entrepreneurship students: Comparing engineering and business education. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning,
16(5), 366–379.
5.
BobircaA.DraghiciA. (2011).
Creativity and economic development. International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering,
5(11), 887–892.
6.
BoudD.KeoghR.WalkerD. (1985). What is reflection in learning? In BoudD.KeoghR.WalkerD. (Eds.), Reflection: Turning experience into learning (pp. 7–17).
Routledge Falmer.
7.
CarayannisE.EvansD.HansonM. (2003).
A cross-cultural earning strategy for entrepreneurship education: Outline of key concepts and lessons learned from a comparative study of entrepreneurship students in France and the US. Technovation,
23(9), 757–771.
8.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. HarperCollins.
9.
DanskyJ. L. (1980).
Make-believe: A mediator of the relationship between play and associative fluency. Child Development,
51, 576–79.
10.
Di Christina, M., Houtz, J., Cameron, J., House, J., & Epstein, R. (2008). Let your creativity soar. Scientific American Mind, 19(3), 24–31.
11.
DuxburyT. (2012).
Creativity: Linking theory and practice for entrepreneurs.Technology Innovation Management Review,
2(8), 10–15.
12.
Edwards-SchachterM.Garcia-GraneroA.Sanchez-BarrioluengoM.Quesada-PinedaH.AmaraN. (2015).
Disentangling competences: Interrelationships on creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship.Thinking Skills and Creativity,
16, 27–39.
13.
EganK. (2005). An imaginative approach to teaching.
Jossey-Bass.
14.
EllisS.CaretteB.AnseelF.LievensF. (2014).
Systematic reflection: Implications for learning from failures and successes. Current Directions in Psychological Science,
23(1), 67–72.
15.
FeistG. J. (1998).
A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review,
2(4), 290–309.
16.
GartnerW. B. (1988).
‘Who is an entrepreneur? Is the wrong question’. American Journal of Small Business,
2(4), 11–28.
17.
GeorgeJ. M.ZhouJ. (2001).
When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach.Journal of Applied Psychology,
86(3), 513–524.
18.
GirouxH.SchmidtM. (2004).
Closing the achievement gap: A metaphor for children left behind. Journal of Educational Change,
5, 213–228.
19.
GreenK. (2014).
Creative-thinking exercises for entrepreneurship class. Journal of Business Cases and Applications,
12, 1–10.
GundryL.Ofstein, L.KickulJ. (2014).
Seeing around corners: How creativity skills in entrepreneurship education influence innovation in business. International Journal of Management Education,
12(3), 529–538.
22.
HirskyK. (1999).
Entrepreneurial metaphors and concepts: An exploratory study. International Small Business Journal,
18(1), 13–34.
23.
JamesK.DrownD. (2012). Organizations and creativity: Trends in research, status of education and practice, agenda for the future. In M. D. Mumford (Eds.). Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 17–38). Elsevier.
24.
KimK. H. (2011).
The creativity crisis: The decrease in creative thinking scores on the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Creativity Research Journal,
23(4), 285–295.
25.
KolbD. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (Vol. 1).
Prentice-Hall.
26.
KostelnikM. J.WhirenA. P.SteinL. C. (1986).
Living with he-man: Managing superhero fantasy play. Young Children,
41(4), 3–9.
27.
McCraeR. R. (1987).
Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
52(6), 1258–1265.
28.
MumfordM.HesterK.RobledoI. (2012). Creativity in organizations: Importance and approaches. In M. Mumford (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp.3–16). Elsevier.
29.
NeckH.GreeneP. (2011).
Entrepreneurship education: Known worlds and new frontiers. Journal of Small Business Management,
49(1), 55–70.
30.
Peters, M (2009). Education, Creativity and the Economy of Passions: New Forms of Educational Capitalism. Thesis 11, 96(1) 40–63.
31.
PluckerJ.BeghettoR.DowG. (2004).
Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist,
39(2), 83–96.
32.
RuncoM. A. (1999). Developmental trends in creative abilities and potential. In RuncoM. A.PritzkerS. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 537–540).
Academic Press.
33.
RuncoM. A.AcarS. (2012).
Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal,
24(1), 66–75.
34.
RuncoM. A.CharlesR. (1995). Developmental trends in creativity. In RuncoM. A. (Ed.), Creativity research handbook (
Vol. 1, pp. 113–150).
Hampton.
35.
RussS. W.RobinsA. L.ChristianoB. A. (1999).
Pretend play: Longitudinal prediction of creativity and affect in fantasy in children. Creativity Research Journal,
12(2), 129–139.
TierneyP.FarmerS. M. (2002).
Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance.Academy of Management Journal,
45(6), 1137–1148.
43.
UnsworthK.CleggC. (2010).
Why do employees undertake creative actions?Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,
83, 77–99.
44.
VolanteL.JaafarS. B. (2010).
Assessment reform and the case for learning-focused accountability. The Journal of Educational Thought,
44(2), 167–188.
45.
VygotskyL. (1960). Imagination and its development in childhood. In VygotskyL. (Ed.), The development of higher mental function (pp. 327–362).
Izdatel’stvo Academii Pedagogicheskikh Nauk RSFSR.
46.
WeisbergR. W. (2006). Creativity: Understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts.
John Wiley & Sons Inc.
47.
WilliamsS. (2002).
Self-esteem and the self-censorship of creative ideas. Personnel Review,
31(4), 495–503.
48.
WilsonK. (2008). Entrepreneurship education in Europe. In PotterJ. (Ed.), Entrepreneurship and higher education (pp.1–20).
OECD.
49.
ZabelinaD. L.RobinsonM. D. (2010).
Child’s play: Facilitating the originality of creative output by a priming manipulation.Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts,
4(1), 57–65.
50.
ZhaoY. (2012).
Flunking innovation and creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan,
94, 56–61.
51.
ZhouJ. (1998).
Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: Interactive effects on creative performance.Journal of Applied Psychology,
83(2), 261–276.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
