Abstract
India's multi-billion-dollar Namami Gange program is simultaneously a celebrated river restoration success and an ecological failure. This study analyzes how the project's failure to restore ecological integrity nevertheless functions as a productive and stable system of governance. Using multi-sited ethnography, including interviews with state officials and external consultants, analysis of government documents, and event ethnographies at key water summits, this paper demonstrates that the program operates through a logic of maintained disrepair. This system is driven by two interdependent engines: a financial engine of ‘Accumulation by Restoration’ that turns pollution into de-risked, bankable assets for private investors and a political engine that manufactures public consent through a spectacle of repair by mobilizing sacred and nationalist sentiments. I argue that the program does not fail to clean the river but rather succeeds in its unstated goal: to maintain the river in a state of profitable, politically generative crisis. The concept of maintained disrepair offers a critical framework for understanding an emergent mode of governance that thrives not on resolving environmental crises, but on perpetually and profitably managing them.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
