Birding is a form of wildlife recreation that often involves exclusive communities and spaces, where both access and practice are policed along hegemonic lines. This paper examines the experiences of birders from marginalised communities who, through online networks, were able to challenge birding's historical hegemonies during the COVID-19 lockdowns and beyond. Our research participants were members of the Self-Isolating Bird Club (SIBC), a grassroots birding group founded on social media in 2020, which challenged preconceptions concerning both who wildlife was for and how it could be enjoyed. We contextualise the SIBC alongside other digitally-empowered wildlife communities and theorise these practices as ‘glitches’ in contemporary environmentalism. We present glitches as generative fissures that dissent, dismantle, and disorient the status quo, yet their impacts are generally understood to be fleeting and momentary. Engaging Legacy Russell's manifesto, Glitch Feminism, and recent geographical scholarship on the glitch's political atmospheres, this paper examines the conditions in which the fleeting impact of glitches can gain duration and engender lasting social change. Informed by affirmative, qualitative accounts of female-identifying members of the SIBC, we outline the participatory work through which the disruptive effects of glitches can endure and note their implications for wildlife recreation spaces like bird hides, parks, and nature reserves, which have historically made non-conforming bodies and marginalised people feel unwelcome or unsafe. Accounting for such duration, we develop work on glitches in digital geography and digital ecologies by conceptualising ‘glitch environmentalism’.
AmooreL (2020) Cloud Ethics: Algorithms and the Attributes of Ourselves and Others. Durham: Duke University Press.
4.
BaradKM (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
5.
BarlaJ (2021) Beyond reflexivity and representation: Diffraction as a methodological sensitivity in science studies. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory24(3): 444–466.
6.
BarryKSulimanS (2023) Imagining multispecies mobility justice. Australian Geographer54(4): 561–571.
BenjaminR (2019) Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Cambridge: Polity.
9.
BensonES (2020) Surroundings: A History of Environments and Environmentalisms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
BergsonH (1911) Creative Evolution. Translated by A. Mitchell. London: Macmillan.
11.
BergsonH (1946) The Creative Mind. New York: The Philosophical Library.
12.
BerlantL (2011) Cruel Optimism. Durham: Duke University Press.
13.
BerlantL (2016) The commons: Infrastructures for troubling times. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space34(3): 393–419.
14.
BerlantL (2022) On the Inconvenience of Other People. Durham: Duke University Press.
15.
BiehlJ (1999) Rethinking Ecofeminist Politics. London: South End Press.
16.
BissellDGorman-MurrayA (2019) Disoriented geographies: Undoing relations, encountering limits. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers44(4): 707–720.
17.
BondsAHolifieldR (2023) Birds, dogs, and racism: Conflicts over care in New York’s Central Park. Annals of the American Association of Geographers113(7): 1630–1638.
18.
BontaM (2010) Ornithophilia: Thoughts on geography in birding. Geographical Review100(2): 139–151.
19.
BookchinM (1980) Toward an Ecological Society. Montréal: Black Rose Books.
BrookeS (2020) Breaking Gender Code: Visibility, Power, and Gender in Creative Coding Cultures. PhD Thesis, University of Oxford.
23.
BroussardM (2024) More than a Glitch: Confronting Race, Gender, and Ability Bias in Tech. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
24.
BullardRD (1990) Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality. Boulder: Westview Press.
25.
ButlerJ (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
26.
Cashman-BrownO (2012) Birds of a Feather: The Whiteness of Birding. In: FalkofNCashman-BrownO (eds) On Whiteness. Leiden: Brill, 173–182.
27.
Clark-ParsonsR (2018) Building a digital Girl Army: The cultivation of feminist safe spaces online. New Media & Society20(6): 2125–2144.
28.
ConnellJ (2009) Birdwatching, twitching and tourism: Towards an Australian perspective. Australian Geographer40(2): 203–217.
29.
CooperC (2023) Better Living Through Birding: Notes from a Black Man in the Natural World. London: Random House.
30.
CooperCLarsonLDayerA, et al. (2015) Are wildlife recreationists conservationists? Linking hunting, birdwatching, and pro-environmental behavior. The Journal of Wildlife Management79: 446–457.
31.
CooperCSmithJ (2010) Gender patterns in bird-related recreation in the USA and UK. Ecology and Society15(4): 4.
32.
CraigM (2023) Birdgirl: Looking to the Skies in Search of a Better Future. London: Macmillan.
33.
CrononW (1996) The trouble with wilderness; Or, getting back to the wrong nature. Environmental History1(1): 7–28.
34.
DeanBP (2007) Natural history, romanticism, and Thoreau. In: LewisM (ed) American Wilderness: A New History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 73–90.
35.
DekeyserTLynchCR (2024) ‘Control and resistance in automated shops: Retail transparency, deep learning, and digital refusal’, Antipode.
36.
DeleuzeG (1986) Cinema 1: The Movement-Image. Translated by Tomlinson, H., and Habberjam, B.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
37.
DeleuzeG (1989) Cinema 2: The Time-Image. Translated by Tomlinson, H., and Galeta, R. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
38.
DeleuzeG (1991) Bergsonism. Translated by Tomlinson, H., and Habberjam, B.New York: Zone Books.
39.
DeleuzeGGuattariF (1987) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Continuum.
40.
DugganM (2017) Questioning “digital ethnography” in an era of ubiquitous computing. Geography Compass11(5): e12313.
41.
ElwoodS (2021) Digital geographies, feminist relationality, black and queer code studies: Thriving otherwise. Progress in Human Geography45(2): 209–228.
FinneyC (2014) Black Faces, White Spaces: Reimagining the Relationship of African Americans to the Great Outdoors. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
GiesekingJJ (2019) Digital. In: JazeelTKentAMcKittrickK, et al. (eds) Keywords in Radical Geography: Antipode at 50. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, 85–89.
49.
GreerKAGuelkeJK (2003) Intrepid naturalists and polite observers”: Gender and recreational birdwatching in southern Ontario, 1791–1886. Journal of Sport History30(3): 323–346.
50.
GregsonNRoseG (2000) Taking butler elsewhere: Performativities, spatialities and subjectivities. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18(4): 433–452.
51.
GuascoA (2022) On an ethic of not going there. The Geographical Journal188(4): 468–475.
52.
HalberstamJ (2011) The Queer Art of Failure. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
53.
HarawayD (1988) Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies14(3): 575–599.
54.
HarawayD (1997) Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. London: Routledge.
55.
HarcourtWArgüello CalleX (2022) Embodying cyberspace: Making the personal political in digital place. In: HarcourtW (ed) Feminist Methodologies, Gender, Development and Social Change. Cham: Springer, 83–112.
56.
JacobsNJ (2016) Birders of Africa: History of a Network. New Haven: Yale University Press.
57.
KellertSBerryJ (1987) Attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors toward wildlife as affected by gender. Wildlife Society Bulletin15(3): 363–371.
58.
KinkaidENelsonL (2020) On the subject of performativity: Judith Butler’s influence in geography. In Routledge Handbook of Gender and Feminist Geographies.
LonghurstR (2016) Mothering, digital media and emotional geographies in Hamilton, Aotearoa New Zealand. Social & Cultural Geography17(1): 120–139.
68.
LorimerJ (2008) Counting corncrakes: The affective science of the UK corncrake census. Social Studies of Science38(3): 377–405.
69.
MaalsenS (2023) Algorithmic epistemologies and methodologies: Algorithmic harm, algorithmic care and situated algorithmic knowledges. Progress in Human Geography47(2): 197–214.
70.
MasonSSinghL (2022) Reporting and discoverability of “Tweets” quoted in published scholarship: Current practice and ethical implications. Research Ethics18(2): 93–113.
71.
MassanariA (2017) #Gamergate and the fappening: How Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures. New Media & Society19(3): 329–346.
72.
MassumiB (2002) Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham: Duke University Press.
73.
McDowellL (1992) Doing gender: Feminism, feminists and research methods in human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers17(4): 399–416.
74.
McKittrickK (2006) Demonic grounds: Black women and the cartographies of struggle. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
75.
McKittrickK (2011) On plantations, prisons, and a black sense of place. Social & Cultural Geography12(8): 947–963.
76.
McLeanJ (2020) Changing Digital Geographies: Technologies, Environments and People. Cham: Springer.
77.
McLeanJMaalsenS (2013) Destroying the joint and dying of shame? A geography of revitalised feminism in social media and beyond. Geographical Research51(3): 243–256.
78.
McLeanJMaalsenSGrechA (2016) Learning about feminism in digital spaces: Online methodologies and participatory mapping. Australian Geographer47(2): 157–177.
79.
McLeanJMaalsenSGrechA (2017) Beyond the binaries: geographies of gender–technology relations. In: WarfB (ed) Handbook on Geographies of Technology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 36–49.
80.
McLeanJMaalsenSPrebbleS (2019) A feminist perspective on digital geographies: Activism, affect and emotion, and gendered human-technology relations in Australia. Gender, Place & Culture26(5): 740–761.
81.
McNielJNHarrisDAFondrenKM (2012) Women and the wild: Gender socialization in wilderness recreation advertising. Gender Issues29(1): 39–55.
82.
MeehanKGerganMDMollettS, et al. (2023) Unsettling race, nature, and environment in geography. Annals of the American Association of Geographers113(7): 1535–1542.
MontgomerieB (2019) The Nice Bird Club. History of Ornithology. Available at: https://amornithhistory.wordpress.com/2019/01/29/the-nice-bird-club/ [Accessed 25/06/2025].
89.
MooreRLScottDMooreA (2008) Gender-based differences in birdwatchers’ participation and commitment. Human Dimensions of Wildlife13(2): 89–101.
90.
MossS (2004) A Bird in the Bush: A Social History of Birdwatching. London: Aurum Press.
91.
MoultonAA (2023) Towards the arboreal side-effects of marronage: Black geographies and ecologies of the Jamaican forest. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space6(1): 3–23.
92.
MoultonAASaloI (2022) Black geographies and Black ecologies as insurgent ecocriticism. Environment and Society13(1): 156–174.
NagyKJohnsonPD (2013) Trash Animals. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
95.
NashC (2000) Performativity in practice: Some recent work in cultural geography. Progress in Human Geography24(4): 653–664.
96.
NashR (2014) Wilderness and the American Mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.
97.
NassarA (2023) Kites, billboards and bridges: Reading the city’s curfew through the glitch. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space41(4): 726–744.
98.
NelsonILHawkinsRGoviaL (2023) Feminist digital natures. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space6(3): 2096–2109.
99.
NewmanLDaleA (2013) Celebrating the mundane: Nature and the built environment. Environmental Values22(3): 401–413.
100.
NightingaleA (2006) The nature of gender: Work, gender, and environment. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space24(2): 165–185.
101.
NobleSU (2018) Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: NYU Press.
102.
PallettH (2022) Glitching computational urban subjects. Dialogues in Human Geography12(3): 397–400.
103.
PereraNOlanipekunO (2023) Outsiders: Reclaim Your Place in Nature. London: Octopus Publishing.
104.
PerryKCSealy-HugginsL (2023) Racial capitalism and climate justice: White redemptive power and the uneven geographies of eco-imperial crisis. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences145: 103772.
105.
PetriOGuidaM (eds) (2023) Winged Worlds: Common Spaces of Avian-Human Lives. London: Routledge.
106.
PulidoL (2015) Geographies of race and ethnicity I: White supremacy vs white privilege in environmental racism research. Progress in Human Geography39(6): 809–817.
107.
RandlerC (2021) Leaders inspiring the next generation of citizen scientists: An analysis of the predictors of leadership in birding. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution9: 727719.
108.
RandlerC (2023) Motivations for birdwatching: Support for a three-dimensional model. Human Dimensions of Wildlife28(1): 84–92.
109.
RandlerCTryjanowskiPJokimäkiJ, et al. (2020) SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19) pandemic lockdown influences nature-based recreational activity: The case of birders. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health17(19): 7310.
110.
RazaviNSAdeniyi-OgunyankinGBasuS, et al. (2022) Everyday urbanisms in the pandemic city: A feminist comparative study of the gendered experiences of COVID-19 in southern cities. Social & Cultural Geography24(3–4): 582–599.
111.
RoaneJT (2022) Black ecologies, subaquatic life, and the Jim Crow enclosure of the tidewater. Journal of Rural Studies94: 227–238.
112.
RocheleauDThomas-SlayterBWangariE (2020) Gender and environment. In: The Environment in Anthropology. New York: New York University Press, 34–40.
113.
Rodino-ColocinoM (2014) #Yesallwomen: Intersectional mobilization against sexual assault is radical (again). Feminist Media Studies14(6): 1113–1115.
114.
RoseG (1997) Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography21(3): 305–320.
115.
RoseG (2008) Using photographs as illustration in human geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education32(1): 151–160.
116.
RoseG (2017) Posthuman agency in the digitally mediated city: Exteriorization, individuation, reinvention. Annals of the American Association of Geographers107(4): 779–793.
SchaffnerS (2011) Binocular Vision: The Politics of Representation in Birdwatching Field Guides. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
125.
SchrepferSR (2005) Nature’s Altars: Mountains, Gender, and American Environmentalism. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
126.
ScottDThigpenJ (2003) Understanding the birder as tourist: Segmenting visitors to the Texas hummer /bird celebration. Human Dimensions of Wildlife8: 199–218.
ScottJC (1985) Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
130.
SearleA (2021) Hunting ghosts: On spectacles of spectrality and the trophy animal. Cultural Geographies28(3): 513–530.
131.
SearleATurnbullJAdamsWM (2023) The digital peregrine: A technonatural history of a cosmopolitan raptor. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers48(1): 195–212.
132.
SearleATurnbullJHartman DaviesO, et al. (2024) Glitches in the technonatural present. Dialogues in Human Geography14(2): 342–346.
133.
SearleATurnbullJLorimerJ (2021) After the anthropause: Lockdown lessons for more-than-human geographies. The Geographical Journal187(1): 69–77.
134.
SontagS (1977) On Photography. New York: Picador.
135.
SontiNFCampbellLKSvendsenES, et al. (2020) Fear and fascination: Use and perceptions of New York City’s forests, wetlands, and landscaped park areas. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening49: 126601.
136.
SultanaF (2021a) Climate change, COVID-19, and the co-production of injustices: A feminist Reading of overlapping crises. Social & Cultural Geography22(4): 447–460.
137.
SultanaF (2021b) Political ecology I: From margins to center. Progress in Human Geography45(1): 156–165.
138.
Tolia-KellyDP (2007) Fear in paradise: The affective registers of the English lake district landscape re-visited. The Senses and Society2(3): 329–351.
139.
TraisnelA (2020) Capture: American Pursuits and the Making of a New Animal Condition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
140.
TuckerFHortonJ (2019) The show must go on!” Fieldwork, mental health and wellbeing in geography, earth and environmental sciences. Area51(1): 84–93.
141.
TurkleS (2011) Alone Together. New York: Basic books.
142.
TurnbullJPlattBSearleA (2022) For a new weird geography. Progress in Human Geography46(5): 1207–1231.
143.
TurnbullJSearleAHartman DaviesO, et al. (2023a) Digital ecologies: Materialities, encounters, governance. Progress in Environmental Geography2(1–2): 3–32.
144.
TurnbullJSearleALorimerJ (2023b) Anthropause environmentalisms: Noticing natures with the self-isolating bird club. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers48(2): 232–248.
145.
VaidhyanathanS (2018) Antisocial Media: how Facebook Disconnects us and Undermines Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
146.
ValentineG (1989) The geography of women’s fear. Area21(4): 385–390.
147.
Vander KloetMA (2010) Cataloguing Wilderness: Whiteness, Masculinity and Responsible Citizenship in Canadian Outdoor Recreation Texts. PhD thesis. University of Toronto (Canada).
148.
VidonE (2016) The call of the wild: Power and ideology in the Adirondack Park. In: NepalSSaarinenJ (eds) Political Ecology and Tourism. New York: Routledge, 100–114.
WardePARobinLSörlinS (2018) The Environment: A History of the Idea. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
153.
WeatherbyTGVidonES (2018) Delegitimizing wilderness as the man cave: The role of social media in female wilderness empowerment. Tourist Studies18(3): 332–352.
WeidensaulS (2008) Of a Feather: A Brief History of American Birding. Orlando: Harvest Books.
156.
WeselyJKGaarderE (2004) The gendered “nature” of the urban outdoors: Women negotiating fear of violence. Gender & Society18(5): 645–663.
157.
WigginsA (2011) Ebirding: Technology adoption and the transformation of leisure into science. In: Proceedings of the 2011 iConference. Seattle: ACM, 798–799.
158.
WilliamsN (2016) Creative processes: From interventions in art to intervallic experiments through Bergson. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space48(8): 1549–1564.
159.
WilsonHF (2022) Seabirds in the city: Urban futures and fraught coexistence. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers47: 1137–1151.
160.
WoodsO (2021) Feminist geographies of online gaming. Digital Geography and Society2: 100015.
161.
WrightMO (1906) The Garden, You and I. St. Louis: Outlook Verlag.
162.
WrigleyC (2018) It’s a bird! it’s a plane! an aerial biopolitics for a multispecies sky. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space1(4): 712–734.
163.
YusoffK (2018) A Billion Black Anthropocenes or None. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
164.
ZarankinJ (2013) Birding vs birdwatching. Ontario Nature. Available at: https://ontarionature.org/birding-vs-birdwatching-blog/ [Accessed 25/06/2025].
