This paper examines the recent marketing and development of fish-inspired waste drones, designed to “take a bite out of water pollution” by collecting litter from urban waterways. Swimming in canals, rivers, and harbors from Florida to Hong Kong, AI-powered trash-eaters like the WasteShark and Jellyfish-Bot are posited as a solution to the plastic waste problem, modeling aquatic food chains through their marketing as animal-like drones. But are these cleaners truly a form of ecological AI, as their developers tell us, or is this vision of a new technospecies merely a means of skirting around the most pressing structural issues behind aquatic pollution? While much of the scholarship on autonomous technology has fixated on its implications for human labor, fewer have examined how AV infrastructures remediate ideas of environment. My approach, informed by multispecies ethnographies, queer ecologies, as well as work in environmental media studies, traces a throughline between the use of sterilized fish employees for weed management to the current crop of waste-eating fish-bots. In particular, I consider how imaginaries of hunger and waste resourcing frame ideas of environmental and multispecies relation. I ultimately argue that the biomimicry of waste drones serves as a form of circumventive remediation, extending existing paradigms of disposability and bottomhood while only superficially engaging with the social, technological, and natural entanglements of a refuse ecology.
AtteberyS (2020) Refuse Ecologies: Indigenous Posthumanism in Polluted Futures. PhD Dissertation, University of California Riverside.
2.
AukesD (2023) Interview with author. 24 May.
3.
BarandiaranXMorenoA (2008) Adaptivity: From metabolism to behavior. Adaptive Behavior16(5): 325–344..
4.
BeckettC (2020) Beyond remediation: Containing, confronting and caring for the giant mine monster. Environmental and Planning E: Nature and Space4(4): 1389–1412.
5.
BennetJ (2020) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
6.
BergA (2015) Waste streams and garbage publics in Los Angeles and Detroit. In: Global Garbage. New York: Routledge, 92–110.
7.
BoetzkesA (2016) Resource Systems, the Paradigm of Zero-Waste, and the Desire for Sustenance. Postmodern Culture26(2). https://muse.jhu.edu/article/635539.
8.
BolterJGrusinR (2000) Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
9.
BridleJ (2022) Ways of Being: Animals, Plants, Machines: The Search for a Planetary Intelligence. London: Penguin UK.
10.
CahillJL (2019) Zoological Surrealism: the Nonhuman Cinema of Jean Painlevé. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
DavisH (2022) Plastic Matter. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
17.
DeloughreyE (2019) Allegories of the Anthropocene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
18.
De WolffK (2017) Plastic naturecultures: Multispecies ethnography and the dangers of separating living from nonliving bodies. Body & Society23(3): 23–47.
19.
DouglasM (2003) Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. New York: Routledge.
20.
FishA (2024) Oceaning: Governing Marine Life with Drones. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
21.
Freshwater Asassins (1947) Directed by Jean Painlevé, France.
22.
GabrysJ (2013) Plastic and the work of the biodegradable. In: GabrysJHawkinsGMichaelM (eds) Accumulation: The Material Politics of Plastic. Abingdon: Routledge, 208–227.
23.
GaneshMI (2020) The ironies of autonomy. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications7(157): 1–110.
Gómez-BarrisM (2022) Submerged perspectives: The arts of land and water defense. In: Agathangelou AM, Killian KD (eds) Time, Climate Change, Global Racial Capitalism and Decolonial Planetary Ecologies. New York: Routledge, 46–55.
27.
HanL (2024) Deepwater Alchemy: Extractive Mediation and the Taming of the Seafloor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
28.
HarawayD (2016) Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
JohnsonPDII (2013) Fly-Fishing for carp as a deeper aesthetics. In: NagyKJohnsonPDII (eds) Trash Animals: How We Live with Nature’s Filthy, Feral, Invasive, and Unwanted Species. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 182–200.
MooreCJMooreSLLeecasterMK, et al. (2001) A comparison of plastic and plankton in the north pacific central gyre. Marine Pollution Bulletin42(12): 1297–1300.
45.
MoorheadB (2023) Interview with Author, 6 June.
46.
MuñozJE (2020) The Sense of Brown. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
47.
NguyenTH (2014) A View From the Bottom: Asian American Masculinity and Sexual Sepresentation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
TallBearK (2017) Beyond the life/non life binary: A feminist-indigenous Reading of cryopreservation, interspecies thinking, and the new materialisms. In: KowalERadinJ (eds) Cryopolitics: Frozen Life in a Melting World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 179–202.
59.
UretaSPatricioF (2022) Worlds of Gray and Green: Mineral Extraction as Ecological Practice. Berkeley: University of California Press.
WuKMJieyingZ (2019) Living with waste: Becoming ‘free’ as waste pickers in Chinese cities. China Perspectives2: 67–74.
66.
YoshidaSHiragaKTakehanaT, et al. (2016) A bacterium that degrades and assimilates poly(ethylene terephthalate). Science351(6278): 1196–1199.
67.
ZettlerERMincerTJAmaral-ZettlerLA (2013) Life in the “plastisphere”: Microbial communities on plastic marine debris. Environmental Science & Technology47(13): 7137–7146.
