The environmental dimension of antimicrobial resistance has expanded the scope and scale of policy concern and research interest in antimicrobial resistance to include not just clinical and agricultural settings but a wide variety of environmental spaces and places. This article examines the ways in which environmental scientists researching the environmental dimension of antimicrobial resistance produce culturally specific forms of environmental imaginaries as a means of stabilising complex, uneven and open-ended environmental, human and microbial relations. These imaginaries work to structure the gaze of scientific enquiry towards particular places, objects and scales, and justify particular decisions and practices over others. Drawing on the imaginaries literature from Science and Technology Studies and Cultural Geography, our analysis examines the spatial and temporal dimensions of environmental imaginaries. In doing so, we identify four imaginaries, the environmental hotspot, the pristine environment, the fluid environment and the environmental reservoir. These distinct but interconnected imaginaries produce a constellation of ideas and assumptions that shape scientific practices, the ways and places in which the environmental dimension of antimicrobial resistance becomes known, and the types of interventions and actions that are made apprehensible as a result. In opening these imaginaries to interrogation at this relatively formative stage, we aim to identify ways in which social science contributions can complement and enhance the ways in which the figure of ‘the environment’ is brought to bear on responses to antimicrobial resistance.
Amábile-CuevasCF (2016) Antibiotics and Antibiotic Resistance in the Environment.
London:
CRC Press.
2.
AndersonB (2010)
Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies. Progress in Human Geography34(6): 777–798.
3.
BegemannSPerkinsEVan HoyweghenI, et al. (2018)
How political cultures produce different antibiotic policies in agriculture: A historical comparative case study between the United Kingdom and Sweden.Sociologia Ruralis58(4): 765–785.
4.
Bengtsson-PalmeJHammarénRPalC, et al. (2016)
Elucidating selection processes for antibiotic resistance in sewage treatment plants using metagenomics.Science of the Total Environment572: 697–712.
5.
Bengtsson-PalmeJKristianssonELarssonDGJ (2017)
Environmental factors influencing the development and spread of antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiology Reviews42(1): 68–80.
6.
BrownHKellyAH (2014)
Material proximities and hotspots: Toward an anthropology of viral hemorrhagic fevers.Medical Anthropology Quarterly28(2): 280–303.
7.
BrownNNettletonS (2017)
‘There is worse to come’: The biopolitics of traumatism in antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The Sociological Review65(3): 493–508.
8.
CastoriadisC (1994) Radical imagination and the social instituting imaginary. In: GRobinsonJRundell (eds) Rethinking Imagination: Culture and Creativity.
London:
Routledge, pp.136–154.
9.
CastreeNBraunB (1998) The Construction of Nature and the Nature of Construction: Analytical and Political Tools for Building Survivable Futures.
London:
Routledge.
10.
CastreeNBraunB (2001) Social Nature: Theory, Practice, and Politics.
Oxford:
Blackwell Publishers.
11.
CaucciSKarkmanACacaceD, et al. (2016)
Seasonality of antibiotic prescriptions for outpatients and resistance genes in sewers and wastewater treatment plant outflow. FEMS Microbiology Ecology92(5): fiw060.
12.
ČermákLKopeckýJNovotnáJ, et al. (2008)
Bacterial communities of two contrasting soils reacted differently to lincomycin treatment. Applied Soil Ecology40(2): 348–358.
13.
ChandlerCIR (2019)
Current accounts of antimicrobial resistance: Stabilisation, individualisation and antibiotics as infrastructure. Palgrave Communications5(1): 53.
14.
CraddockSHinchliffeS (2015)
One world, one health? Social science engagements with the one health agenda.Social Science & Medicine129: 1–4.
15.
D’AlessioMDursoLMMillerDN, et al. (2019)
Environmental fate and microbial effects of monensin, lincomycin, and sulfamethazine residues in soil.Environmental Pollution246: 60–68.
16.
DanielsS (2011)
Geographical imagination. Boundary crossings. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers36: 182–187.
17.
DavisD (2011) Imperialism, orientalism, and the environment in the Middle East: History, policy, power, and practice. In: DDavisElBurke (eds) Environmental Imaginaries of the Middle East and North Africa.
Athens, GA:
Ohio University Press, pp.1–22.
18.
D’CostaVMMcGrannKMHughesDW, et al. (2006)
Sampling the antibiotic resistome.Science311(5759): 374–377.
19.
DingG-CRadlVSchloter-HaiB, et al. (2014)
Dynamics of soil bacterial communities in response to repeated application of manure containing sulfadiazine.PLoS One9(3): e92958.
20.
European Commission (2017) A European One Health Action Plan Against Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Available at; (accessed February 2020).
21.
World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Organisation for Animal Health (2016) Antimicrobial resistance: A manual for developing national action plans. Version 1. Geneva: World Health Organization.
22.
FlachC-FGenhedenMFickJ, et al. (2018)
A comprehensive screening of Escherichia coli isolates from Scandinavia’s largest sewage treatment plant indicates no selection for antibiotic resistance.Environmental Science & Technology52(19): 11419–11428.
23.
ForsbergKJReyesAWangB, et al. (2012)
The shared antibiotic resistome of soil bacteria and human pathogens.Science337(6098): 1107–1111.
24.
FortunKFortunM (2005)
Scientific imaginaries and ethical plateaus in contemporary U.S. toxicology. American Anthropologist107(1): 43–54.
25.
FortunKKnowlesSGChoiV, et al. (2016) Researching disaster from an STS perspective. In: Felt U, Fouché R, Miller CA, Smith-Doerr Let al. (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies.
Cambridge:
MIT Press, pp.1003–1028.
26.
GazeWHKroneSMLarssonDGJ, et al. (2013)
Influence of humans on evolution and mobilization of environmental antibiotic resistome. Emerging Infectious Diseases19(7): e120871.
27.
GillingsMRGazeWHPrudenA, et al. (2015)
Using the class 1 integron-integrase gene as a proxy for anthropogenic pollution.The ISME Journal9(6): 1269–1279.
28.
GiraudEHadley KershawEHelliwellR, et al. (2019)
Abundance in the Anthropocene. The Sociological Review67(2): 357–373.
29.
GothwalRShashidharT (2015)
Antibiotic pollution in the environment: A review. CLEAN – Soil, Air, Water43(4): 479–489.
30.
GraceD (2015) Review of evidence on antimicrobial resistance and animal agriculture in developing countries. Nairobi, Kenya: International Livestock Research Institute. Available at: DOI: 10.12774/eod_cr.june2015.graced (accessed February 2020).
31.
GreenfieldBKShakedSMarrsCF, et al. (2018)
Modeling the emergence of antibiotic resistance in the environment: An analytical solution for the minimum selection concentration. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy62(3): e01686–e01617.
32.
GrovesCHenwoodKShiraniF, et al. (2016)
The grit in the oyster: Using energy biographies to question socio-technical imaginaries of ‘smartness’. Journal of Responsible Innovation3(1): 4–25.
33.
Grove-WhiteRMacnaghtenPWynneB (2000) Wising up: The public and new technologies. Lancaster, UK: Centre for the Study of Environmental Change.
34.
GullbergECaoSBergOG, et al. (2011)
Selection of resistant bacteria at very low antibiotic concentrations.PLOS Pathogens7(7): e1002158.
35.
HarveyF (2019) Antibiotic resistance as big a threat as climate change – Chief medic. The Guardian, 29th April.
36.
HeuerHSchmittHSmallaK (2011)
Antibiotic resistance gene spread due to manure application on agricultural fields.Current Opinion in Microbiology14(3): 236–243.
37.
HinchliffeS (2015)
More than one world, more than one health: Re-configuring interspecies health.Social Science & Medicine129: 28–35.
38.
HollowayKA (2011)
Promoting the rational use of antibiotics. Regional Health Forum15(1): 122–130.
39.
HulscherMEJLGrolRPTMvan der MeerJWM (2010)
Antibiotic prescribing in hospitals: A social and behavioural scientific approach. The Lancet Infectious Diseases10(3): 167–175.
40.
JasanoffS (2015) Future imperfect: Science, technology and the imaginations of modernity. In: SJasanoffS-HKim (eds) Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power.
London:
The University of Chicago Press, pp.1–33.
41.
JasanoffSKimS-H (2009)
Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva47(2): 119.
42.
KamenshchikovaAWolffsPFGHoebeCJ, et al. (2018)
Complex narratives of health, stigma and control: Antimicrobial resistance screening among non-hospitalized refugees.Social Science & Medicine212: 43–49.
43.
KümmererK (2004)
Resistance in the environment.Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy54(2): 311–320.
44.
LandeckerH (2015)
Antibiotic resistance and the biology of history.Body & Society22(4): 19–52.
45.
LarsonBMHNerlichBWallisP (2005)
Metaphors and biorisks: The war on infectious diseases and invasive species. Science Communication26(3): 243–268.
46.
LarssonDGJAndremontABengtsson-PalmeJ, et al. (2018)
Critical knowledge gaps and research needs related to the environmental dimensions of antibiotic resistance.Environment International117: 132–138.
47.
LarssonDGJde PedroCPaxeusN (2007)
Effluent from drug manufactures contains extremely high levels of pharmaceuticals.Journal of Hazardous Materials148(3): 751–755.
48.
LeeNMotzkauJ (2012)
Varieties of biosocial imagination: Reframing responses to climate change and antibiotic resistance. Science, Technology, & Human Values38(4): 447–469.
49.
LiL-GYinXZhangT (2018)
Tracking antibiotic resistance gene pollution from different sources using machine-learning classification.Microbiome6(1): 93.
50.
LiboironMTironiMCalvilloN (2018)
Toxic politics: Acting in a permanently polluted world.Social Studies of Science48(3): 331–349.
51.
LittmannJViensAM (2015)
The ethical significance of antimicrobial resistance.Public Health Ethics8(3): 209–224.
52.
LorimerJ (2017)
Probiotic environmentalities: Rewilding with wolves and worms. Theory, Culture & Society34(4): 27–48.
53.
McGregorA (2004)
Sustainable development and ‘warm fuzzy feelings’: Discourse and nature within Australian environmental imaginaries. Geoforum35(5): 593–606.
54.
MacnaghtenPSzerszynskiB (2013)
Living the global social experiment: An analysis of public discourse on solar radiation management and its implications for governance. Global Environmental Change23(2): 465–474.
55.
McNeilMArribas-AyllonMHaranJ, et al. (2017) Conceptualizing imaginaries of science, technology and society. In: UFeltRFoucheCAMiller, et al. (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. 4th ed.
Cambridge:
MIT Press, pp.435–464.
56.
McNultyCAMBoylePNicholsT, et al. (2007)
Don’t wear me out – The public’s knowledge of and attitudes to antibiotic use.Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy59(4): 727–738.
57.
MartinLSimonS (2008)
A formula for disaster: The department of homeland security’s virtual ontology. Space and Polity12(3): 281–296.
58.
MartínezJL (2008)
Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in natural environments.Science321(5887): 365–367.
59.
MorrisCHelliwellRRamanS (2016)
Framing the agricultural use of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in UK national newspapers and the farming press. Journal of Rural Studies45: 43–53.
60.
MorrisCRamanSSeymourS (2019)
Openness to social science knowledges? The politics of disciplinary collaboration within the field of UK Food Security Research. Sociologia Ruralis59(1): 23–43.
61.
MurphyM (2006) Sick Building Syndrome and the Problem of Uncertainty: Environmental Politics, Technoscience, and Women Workers.
London:
Duke University Press.
62.
MurphyM (2013)
Distributed reproduction, chemical violence, and latency.The Scholar & Feminist Online11(3): 2.
63.
MuurinenJStedtfeldRKarkmanA, et al. (2017)
Influence of manure application on the environmental resistome under Finnish agricultural practice with restricted antibiotic use.Environmental Science & Technology51(11): 5989–5999.
64.
NerlichBJamesR (2008)
“The post-antibiotic apocalypse” and the “war on superbugs”: Catastrophe discourse in microbiology, its rhetorical form and political function.Public Understanding of Science18(5): 574–590.
65.
NixonR (2011) Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
66.
O’Neill J (2016) Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: Final report and recommendations. London: Review on Antimicrobial Resistance. Available at: https://amr-review.org/Publications.html. (accessed February 2020).
67.
PeetRWattsM (1996) Liberation ecology: Development, sustainability, and environments in a age of market triumphalism. In: RPeetMWatts (eds) Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements.
London:
Routledge, pp.1–45.
68.
PodolskyS (2015) The Antibiotic Era: Reform, Resistance, and the Pursuit of Rational Therapeutics.
Baltimore, MD:
Johns Hopkins University Press.
69.
PrudenALarssonDGJAmézquitaA, et al. (2013)
Management options for reducing the release of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes to the environment.Environmental Health Perspectives121(8): 878–885.
70.
Quintela-Baluja M, Abouelnaga M, Romalde J, et al. (2019) Spatial ecology of a wastewater network defines the antibiotic resistance genes in downstream receiving waters. Water Research 162: 347–357.
71.
RahubeTOMartiRScottA, et al. (2014)
Impact of fertilizing with raw or anaerobically digested sewage sludge on the abundance of antibiotic-resistant coliforms, antibiotic resistance genes, and pathogenic bacteria in soil and on vegetables at harvest.Applied and Environmental Microbiology80(22): 6898–6907.
72.
RheeJ (2018) The Robotic Imaginary: The Human and the Price of Dehumanized Labor.
Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press.
73.
Rosenblatt-Farrell N (2009)
The landscape of antibiotic resistance.Environmental Health Perspectives117(6): A244–A250.
74.
SalyersAAAmábile-CuevasCF (1997)
Why are antibiotic resistance genes so resistant to elimination?Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy41(11): 2321–2325.
75.
SingerACShawHRhodesV, et al. (2016)
Review of antimicrobial resistance in the environment and its relevance to environmental regulators.Frontiers in Microbiology7: 1728.
76.
SteffenWCrutzenPJMcNeillJR (2007)
The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature?Ambio36(8): 614–621.
WatkinsJ (2015)
Spatial imaginaries research in geography: Synergies, tension, and new directions. Geography Compass9(9): 508–522.
79.
WoolhouseMWardMvan BunnikB, et al. (2015)
Antimicrobial resistance in humans, livestock and the wider environment.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences370(1670): 20140083.
80.
WrightGD (2010)
Antibiotic resistance in the environment: A link to the clinic?Current Opinion in Microbiology13(5): 589–594.
81.
ZellwegerRMCarrique-MasJLimmathurotsakulD, et al. (2017)
A current perspective on antimicrobial resistance in Southeast Asia.Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy72(11): 2963–2972.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
