This introduction to the special collection explores how a revised or expanded understanding of ‘environmentality’ can further our analysis of the evermore complex terrain of environmental politics today. We offer an outline of the literature from which the discussion emerges and how the subsequent articles both engage with and depart from it. We describe the origin of the ‘green governmentality’ discussion following the rise of global sustainable development discourse. We then explain how this initial exploration was subsequently complicated by introduction of two further lines of investigation: (1) attention to the micropolitics of community-based natural resource management; and (2) extrapolation from this to describe the different forms of green governmentality within which such local practices are situated as well as the multiple scales at which environmental governance is exercised. Following this, we outline a range of critiques to which this burgeoning research has also been subject and the fruitful lines of future research to which they point. We finish by describing how the various contributions to this collection engage with different aspects of this multifaceted discussion as the basis for further engagement by other researchers in the years ahead.
AgrawalA (2005a) Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects.
Durham, NC:
Duke University Press.
2.
AgrawalA (2005b)
Environmentality: Community, intimate government, and the making of environmental subjects in Kumaon, India.Current Anthropology46(2): 161–190.
3.
AlatoutS (2013) Commentary: Water scarcity in late modernity. In: HarrisLMGoldinJASneddonC (eds) Contemporary Water Governance in the Global South.
London:
Routledge, pp.101–107.
4.
AsiyanbiAPOgarEAkintoyeOA (2019)
Complexities and surprises in local resistance to neoliberal conservation: Multiple environmentalities, technologies of the self and the poststructural geography of local engagement with REDD+. Political Geography69: 128–138.
5.
BiermannCAndersonRM (2017)
Conservation, biopolitics, and the governance of life and death. Geography Compass11(10): e12329.
6.
BoerH (2017)
Welfare environmentality and REDD+ incentives in Indonesia. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning19(6): 795–809.
7.
BrennerNPeckJTheodoreN (2010)
After neoliberalization?Globalizations7(3): 327–345.
8.
BrosiusJP (1999)
Analyses and interventions: Anthropological engagements with environmentalism. Current Anthropology40(3): 277–310.
9.
CepekML (2011)
Foucault in the forest: Questioning environmentality in Amazonia. American Ethnologist38(3): 501–515.
10.
Chambers J, Mejía MDA, Reátegui RR, et al. (2020) Why joint conservation and development projects often fail: An in-depth examination in the Peruvian Amazon. Environment and Planning: Nature and Space 3(2): 365–398.
11.
Clarke-SatherA (2017)
State power and domestic water provision in semi-arid Northwest China: Towards an aleatory political ecology. Political Geography58: 93–103.
12.
CollinsYA (2019)
Colonial residue: REDD+, territorialisation and the racialized subject in Guyana and Suriname. Geoforum106: 38–47.
13.
Collins YA (2020) How REDD+ governs: Multiple forest environmentalities in Guyana and Suriname. Environment and Planning: Nature and Space 3(2): 323–345.
14.
Cortes-VazquezJARuiz-BallesterosE (2018)
Practising nature: A phenomenological rethinking of environmentality in natural protected areas in Ecuador and Spain. Conservation and Society16(3): 232–242.
15.
Cullen A (2020) Transitional environmentality – Understanding uncertainty at the junctures of eco-logical production in Timor-Leste. Environment and Planning: Nature and Space 3(2): 423–441.
16.
DarierE (1996)
Environmental governmentality: The case of Canada’s green plan. Environmental Politics5(4): 585–606.
17.
DarierE (1999) Foucault and the environment. In: DarierE (ed) Discourses of the Environment.
Malden, PA:
Blackwell, pp.1–33.
18.
de CerteauM (1984) The Practice of Everyday Life. Translated by S. Rendall. Berkeley: University of California Press.
19.
EscobarA (1995) Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
20.
FayeP (2016) Adding scepticism about ‘environmentality’: Gender exclusion through a natural resources collectivization initiative in Dionewar, Senegal. In: BosePDijkHV (eds) Dryland Forests.
New York:
Springer International Publishing, pp.95−114.
21.
FergusonJ (2011)
Toward a left art of government: From ‘Foucauldian critique’ to Foucauldian politics. History of the Human Sciences24(4): 61–68.
22.
FletcherR (2010)
Neoliberal environmentality: Towards a poststructuralist political ecology of the conservation debate. Conservation and Society8(3): 171–181.
Fletcher R (2020) Diverse ecologies: Mapping complexity in environmental governance. Environment and Planning: Nature and Space 3(2): 481–502.
25.
ForsythTWalkerA (2014)
Hidden alliances: Rethinking environmentality and the politics of knowledge in Thailand’s campaign for community forestry. Conservation and Society12(4): 408–417.
26.
FoucaultM (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison.
New York:
Vintage.
27.
FoucaultM (1991) Governmentality. In: BurchellGGordonCMillerP (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality.
Hemel Hempstead:
Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 87--104.
28.
FoucaultM (2007) Security, Territory, Population.
New York:
Palgrave Macmillan.
29.
FoucaultM (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics.
New York:
Palgrave Macmillan.
30.
GabrysJ (2016) Program Earth: Environmental Sensing Technology and the Making of a Computational Planet.
Vol. 49.
Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press.
31.
Gibson-GrahamJK (2006) A Postcapitalist Politics.
Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press.
32.
HallerTAcciaioliGRistS (2016)
Constitutionality: Conditions for crafting local ownership of institution-building processes. Society & Natural Resources29(1): 68–87.
33.
HallerTBelskyJMRistS (eds) (2018) Human Ecology 46(1), special issue on “Constitutionality”.
34.
Hommes L, Boelens R, Bleeker S, et al. (2020) Water governmentalities: The shaping of hydrosocial territories, water transfers and rural -urban subjects in Latin America. Environment and Planning: Nature and Space 3(2): 399–422.
35.
JessopWBrannstromCPersonsN (2012)
‘We don’t take the pledge’: Environmentality and environmental scepticism at the epicenter of US wind energy development. Geoforum43: 851−863.
36.
LemkeT (2015)
New materialisms: Foucault and the ‘government of things.’ Theory, Culture & Society32(4): 3–25.
37.
LemkeT (2016) Foucault, Governmentality and Critique.
New York:
Routledge.
38.
Li TM (2007) The will to improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
39.
LorimerJ (2017)
Probiotic environmentalities: Rewilding with wolves and worms. Theory, Culture & Society34(4): 27–48.
40.
LukeTW (1995a) Sustainable development as a power/knowledge system: The problem of ‘governmentality’. In: Fischer F and Black M (eds) Greening Environmental Policy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.21–32.
41.
LukeTW (1995b)
On environmentality: Geo-power and eco-knowledge in the discourses of contemporary environmentalism. Cultural Critique31: 57–81.
42.
LukeT (1999a) Environmentality as green governmentality. In: DarierE (ed) Discourses of the Environment.
Oxford:
Blackwell Publishers, pp.121–151.
43.
LukeT (1999b) Eco-managerialism: Environmental studies as a power/knowledge formation. In: FisherFHajerMA (eds) Living with Nature: Environmental Politics as Cultural Discourse.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press, pp.101–120.
44.
Machaqueiro RR (2020) Environmentality by the United Nations Framework Convention for Climate Change: Neoliberal ethos and the production of environmental subjects in Acre and Mozambique. Environment and Planning: Nature and Space 3(2): 442–461.
45.
MacKinnon I (2020) Environmentality judiciously fired - Burning questions of forest conservation and subject transformation in the Himalayan foothills. Environment and Planning: Nature and Space 3(2): 462–480.
46.
Montes J (2020) Neoliberal environmentality in the land of Gross National Happiness. Environment and Planning: Nature and Space 3(2): 300–322.
47.
Nepomuceno Í, Affonso H, Fraser JA, et al. (2019) Counter-conducts and the green grab: Forest peoples' resistance to industrial resource extraction in the Saracá-Taquera National Forest, Brazilian Amazonia. Global Environmental Change 56: 124--133.
48.
NeumannR (2001) Disciplining peasants in Tanzania: From state violence to self-surveillance in wildlife conservation. In: PelusoNLWattsM (eds) Violent Environments.
Ithaca, NY:
Cornell University Press, pp.305–327.
49.
NygrenA (1998)
Environment as discourse: Searching for sustainable development. Environmental Values7(2): 201–222.
50.
RoseN (1999) Powers of Liberty.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
51.
RoseNO’MalleyPValverdeM (2006)
Governmentality.Annual Review of Law and Social Science2: 83–104.
52.
RutherfordS (2007)
Green governmentality: Insights and opportunities in the study of nature’s rule. Progress in Human Geography31(3): 291–307.
53.
RutherfordS (2011) Governing the Wild: Ecotours of Power.
Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press.
54.
SilvaL (2015)
Foucault in the landscape: Questioning governmentality in the Azores. Landscape Research40(4): 397−410.
55.
SinghNM (2013)
The affective labor of growing forests and the becoming of environmental subjects: Rethinking environmentality in Odisha, India.Geoforum47: 189–198.
56.
SrinivasanKKasturiranganR (2016)
Political ecology, development, and human exceptionalism. Geoforum75: 125–128.
57.
SundarN (2001) Beyond the bounds? Violence at the margins of new legal geographies. In: PelusoNLWattsM (eds) Violent Environments.
Ithaca, NY:
Cornell University Press, pp.328–353.
58.
WangTJ (2015) Green governmentality. In: BryantR (ed) The International Handbook of Political Ecology.
Cheltenham:
Edward Elgar, pp.318–331.
59.
WhatmoreS (2006)
Materialist returns: Practising cultural geography in and for a more-than-human world. Cultural Geographies13: 600–609.
60.
Youdelis M (2020) Multiple environmentalities and post-politicization in a Canadian Mountain Park. Environment and Planning: Nature and Space 3(2): 346–364.
