Post-Paris Agreement, India is swiftly transitioning to low-carbon electricity generation through solar park development. Despite exceeding emissions reduction targets, many social development claims remain unrealized. This paper addresses the following questions: (1) What discourses do state institutions utilize to justify solar park development in rural spaces? (2) What sociopolitical effects do these discourses have at the local scale? I conducted a critical discourse analysis of technical and policy documents focusing on knowledge production to influence social power and the political economy. I also draw on eight months of fieldwork, including semi-structured interviews of residents, bureaucrats, and solar employees in Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, and New Delhi. This paper argues that solar parks are rationalized via discursive formations of the climate crisis, economic development, and ecological modernization. These discursive formations are stitched together into story-lines and circulated by public and private institutions (Solar India), comprising a “deus ex mitigata,” a deus ex machina set of discursive formations that rationalize greener capital accumulation in neoliberal India that does not address asymmetric power relations. The modalities by which this is accomplished dispossess peasants of land and livelihoods. As such, low-carbon electricity generation does not positively “transform the lives” of residents, a raison d’être for solar park development.
Asian Development Bank (2012) India: Support to Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission. Mandaluyong, Philippines: Asian Development Bank. Available at: https://www.adb.org/projects/45380-001/main (accessed 12 August 2018).
5.
Asian Development Bank (2017) Solar transmission sector project (RRP IND 49214): Solar park development and business structure. Mandaluyong, Philippines: Asian Development Bank. Available at: https://www.adb.org/projects/documents/ind-49214-002-rrp (accessed 12 August 2018).
6.
BakaJ (2013)
The political construction of wasteland: Governmentality, land acquisition and social inequality in South India. Development and Change44(2): 409–428.
7.
BakaJ (2014)
What wastelands? A critique of biofuel policy discourse in South India. Geoforum54: 315–323.
8.
BakaJ (2017)
Making space for energy: Wasteland development, enclosures, and energy dispossessions. Antipode49(4): 977–996.
9.
BakaJBailisR (2014)
Wasteland energy-scapes: A comparative energy flow analysis of India’s biofuel and biomass economies. Ecological Economics108: 8–17.
10.
BakaJHesseAWeinthalEand Bakker K (2019)
Environmental knowledge cartographies: Evaluating competing discourses in US hydraulic fracturing rule-making. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109(6): 1941--1960.
11.
BakaJNevilleKJWeinthalE, et al. (2018)
Agenda‐setting at the energy‐water nexus: Constructing and maintaining a policy monopoly in US hydraulic fracturing regulation. Review of Policy Research35(3): 439–465.
12.
BakkerK (2015) Neoliberalization of nature. In: PerreaultTBridgeGMcCarthyJ (eds) Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology.
London and New York:
Routledge, pp.446–456.
13.
BaldwinA (2013)
Racialisation and the figure of the climate change migrant. Environment and Planning A45: 1474–1490.
14.
BarryJEllisCRobinsonC (2008)
Cool rationalities and hot air: A rhetorical approach to understanding debates on renewable energy. Global Environmental Politics8(2): 67–98.
15.
BassettTFogelmanC (2013)
Déjà vu or something new? The adaptation concept in the climate change literature. Geoforum48: 42–53.
16.
BaviskarA (2004) In the Belly of the River: Tribal Conflicts Over Development in the Narmada Valley. 2nd ed.New Delhi:
Oxford University Press.
17.
BettiniG (2013)
Climates barbarians at the gate? A critique of apocalyptic narratives on climate refugees. Geoforum45: 63–72.
18.
Beymer-FarrisBBassettT (2012)
The REDD menace: Resurgent protectionism in Tanzania’s mangrove forests. Global Environmental Change22: 332–341.
19.
BhattC (2013) Democracy and Hindu nationalism. In: AndersonJ (ed) Religion, Democracy and Democratization.
New York:
Routledge, pp. 133--154.
20.
BirkenholtzT (2008)
Contesting expertise: The politics of environmental knowledge in northern Indian groundwater practices. Geoforum39(1): 466–482.
21.
BirkenholtzT (2009)
Groundwater governmentality: Hegemony and technologies of resistance in Rajasthan’s (India) groundwater governance. The Geographical Journal175(3): 208–220.
22.
BirkenholtzT (2012)
Network political ecology method and theory in climate change vulnerability and adaptation research. Progress in Human Geography36(3): 295–315.
23.
BirkenholtzT (2016)
Dispossessing irrigators: Water grabbing, supply-side growth and farmer resistance in India. Geoforum69: 94–105.
24.
BondP (2012)
Emissions trading, new enclosures, and eco-social contestation. Antipode44(3): 684–701.
25.
Borras SM Jr and Franco JC (2013) Global land grabbing and political reactions ‘from below’. Third World Quarterly 34(9): 1723--1747.
26.
BoydEBoykoffMNewellP (2011)
The “new” carbon economy: What’s new?Antipode43(3): 601–611.
27.
BraunBP (2014)
A new urban dispositif? Governing life in an age of climate change. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space32: 49–64.
28.
BridgeG (2001)
Resource triumphalism: Postindustrial narratives of primary commodity production. Environment and Planning A33: 2149–2173.
29.
BryantGDabhiSBohmS (2015)
‘Fixing’ the climate crisis: Capital, states, and carbon offsetting in India. Environment and Planning A47: 2047–2063.
30.
BumpusALivermanD (2010) Carbon colonialism? Offsets, greenhouse gas reductions, and sustainable development. In: PeetRRobbinsPWattsM (eds) Global Political Ecology.
New York:
Routledge, pp. 217--238.
31.
BuxtonN (2016)
COP 21 charades: Spin, lies and real hope in Paris. Globalizations13(6): 934–937.
32.
CantoniRRignallK (2019)
Kingdom of the Sun: A critical, multiscalar analysis of Morocco’s solar energy strategy. Energy Research & Social Science51: 20–31.
33.
CastreeN (2014) Making Sense of Nature.
New York:
Routledge.
34.
ChaiyapaWEstebanMKameyamaY (2018)
Why go green? Discourse analysis of motivations for Thailand’s oil and gas companies to invest in renewable energy. Energy Policy120: 448–459.
35.
ChaligantiRMüllerU (2016)
Policy discourses and environmental rationalities underpinning India’s Biofuel Programme. Environmental Policy and Governance26(1): 16–28.
36.
ChowR (2002) From biopower to ethnic difference. In: The Protestant Ethnic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp.1–17.
37.
CrehanK (2002) Gramsci, Culture and Anthropology.
Berkeley:
University of California Press.
38.
DryzekJS (2013) The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. 3rd ed.Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
39.
DubashNK (2011) Handbook of Climate Change and India: Development, Politics and Governance.
New York:
Routledge.
40.
DubashNJosephNB (2016)
Evolution of institutions for climate policy in India. Economic & Political Weekly51(3): 44–54.
41.
DunlapA (2018)
Counterinsurgency for wind energy: The Bíi Hioxo wind park in Juchitán, Mexico. Journal of Peasant Studies45(3): 630–652.
42.
EhrlichPR (1970) The Population Bomb.
New York:
Ballantine Books.
43.
EinsiedelEFRemillardCGomaaM, et al. (2017)
The representation of biofuels in political cartoons: Ironies, contradictions and moral dilemmas. Environmental Communication11(1): 41–62.
44.
EkersMPrudhamS (2017)
The metabolism of socioecological fixes: Capital switching, spatial fixes, and the production of nature. Annals of the American Association of Geographers107(6): 1370–1388.
45.
ErvineK (2013)
Carbon markets, debt, and uneven development. Third World Quarterly34(4): 653–670.
46.
EscobarA (1995) Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
47.
FaircloughN (2001) Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. In: WodakRMeyerM (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE Publications, pp.121–138.
48.
FaircloughN (2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research.
New York and London:
Routledge.
49.
FairheadJLeachM (2000)
Desiccation and domination: Science and struggles over environment and development in colonial Guinea. Journal of African History41: 35–54.
50.
FairheadJLeachMScoonesI (2012)
Green grabbing: A new appropriation of nature?The Journal of Peasant Studies39(2): 237–261.
51.
FanonF (1965 [2001]) The Wretched of the Earth. Translated by Constance Farrington.
New York:
Grove Press.
52.
FarbotkoCLazrusH (2012)
The first climate refugees? Contesting global narratives of climate change in Tuvalu. Global Environmental Change22: 382–390.
53.
FergusonJ (2006) Global Shadows: Africa and the New World Order.
Durham, NC:
Duke University Press.
54.
Fernandes D, Jörgensen K and Narayanan NC (2019) Factors shaping the climate policy process in India. In: Ciercierska-Holmes N, Jörgensen K, Ollier LL and Raghunandan D (eds) Environmental Policy in India. New York: Routledge, pp. 158--173.
55.
ForsythT (2003) Critical Political Ecology: The Politics of Environmental Science.
New York:
Routledge.
56.
FrankAG (1989)
The development of underdevelopment. Monthly Review: An Independent Socialist Magazine41(2): 37–51.
57.
GenusA (2016)
Institutions, discourses, and the promotion of renewable energy. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment5(1): 119–124.
58.
GidwaniV (1992)
“Waste” and the permanent settlement in Bengal. Economic and Political Weekly27(4): PE-39–PE-46.
59.
GidwaniV (2002)
The unbearable modernity of ‘development’? Canal irrigation and development planning in Western India. Progress in Planning58: 1–80.
60.
GidwaniV (2008) Capital, Interrupted: Agrarian Development and the Politics of Work in India.
Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press.
61.
GierynTF (1999) Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line.
Chicago, IL:
The University of Chicago Press.
62.
GilmoreRW (2002)
Fatal couplings of power and difference: Notes on racism and geography. The Professional Geographer54(1): 15–24.
Government of Gujarat (2014) State Action Plan on Climate Change.
Gandhinagar:
Climate Change Department. Available at: https://ccd.gujarat.gov.in/state-action-plan.htm (accessed 3 August 2018).
GregoryDJohnstonRPrattG, et al. (2009) The Dictionary of Human Geography. 5th ed.Malden, MA:
Wiley-Blackwell.
69.
GuhaS (2013) Beyond Caste: Identity and Power in South Asia, Past and Present.
Boston, MA:
Brill.
70.
GustonDH (2001)
Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: An introduction. Science, Technology, & Human Values26(4): 399–408.
71.
HajerMA (1996) The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
72.
HajerMVersteegW (2005)
A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning7(3): 175–184.
73.
HallS (1992) The west and the rest: Discourse and power. In: HallSGiebenB (eds) Formations of Modernity.
Cambridge:
Polity Press, pp.276–320.
74.
HallS (1996) Race, articulation and societies structured in dominance. In: BakerHAJr and DiawaraM (eds) Black British Cultural Studies: A Reader.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press, pp. 16--60.
75.
HechtSCockburnA (1989) The Fate of the Forest: Developers, Destroyers, and Defenders of the Amazon.
New York:
Harper and Row.
76.
Hermwille L (2016) The role of narratives in socio-technical transitions--Fukushima and the energy regimes of Japan, Germany, and the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science 11: 237--246.
77.
Hijioka Y, Lin E, Pereira JJ, et al. (2014) Asia. In: Barros VR, Field CB, Dokken DJ, et al. (eds) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1327--1370. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/WGIIAR5-Chap24_FINAL.pdf (accessed 17 November 2018).
78.
JessupB (2010)
Plural and hybrid environmental values: A discourse analysis of the wind energy conflict in Australia and the United Kingdom. Environmental Politics19(1): 21–44.
79.
KennedySF (2018)
Indonesia’s energy transition and its contradictions: Emerging geographies of energy and finance. Energy Research and Social Science41: 230–237.
80.
KingMGoodmanS (2011)
Defense community perspectives on uncertainty and confidence judgments. Climatic Change108(4): 803–809.
81.
KolbertE (2006) Field Notes from a Catastrophe: Man, Nature and Climate Change.
New York:
Bloomsbury Publishing.
82.
KythreotisAP (2012)
Progress in global climate change politics? Reasserting national state territoriality in a ‘post-political’ world. Progress in Human Geography36(4): 457–474.
83.
LaclauEMouffeC (2001) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. 2nd ed.New York:
Verso.
84.
LatourB (2004) Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
85.
LeachMFairheadJFraserJ (2012)
Green grabs and biochar: Revaluing African soils and farming in the new carbon economy. Journal of Peasant Studies39(2): 285–307.
86.
LeachMMearnsR (1996) Challenging received wisdom in Africa. In: LeachMMearnsR (eds) The Lie of the Land.
Oxford and Portsmouth, NH:
James Currey and Heinemann, pp.1–33.
87.
LeggS (2011)
Assemblage/apparatus: Using Deleuze and Foucault. Area43(2): 128–133.
88.
LevienM (2015)
From primitive accumulation to regimes of dispossession: Six theses on India’s land question. Economic and Political Weekly50(22): 146–157.
89.
LevienM (2018) Dispossession Without Development: Land Grabs in Neoliberal India.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
90.
LiTM (2014)
What is land? Assembling a resource for global investment. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers39(4): 589–602.
91.
LinkeU (2014)
Racializing cities, naturalizing space: The seductive appeal of iconicities of dispossession. Antipode46(5): 1222–1239.
92.
McAfeeKShapiroE (2010)
Payments for ecosystem services: Nature, neoliberalism, social movements, and the state. Annals of the Association of American Geographers100(3): 579–599.
93.
McCarthyJ (2015)
A socioecological fix to capitalist crisis and climate change? The possibilities and limits of renewable energy. Environment and Planning A47(12): 2485–2502.
94.
McKibbenB (2006) The End of Nature.
New York:
Random House Trade Paperbacks.
95.
MakkiF (2014)
Development by dispossession: Terra Nullius and the social-ecology of new enclosures in Ethiopia. Rural Sociology79(1): 79–103.
96.
MeadowsDMeadowsDRandersJ, et al. (1972) The Limits to Growth.
New York:
Potomac Associates Books.
MNRE (2017b) Success story of solar parks in India: Vis-à-vis beginning of a new era of solar tariff. Akshay Urja magazine, August–October. Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, Government of India. Available at: https://mnre.gov.in/file-manager/akshay-urja/october-2017/Images/37-41.pdf (accessed 8 August 2018).
105.
MNRE (2018) Mission Document.
New Delhi:
Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, Government of India. Available at: https://mnre.gov.in/mission-document# (accessed 29 May 2018).
106.
ModiN (2011) Convenient Action: Gujarat’s Response to Challenges of Climate Change.
New Delhi:
Macmillan.
NagodaSEriksenSHetlandØ (2017)
What does climate change adaptation mean for humanitarian assistance? Guiding principles for policymakers and practitioners. IDS Bulletin48(4): 125–137.
110.
NalepaRABauerDM (2012)
Marginal lands: The role of remote sensing in constructing landscapes for agrofuel development. Journal of Peasant Studies39(2): 403–422.
111.
NewellPMulvaneyD (2013)
The political economy of the “just transition.”Geographical Journal179(2): 132–140.
112.
NietzscheFW (1872) Die Geburt der Tragödie aus dem Geiste der Musik.
Leipzig:
E.W. Fritzsch.
113.
OjhaHGhimireSPainA, et al. (2016)
Policy without politics: Technocratic control of climate change adaptation policy making in Nepal. Climate Policy16(4): 415–433.
114.
OlivierJGJSchureKMPetersJAHW (2017) Trends in Global CO2 and Total Greenhouse Gas Emissions: 2017 Report.
The Hague:
PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
115.
ParentiC (2012) Tropic of Chaos: Climate Change and the New Geography of Violence.
New York:
Nation Books.
116.
PatelR (2013)
The long green revolution.The Journal of Peasant Studies40(1): 1–63.
117.
PelusoNLWattsM (2001) Violent Environments.
Ithaca, NY:
Cornell University Press.
118.
PowerM (2003) Rethinking Development Geographies.
London:
Routledge.
119.
RadcliffeS (2005)
Development and geography: Towards a postcolonial development geography?Progress in Human Geography29(3): 291–298
120.
RamamurthyP (2014) A feminist commodity chain analysis of rural transformation in contemporary India. In: FernandesL (ed) Routledge Handbook of Gender in South Asia.
London and New York:
Routledge, pp.247–259.
RibotJ (2014)
Cause and response: Vulnerability and climate in the Anthropocene. Journal of Peasant Studies41(5): 667–705.
123.
RignallKE (2016)
Solar power, state power, and the politics of energy transition in pre-Saharan Morocco. Environment and Planning A48(3): 540–557.
124.
RobbinsP (2012) Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction. 2nd ed.Malden, MA:
Wiley-Blackwell.
125.
RoitmanJ (2013) Anti-Crisis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp.15–40.
126.
RoseG (2001) Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials.
London:
Sage.
127.
RoseNMillerP (1992)
Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology43: 173–205.
128.
RosenbloomDBertonHMeadowcroftJ (2016)
Framing the sun: A discursive approach to understanding multi-dimensional interactions within socio-technical transitions through the case of solar electricity in Ontario, Canada. Research Policy45(6): 1275–1290.
129.
SaidE (1978) Orientalism.
New York:
Vintage Books.
SassenS (2014) Expulsions: Brutality and Complexity in the Global Economy.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
132.
ScheffranJIdeTSchillingJ (2014)
Violent climate or climate of violence? Concepts and relations with focus on Kenya and Sudan. International Journal of Human Rights18(3): 369–390.
133.
Scheidel A and Sorman A (2012) Energy transitions and the global land rush: Ultimate drivers and persistent consequences. Global Environmental Change 22(3): 588--595.
134.
SchlosbergDRinfretS (2008)
Ecological modernisation, American style. Environmental Politics17(2): 254–275.
135.
ScottJC (1998) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed.
New Haven, CT:
Yale University Press.
SiamantaZC (2018)
Building a green economy of low carbon: The Greek post-crisis experience of photovoltaics and financial “green grabbing.”Journal of Political Ecology24(1): 258.
138.
SmeetsN (2018)
The Green Menace: Unraveling Russia’s elite discourse on enabling and constraining factors of renewable energy policies.Energy Research & Social Science40: 244–256.
139.
SojaEW (1980)
The socio-spatial dialectic. Annals of the Association of American Geographers70(2): 207–225.
140.
SpäthP (2012)
Understanding the social dynamics of energy regions – The importance of discourse analysis. Sustainability4(6): 1256–1273.
141.
StarSLGriesemerJR (1989)
Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science19(3): 387–420.
142.
StockRBirkenholtzT (2019) The sun and the scythe: Energy dispossessions and the agrarian question of labor in solar parks. The Journal of Peasant Studies. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2019.1683002 (Published online 15 December 2019).
143.
StockRBirkenholtzTGargA (2019)
Let the people speak: Improving regional adaptation policy by combining adaptive capacity assessments with vulnerability perceptions of farmers in Gujarat, India. Climate and Development11(2): 138–152.
144.
SultanaF (2013)
Water, technology, and development: Transformations of development technonatures in changing waterscapes. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space31: 337–353.
145.
SwyngedouwE (2010)
Apocalypse forever? Post-political populism and the spectre of climate change. Theory, Culture & Society27(2–3): 213–232.
146.
SwyngedouwE (2013)
The non-political politics of climate change. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies12(1): 1–8.
147.
TaylorM (2015) The Political Ecology of Climate Change Adaptation.
New York:
Routledge.
ThomasKAWarnerBP (2019)
Weaponizing vulnerability to climate change. Global Environmental Change57: 101928.
152.
TongiaR (2018) Understanding India, Its Energy Needs and Ambitions, and the Global Implications for Carbon Emissions.
Washington, DC:
Brookings Institute.
WainwrightJMannG (2018) Climate Leviathan: A Political Theory of Our Planetary Future.
New York:
Verso.
155.
WattsM (2004)
Resource curse? Governmentality, oil and power in the Niger Delta, Nigeria. Geopolitics9(1): 50–80.
156.
WhiteheadJ (2010)
John Locke and the governance of India’s landscape: The category of wasteland in colonial revenue and forest legislation.Economic and Political Weekly45(5), 83--93.
157.
WhiteheadJ (2012)
John Locke, accumulation by dispossession and the governance of colonial India. Journal of Contemporary Asia42(1): 1–21.
158.
Willems-BraunB (1997)
Buried epistemologies: The politics of nature in (post) colonial British Columbia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers87(1): 3–31.
159.
WinfieldMDolterB (2014)
Energy, economic and environmental discourses and their policy impact: The case of Ontario’s Green Energy and Green Economy Act. Energy Policy68: 423–435.
160.
World Bank (2015a). Project Appraisal Document (QER Stage) on a Proposed IBRD Loan in the Amount of US$ 270 Million and a Proposed Clean Technology Fund (CTF) Loan in the Amount of US$ 30 Million to the POWERGRID Corporation of India Limited for Transmission for Power Evacuation from Solar Parks Project (P156974). Washington DC: World Bank. Available at: http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/688451531507613774/1844-XCTFIN210A-India-Initial-Project-Document.pdf (accessed 9 August 2018).
World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our Common Future.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
163.
YennetiK (2016)
Industry perceptions on feed in tariff (FiT) based solar power policies – A case of Gujarat, India. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews57: 988–998.
164.
YennetiKDayRGolubchikovO (2016)
Spatial justice and the land politics of renewables: Dispossessing vulnerable communities through solar energy mega-projects. Geoforum76: 90–99.
