Discursive politics and policy (im)mobility: Metro-TOD policies in India

Abstract

Large investments in metro systems, supported through a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) regime, have become the preferred policy option to achieve sustainable and inclusive urban mobility in India. In this paper, we examine the particular practices and power relations through which metro-TOD policies have emerged and gained discursive dominance in India’s urban transport policies. We do so by bringing together urban policy mobilities (UPM) and argumentative discourse analysis (ADA) to conceptualize (im)mobility as the intense movement of specific discursive framings to the exclusion of others. Our analysis brings out the crucial role played by Urban Mobility India (UMI), an annual conference organized by the Indian federal government, in the (im)mobility of metro-TOD policies across Indian cities. We contribute to the growing literature on the power-laden nature of policy circulation in the Global South and address concerns regarding lack of analytical attention to marginalized policy pathways and immobile elements of mobile policies in UPM literature. We argue that policy mobility scholars can move beyond the analytical binaries of mobile/immobile policies by drawing upon the concepts of ADA which allow close examination of the discursive politics at play in policy related conferences. By studying the intra-national (im)mobility of metro-TOD policies in India, we expand the bounds of UPM literature towards a geography that has received limited attention thus far.

Keywords

Urban policy mobilities argumentative discourse analysis metro and Transit-Oriented Development India’s urban transport conference spaces

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Advani M and Tiwari G (2005) Evaluation of public transport systems: case study of Delhi Metro. In: Transportation Research & Injury Prevention Programme, IIT Kharagpur, India, 2005, pp. 1–8. Available at: http://sa.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/mukti_metro_kharagpur_05.pdf.

Agarwal

(2017) Taking metro rail to people’s doorsteps. Available at: www.urbanmobilityindia.in/Upload/Conference/7787f3a8-a383-4fab-a869-b1259e0da77a.pdf (accessed 18 June 2021).

Ahluwalia

Munjee

Vijayanunni

, et al. (2011). Report on Indian urban infrastructure and services. High Powered Expert Committee, Government of India, March.

Andersson

Cook

(2019) Conferences, award ceremonies and the showcasing of ‘best practice’: A case study of the annual European week of regions and cities in Brussels. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 37(8): 1361–1379.

Baker

Temenos

(2015) Urban policy mobilities research: Introduction to a debate. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39(4): 824–827.

Bok

(2014) Airports on the move? The policy mobilities of Singapore Changi airport at home and abroad. Urban Studies 52(14): 2724–2740.

Bok R and Coe NM (2017) Geographies of policy knowledge: The state and corporate dimensions of contemporary policy mobilities. Cities 63: 51–57. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.01.001.

Cook

Ward

(2012) Conferences, informational infrastructures and mobile policies: The process of getting Sweden ‘BID ready. European Urban and Regional Studies 19(2): 137–152.

Cotton

Rattle

Van Alstine

(2014) Shale gas policy in the United Kingdom: An argumentative discourse analysis. Energy Policy 73: 427–438.

10.

Ecocabs India (2012) Urban Mobility 2011 Conference : Q & A session – last mile connectivity. Available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_21N6vuta4 (accessed 11 April 2021).

11.

González

(2010) Bilbao and Barcelona ‘in motion’. How urban regeneration ‘models’ travel and mutate in the global flows of policy tourism. Urban Studies 48(7): 1397–1418.

12.

Hajer

(1995) The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

13.

Hajer MA (2006) Doing discourse analysis: coalitions, practices, meaning. In: van den Brink M and Metze T (eds) Words Matter in Policy and Planning – Discourse Theory and Method in the Social Sciences. Netherlands geographical studies (ISSN 0169-4839), 344. Utrecht: Koninklijk Nederlands Aardrijkskundig Genootschap, pp. 65–74.

14.

Jacobs

(2012) Urban geographies I: Still thinking cities relationally. Progress in Human Geography 36(3): 412–422.

15.

Janyala

(2011) In the way of Hyderabad Metro railway, some protest, some delay, much confusion. The Indian Express, 26 October. Available at: https://indianexpress.com/article/news-archive/web/in-the-way-of-hyderabad-metro-railway-some-protest-some-delay-much-confusion/ (accessed 11 April 2021).

16.

Kakodkar

Tatke

(2014) Controversy over fare hike on the eve of Mumbai Metro inauguration. The Hindu, 8 June. Available at: www.thehindu.com/news/cities/mumbai/controversy-over-fare-hike-on-the-eve-of-mumbai-metro-inauguration/article6093066.ece (accessed 2 May 2020).

17.

Katakam

(2019) Mumbai metro’s car shed project vs green brigade. Available at: https://frontline.thehindu.com/social-issues/general-issues/article29766681.ece (accessed 12 January 2021).

18.

Kaushik

(2012) Why reliance infrastructure wants to quit Delhi airport express project. Business Today, 1 November. Available at: www.businesstoday.in/current/perspective/reliance-infrastructure-delhi-metro-airport-express/story/189523.html (accessed 2 May 2020).

19.

Kishore

(2017) Delhi metro fare hike controversy reflects India’s growing urban transport challenge. Livemint, 11 October. Available at: www.livemint.com/Politics/t43nHi9AsvWfuxEGtwC2pN/Delhi-Metro-fare-hike-controversy-reflects-Indias-growing-u.html (accessed 2 May 2020).

20.

Lees

(2004) Urban geography: Discourse analysis and urban research. Progress in Human Geography 28(1): 101–107.

21.

Lovell

(2017) Policy failure mobilities. Progress in Human Geography 43(1): 46–63.

22.

McCann E (2008) Expertise, truth, and urban policy mobilities: Global circuits of knowledge in the development of Vancouver, Canada’s ‘four pillar’ drug strategy. Environment and Planning A 40(4): 885–904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a38456.

23.

McCann

(2011) Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: Toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101(1): 107–130.

24.

McCann

Ward

(2012) Assembling urbanism: Following policies and ‘studying through’ the sites and situations of policy making. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 44(1): 42–51.

25.

McCann

Ward

(2015) Thinking through dualisms in urban policy mobilities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39(4): 828–830.

26.

Mohan

(2008) Mythologies, metro rail systems and future urban transport. Economic and Political Weekly 43(4): 41–53.

27.

Mohanty

(2014) Cities and Public Policy: An Urban Agenda for India. India: SAGE Publications India.

28.

Montero

(2017) Study tours and inter-city policy learning: Mobilizing Bogotá’s transportation policies in Guadalajara. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49(2): 332–350.

29.

National Transport Development Policy Committee (NTDPC) (2014) Urban transport. In: Deb Sandipan (ed.) India Transport Report: Moving India to 2032. London: Routledge, pp.380–477.

30.

Newman

Kenworthy

(1996) The land use – Transport connection: An overview. Land Use Policy 13(1): 1–22.

31.

Peck

Theodore

(2010) Mobilizing policy: Models, methods, and mutations. Themed Issue: Mobilizing Policy 41(2): 169–174.

32.

Peck

Theodore

(2012) Follow the policy: A distended case approach. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 44(1): 21–30.

33.

Pratap

(2015) Delhi airport metro fiasco. Economic and Political Weekly 48(49): 18–20.

34.

PRS Legislative Research (2019) Demand for grants analysis: Housing and urban affairs. Available at: www.prsindia.org/parliamenttrack/budgets/demand-grants-analysis-housing-and-urban-affairs (accessed 2 May 2020).

35.

Robinson

(2015) ‘Arriving at’ urban policies: The topological spaces of urban policy mobility. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39(4): 831–834.

36.

Schwartz-Shea

Yanow

(2012) Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. London: Routledge.

37.

Shah

Mathur

(2019) Contestations around water allocation during a climate crisis in India: The case of ‘IPL vs. drought’. Global Environmental Change 57: 101927.

38.

Sheller

Urry

(2006) The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 38(2): 207–226.

39.

Shore

Wright

(1997) Anthropology of Policy . Critical Perspectives on Governance and Power. EASA Series. London: Routledge.

40.

Temenos

(2016) Mobilizing drug policy activism: Conferences, convergence spaces and ephemeral fixtures in social movement mobilization. Space and Polity 20(1): 124–141.

41.

Temenos

Baker

Cook

(2019) Inside mobile urbanism: Cities and policy mobilities. In: Schwanen

Kempen

R van

(eds) Handbook of Urban Geography. Research Handbooks in Geography Series. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing: 103–118.

42.

Thomas

Pojani

Lenferink

, et al. (2018) Is transit-oriented development (TOD) an internationally transferable policy concept? Regional Studies 52(9): 1201–1213.

43.

Times News Network (2015) Metro phase I may not be financially viable: UDH min. Available at: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/jaipur/Metro-phase-I-may-not-be-financially-viable-UDH-min/articleshow/47410007.cms (accessed 2 May 2020).

44.

Tiwari G (2007) Urban transport in Indian cities. In: Urban India: understanding the maximum city (ed. R Burdett), 2007, pp. 9–10. LSE Cities.

45.

Tiwari

(2010) Sustainable urban transport: Accessible and inclusive cities. Available at: www.urbanmobilityindia.in/Upload/Conference/1ddfa9eb-5536-4dc9-a679-ce9440f45cc3.pdf (accessed 18 June 2021).

46.

Tiwari

(2013) Metro rail and the city: Derailing public transport. Economic and Political Weekly 65–76.

47.

Wood

(2014) Learning through policy tourism: Circulating bus rapid transit from South America to South Africa. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 46(11): 2654–2669.

48.

Wood

(2015) The politics of policy circulation: Unpacking the relationship between South African and South American cities in the adoption of bus rapid transit. Antipode 47(4): 1062–1079.

49.

Working Group on Urban Transport (WGUT) (2012) Recommendations of Working Group on Urban Transport for 12th Five Year Plan. India: Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India.