Drawing on work in feminist political ecologies and employing a grounded theory approach, this article examines the socio-spatial links between the patriarchal tradition of dowry, tigers, and women’s well-being. It shows how a landscape governed for conservation purposes can produce embodied and material harm for women living under a patriarchal system. Focus groups conducted in eastern Rajasthan, India, reveal how human–tiger interaction, even if primarily potential rather than actual, initiates a chain of social impacts that presents severe risks to women’s well-being, mental health, and life itself. Analysis connecting the pressures of dowry (financial, physical, and psychological) to tiger presence helps expose the presumptions of unfairness, intra-household power dynamics, and hidden costs of human–wildlife cohabitation while supporting calls for the inclusion of women’s perspectives in environmental theory and management.
AckersonLKSubramanianSV (2009) Intimate partner violence and death among infants and children in India. Pediatrics124(5): e878–e889.
2.
Agarwal S (1995) Speech at the first international conference on dowry and bride-burning in India. Harvard Law School, 30 September–2 October.
3.
AgyemanJEvansB (2004) ‘Just sustainability’: The emerging discourse of environmental justice in Britain?The Geographical Journal170(2): 155–164.
4.
AhmadiaGNGlewLProvostM, et al.(2015) Integrating impact evaluation in the design and implementation of monitoring marine protected areas. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B370(1681): 20140275.
5.
Ahmed-GhoshH (2004) Chattels of society: Domestic violence in India. Violence Against Women10(1): 94–118.
6.
AndersonS (2003) Why dowry payments declined with modernization in Europe but are rising in India. Journal of Political Economy111(2): 269–310.
7.
BaruaMBhagwatSAJadhavS (2013) The hidden dimensions of human-wildlife conflict: Health impacts, opportunity and transaction costs. Biological Conservation157: 309–316.
8.
BasuS (2001) She Comes to Take her Rights. Property and Propriety, New Delhi: Kali for Women.
9.
BasuS (2005) Dowry and Inheritance, Delhi: Women Unlimited.
10.
BebbingtonA (1999) Capitals and capabilities: A framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods, and poverty. World Development27(12): 2021–2044.
11.
BennettNJ (2016) Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management. Conservation Biology30(3): 582–592.
12.
BennettNJRothR (2015) The Conservation Social Sciences: What? How? And Why?, Vancouver: Canadian Wildlife Federation and Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, University of British Columbia.
13.
BennettNJRothRKlainSC, et al.(2017) Conservation social science: Understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation. Biological Conservation205: 93–108.
14.
Bhalotra S, Chakravarty A and Gulesci S (2018) The price of gold: Dowry and death in India. CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP12712.
15.
BolchFRaoV (2002) Terror as a bargaining instrument: A case study of dowry violence in rural India. The American Economic Review92(4): 1029–1043.
16.
BondJMkutuK (2017) Exploring the hidden costs of human-wildlife conflict in northern Kenya. African Studies Review2017: 1–10.
17.
BoserupE (1970) Woman’s Role in Economic Development, London: Earthscan.
18.
BradleyT (2010) Religion as a bridge between theory and practice in work on violence against women in Rajasthan. Journal of Gender Studies19(4): 361–375.
19.
BraidottiRCharkiewiczEHauslerS, et al.(1994) Women, the Environment, and Development: Towards a Theoretical Synthesis, London: Zed Books.
20.
CarneyJ (1996) Converting the wetlands, engendering the environment. In: PeetRWattsM (eds) Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements, New York: Routledge, pp. 165–187.
21.
CharnleySCarothersCSatterfieldT, et al.(2017) Evaluating the best available social science for natural resource management decision-making. Environmental Science & Policy73: 80–88.
22.
ChestinIEPaltsynMYPereladovaOB, et al.(2017) Tiger re-establishment potential to former Caspian tiger (Panthera tigris virgata) range in Central Asia. Biological Conservation205: 42–51.
23.
ChowdharyNPatelV (2008) The effect of spousal violence on women’s health: Findings from the Stree Arogya Shodh in Goa, India. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine54(4): 306–312.
24.
ChowdhuryANMondalRBrahmaA, et al.(2008) Eco-psychiatry and environmental conservation: Study from Sundarban Delta, India. Environmental Health Insights2: 61–76.
25.
CollardRHarrisLMHeynenN, et al.(2018) The antinomies of nature and space. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space1: 3–24.
26.
CorsonCMacDonaldKI (2012) Enclosing the global commons: The convention on biological diversity and green grabbing. The Journal of Peasant Studies39(2): 263–283.
27.
DeUKChauhanK (2015) Degradation of forest and biodiversity in Sariska National Park, India and the responsible factors. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development14(4): 398–426.
28.
DeleuzeGGuattariF (1987) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
29.
de SilvaSSrinivasanK (2019) Revisiting social natures: People-elephant conflict and coexistence in Sri Lanka. Geoforum102: 182–190.
30.
DettrickZJimenez-SotoEHodgeA (2013) Socioeconomic and geographical disparities in under-five and neonatal mortality in Uttar Pradesh, India. Maternal and Child Health Journal18(4): 960–969.
31.
DhakalNPNelsonKCSmithJD (2011) Resident well-being in conservation resettlement: The case of Padampur in the Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Society and Natural Resources24(6): 597–615.
32.
DomínguezG (2013) Dowry thrives in modern India. Deutsche Welle. , 10 September.
33.
DoubledayKF (2018a) Human-tiger (re) negotiations: A case study from Sariska Tiger Reserve, India. Society & Animals26(2): 148–170.
34.
Doubleday KF (2018b) Rewilding expectations: Human-environmental relations in context of apex predator reintroduction in Rajasthan, India. PhD Thesis, University of Texas-Austin, USA.
35.
DwyerDBruceJ (1988) A Home Divided: Women and Income in the Third World, Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
36.
EdwardsRHollandJ (2013) What Is Qualitative Interviewing?, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
37.
FerraroGAndreattaS (2014) Cultural Anthropology: An Applied Perspective, Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
38.
FerraroPJPresseyRL (2015) Measuring the difference made by conservation initiatives: Protected areas and their environmental and social impacts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B370(1681):
39.
FikreeFFPashaO (2004) Role of gender in health disparity: The South Asian context. BMJ328(7443): 823–826.
40.
FolbreN (1988) The black four of hearts: Toward a new paradigm of household economics. In: DwyerDBruceJ (eds) A Home Divided: Women and Income in the Third World, Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 248–289.
41.
FortmannL (1996) Gendered knowledge: Rights and space in two Zimbabwe villages. In: RocheleauDThomas-SlayterBWangariE (eds) Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues and Local Experiences, New York: Routledge, pp. 211–223.
GezonLL (2006) Global Visions, Local Landscapes: A Political Ecology of Conservation, Conflict, and Control in Northern Madagascar, Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.
44.
GlaserBG (1998) Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions, Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
45.
GondalS (2015) The dowry system in India – Problem of dowry deaths. Journal of Indian Studies1(1): 37–41.
46.
Government of Rajasthan (GOR) (2004) Management Plan for Sariska Tiger Reserve (2004–2014), Jaipur: Government of Rajasthan.
47.
GururaniS (2002) Forests of pleasure and pain: Gendered practices of labor and livelihood in the forests of the Kumaon Himalayas, India. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography9(3): 229–243.
48.
HolmesGBrockingtonD (2012) Protected areas – What people say about well-being. In: RoeDElliottJSandbrookC, et al.(eds) Linking Biodiversity Conservation and Poverty Reduction, London: Wiley, pp. 160–172.
49.
HovorkaA (2006) The No. 1 Ladies’ Poultry Farm: A feminist political ecology of urban agriculture in Botswana. Gender, Place and Culture13(3): 207–255.
50.
IndupalliASGiriPA (2014) Sexual violence among married women: An unspoken sting. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences2(4): 1248–1252.
51.
JadhavSBaruaM (2012) The elephant vanishes: Impact of human-elephant conflict on people’s wellbeing. Health and Place18(6): 1356–1365.
52.
JainPSajjadH (2016) Household dependency on forest resources in the Sariska Tiger Reserve, India: Implications for management. Journal of Sustainable Forestry35(1): 60–74.
53.
JaroszL (1997) Women as rice sharecroppers in Madagascar. In: SachsC (ed) Women Working in the Environment, New York: Taylor and Francis, pp. 127–138.
54.
JaroszL (1999) A feminist political ecology perspective. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography6(4): 390.
55.
JefferyP (2014) Supply-and-demand demographics: Dowry, daughter aversion and marriage markets in contemporary north India. Contemporary South Asia22(2): 171–188.
56.
JejeebhoySJ (1998) Association between wife-beating and fetal and infant death: Impressions from a survey in rural India. Studies in Family Planning29(3): 300–308.
57.
KapadiaK (2003) The Violence of Development: The Politics of Identity, Gender and Social Inequalities in India, New York: Zed Books.
58.
KaranthKUGopalR (2005) An ecology-based policy framework for human-tiger coexistence in India. In: WoodroffeRThirgoodSRabinowitzA (eds) People and Wildlife: Conflict or Coexistence?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 373–387.
59.
KaurRGargS (2010) Domestic violence against women: A qualitative study in a rural community. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health22(2): 242–251.
60.
KaushikTS (2003) The essential nexus between transformative laws and culture: The ineffectiveness of dowry prohibition laws of India. Santa Clara Journal of International Law1(1):
61.
KhumaloKEYungLA (2015) Women, human–wildlife conflict, and CBNRM: Hidden impacts and vulnerabilities in Kwandu Conservancy, Namibia. Conservation and Society13(3): 232–243.
62.
KumarR (1989) Brides Are Not for Burning: Dowry Victims in India, Delhi: Radiant Publishers.
63.
LeachM (1992) Women’s crops in women’s spaces: Gender relations in Mende rice farming. In: CrollEParkinD (eds) Bush Base, Forest Farm: Culture, Environment and Development, New York: Routledge, pp. 76–97.
64.
LehmanJS (2013) Relating to the sea: Enlivening the ocean as an actor in eastern Sri Lanka. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space31(3): 485–501.
65.
LeisherCSambergLvan BuekeringP, et al.(2013) Focal areas for measuring the human well-being impacts of a conservation initiative. Sustainability5(3): 997–1010.
66.
LoganTDArunachalamR (2014) Is there dowry inflation in South Asia? An assessment of the evidence. Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History47(2): 81–94.
67.
LorimerJ (2010) Elephants as companion species: The lively biogeographies of Asian elephant conservation in Sri Lanka. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers35: 491–506.
68.
LorimerJDriessenC (2016) From “Nazi Cows” to cosmopolitan “Ecological Engineers”: Specifying rewilding through a history of Heck cattle. Annals of the American Association of Geographers106(3): 631–652.
69.
LovellRHuskKCooperC, et al.(2015) Understanding how environmental enhancement and conservation activities may benefit health and wellbeing: A systematic review. BMC Public Health15(1): 864.
70.
LynamAJ (2010) Securing a future for wild Indochinese tigers: Transforming tiger vacuums into tiger source sites. Integrative Zoology5(4): 324–334.
71.
MackenzieAFD (1998) Land, Ecology and Resistance in Kenya, 1880–1952, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
72.
MansfieldB (2003) From catfish to organic fish: Making distinctions about nature as cultural economic practice. Geoforum34(3): 329–342.
73.
MarinoACBraschiCRicciS, et al.(2016) Ex post and insurance-based compensation fail to increase tolerance for wolves in semi-agricultural landscapes of central Italy. European Journal of Wildlife Research62(2): 227–240.
74.
MathurK (2004) Countering Gender Violence: Initiatives Towards Collective Action in Rajasthan, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
75.
MenskiW (1998) South Asians and the Dowry Problem, Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books and School of Oriental & African Studies.
76.
MerrySE (2001) Rights, religion and community approaches to violence against women in the context of globalization. Law & Society Review35(1): 39–88.
77.
MiesM (1986) Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labour, London: Zed Books.
78.
MollettSFariaC (2013) Messing with gender in feminist political ecology. Geoforum45(2013): 116–125.
79.
MossPDyckI (1999) Body, corporeal space, and legitimating chronic illness: Women diagnosed with M.E. Antipode31(4): 372–397.
80.
NayakMByrneCMartinM, et al.(2003) Attitudes towards violence against women: A cross-nation study. Sex Roles49(7/8): 333–342.
81.
NewmanA (1992) For richer, for poorer, til death do us part: India’s response to dowry deaths. ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law15(109):
82.
NightingaleA (2006) The nature of gender: Work, gender, and environment. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space24(2): 165–185.
83.
OgraMV (2008) Human–wildlife conflict and gender in protected area borderlands: A case study of costs, perceptions, and vulnerabilities from Uttarakhand (Uttaranchal), India. Geoforum39: 1408–1422.
84.
OgraMV (2009) Attitudes toward resolution of human-wildlife conflict among forest-dependent agriculturalist near Rajaji National Park, India. Human Ecology37: 161–177.
85.
OgraMV (2012) Gender mainstreaming in community-oriented wildlife conservation: Experiences from nongovernmental conservation organizations in India. Society & Natural Resources25(12): 1258–1276.
86.
PatelVKirkwoodBRPednekarS, et al.(2006) Gender disadvantage and reproductive health risk factors for common mental disorders in women: A community survey in India. Archives of General Psychiatry2006(63): 404–413.
87.
PearsonRJacksonC (1998) Feminist Visions of Development: Gender Analysis and Policy, New York: Routledge.
88.
PrakashN (2011) Domestic violence against women in rural Rajasthan, India: A sociological analysis. In: WejnertB (ed) Democracies: Challenges to Societal Health, Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 89–102.
89.
QinYNyhusPJLarsonCL, et al.(2015) An assessment of South China tiger reintroduction potential in Hupingshan and Houhe National Nature Reserves, China. Biological Conservation182: 72–86.
90.
RadelC (2012) Gendered livelihoods and the politics of socio-environmental identity: Women’s participation in the conservation projects in Calakmul, Mexico. Gender, Place and Culture19(1): 61–82.
91.
RocheleauDThomas-SlayterBWangariE (1996) Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues and Local Experiences, London: Routledge.
92.
RustNATzanopoulosJHumleT, et al.(2016) Why has human–carnivore conflict not been resolved in Namibia?Society & Natural Resources29(9): 1079–1094.
93.
SankarKQureshiQMalikPK, et al.(2013) Reintroduction of tigers in Sariska Tiger Reserve, Rajasthan. In: Sharma BK, Kulshreshtha S and Rahmani AR (eds) Faunal Heritage of Rajasthan, India, New York: Springer International Publishing, pp. 157–171.
94.
SenA (1981) Poverty and Famine: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
95.
ShaankarA (2017) Gender and son meta-preference: Is development itself an antidote?Economic Survey1: 102–118.
96.
ShahabuddinGKumarRShrivastavaM (2007) Creation of ‘inviolate space’: Lives, livelihoods and conflict in Sariska Tiger Reserve. Economic and Political Weekly42(20): 1855–1862.
97.
SharmaP (2015) Chakravyuha: Silent suffering, agony, joys and sorrows of womanhood in The Binding Vine. Social Sciences Humanities1(3): 39–44.
SitaramanB (1999) Law as ideology: Women, courts and ‘dowry deaths’ in India. International Journal of the Sociology of Law27(3): 287–316.
100.
SpeizerISPearsonE (2011) Association between early marriage and intimate partner violence in India: A focus on youth from Bihar and Rajasthan. Journal of Interpersonal Violence26(10): 1963–1981.
101.
SrinivasanPLeeG (2004) The dowry system in northern India: Women’s attitudes and social change. Journal of Marriage and Family66(5): 1108–1117.
102.
SrinivasanSBediA (2007) Domestic violence and dowry: Evidence from a South Indian village. World Development35(5): 857–880.
103.
SultanaF (2011) Suffering for water, suffering from water: Emotional geographies of resource access, control and conflict. Geoforum42(2): 163–172.
104.
SundbergJ (2011) Diabolic caminos in the desert and cat fights on the Río: A posthumanist political ecology of boundary enforcement in the United States–Mexico Borderlands. Annals of the Association of American Geographers101(2): 318–336.
105.
TeaysW (1991) The burning bride: The dowry problem in India. Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion7(2): 29–52.
106.
TrueloveY (2011) (Re-)conceptualizing water inequality in Delhi, India through a feminist political ecology framework. Geoforum42(2): 143–152.
107.
UpadhyayB (2005) Women and natural resource management: Illustrations from India and Nepal. Natural Resources Forum29(3): 224–232.
108.
UrbanikJ (2012) Placing Animals: An Introduction to the Geography of Human-Animal Relations, New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
109.
WhatmoreS (1999) Hybrid geographies: Rethinking the ‘human’ in human geography. In: MasseyDAllenJSarreP (eds) Human Geography Today, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 22–39.
WikramanayakeEDinersteinESeidenstickerJ, et al.(2011) A landscape-based conservation strategy to double the wild tiger population. Conservation Letters4(3): 219–227.
112.
WillisJRKumarVMohantyS, et al.(2009) Gender differences in perception and care-seeking for illness of newborns in rural Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition27(1): 62.
113.
YeoJNeoH (2010) Monkey business: Human-animal conflicts in urban Singapore. Social & Cultural Geography11(7): 681–699.
