Anticipatory practices: Shifting baselines and environmental imaginaries of ecological restoration in the Columbia River Basin

Abstract

Ecological restorationists working to restore species and habitats must make decisions about how to monitor the effectiveness of their actions. In order to do this, they must determine historical baselines for populations by measuring and monitoring reference habitat sites: analog ecological systems that act as controls for comparison. Yet as climate change alters what is possible in terms of habitat restoration, drawing baselines for recovery has become fraught with difficulty. This article examines the epistemic and legal practices of baseline-setting in the case of the Columbia River Basin as well as the ways that ecological restorationists are dealing with the shifting baselines of a climate-changed river. Restorationists do this by altering their epistemic practices, using trained judgment and establishing alternative, anticipatory baselines. While the field of restoration was born out of the idea that environmental repair was about looking to the past, the discipline has transformed to look forward and even to anticipate the future. One way that this is occurring is through re-thinking baselines to reflect emerging environmental and sociotechnical imaginaries, which are enacted through epistemic practice. Anticipatory practices such as baseline-setting help sensitize the field of restoration ecology to the future, while at the same time facilitating the emergence of ideas that will enable scientifically based decision-making to continue to occur within a high level of uncertainty.

Keywords

Baseline climate change co-production restoration science studies

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adam

(2009) Cultural future matters: An exploration in the spirit of Max Weber’s methodological writings. Time & Society 18(1): 7–25.

Adams

(1913) Guide to the Study of Animal Ecology, New York: Macmillan.

Adams

Murphy

Clarke

(2009) Anticipation: Technoscience, life, affect, temporality. Subjectivity 28(1): 246–265.

Alagona

Sandlos

Wiersma

, et al. (2012) Past imperfect: Using historical ecology and baseline data for conservation and restoration projects in North America. Environmental Philosophy 9(1): 49–70.

Ankersen

Regan

(2010) Shifting baselines and backsliding benchmarks: The need for the National Environmental Legacy Act to address the ecologies of restoration, resilience, and reconciliation. In: Flournoy

Driesen

(eds) Beyond Environmental Law: Policy Proposals for a Better Environmental Future, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 53–80.

Beechie TJ, Imaki H, Greene J, et al. (2013) Restoring salmon habitat for a changing climate. River Research and Applications 29: 939–960.

Blumm MC and Paulsen A (2012) The Role of the Judge in Endangered Species Act Implementation: District Judge James Redden and the Columbia Basin Salmon Saga. ID 2051638, SSRN Scholarly Paper, 5 May. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2051638 (accessed 30 July 2018).

Blunden J and Arndt DS (2015) State of the Climate in 2015. 97(8). Special Supplement to the Bulletin of the American Meterological Society: 300.

Charmaz K (2005) Grounded theory in the 21st century: A qualitative method for advancing social justice research. In: Denzin NK and Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp.507–536.

10.

Clarke

(2005) Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

11.

Clewell

(2009) Intent of ecological restoration, its circumscription, and its standards. Ecological Restoration 27(1): 5–7.

12.

Cosens

(2008) Resolving conflict in non-ideal, complex systems: Solutions for the law-science breakdown in environmental and natural resource law. Natural Resources Law Journal 48: 257.

13.

Cosens

Craig

Hirsch

, et al. (2017) The role of law in adaptive governance. Ecology and Society 22(1): 30.

14.

Cosens

Gunderson

Allen

, et al. (2014) Identifying legal, ecological and governance obstacles, and opportunities for adapting to climate change. Sustainability 6(4): 2338–2356.

15.

Craig

(2014) Perceiving change and knowing nature: Shifting baselines and nature’s resiliency. In: Hirokawa

(eds) Environmental Law and Contrasting Ideas of Nature: A Constructivist Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 87–111.

16.

Dalton MM, Mote PW and Snover AK (2013) Climate Change in the Northwest: Implications for Our Landscapes, Waters, and Communities. Washington, DC: Island Press. Available at: http://choicereviews.org/review/10.5860/CHOICE.51-6191 (accessed 30 July 2018).

17.

Daston

Galison

(2007) Objectivity, New York; Cambridge: Zone Books; Distributed by the MIT Press.

18.

Davis

(2011) Imperialism, orientalism, and the environment of the Middle East: History, power, and practice. In: Davis

Burke

III (eds) Environmental Imaginaries of the Middle East and North Africa, Athens: University of Ohio Press, pp. 1–22.

19.

Evers

Wardropper

Branoff

, et al. (2018) The ecosystem services and biodiversity of novel ecosystems: A literature review. Global Ecology and Conservation 13: 1–11.

20.

Good

Beechie

McElhany

, et al. (2007) Recovery planning for endangered species act-listed Pacific salmon: Using science to inform goals and strategies. Fisheries 32(9): 426–440.

21.

Gosnell

Chaffin

Ruhl

, et al. (2017) Transforming (perceived) rigidity in environmental law through adaptive governance: A case of Endangered Species Act implementation. Ecology and Society 22(4): 42.

22.

Gross

(2010) Ignorance and Surprise: Science, Society, and Ecological Design, Cambridge: MIT Press.

23.

Hall

(1997) The work of representation. In: Hall S. (eds) Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. 13–74, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

24.

Hiers

Mitchell

Barnett

, et al. (2012) The dynamic reference concept: Measuring restoration success in a rapidly changing no-analogue future. Ecological Restoration 30(1): 27–36.

25.

Hobbs

Arico

Aronson

, et al. (2006) Novel ecosystems: Theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Global Ecology and Biogeography 15(1): 1–7.

26.

Hobbs

Cramer

(2008) Restoration ecology: Interventionist approaches for restoring and maintaining ecosystem function in the face of rapid environmental change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 33(1): 39–61.

27.

Hobbs

Higgs

Hall

(2013) Introduction: Why novel ecosystems? Novel Ecosystems: Intervening in the new ecological world order 5: 1–8.

28.

Jachowski

Kesler

Steen

, et al. (2015) Redefining baselines in endangered species recovery. The Journal of Wildlife Management 79(1): 3–9.

29.

Jasanoff

(2004) States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order, London: Routledge.

30.

Jasanoff

(2015) Future imperfect: Science, technology, and the imaginations of modernity. In: Jasanoff

Kim

S-H

(eds) Dreamscapes of Modernity, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

31.

Jasanoff

Kim

S-H

(2009) Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva 47(2): 119–146.

32.

Knorr-Cetina

(1999) Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

33.

Kopf

Findlayson

Humphries

, et al. (2015) Anthropocene baselines: Assessing change and managing biodiversity in human-dominated aquatic ecosystems. BioScience 65(8): 798–811.

34.

Lave

(2012) Fields and Streams: Stream Restoration, Neoliberalism, and the Future of Environmental Science, Athens: University of Georgia Press.

35.

Lave

(2016) Stream restoration and the surprisingly social dynamics of science: Stream restoration and the surprisingly social dynamics of science. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water 3(1): 75–81.

36.

Light

Thompson

Higgs

(2013) Valuing novel ecosystems. In: Hobbs

Higgs

Hall

(eds) Novel Ecosystems, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 257–268.

37.

Lorimer

Driessen

(2014) Wild experiments at the Oostvaardersplassen: Rethinking environmentalism in the Anthropocene. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 39(2): 169–181.

38.

Mantua

Tohver

Hamlet

(2010) Climate change impacts on streamflow extremes and summertime stream temperature and their possible consequences for freshwater salmon habitat in Washington State. Climatic Change 102(1–2): 187–223.

39.

Meengs

Lackey

(2005) Estimating the size of historical Oregon salmon runs. Reviews in Fisheries Science 13(1): 51–66.

40.

Mitchell

(2011) Are environmental imaginaries culturally constructed? In: Davis

Burke

III (eds) Environmental Imaginaries of the Middle East and North Africa, Athens: University of Oho Press, pp. 265–273.

41.

Mote

Rupp

, et al. (2016) Perspectives on the causes of exceptionally low 2015 snowpack in the western United States. Geophysical Research Letters 43(20): 10980–10988.

42.

National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC) (2017) Total Wildland Fires and Acres (1960–2017). Available at: https://www.nifc.gov/fireInfo/fireInfo_statistics.html (accessed June 2019).

43.

Nesbitt

Weiner

(2001) Conflicting environmental imaginaries and the politics of nature in Central Appalachia. Geoforum 32: 333–349.

44.

NOAA Fisheries (2012) Northwest Salmon & Steelhead Recovery Planning & Implementation: An Introduction to Recovery Planning Under the Endangered Species Act. Available at: https://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/publications/education/intro_recovery_planning.pdf (accessed June 2019).

45.

Nolin

Sproles

Brown

(2012) Transboundary River Governance in the Face of Uncertainty: The Columbia River Treaty: A Project of the Universities Consortium on Columbia River Governance, Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.

46.

NW Council (2015) Warm water wreaks havoc on Columbia river fish. Available at: https://www.nwcouncil.org/news/warm-water-wreaks-havoc-columbia-river-fish (accessed 9 July 2018).

47.

NWF v. NMFS National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries Service (2011) 839 F. Supp. 2d 1117.

48.

NWF v. NMFS National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries Service (2016) 184 F. Supp. 3d 861.

49.

Pauly

(1995) Anecdotes and shifting baselines syndrome of fisheries. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10: 430.

50.

Peet

Watts

(1996) Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements, London: Routledge.

51.

Ribes D (2014) Ethnography of scaling. Or, how to fit a national research infrastructure in the room. In: CSCW.

52.

Rieman BE and Isaak DJ (2010) Climate Change, Aquatic Ecosystems, and Fishes in the Rocky Mountain West: Implications and Alternatives for Management. RMRS-GTR-250. Ft Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.

53.

Robertson

(2004) The neoliberalization of ecosystem services: Wetland mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance. Geoforum 35(3): 361–373.

54.

Ruhl

(2012) Panarchy and the law. Ecology and Society 17(3): 31.

55.

Ruhl

Salzman

(2011) Gaming the past: The theory and practice of historic baselines in the administrative state. Vanderbilt Law Review 64: 1–57.

56.

Seastedt

Hobbs

Suding

(2008) Management of novel ecosystems: Are novel approaches required? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6(10): 547–553.

57.

Steinhardt SB and Jackson SJ (2015) Anticipation work: Cultivating vision in collective practice. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing, New York, NY, USA, 2015, CSCW’15, pp.443–453. New York: ACM.

58.

Suding

Leger

(2012) Shifting baselines: Dynamics of evolution and community change in a changing world. In: van Andel

Aronson

(eds) Restoration Ecology: The New Frontier, 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 281–292.

59.

Vano

Nijssen

Lettenmaier

(2015) Seasonal hydrologic responses to climate change in the Pacific Northwest. Water Resources Research 51(4): 1959–1976.

60.

Weber

(1946) Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

61.

West

Julius

Kareiva

, et al. (2009) U.S. natural resources and climate change: Concepts and approaches for management adaptation. Environmental Management 44(6): 1001–1021.

62.

White

(1995) The Organic Machine: The Remaking of the Columbia River, New York: Hill and Wang.

63.

Williams JW and Jackson ST (2007) Novel climates, no-analog communities, and ecological surprises. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5(9). Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20440743.