Environmental conservation through the creation of protected areas is recognised as a key tactic in the fight against degrading ecosystems worldwide. Understanding the implications of protected area regimes on both places and people is an important part of the protection agenda. In this context and in this paper, we build on the work of feminist legal geographers and feminist political ecologists to enhance our understanding of the constitution of localised socio-legal-environmental interactions in and around protected areas. Our approach looks to developments in feminist and legal geographic thought to examine the interactions between identities, law and the environment in a Ramsar protected wetland on the Tonle Sap, Cambodia. We bring together legal geography perspectives regarding the spatiality of law with insights from feminist political ecology examining gendered roles and exclusions. We found that conservation areas interact in complex ways with local pre-existing norms prescribing female weakness and vulnerability which, ultimately, restrict women’s spatial lives.
AckerJBarryKEsseveldJ (1993) Objectivity and truth: Problems in doing feminist research. In: FonnowMMCookJA (eds) Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 133–153.
2.
AgarwalB (1997) “Bargaining” and gender relations: Within and beyond the household. Feminist Economics3: 1–51.
3.
AnthiasFYuval-DavisN (2005) Racialized Boundaries: Race, Nation, Gender, Colour and Class and the Anti-Racist Struggle, New York: Routledge.
4.
AriasMECochraneTAKummuM, et al.(2014) Impacts of hydropower and climate change on drivers of ecological productivity of Southeast Asia’s most important wetland. Ecological Modelling272: 252–263.
5.
BadolaRHussainSA (2003) Conflict in paradise. Mountain Research and Development23: 234–237.
6.
BensonM (2012) Mining sacred space: Law’s enactment of competing ontologies in the American West. Environment and Planning A44: 1443–1458.
7.
BlandySSibleyD (2010) Law, boundaries and the production of space. Social & Legal Studies19: 275–284.
8.
BonheurNLaneBD (2002) Natural resources management for human security in Cambodia’s Tonle Sap Biosphere Reserve. Environmental Science & Policy5: 33–41.
9.
BravermanI (2011) Hidden in plain view: Legal geography from a visual perspective. Law, Culture and the Humanities7: 173–186.
10.
BrickellK (2011) “We don’t forget the old rice pot when we get the new one”: Discourses on ideals and practices of women in contemporary Cambodia. Signs36: 437–462.
11.
Brickell K and Cuomo D (2017) Feminist geolegality. Progress in Human Geography 43: 104–122.
12.
Borrini-Feyerabend GN, Dudley TJ, Lassen NB, Pathak B, Phillips A and Sandwith T (2013) Governance of Protected Areas: From understanding to action. Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 20, Gland, Switzerland:IUCN. pp.xvi + 124.
13.
CampbellICPooleCGiesenW, et al.(2006) Species diversity and ecology of Tonle Sap Great Lake, Cambodia. Aquatic Sciences68: 355–373.
14.
CarettaMA (2015) Situated knowledge in cross-cultural, cross-language research: A collaborative reflexive analysis of researcher, assistant and participant subjectivities. Qualitative Research15: 489–505.
15.
ChoSCrenshawKWMcCallL (2013) Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs38: 785–810.
16.
CrenshawK (1991) Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review43: 1241–1299.
17.
David S (2017) Fishermen seek changes to net rules. The Phnom Penh Post (accessed January 5 2017).
18.
David S and Dara M (2017) Ministry says fisheries crime down. The Phnom Penh Post (accessed January 20 2017).
19.
Delaney D (2003) Beyond the word: Law as a thing of this world. In: Law and Geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
DelaneyD (2015) Legal geography I: Constitutivities, complexities, and contingencies. Progress in Human Geography39: 96–102.
21.
DelaneyD (2017) Legal geography III: New worlds, new convergences. Progress in Human Geography41: 667–675.
22.
DerksA (2008) Khmer Women on the Move: Exploring Work and Life in Urban Cambodia, Honolulu University of Hawai’i Press.
23.
EdwardsR (1998) A critical examination of the use of interpreters in the qualitative research process. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies24: 197–208.
24.
ElmhirstR (2011) Introducing new feminist political ecologies. Geoforum42: 129–132.
25.
EngSLiYMulsowM, et al.(2010) Domestic violence against women in Cambodia: Husband’s control, frequency of spousal discussion, and domestic violence reported by Cambodian women. Journal of Family Violence25: 237–246.
26.
Farries E and Sturm T (2018) Feminist legal geographies of nonconsensual pornography online: Using copyright logic to combat the unauthorized distribution of celebrity intimate images in cyberspace. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X18786964.
27.
GellertPK (2010) Extractive regimes: Toward a better understanding of Indonesian development. Rural Sociology75: 28–57.
28.
GillespieJ (2013) World heritage management: Boundary-making at Angkor Archaeological Park, Cambodia. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management56: 286–304.
29.
GillespieJ (2017) Engaged enquiry in environmental law: Understanding people/place connections through a geographically informed human rights lens. In: Philippopoulos-MihalopoulosABrooksV (eds) Research Methods in Environmental Law: A Handbook, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 265–285.
30.
GillespieJ (2018) Wetlands conservation and legal layering: Managing Cambodia’s great lake. The Geographical Journal184: 31–40.
31.
GillespieJPerryN (2018) Feminist political ecology and legal geography: A case study of the Tonle Sap protected wetlands of Cambodia. Environment and Planning A50: 1–17.
32.
HarrisLKleiberDGoldinJ, et al.(2017) Intersections of gender and water: Comparative approaches to everyday gendered negotiations of water access in underserved areas of Accra, Ghana and Cape Town, South Africa. Journal of Gender Studies26: 561–582.
33.
HarrisLM (2006) Irrigation, gender, and social geographies of the changing waterscapes of southeastern Anatolia. Environment and Planning D24: 187–213.
34.
Hortle KG, Pengbun N, Rady H, et al. (2004) Trends in the Cambodian Dai fishery: Floods and fishing pressure. Catch and Culture 10: 7–9.
35.
JacobsenT (2008) Lost Goddesses: The Denial of Female Power in Cambodian History, Copenhagen: NIAS Press.
36.
KleiberDHarrisLMVincentAC (2015) Gender and small-scale fisheries: A case for counting women and beyond. Fish and Fisheries16: 547–562.
37.
Kleiber D, Harris LM and Vincent AC (2018) Gender and marine protected areas: A case study of Danajon Bank, Philippines. Maritime Studies 17: 163–175.
38.
KobayashiAPeakeL (1994) Unnatural discourse. ‘Race’ and gender in geography. Gender, Place & Culture1: 225–243.
39.
KoskelaH (1997) ‘Bold walk and breakings’: Women’s spatial confidence versus fear of violence. Gender, Place & Culture4: 301–320.
40.
KummuMPennyDSarkkulaJ, et al.(2008) Sediment: Curse or blessing for Tonle Sap Lake. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment37: 158–163.
41.
KummuMSarkkulaJ (2008) Impact of the Mekong River Flow alteration on the Tonle Sap flood pulse. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment37: 185–192.
42.
KusakabeK (2003) Gender Issues in Small Scale Inland Fisheries in Asia: Women as an Important Source of Information, Bangkok: FAO and MRC.
43.
LauJDScalesIR (2016) Identity, subjectivity and natural resource use: How ethnicity, gender and class intersect to influence mangrove oyster harvesting in the Gambia. Geoforum69: 136–146.
44.
LiljaM (2016) Resisting Gendered Norms: Civil Society, the Juridical and Political Space in Cambodia, Oxon: Routledge.
45.
McCallL (2005) The complexity of intersectionality. Signs30: 1771–1800.
MasseyD (1994) Space, Place and Gender, Cambridge: Cambridge Polity Press.
48.
MehtaABondiL (1999) Embodied discourse: On gender and fear of violence. Gender, Place & Culture6: 67–84.
49.
MensherIJ (2006) The Tonle Sap: Reconsideration of the laws governing Cambodia’s most important fishery. Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal15: 797–825.
50.
MilneS (2015) Cambodia’s unofficial regime of extraction: Illicit logging in the shadow of transnational governance and investment. Critical Asian Studies47: 200–228.
51.
MyersNMittermeierRAMittermeierCG, et al.(2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature403: 853–858.
52.
NightingaleA (2006) The nature of gender: Work, gender, and environment. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space24: 165–185.
53.
NightingaleA (2011) Bounding difference: Intersectionality and the material production of gender, caste, class and environment in Nepal. Geoforum42: 153–162.
54.
NuortevaPKeskinenMVarisO (2010) Water, livelihoods and climate change adaptation in the Tonle Sap Lake area, Cambodia: Learning from the past to understand the future. Journal of Water and Climate Change1: 87–101.
55.
PattonMQ (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, Newbury Park, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
56.
PechSSunadaK (2008) Population growth and natural-resources pressures in the Mekong River Basin. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment37: 219–224.
57.
PrattGHansonS (1994) Geography and the construction of difference. Gender, Place & Culture1: 5–29.
58.
RadelC (2012) Gendered livelihoods and the politics of socio-environmental identity: Women’s participation in conservation projects in Calakmul, Mexico. Gender, Place and Culture19: 61–82.
59.
ResurrecciónBP (2006) Rules, roles and rights: Gender, participation and community fisheries management in Cambodia’s Tonle Sap region. International Journal of Water Resources Development22: 433–447.
60.
ResurrecciónBP (2017) Gender and environment from ‘women, environment and development’ to feminist political ecology. In: MacGregorS (eds) Handbook of Gender and Environment, London: Routledge, pp. 71–85.
61.
RobinsonDF (2013) Legal geographies of intellectual property, ‘traditional’ knowledge and biodiversity: Experiencing conventions, laws, customary law, and karma in Thailand. Geographical Research51: 375–386.
62.
RocheleauDThomas-SlayterBWangariE (1996) Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues and Local Experience, London and New York: Routledge.
63.
RodriguesASLAndelmanSJBakarrMI, et al.(2004) Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature428: 640–643.
64.
RuscaMSchwartzKHadzovicL, et al.(2015) Adapting generic models through bricolage: Elite capture of water users associations in peri-urban Lilongwe. The European Journal of Development Research27: 777–792.
65.
SithirithM (2014) The patron–client system and its effect on resources management in Cambodia: A case in the Tonle Sap Lake. Asian Politics & Policy6: 595–609.
66.
SithirithM (2017) Water governance in Cambodia: From centralized water governance to farmer water user community. Resources6: 44.
67.
SultanaF (2009) Fluid lives: Subjectivities, gender and water in rural Bangladesh. Gender, Place and Culture16(4): 427–444.
68.
SundbergJ (2004) Identities in the making: Conservation, gender and race in the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala. Gender, Place & Culture11: 43–66.
69.
Sundberg J (2017) Feminist political ecology. In: Richardson D, Castree N, Goodchild MF, Kobayashi A, Liu W and Marston RA (eds) The International Encyclopedia of Geography. Hoboken, United States: Wiley-Blackwell and Association of American Geographers.
70.
SuriH (2011) Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal11: 63–75.
71.
TaylorLJ (2010) Moral entrepreneurs and moral geographies on the US/Mexico border. Social & Legal Studies19: 299–310.
ValentineG (1989) The geography of women’s fear. Area21: 385–390.
74.
ValentineG (2007) Theorizing and researching intersectionality: A challenge for feminist geography. The Professional Geographer59: 10–21.
75.
Van ZalingeNNaoSTTouchST, et al.(2000) Where there is water, there is fish? Cambodian fisheries issues in a Mekong River basin perspective. ICLARM Studies and Reviews, International Center for Living Aquatic Resource Management26: 37–48.
