A determinative, also known as a “classifier,” is an ideogram utilized within a phonogram-ideogram compound, a common feature in ideographic-phonographic writing systems. It functions as a semantic indicator for the hosting word. Both ancient Egyptian and Chinese scripts extensively employed metonymic determinatives, which indicate the meaning of their hosting words in a metonymic manner. This article compares the use of metonymic determinatives in these two scripts and summarizes five underlying metonymic models through the analysis of numerous examples. Additionally, the cultural influences affecting the selection of metonymic determinatives are explored.
BoltzWG (1994) The Origin and Early Development of the Chinese Writing System. New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society
.
2.
ChampollionJF (1836) Grammaire égyptienne: ou Principes généraux de l’écriture sacrée égyptienne appliquée à la représentation de la langue parlée. Typ. de Firmin Didot frères.
Chen YS [陈永生] (2013) Hanzi Yu Shengshuzi Biaoci Fangshi Bijiao Yanjiu [汉字与圣书字表词方式比较研究]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press
.
5.
Chen YS [陈永生] (2016) The prototypical determinatives in Egyptian and Chinese writing. SCRIPTA8: 101–126.
6.
ErmanAGrapowH (eds) (1971) Wörterbuch der Aegyptischen Sprache. Berlin: Academie-Verlag
.
7.
FaulknerRO (1962) A Concise Dictionary of Middle Egyptian. Oxford: Griffith Institute & Ashmolean Museum
.
8.
GardinerAH (1957) Egyptian Grammar: Being an Introduction to the Study of Hieroglyphs (3rd edn). Oxford: The Griffith Institute
.
9.
GoldwasserO (1995) From Icon to Metaphor: Studies in the Semiotics of the Hieroglyphs. Fribourg: University Press
.
10.
GoldwasserO (2002) Prophets, Lovers and Giraffes: Wor(l)d Classification in Ancient Egypt. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz
.
11.
GoldwasserO (2023) From determinatives to classifiers: Categorisation in the Ancient Egyptian writing system. In: PolisS (ed.) Guide to the Writing Systems of Ancient Egypt. Cairo, Egypt: Institut Français d'Archéologie Orientale
, pp. 192–199.
12.
KahlJ (1994) Das System der ägyptischen Hieroglyphenschrift in der 0.–3.Dynastie. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
13.
KahlJ (2001) Hieroglyphic writing during the fourth millennium BC: An analysis of systems. Archéo-Nil11: 101–134.
14.
LangackerRW (1999) Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
.
15.
Li GY [李国英] (1996) Xiaozhuan Xingshengzi Yanjiu [小篆形声字研究]. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press
.
16.
Lin Y [林沄] (2012) Guwenzixue Jianlun [古文字学简论]. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company
.
17.
LinckeESKammerzellF (2012) Egyptian classifiers at the interface of lexical semantics and pragmatics. In: Lexical Semantics in Ancient Egyptian, Lingua Aegyptia Studia Monographica 9, pp. 55–112.
18.
LoprienoA (2003) Is the Egyptian hieroglyphic determinative chosen or prescribed? In: MorraLBazzanellaC (eds) Philosophers and Hieroglyphs. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier
, pp. 237–250.
19.
McDonaldA (2004) Review of: Goldwasser (2002). Lingua Aegyptia12: 235–244.
20.
PolisS (2018) The functions and toposyntax of ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs: Exploring the iconicity and spatiality of pictorial graphemes. In: KlinkenbergJMPolisS (eds), Signatures. (Essais en) Sémiotique del’écriture. Liège: Signata Annales des Sémiotiques9, pp. 291–363.
21.
PolisSRosmorducS (2015) The hieroglyphic sign functions: Suggestions for a revised taxonomy. In: MuellerMRonsdorfMAmstutzDDornAUljasS (eds), Fuzzy Boundaries: Festschrift for Antonio Loprieno, Vol. 1. Hamburg
: Widmaier, pp.149–174.
22.
Qiu XG [裘锡圭] (2000) Chinese Writing [文字学概要]. Trans. Mattos GL and Norman J. Berkeley, CA: Society for the Study of Early China and the Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California
.
23.
RaddenGKövecsesZ (1999) Towards a theory of metonymy. In: RaddenGPantherK (eds) Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam
: John Benjamins Publishing, pp. 29–43.
24.
SchenkelW (1976) The structure of hieroglyphic script. RAIN15: 4–7.
25.
Xu S [许慎] (1963) Shuo Wen Jie Zi [说文解字]. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company
.
