Abstract
Category:
Ankle; Arthroscopy; Midfoot/Forefoot; Other
Introduction/Purpose:
Studies investigating when patients can safely return to driving are becomingly increasingly numerous in the orthopedic literature because of the recognition of the importance of the activity to the lives of most adults. Previous systematic reviews have proven helpful by collecting and summarizing these studies to establish concise guidelines that can be presented to patients during the counseling surrounding a procedure. Having these guidelines can be even more crucial when discussing elective procedures. This systematic review summarizes the available studies investigating when it is safe to return to driving following elective foot and ankle procedures.
Methods:
A systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL to identify English-language studies from 1999 to present that investigate return to driving after right-sided elective foot and ankle procedures. Qualitative assessment of each of the included studies was performed independently by two authors. Then data from each study was extracted and broken down into distinct categories for comparison: study details, population, control group, method of evaluation, and results.
Results:
Eight studies met inclusion criteria. All of the studies investigate brake reaction time (BRT), via a driving simulator, as their primary outcome. A variety of objective and subjective secondary outcomes were collected. Patients undergoing right ankle or subtalar arthroscopic procedures have no significant difference in BRT compared to controls at 2 weeks post-operatively. 92% of patients undergoing right ankle arthroplasty had a BRT that was not significantly different to the control group at 6 weeks post- operatively. Patients who had an ankle arthrodesis had significantly delayed BRT compared to controls even past 1-year post- operatively. The majority of patients after corrective hallux valgus surgery have no significant difference in BRT at 6 weeks post- operatively compared to their pre-operative baselines depending upon how they are doing clinically. The included studies used a variety of patient reported outcomes that were helpful in predicting which patients would fail the driving simulation at the various timepoints.
Conclusion:
The recommendations from these reviewed studies can guide physicians when counseling their patients on when they can expect to safely return to driving after a specific, elective foot and ankle procedure. However, these recommendations are reliant on routine healing post-operatively and may need to be adjusted if a patient is experiencing any complications. A variety of patient surveys and other subjective scores can be very helpful in assuring a routine post-operative course.
