Abstract
Category:
Ankle Arthritis
Introduction/Purpose:
Hemophilia is a rare hematological disease associated with spontaneous joint hemorrhaging causing hemophilic arthropathy. Symptoms comprise joint pain and deformity, paired with loss of function. In the presence of advanced joint deterioration, therapeutic options are confined to either arthroplasty or arthrodesis. For the ankle, the latter is still referred to as the procedure of choice. However - in light of its capacity to reduce pain while preserving ankle motion - total ankle replacement (TAR) has recently gained acceptance as an alternative. The aim of this study was to investigate the mid- to long-term results of TAR in hemophilic ankle arthropathy.
Methods:
Seventeen TARs were implanted between 1998 and 2012 (mean age: 43 years). Preoperative demographic and disease specific data, complications and revision surgeries were recorded. With a mean follow-up of 9.3 years (range, 2.2-17.8) implant survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Follow-up assessment of 12 TARs was performed after 9.6 years (5 lost to follow-up). Satisfaction and pain scales, the AOFAS hindfoot-score, and the SF-36 were obtained to assess clinical outcome. Radiographic evaluation of pre- and follow-up radiographs was conducted.
Results:
Three cases (17.6%) had undergone TAR removal secondary to loosening at an average interval of 7.5 years. The estimated implant survival was 94% at 5, 85% at 10, and 70% at 15 years (95% CI, 11.9-17.7). The mean estimated implant survival was 14.77 years (95% CI, 11.9-17.7). The mean level of satisfaction was 76%, and of pain 2/10 (VAS). ROM had increased significantly (p=0.037). The SF-36 summary scores were comparable to those of a matched standard population. The AOFAS hindfoot-score averaged 81/100 points.
Conclusion:
TAR is a viable treatment option for advanced hemophilic ankle arthropathy. Based on the herein presented follow- up, implant survival compares to that of non-hemophilic populations. Clinical mid- to long-term results are favorable. However, the majority of follow-up radiographs revealed component loosening and/or periprosthetic lucency. Considering the study population’s young age and specific risk factors, need for revision surgery secondary to symptomatic component loosening may arise.