Performing in Heritage Squares: Case Study of Macao

Abstract

Revitalization (adaptive reuse) of heritage buildings is an established trend in Macao. Although various heritage squares in Macao are suitable for conducting performing arts, no well-established regulatory framework has been developed for the best use of such spaces; consequently, it is difficult to carry out performances at heritage buildings, enhance the quality of performance and promote the heritage. This research thus aims to examine the programming process of integrating performing arts with heritage squares. The research has been carried out in 2020, with an objective to frame a programme and administrative polices for heritage and art institutions. Through research, interviews and observation, a mechanism will be formulated, aiming to provide all-round guidelines and instructions to curators and artists for their management in the future. It can be summarized in three main steps: (a) preliminary research, (b) programming considerations and (c) regulatory requirements and administrative processes. In the hope of establishing revitalization guidelines and integrating heritage and performing arts, endless opportunities for heritage conservation of Macao can be further identified.

Keywords

Performing arts outdoor performance heritage revitalization art-led revitalization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Appleton

(1996). Buildings for the performing arts: A design and development guide. Butterworth Architecture.

Barker

, & Beckerman

(2009). Theatrical production. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/art/theatrical-production/Aims-and-functions

Chen

X. F.

(n.d.). Tan suo Ao men ju chang kong jian de wei lai lu xiang (Exploring the future trends of theatre space in Macao). Fantasia. https://fantasiamacau.com/2019/03/14/%e6%8e%a2%e7%b4%a2%e6%be%b3%e9%96%80%e5%8a%87%e5%a0%b4%e7%a9%ba%e9%96%93%e7%9a%84%e6%9c%aa%e4%be%86%e8%b7%af%e5%90%91/

Chu

C. L.

(2015). Spectacular Macau: Visioning futures for a world heritage city. Geoforum, 65, 440–450.

Cultural Affairs Bureau, Macao SAR. (n.d.a). Department of Cultural Heritage. Cultural Affairs Bureau Official Website. https://www.icm.gov.mo/en/DPC

Curl

(2003). Historic armory building may become performing arts center. Daily Journal of Commerce, Vol. 1.

Hammarberg

, Kirkman

, & de Lacey

(2016). Qualitative research methods: When to use them and how to judge them. Human Reproduction, 31(3), 498–501.

Horwitz-Bennett

(2006). A better idea. Building Design & Construction, 47(12), 62–63.

ICOMOS. (2013). Understanding and assessing cultural significance (The Burra charter practice notes, pp. 1–12). Australia International Council of Monuments and Sites.

10.

Johnston

(1992). What is social value? A discussion paper [Technical Publications Series No. 3]. Australian Government Publishing Services.

11.

Kawulich

B. B.

(2005). Participant observation as a data collection method. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(2), 43.

12.

Klein

, & Loveless

(2020). Responding to site: The performance work of Marilyn Arsem. Intellect.

13.

Kolleeny

J. F.

(2003). Poetry of performance. Architectural Record, 191(10), 125–140.

14.

Lavenda

R. H.

, & Schultz

(2013). Core concepts in cultural anthropology (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

15.

Leong

K. K. H.

, & Zheng

(2019, October 23–26). Effectiveness of arts-led urban regeneration in Macao. Paper presented at World City Cultural Forum.

16.

Macao SAR. (2006). Dispatch from the Chief Executive No. 202/2006. Macao SAR

17.

Macao SAR. (2008). Dispatch from the Chief Executive No. 83/2008. Macao SAR.

18.

Macao SAR. (2013). Cultural Heritage Protection Law. Macao SAR.

19.

Marshall

, & Rossman

G. B.

(1989). Designing qualitative research. SAGE Publications.

20.

Maxwell

J. A.

(2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. SAGE Publications.

21.

Miller

(2017). What is the difference between visual arts and performing arts? How can each be used in cultural events? The Old Jail Art Center. http://www.theoldjailartcenter.org/differences-between-visual-and-performing-arts/use-in-cultural-events

22.

Pearson

(2010). Site-specific performance. Palgrave Macmillan.

23.

Rogers

A. P.

(2019). Values and relationships between tangible and intangible dimensions of heritage places. In Acrami

, Macdonald

, Mason

, & Myers

(Eds.), Values in heritage management: Emerging approaches and research directions (pp. 172–185). The Getty Conservation Institute.

24.

Schechner

(1968). 6 Axioms for Environmental Theatre. The Drama Review, 12(3), 41–64. 10.2307/1144353

25.

Shank

(1982). American alternative theatre. Macmillan.

26.

Stein

, & Bathurst

(2008). Performing arts management: A handbook of professional practices. Allworth Press.

27.

UNESCO (n.d.). Performing arts. Intangible Cultural Heritage. https://ich.unesco.org/en/performing-arts-00054

28.

Uzzell

, & Roy

(2008). Heritage that hurts: Interpretation in a postmodern world. In Fairclough

, . (Eds.), The heritage reader (pp. 502–513). Routledge.

29.

White

C. A.

(2001). Technical theatre: A practical introduction. Arnold.

30.

Xiao

(2010). Dang cheng shi bian cheng zu ti: lun ao men cheng shi yi sui 09 de ji ge huan jing ju chang yan chu (When city becomes a topic: Discussing several performances of environmental theatre in Macao City Fringe Festival 2009). Man zou, Aomen: Huan jing ju change er shi nian. Huan jing ju chang ping lun xuan (Walk slow, Macao: Environmental in 20 years. Selection of environmental critiques) (pp. 80–83). Macau Theatre Association.

31.

Yang

E. H.

(2015). Wu tai yi shu yao su: deng guang, yin xiang, duo mei ti de yun yong (Artistic elements on stage: the use of lighting, sounds and multi-media). Arts Education, 2, 59.