Cities are characterised by social and cultural diversity. The management of urban wildlife requires developing a better understanding of cultural beliefs associated with wildlife in diverse urban settings. We document a range of cultural beliefs associated with the slender loris (Loris lydekkerianus), an endemic, nocturnal primate, in the Indian megacity of Bengaluru. Many residents associate the loris with practices such as black magic, and they believe that the animal’s call is a bad omen that brings death and misfortune. Others consider it a harbinger of good luck that offers protection to young children. These superstitious beliefs may motivate illegal wildlife trafficking of the loris. Urbanisation has led to changes in these perceptions, and many respondents now report that they consider these beliefs to be old-fashioned superstitions that hold no place in a modern city. This study contributes to knowledge on changing urban attitudes to wildlife, which is vital to developing conservation strategies that involve local residents.
AipanjigulyS., JacobsonS. K., & FlammR. (2003). Conserving manatees: Knowledge, attitudes, and intentions of boaters in Tampa Bay, Florida. Conservation Biology, 17(4), 1098–1105. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01452.x
2.
AlvesR. R. N., SoutoW. M. S., & BarbozaR. R. D. (2010). Primates in traditional folk medicine: A world overview. Mammal Review, 40(2), 155–180. 10.1111/j.1365-2907.2010.00158.x
3.
AlvesR. R., SoutoW. M., BarbozaR. R., & BezerraD. M. (2013). Primates in traditional folk medicine. In AlvesR. R. & RosaI. L. (Eds.), Animals in traditional folk medicine (pp. 135–170). Springer.
4.
AronsonM. F., La SorteF. A., NilonC. H., KattiM., GoddardM. A., LepczykC. A., WarrenP. S., WilliamsN. S., CilliersS., ClarksonB., DobbsC., DolanR., HedblomM., KlotzS., KooijmansJ. L., KühnI., Macgregor-ForsI., McDonnellM., MörtbergU., … & WinterM. (2014). A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proceedings. Biological Sciences, 281(1780), 20133330. 10.1098/rspb.2013.3330
5.
BaharuddinZ. M., KaruppannanS., & SivamA. (2013). Environmental attitude: Values of urban wildlife A case study of Kuala Lumpur urban parks. Edinburgh Architectural Research Journal, 33, 25–47.
6.
BandaraR., & TisdellC. (2003). Comparison of rural and urban attitudes to the conservation of Asian elephants in Sri Lanka: Empirical evidence. Biological Conservation, 110(3), 327–342. 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00241-0
7.
BjerkeT., & ØstdahlT. (2004). Animal-related attitudes and activities in an urban population. Anthrozoös, 17(2), 109–129. 10.2752/089279304786991783
8.
BraczkowskiA. R., O’BryanC. J., StringerM. J., WatsonJ. E., PossinghamH. P., & BeyerH. L. (2018). Leopards provide public health benefits in Mumbai, India. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 16(3), 176–182. 10.1002/fee.1776
DevanM. S. J. (2011). Comparative study of honey samples depicting the difference in important nectar yielding plants after a span of 15 years in Bangalore, Karnataka, India. Journal of Apiculture, 26(1), 43–47.
11.
DickmanA. J. (2010). Complexities of conflict: The importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human–wildlife conflict. Animal Conservation, 13(5), 458–466. 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00368.x
12.
ElmqvistT., FragkiasM., GoodnessJ., GüneralpB., MarcotullioP. J., McDonaldR. I., … WilkinsonC. (2013). Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities: A global assessment. Springer Nature.
13.
Fitch-SnyderH. (2001). E-mail from the edge: Loris survey in Vietnam. Loris conservation and San Diego Zoo. Retrieved January11, 2019. http://www.sandiegozoo.org/wildideas/conservation/e_f_e_vietnam7.html
14.
GlaserB., & StraussA. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.
15.
GnanaolivuS. D., CamperaM., NekarisK. A. I., NijmanV., SatishR., BabuS., & SinghM. (2022). Medicine, black magic and supernatural beings: Cultural rituals as a significant threat to slender lorises in India. People and Nature, 4(4), 1007–1019. 10.1002/pan3.10336
16.
Jhamvar-ShingoteR., & SchuettM. A. (2013). The predators of Junnar: Local peoples’ knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes toward leopards and leopard conservation. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 18(1), 32–44. 10.1080/10871209.2012.694578
17.
JunJ. S. (1879). Malagasy folk-lore and popular superstitions. Folk-Lore Record, 2(1), 19–46. 10.1080/17441994.1879.10602562
18.
KadidalA. (2019, May14). Black magic puts city’s slender loris in the red. Deccan Herald. https://www.deccanherald.com/city/top-bengaluru-stories/black-magic-puts-citys-slender-loris-in-the-red-733705.html
19.
Kar GuptaK. (2007). Socioecology and conservation of the slender loris (Loris tardigradus) in southern India. Arizona State University.
20.
KnightJ. (1999). Monkeys on the move: The natural symbolism of people–macaque conflict in Japan. Journal of Asian Studies, 58(3), 622–647. 10.2307/2659114
21.
KnightJ. (Ed.). (2004). Wildlife in Asia: Cultural perspectives. Routledge.
22.
KulkarniV., RameshH. P., HarshithaS. C., ChoudhuryS., AshokP., BacchuR., AruP. V., AchappaA., KumarY., RajuA., GururajaK. V., BhutiaK., PageN., JoisD., JayasankarS., KrishnaM. B., & Kar GuptaK. (2015, September). Where have all the lorises gone: Slender loris, citizen scientists, and urban growth in Bangalore [Paper presentation]. 6th Student Conference on Conservation Science (SCCS), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
23.
KumaraH. N., SinghM., & KumarS. (2006). Distribution, habitat correlates, and conservation of Loris lydekkerianus in Karnataka, India. International Journal of Primatology, 27(4), 941–969. 10.1007/s10764-006-9054-z
24.
ManfredoM., TeelT., & BrightA. (2003). Why are public values toward wildlife changing?Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 8(4), 287–306. 10.1080/716100425
25.
MasciaM. B., BrosiusJ. P., DobsonT. A., ForbesB. C., HorowitzL., McKeanM. A., & TurnerN. J. (2003). Conservation and the social sciences. Conservation Biology, 17(3), 649–650. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01738.x
26.
NagendraH. (2016). Nature in the city: Bengaluru in the past, present, and future. Oxford University Press.
27.
NagendraH., SudhiraH., KattiM., TengoM., & and SchweniuM. (2012). Urbanization, ecosystems and biodiversity: Assessments of India and Bangalore. Released at the Cities for Life Summit, 11th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
28.
NekarisA., SinghM., & KumarC. (2008). Loris lydekkerianus. The IUCN red list of threatened species. Retrieved February2019. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/44722/10942453
29.
NekarisK. A.-I., MooreR. S., RodeE. J., & FryB. G. (2013). Mad, bad and dangerous to know: The biochemistry, ecology and evolution of slow loris venom. Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins Including Tropical Diseases, 19(1), 21. 10.1186/1678-9199-19-21
30.
NisbettR. A., PealA. L., HoytR. A., & CarterJ. (2003). Liberia. In KormosR., BoeschC., BakarrM. I. & ButynskiT. M. (Eds.), West African Chimpanzees: Status survey and conservation action plan (pp. 89–98). International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources/SSC Primate Specialist Group.
31.
RadhakrishnaS. (2017). Cultural and religious aspects of primate conservation. In FuentesA. (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of primatology. Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781119179313.wbprim0323
32.
RadhakrishnaS. (2018). Primate tales: Using literature to understand changes in human–primate relations. International Journal of Primatology, 39(5), 878–894. 10.1007/s10764-018-0035-9
33.
SaraswatR., SinhaA., & RadhakrishnaS. (2015). A god becomes a pest? Human–rhesus macaque interactions in Himachal Pradesh, northern India. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 61(3), 435–443. 10.1007/s10344-015-0913-9
34.
ShackletonS., ChinyimbaA., HebinckP., ShackletonC., & KaomaH. (2015). Multiple benefits and values of trees in urban landscapes in two towns in northern South Africa. Landscape and Urban Planning, 136, 76–86. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.12.004
35.
SoonsawadN. (2014). An assessment of ecosystem services provided by street trees in Bangkok, Thailand. University of California, Riverside.
36.
SoulsburyC. D., & WhiteP. C. L. (2015). Human–wildlife interactions in urban areas: A review of conflicts, benefits and opportunities. Wildlife Research, 42(7), 541–553. 10.1071/WR14229
37.
StillfriedM., GrasP., BörnerK., GöritzF., PainerJ., RölligK., WenzlerM., HoferH., OrtmannS., & Kramer-SchadtS. (2017). Secrets of success in a landscape of fear: Urban wild boar adjust risk perception and tolerate disturbance. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 157. 10.3389/fevo.2017.00157
38.
StreicherU., SinghM., TimminsR. J., & BrockelmanW. (2008). Nycticebus bengalensis. The IUCN red list of threatened species. Retrieved April2020. http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/39758/0
39.
TeelT. L., & ManfredoM. J. (2010). Understanding the diversity of public interests in wildlife conservation. Conservation Biology, 24(1), 128–139. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01374.x
40.
TembyI. (2007). Pest or guest – Some perspectives of abundant wildlife in Victoria. In EbyP. H. (Ed.), Pest or guest: The zoology of overabundance (pp. 150–157). Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales.
41.
United Nations. (2016). The world’s cities in 2016: Data booklet. Retrieved March19, 2019. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/urbanization/the_worlds_cities_in_2016_data_booklet.pdf
42.
WilksS. L., RussellT., & EymannJ. (2013, April). Valued guest or vilified pest? How attitudes towards urban brushtail possums ‘Trichosurus vulpecula’ fit into general perceptions of animals. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10.2139/ssrn.2258809
43.
ZimmermannA., WalpoleM. J., & Leader-WilliamsN. (2005). Cattle ranchers’ attitudes to conflicts with jaguar Panthera onca in the Pantanal of Brazil. Oryx, 39(4), 406–412. 10.1017/S0030605305000992
