The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of solidarity and care networks in withstanding crises. One example is the emergence of Ollas Comunes (Common Pots, a type of community kitchen) in the peripheries of Lima, which highlighted the enormous need for spaces that promote, channel, and strengthen collective support. Consolidating these networks, and allowing them to prosper over time, constitutes an alternative aimed at improving the living conditions of marginal groups, a crucial task in reducing urban inequalities. Co-production occurred at multiple scales: from local implementations of community kitchens to the design of urban networks for agriculture, water and sanitation, and food production. Collective innovation happened in technical terms towards promoting the efficient use of renewable resources (extending the concept of care to the care of the territory and the environment) and in the formulation of alternative governance in the maintenance and repair of the implemented infrastructure towards a renewed sense of citizenship.
AllenA., BelkowT., EscalanteC., de los RíosS., KamiyaM., LambertR., MirandaL., WeselyJ., & ZilbertL. (2017). De la mitigación de desastres a la interrupción de trampas de riesgo: La experiencia de aprendizaje-acción de clima sin riesgo [From disaster mitigation to risk trap disruption: The learning–action experience of Clima sin Riesgo].REDER, 1(1), 6–28.
2.
AllenA., ZilbertL., & WeselyJ. (2017). From state agencies to ordinary citizens: Reframing risk-mitigation investments and their impact to disrupt urban risk traps in Lima, Peru. Environment & Urbanization, 29(2), 477–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247817706061
AnguloN. (2011). Comedores populares: Seguridad alimentaria y ejercicio de ciudadanía en el Perú [Community kitchens: Food security and the exercise of citizenship in Peru]. Socioeco. http://www.socioeco.org/bdf_fiche-document-4392_es.html
5.
BlondetC., & MonteroC. (1995). Hoy: Menu popular, comedores en Lima [Serving today: Popular menu, community kitchens in Lima]. IEP ediciones. http://lanic.utexas.edu/project/laoap/iep/ddtlibro46.pdf
6.
BlondetC., MonteroC., TrivelliC., GonzálesN., FalcoI., CaballeroV., & YancariJ. (2004). Cucharas en alto [Spoons up]. In BlondetC. & TrivellC. (Eds), Del asistencialismo al desarrollo local: Fortaleciendo la participación de las mujeres[From assistance to local development: Strengthening the participation of women]. IEP ediciones.
7.
BoanoC., & KellingE. (2013). Toward an architecture of dissensus: Participatory urbanism in South-East Asia. Footprint: Delft School of Design Journal, 7(2). https://doaj.org/article/e1ccc7498c0642d59fe108340018bbe5
8.
CalderónJ. (2016). La ciudad ilegal: Lima en el siglo XX[Illegal city: Lima in the twentieth century] (2nd ed.). Punto Cardinal.
9.
CárdenasA. (2021, August11). Ollas comunes fantasmas, un golpe bajo a la emergencia alimentaria [Ghost community kitchens: A low blow to the food emergency]. La República. https://data.larepublica.pe/ollas-comunes-fantasmas-un-golpe-bajo-a-la-emergencia-alimentaria/
10.
Castán BrotoV., & Neves AlvesS. (2018). Intersectionality challenges for the co-production of urban services: Notes for a theoretical and methodological agenda. Environment and Urbanization, 30(2), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247818790208
11.
ClarkF. C., & LaurieN. (2000). Gender, age, and exclusion: A challenge to community organisations in Lima, Peru. Gender and Development, 8(2), 80–88. http://www.jstor.org.ezphost.dur.ac.uk/stable/4030477
12.
CrawfordC. A. (2011). Can humanitarian responses in urban areas reinforce underlying causes of vulnerability? Tweaking a livelihoods analysis of inequality and infrastructure in splintering cities. Environmental Hazards, 10(3), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2011.597497
13.
DaduscD. (2019). The micropolitics of border struggles: Migrants’ squats and inhabitance as alternatives to citizenship. Citizenship Studies, 23(6), 593–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2019.1634377
14.
DanielsB., LatasteC., BustamanteE., SandovalS., Basfi-ferK., & CáceresP. (2021). Contribución de las organizaciones sociales ‘ollas comunes’ a la alimentación de la población chilena en tiempos de pandemia por COVID-19 [Contribution of the social organisation ‘Ollas Comunes’ to feeding the Chilean population in times of the COVID-19 pandemic]. Revista Chilena de Nutricion, 48(5), 707–716. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-75182021000500707
15.
Defensoría del Pueblo. (2020). Defensoría del Pueblo: Urgen medidas con enfoque de género para prevenir sobrecarga laboral en las mujeres. [Ombudsman’s office: Measures with a gender approach are urgently needed to prevent work overload in women]https://www.defensoria.gob.pe/defensoria-del-pueblo-urgen-medidas-con-enfoque-de-genero-para-prevenir-sobrecarga-laboral-en-las-mujeres/
16.
Delgado PugleyD. (2020). La COVID-19 en el Perú: Una pequeña tecnocracia enfrentándose a las consecuencias de la desigualdad [COVID-19 in Peru: A small technocracy facing the consequences of inequality]. Análisis Carolina, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.33960/AC_26.2020
17.
DesmaisonB. (2021). Living in the city beyond housing: Urbanism of the commons. In McFarlaneC. & LancioneM. (Eds), Global urbanism: Knowledge, power and the city (pp. 331–341). Routledge.
18.
EscalanteC. (Ed.). (2020). Es vida no experiencia: Estudio de gestión de territorio en las laderas del Asentamiento Humano José Carlos Mariátegui[It’s life, not experience: Territory management study on the slopes of the José Carlos Mariátegui settlement]. CENCA Instituto de Desarrollo Urbano.
19.
EvansA. (2021). Why is feminist activism thriving in Latin America?https://www.draliceevans.com/post/why-is-feminist-activism-thriving-in-latin-america
20.
ForsytheD. P. (2009). Humanitarianism in question: Politics, power, ethics (review). In Human Rights Quarterly, 31. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.0.0066
GrantW. (2021, June1). Covid: Peru more than doubles death toll after review. BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-57307861
23.
GygerH. (2019). Improvised cities: Architecture, urbanization & innovation in Peru. University of Pittsburgh Press.
24.
HerzerH., RodríguezC., RedondoA., di VirgilioM. M., & OstuniF. (2004). Organizaciones sociales en el barrio de La Boca: Cambios y permanencias en un contexto de crisis [Social organisations in the La Boca neighbourhood: Changes and permanence in a context of crisis]. Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos, 20(2), 269–308. https://doi.org/10.24201/edu.v20i2.1219
25.
HordijkM. (2010). Nuestra Realidad es Otra: Changing realities in Lima’s peripheral settlements: A case study from San Juan de Miraflores. In BrunfautV.d’AuriaV.De MeulderB.MorettaL. & ShannonK. (Eds.), The production, use and dissemination of urban knowledge in cities of the south, N-AERUS XI (pp. 361–374).
26.
ImminkM. D. C. (2001). People’s community kitchens in Peru: Women’s activism pro urban food security. Ecology of Food Nutrition, 40(6), 699–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/03670244.2001.9991678
27.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática. (2019). Compendio estádistico provincia de Lima 2019 [Statistical compendium of the province of Lima, 2019]. Instituto Nacional de Estadistica e Informatica. https://www.inei.gob.pe/media/MenuRecursivo/publicaciones_digitales/Est/Lib1714/Libro.pdf
28.
Instituto Nacional de Estadistica e Informatica. (2020). Planos estratificados de Lima Metropolitana a nivel de manzanas 2020: Según ingreso per cápita del hogar [Stratified plans of Metropolitan Lima by block, According to household income per capita, 2020]. Instituto Nacional de Estadistica e Informatica. https://www.inei.gob.pe/media/MenuRecursivo/publicaciones_digitales/Est/Lib1744/libro.pdf
29.
JaimeK., GallardoL., BernalesD., & HerndonM. (2021). José Carlos Mariátegui: Hacia un visión colectiva e integral del espacio, la ciudad y el territorio [José Carlos Mariátegui: Towards a collective and integral vision of space, the city, and the territory]. https://www.urban-know.com/no-5-know-working-paper-esp
30.
KihatoC. W., & LandauL. B. (2020). Visibilising suffering or stealth humanitarianism? The perils of promoting durable protection in cities of the south. In PasquettiS. & SanyalR. (Eds.), Displacement: Global conversations on refuge (pp. 193–209). M y M Impresiones.
31.
KlinenbergE. (2018). Palaces for the people: How social infrastructure can help fight inequality, polarization, and the decline of civic life. Crown.
32.
LambertR. (2021). Examinando la relación entre la planeación y la urbanización periférica en Lima [Examining the relationship between planning and peripheral urbanisation in Lima]. Ensayos, 1(2), 71–93.
33.
MarmotM., AllenJ., GoldblattP., HerdE., & MorrisonJ. (2020). Build back fairer: The COVID-19 Marmot review. Health Foundation. https://www.health.org.uk/publications/build-back-fairer-the-covid-19-marmotreview
34.
MatternS. (2018). Maintenance and care. Places Journal, (November).
35.
Minaya RodríguezJ. (2015). “No matarás ni con hambre ni con balas”. Las mujeres de los comedores populares autogestionarios en El Agustino durante la violencia política [“Don’t kill; nor with hunger nor bullets”. Women of self-managed welfare kitchens in El Agustino during the political violence]. Anthropologica Del Departamento de Ciencias Sociales, 33(34), 165–188.
36.
MitlinD. (2021). Editorial: Citizen participation in planning: From the neighbourhood to the city. Environment and Urbanization, 33(2), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/09562478211035608
MoserA. (2004). Happy heterogeneity? Feminism, development, and the grassroots women’s movement in Peru. Feminist Studies, 30(1), 211–237.
39.
OsuteyeE., OrtizC., LípietzB., CastánV., JohnsonC., & KombeW. (2019). Knowledge co-production for urban equality. KNOW (Knowledge in Action for Urban Equality) Working Paper Series, (1), 14. https://www.urban-know.com/no-1-know-working-paper
40.
PalaciosM. (2021, December14). Abilia Ramos, lideresa vecinal: ‘Escapé del machismo, del terrorismo, quería ser profesional’ [Abilia Ramos, community leader: ‘I escaped from machismo, from terrorism, I wanted to be a professional’]. Peru 21.
41.
PozzebonS. (2021, November30). Hunger in Latin America and the Caribbean is at its highest point in two decades, UN says. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2021/11/30/americas/latin-america-caribbean-hunger-food-insecurity-un-report-intl/index.html
42.
Puig de la BellacasaM. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. University of Minnesota Press.
43.
QuispeR. (2020). Inversiones en las partes altas del AHJCM [Investments in the upper parts of José Carlos Mariátegui]. In EscalanteC. (Ed.), Es vida no experiencia: Estudio de gestión de territorio en las laderas del Asentamiento Humano José Carlos Mariátegui [It’s life not experience: Study of land management on the slopes of the José Carlos Mariátegui settlement] (pp. 71–124). CENCA Instituto de Desarrollo Urbano.
44.
Ramirez-CorzoD., & HerreraT. (2018). Estadísticas y mapas de Lima metropolitana por distritos según el censo 2017 [Statistics and maps of metropolitan Lima by district according to the 2017 census]. https://www.urban-know.com/lima
45.
Red de Ollas Comunes de Lima [@ollascomunes_pe] (2022, January17). Las ollas comunes no pedimos asistencialismo señor #Muñoz, decir que haber hecho puras donaciones es un ‘gran logro’ no solo es un despropósito, sino también un desconocimiento de lo que significa gestión territorial y sostenibilidad de las organizaciones [The Ollas Comunes do not ask for assistance Mr #Muñoz. Saying that making food donations is a ‘great achievement’ is not only nonsense, but also depicts a lack of knowledge of what territorial management and sustainability of community-based organisations really means]. https://twitter.com/ollascomunes_pe/status/1483136019889221634
46.
SantandreuA. (2021). #OllasContraElHambre: Entre la victimización y la resistencia [#PotsAgainstHunger: Between victimisation and resistance]. http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/peru/17426.pdf
47.
Sarmiento VienaK. (2017). La disputa de las mujeres por el hábitat popular: La experiencia de los comedores populares autogestionarios de El Agustino, Lima [The struggles of women for popular habitat: The experience of self-managed community kitchens in El Agustino, Lima]. Bulletin de l’Institut Français d’études Andines, 46(3), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.4000/bifea.8864
48.
SchroederK. (2006). A feminist examination of community kitchens in Peru and Bolivia. Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 13(6), 663–668.
SolnitR. (2009). A paradise built in hell: The extraordinary communities that arise in disaster. Penguin Group.
51.
TanakaM. (1999). La participación social y política de los pobladores populares urbanos ¿del movimientismo a una política de ciudadanos?: El caso de El Agustino [The social and political participation of popular urban residents: From a political movement to a citizens’ policy? The case of El Agustino]. In Instituto de Estudios Peruanos. https://repositorio.iep.org.pe/handle/IEP/920
52.
TorresD. (2018). Lima: Titulación de tierras sin ciudad, del bien colectivo al privado [Lima: Titling of land without a city, from collective to private property]. https://www.puec.unam.mx/pdf/publicaciones_digitales/tesis/lima_libroelectronico.pdf
53.
VasconcelosV. V., SantosF. C., & PachecoJ. M. (2013). A bottom-up institutional approach to cooperative governance of risky commons. Nature Climate Change, 3(9), 797–801. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1927
54.
Vega-CentenoI. (2004). Los comedores populares son política social?: Entre la nominación y la violencia simbólica [Are community kitchens a social policy? Between nomination and symbolic violence]. Nueva Sociedad, (193), 146–162.
