Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The broad success of development initiatives and ensuing material prosperity in rural areas of the Indian Himalayas have seen an increasing number of families route their increased surpluses to nearby urban areas in search of speculative footholds. Yet, the region continues to be viewed as essentially rural by policy and academic literatures. This article critiques this association by focusing on social-spatial change in the town of Banjar in the Kullu district of Himachal Pradesh. We turn our attention to the stories of property and infrastructures that connect households, contractors, workers and materials, as well as the collectives that emerge or are reconfigured alongside these built environments. The article shows how upward mobility is accompanied by new susceptibilities, how an unlikely and understudied set of agents drives urban change in the absence of formal planning and how inherited hierarchies are being renegotiated through everyday practices to produce what we call ‘contoured urbanism’, or the uneven but geographically situated form of urbanisation in parts of the Himalayan region. The article makes the case for critical urban research as a productive entry point into debates on regional futures.

Keywords

urbanisation infrastructure caste planning Himachal Pradesh Himalayas

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

(2003). Environmental planning and management of the peri-urban interface: Perspectives on an emerging field. Environment and Urbanization, 15(1), 135–148.

Angelo

, & Hentschel

(2015). Interactions with infrastructure as windows into social worlds: A method for critical urban studies. City, 19(2), 306–312.

Arboleda

(2016). In the nature of the non-city: Expanded infrastructural networks and the political ecology of planetary urbanisation. Antipode, 48(2), 233–251.

Berti

(2015). Ritual kingsip, divine bureaucracy and electoral politics in Kullu. European Bulletin of Himalayan Research, 8(1), 29–30, 39–61.

Brenner

, & Schmid

(2015). Towards a new epistemology of the urban? City, 19(2–3), 151–182.

Bunnell

, & Maringanti

(2010). Practicing urban and regional research beyond metrocentricity. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(2), 415–20.

Chhatre

, & Saberwal

(2005). Political incentives for biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology, 19(2), 310–17.

Das

M.B.

, Kapoor-Mehta

, Tas

E.O.

, & Zumbyte

(2015). Scaling the heights: Social inclusion and sustainable development in Himachal Pradesh. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

Denis

, & Marius-Gnanou

(2011). Toward a better appraisal of urbanisation in India: A fresh look at the landscape of morphological agglomerates. Cybergeo, doi: 10.4000/cybergeo.24798. Retrieved from http://cybergeo.revues.org/24798

10.

Denis

, Mukhopadhyay

, & Zerah

M.-H.

(2012). Subaltern urbanisation in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 47(30), 52–62.

11.

Derné

(2005). The (limited) effect of cultural globalization in India: Implications for culture theory. Poetica, 33(1), 33–47.

12.

Editorial Board and Editorial Collective (2016). Introducing urbanisation. Urbanisation, 1(1), vii–xiii. doi: 10.1177/2455747116646638.

13.

Gayer

, & Jaffrelot

(2012). Muslims in Indian cities: Trajectories of marginalisation. New York: Columbia University Press.

14.

Jodhka

S. S.

(2015). Cast(e) on the hill: ‘Divine’ power, social cohesion and hierarchy in Himachal Pradesh. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(21), 59–68.

15.

Kundu

(2011). Trends and processes of urbanisation in India. Urbanisation and Emerging Population Issues Working Paper 6. London: IIED and UNFPA.

16.

Lawhon

, Ernston

, & Silver

(2014). Provincializing urban political ecology: Towards a situated UPE through African urbanism. Antipode, 46(2), 497–516.

17.

Merrifield

(2013). The urban question under planetary urbanization. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3), 909–922.

18.

Morton

(2014). How I learned to stop worrying and love the term Anthropocene. Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry, 1(2), 257–64.

19.

Raman

, Prasad-Aleyamma

, & De Bercegol

, Denis

, & Zerah

M-H.

(2015). Selected readings on small town dynamics in India. Delhi: USR 3330 Savoirs et Mondes Indiens Working Paper Series No. 7.

20.

Robinson

(2013). Culture of small-town India. In Sharma

R. N.

& Sandhu

R. S.

(Eds), Small cities and towns in global era: Emerging changes and perspectives (pp. 70–83). Jaipur: Rawat Publications.

21.

Roy

(2005). Urban informality: Toward an epistemology of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), 147–158.

22.

Roy

(2009). Why India cannot plan its cities: Informality, insurgence and the idiom of urbanization. Planning Theory, 8(1), 76–87.

23.

Scrase

T. J.

, Rutten

, Ganguly-Scrase

, & Brown

(2015). Beyond the metropolis: Regional globalisation and town development: An introduction. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 38(2), 216–229.

24.

Silver

(2014). Incremental infrastructures: Material improvisation and social collaboration across post-colonial Accra. Urban Geography, 35(6), 788–804.

25.

Simone

(2001). On the worlding of African cities. African Studies Review, 44(2), 15–41.

26.

Simone

(2004). People as infrastructure: Intersecting fragments in Johannesburg. Public Culture, 16(3), 407–29.

27.

Simone

(2015). The urban poor and their ambivalent exceptionalities: Some notes from Jakarta. Current Anthropology, 56(11), 15–23.

28.

Tiwari

A.K.

(2000). Infrastructure and economic development in Himachal Pradesh. New Delhi: Indus Publishing Company.

29.

Vasan

, & Kumar

(2006). Situating conserving communities in their place: Political economy of Kullu Devban. Conservation and Society, 4(2), 325–346.

30.

World Bank (2007). Himachal Pradesh: Accelerating development and sustaining success in a hill state. Delhi: India Country Management Unit.

31.

Zhu

(2000). In situ urbanization in rural China: Case studies from Fujian Province. Development and Change, 31(2), 413–434.

Contoured Urbanism: People,Property and Infrastructures in the Indian Himalayas

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References