The increase of bandit groups in Bengal over the nineteenth century was a menace to the established law and order. The bandit gangs are known as dakat, a Hindi word for banditry. The article sheds light on several issues including whether people engaged in dacoities belonged to a particular caste, community, class or religion. It also examines how much they transcended these categories. It is important to understand how crime has a social impact; therefore, the analysis emphasizes this aspect by looking at the individuals and their reasons. The article on the other hand points out socio-economic backgrounds, motives and social origins of criminal behaviour in analysing various dacoity groups.
AcharyaB. K. (1914). Codification in British India. S. K. Banerji & Sons.
2.
ArnoldD. (1985). Crime and Crime Control in Madras. In YangA. A. (Ed.), Crime and criminality in British India. University of Arizona Press.
3.
AwwalI. (1990). Extent and nature of dacoity in Bengal countryside, 1837–1863. Dhaka University Studies, 47(2), 51–69.
4.
BoseG. C. (1958). Sekaler Darogar Kahini. Pustak Bipani.
5.
CohnB. S. (1989). Law and the colonial state in India. In StarrJ. & CollierJane F. (Eds.), History and power in the study of law. Cornell University Press.
6.
DalyF. C. (1916). Manual of criminal classes operating in Bengal. Bengal Secretariat Press.
7.
DasS. (2007). Behind the blackened faces in the 19th century Bengali Dacoities. Economic & Political Weekly, 42(35), 3573–3579.
8.
DennisM. R. (1995). Social Darwinism racism, and the metaphysics of race. Journal of Negro Education, 64(3), 243–252.
9.
DerrettJ. D. M. (1968). Religion, law, and the state in India. Faber & Faber.
10.
FoucaultM. (1991). Governmentality. In BurchellG., GordonC. & MillerP. (Eds.), The Foucault effect (pp. 87–104). The University of Chicago Press.
11.
GrantC. (1792). Observations on the State of Society among the Asiatic Subjects of Great Britain: Particularly with respect to morals; and on the means of improving it. Cambridge University Press.
12.
GuhaR. (1983). The elementary aspects of peasant insurgency in Colonial India (pp. 83–85). Oxford University Press.
13.
HobswanmE. J. (2013). Bandits. Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
14.
HunterW. W. (1868). The annals of rural Bengal. Leypoldt and Holt.
15.
IrvingB. (1853). The theory and practice of caste: Being an Inquiry into the effects of caste on the institutions and probable destinies of the Anglo-Indian empire (pp. 3–10). Smith Elder & Co.
16.
KayeJ. W. (1853). The administration of the East India Company: A history of Indian progress. Richard Bentley.
17.
McLaneJ. R. (1985). Bengali Bandits, police and landlords after the permanent settlement. In YangA. A. (Ed.), Crime and criminality in British India (pp. 26–47). University of Arizona Press.
18.
National Archive of India (NAI). (1876, March). Criminal Tribes Act Extension Bill (CTAEB). In Legislative department proceedings, No. 73–75.
19.
NigamN. (1990). Disciplining and policing the ‘criminals by birth’, Part 1: The making of a colonial stereotype—The Criminal Tribes and Castes of North India. Indian Economic & Social History Review, 27(2), 131–64.
20.
OdomH. H. (1967). Generalizations on race in nineteenth-century physical anthropology. ISIS, 58(1), 11–12.
21.
PilliavskyA. (2015). The criminal tribe in India before the British. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 57(2), 323–354.
22.
RisleyH. H. (1891). Castes and tribes of Bengal. Calcutta.
23.
SaidE. (1978). Orientalism. Random House.
24.
SchwarzH. (2010). Constructing the criminal tribe in Colonial India: Acting like a thief. Wiley-Blackwell.
25.
SenR. (1988). Social banditry in Bengal 1757–1793: A study in primary resistance. Ratna Prakashan.
26.
SinghaR. (1998). A despotism of law: Crime and justice in Early Colonial India. Oxford University Press.
27.
The Fifth Report. (1866). The fifth report from the select committee on the affairs of the East India Company (1812) (Vol. I). J. Hihhinbotham.
28.
The National Library of India (NLI). (1859). Selections from the records of the Bengal government: Reports relating to the suppression of dacoity in Bengal for 1855–57 and 1857–58, Calcutta, Appendix F. The confessions of Manjeon Sirdar during 1850s.
29.
WeberM. (1958). The religion of India: The sociology of Hinduism and Buddhism, translated and edited by GerthH. H. and MartindaleD., Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press.
30.
West Bengal Secretariat Library (WBSL). (1854). Selection from the Records of Government of Bengal No. 18; Correspondence relating to the suppression of Dacoity in Bengal.
31.
West Bengal Secretariat Library (WBSL). (1857). Selections from the confessions of the dacoity approvers before the commissioners from the suppression of Dacoity, Nuddea Gowala Gang (hereafter Nuddea Gowala Gang), Calcutta.
32.
West Bengal State Archives (WBSA). (1809, 17November). Judicial criminal proceedings (JCP), No. 20.
