Empowerment of Scheduled Castes in India: An Impact Assessment Study of Haryana Panchayati Raj (Amendment) Act,2015

Abstract

Caste-based social stratification is strong in India. Scheduled Castes (SCs) are weaker section of the society facing multiple inequities and discrimination in India. The state of Haryana has enacted Panchayati Raj (Amendment) Act, 2015, by which educational qualifications have been made mandatory to fight Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) elections since 2016. Based on secondary data collected from the Haryana Panchayati Raj Institutions Election Reports for the year 2010 and 2016, the study reveals that the share of elected SC PRIs increased from 22.94% in 2010 to 25.39% in 2016, after the introduction of educational qualifications for the PRIs election. Empowerment has been gauged on account of extra seats SCs have won than the seats reserved. SC PRIs empowerment composite score increased from 71.07 in 2010 to 116.55 in 2016. Mewat district had low educational level among rural SCs recorded highest PRIs empowerment index. The study highlights that the SCs, particularly of Panchkula, Kaithal, Sonipat and Jind districts require some motivational support to encourage their participation in PRIs elections.

Keywords

Scheduled Castes empowerment education elections Panchayati Raj Institutions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Balaboina

(2013). Panchayati Raj and Dalits in India: A post 73rd amendment scenario, Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance, 13/14, 181–184.

Bharti

(2010). Social justice and scheduled castes in India. Dynamics of Public Administration, 27(1), 1–7.

Chaudhary

(2020). Caste and its changing perception in modern era. Man & Development, 42(1), 23–34.

D’Souza

V. S.

(1975). Scheduled castes and urbanization in Punjab: An explanation. Sociological Bulletin, 24(1), 1–12.

Haokip

, & Umarani

(2018). Socio-political empowerment of dalits through Panchayati Raj: Experience from India. International Journal of Advanced Scientific Research and Management, 3(2), 63–70.

Inbanathan

(2003). Affirmative action and dalits: Political representation in Panchayats. [Working Paper, 138, pp. 1–32]. Institute for Social and Economic Change.

Kumar

(2016). Caste, contemporaneity and assertion. Economic & Political Weekly, 50(50), 84–86.

Lieten

G. K.

(1992). Caste, gender and class in Panchayats: Case of Barddhaman, West Bengal. Economic & Political Weekly, 27(29), 1567–1574.

Mathew

(2000). Panchayati Raj in India: Overview, in Status of Panchayati raj in the States and Union Territories of India (pp. 3–22). Institute of Social Science, Concept Publishing Company.

10.

Mendelsohn

(1993). The transformation of authority in rural India. Modern Asian, 15(4), 805–842.

11.

Pal

(2004). Caste and patriarchy in Panchayats. Economic & Political Weekly, 39(32), 3581–3583.

12.

Reddy

G. N.

(1984). Dominant caste and social interaction in a Karnataka village. Social Change, 14(4), 25.

13.

Sharma

(2015). Mewat sees hasty weddings to duck education norm. The Tribune, 21 December 2015, 6.

14.

Singh

A. B.

(2013). Political inclusion of Dalit women in Panchayats: A study from Tirunelveli district of Tamil Nadu. Journal of Exclusion Studies, 3(1), 62–71. 10.5958/j.2231-4555.3.1.001

15.

Singh

(1994). Constitutional base for Panchayati Raj in India: The 73rd Amendment Act. Asian Survey, 34, 818–827.

16.

Thorat

, & Newman

K. S.

(2007). Caste and economic distribution: Causes, consequences and remedies. Economic & Political Weekly, 42(41), 4121–4124.

17.

Webster

(1990). Agrarian relations in Burdhwan district, West Bengal: From the economics of the Green Revolution to the politics of Panchayati Raj. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 20(2), 177–211.