This article examines the context and implications of increasing participation of women in Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) in Arunachal Pradesh. The key question that is addressed is whether inclusion of women in grassroots-level governance expands the scope for a more inclusive governance. The findings of the study suggest that the mere representation of women in decentralised governance is not enough to bring any qualitative change in local politics so far as inclusiveness is concerned. In the presence of multiple marginalities and multiple forms of exclusion, positive discrimination in one domain has not been able to create a ripple effect in addressing other forms of exclusion. With all its potential as an agent of change, women’s reservation in PRIs remains firmly anchored in the patriarchal politics of identity. The study finds that reservation for women in PRIs, although an important step towards gender equality, has failed to create the ground for a more inclusive form of grassroots governance.
AlsopR., KrishnaA., & DishaS. (2001). Inclusion and local elected governments: The Panchayati Raj System in India (Social Development Paper No. 37). Washington, DC: The World Bank: South Asia-Social Development Unit. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/464001468752428183/pdf/282800SDP37.pdf
2.
BardhanP. (1996). Decentralised development. Indian Economic Review, 31(2), 139–156.
3.
BardhanP. (2002). Decentralization of governance and development. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(4), 185–205.
4.
BardhanP., & MookherjeeD. (2007). Decentralisation in West Bengal: Origins, functioning and impact. In BardhanP. & MookherjeeD. (Eds.), Decentralization and local governance in developing countries: A comparative perspective (pp. 203–222). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
5.
BatesR. H. (2005). Ethnicity. The Elgar companion to development studies. Retrieved from http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:3353949
6.
BathN. (2009). Arunachal: Emergence of issue-based politics?Economic & Political Weekly, 44(39), 157–159.
7.
BhallaA., & LapeyreF. (1997). Social exclusion: Towards an analytical and operational framework. Development and Change, 28(3), 413–433.
8.
BlairH. (2000). Participation and accountability at the periphery: Democratic local governance in six countries. World Development, 28(1), 21–39.
9.
BonuS., RaniM., PetersD. H., & BakerT. D. (2011). Empowering the ‘socially excluded’ in rural local governments: An exploratory study from a state in India. Journal of International Development, 23(1), 42–62.
10.
BremanJ. (2004). Social exclusion in the context of globalization (Working Paper No. 18. Policy Integration Department. World Commission on the Social dimension on Globalization). Geneva: ILO.
11.
CartayaV., MagallanesR., & DominiquezC. (1997). Venezuela: Exclusion and integration: A synthesis in the Building?Geneva: ILO.
12.
ChangkijaM. (2017, February7). Equality’s time has come: Naga women’s claim to economic equality has unsettled its male-dominated tribal bodies. The Indian Express (New Delhi edition). Retrieved from: https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/nagaland-violence-kohima-protest-against-women-reservation-4511227/
13.
ChattopadhyayR., & DufloE. (2004a). Women as policy makers: Evidence from a randomized policy experiment in India. Econometrica, 72(5), 1409–1443.
14.
ChattopadhyayR., & DufloE. (2004b). Impact of reservation in Panchayati Raj: Evidence from a nationwide randomised experiment. Economic & Political Weekly, 39(9), 979–986.
15.
CrookR. C., & SverrissonA. S. (1999). To what extent can decentralized forms of government enhance the development of pro-poor policies and improve poverty- alleviation outcomes?The World Bank. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPOVERTY/Resources/WDR/DfiD-Project-Papers/crook.pdf
16.
ElwinV. (1999 [1957]). A Philosophy for NEFA. Itanagar: Directorate of Research, Government of Arunachal Pradesh.
17.
ElwinV. (2007 [1965]). Democracy in NEFA. Itanagar: Directorate of Research, Government of Arunachal Pradesh.
18.
EteJ.(n.d.). Gandhi’s vision of Gram Swaraj. Retrieved from http://www.arunachalfront.info/leisure.aspx
19.
GhoshP. S., & MishraD. K. (2013). Party dynamics in a border region: Meeting the political challenges of India’s north-eastern hill states. In MehraA. K. (Ed.), Party system in India: Emerging trajectories (pp. 297–324). New Delhi: Lancer.
20.
GibsonC. (2012). Making redistributive direct democracy matter: Development and women’s participation in the Gram Sabhas of Kerala, India. American Sociological Review, 77(3), 409–434.
21.
Government of Arunachal Pradesh (2005). Arunachal Pradesh human development report. Itanagar: Author.
22.
Government of Arunachal Pradesh (n.d.). Panchayati Raj in Arunachal Pradesh. Retrieved from http://arunachalpradesh.gov.in/panchayat/html/pachayat.htm
23.
Government of Arunachal Pradesh (n.d.). Hand book for Gaon-Buras and Panchayati Raj leaders. Retrieved from www.arunachalpwd.org/pdf/Hand%20Book%20for%20Gaon%20Burahs.pdf
24.
Government of India (2016). Devolution report: 2015–16 where local democracy and devolution in India is heading towards?New Delhi: Ministry of Panchayati Raj and Tata Institute of Social Sciences. Retrieved from http://www.panchayat.gov.in/documents/10198/378720/devolution.pdf
25.
Harriss-WhiteB., MishraD. K., & PrakashA. (2017). Inclusive development, citizenship and globalisation: The case of Arunachal Pradesh. In MishraD. K. & UpadhyayV. (Eds.), Rethinking economic development in Northeast India: The emerging dynamics (pp. 136–150). London: Routledge.
26.
Harriss-WhiteB., MishraD. K., & UpadhyayV. (2009). Institutional diversity and capitalist transition: The political economy of agrarian change in Arunachal Pradesh, India. Journal of Agrarian Change, 9(4), 512–547.
27.
HussainM. (2003). Governance and electoral processes in India’s North-East. Economic & Political Weekly, 38(10), 981–990.
28.
JayalN. G. (2003). Locating gender in the governance discourse. In NussbaumM., BasuA., TambiahY., & JayalN. G. (Eds.), Essays on gender and governance (pp. 96–134). New Delhi: UNDP, HDRC.
29.
JayalN. G. (2006). Engendering local democracy: The impact of quotas for women in India’s panchayats. Democratization, 13(1), 15–35.
30.
KabeerN. (2000). Social exclusion, poverty and discrimination towards an analytical framework. IDS Bulletin, 31(4), 83–97.
31.
KaushikA., & ShaktawatG. (2010). Women in Panchayati Raj institutions: A case study of Chittorgarh District Council. Journal of Developing Societies, 26(4), 473–483.
32.
Lahiri-DuttK., & SamantaG. (2002). State initiatives for the empowerment of women of rural communities: Experiences from eastern India. Community Development Journal, 37(2), 137–156.
33.
LuthraP. N. (1993 [1971]). Constitutional and administrative growth of the Arunachal Pradesh. Itanagar: Directorate of Research, Government of Arunachal Pradesh.
34.
MedoffM. H. (1986). Determinants of the political participation of women. Public Choice, 48(3), 245–253.
35.
MishraA. (2006) Occupational structure and gender-based segregation in North-East India: The case of Arunachal Pradesh. Social Change and Development, 4(1), 125–145.
36.
MishraA., & MishraD. K. (2016). Gender, ethnicity, and grassroots governance in Arunachal Pradesh, India. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 22(2), 147–164.
37.
MishraD. K. (2007). Gender, forests and livelihoods: A note on the political economy of transition in north-east India. Social Change, 37(4), 65–90.
38.
MishraD. K. (2015a). Agrarian relations and institutional diversity in Arunachal Pradesh. In Harriss-WhiteB. & HeyerJ. (Eds.), Indian Capitalism in Development (pp. 66–83). London and New York, NY: Routledge.
39.
MishraD. K. (2015b). Regions and capitalist transition in India: Arunachal Pradesh in a comparative perspective. In BasileE., Harriss-WhiteB., & LutringerC. (Eds.), Mapping India’s capitalism: Old and new regions (pp. 87–112). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
40.
MishraD. K., & UpadhyayV. (2005). A situational analysis of women and girls in Arunachal Pradesh. New Delhi: National Commission for Women.
41.
MishraD. K., & UpadhyayV. (2007). In the name of the community: Gender, development and governance in Arunachal Pradesh. In KrishnaS. (Ed.), Women’s livelihood rights: Recasting citizenship for development (pp. 167–208). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
42.
MishraD. K., & UpadhyayV. (2012). The difficult transition: Economic development and gender relations in Arunachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 19(1), 93–126.
43.
MishraS. N. (1983). Arunachal’s tribal economic formations and their dissolutions. Economic & Political Weekly, 18(43), 1837–1846.
44.
MohantyB. (1995). Panchayati Raj, 73rd constitutional amendment and women. Economic & Political Weekly, 30(52), 3346–3350.
45.
MukhopadhyayM. (2005). Decentralisation and gender equity in South Asia: An issues paper. Retrieved from http://www.idrc.ca/EN/Documents/WRC
46.
NussbaumM. C. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
PandeyB. (1996). Arunachal Pradesh: Village state to statehood. Itanagar: Himalayan Publisher.
48.
PandeyB. B., DuarahD. K., & SarkarN. (Eds.). (1999). Tribal village councils of Arunachal Pradesh. Itanagar: Directorate of Research, Government of Arunachal Pradesh.
49.
PatnaikP. (2014). Politics is not just a man’s game: Women in democratic local governance of Odisha. Social Change, 44(1), 131–153.
50.
PurK. A. (2006). Selection by custom and election by statute: Interface in local governance in Karnataka. In JayalN., PrakashA., & SharmaP. K. (Eds.), Local governance in India: Decentralisation and beyond (pp. 27–46). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
51.
RaiP. (2011). Electoral participation of women in India: Key determinants and barriers. Economic & Political Weekly, 46(3), 47–55.
52.
Roy BurmanB. K. (2002). Traditional self-governing institutions among the hill tribal population groups of North East India. In GoswamiA. (Ed.), Traditional self-governing institutions among the hill tribes of North East India (pp. 20–45). New Delhi: Akansha.
53.
SenA. (2000). Social exclusion: Concept, application and scrutiny (Office of Environment and Social Development, Social Development Papers No. 1). Manila: Asian Development Bank. Retrieved from https://think-asia.org/bitstream/handle/11540/2339/social-exclusion.pdf?sequence=1
54.
SutarA. S. (2007). Caste and patriarchy in the emerging women’s leadership in panchayats: A study from Karnataka. Social Change, 37(2), 40–52.
55.
TalukdarA. C. (2002). Traditional self-governing institutions among the tribes of Arunachal Pradesh. In GoswamiA. (Ed.), Traditional self-governing institutions among the hill tribes of North East India (pp. 161–179). New Delhi: Akansha.
56.
TambiahY. (2003). The impact of gender inequality on governance. In NussbaumM., BasuA., TambiahY., & JayalN. G. (Eds.), Essays on gender and governance (pp. 59–95). New Delhi: HDRC, UNDP.
57.
ThakurA. K. (2003). Slavery in Arunachal Pradesh. New Delhi: Mittal Publications.
