This article takes three concepts, namely ‘democracy’, ‘development’ and ‘political representation’ as entry points to understand the functioning of democracy in Uttar Pradesh. India, since the 1980s, has seen a tremendous rise of ‘lowered’ caste people and a parallel rise of Hindu communalism by ‘upper’ castes. In this respect, it becomes pertinent to ask if the rise of plebeians in Uttar Pradesh’s political sphere brought about any actual change in the lives of the plebeians. In search for an answer to this question, this article looks at the conspicuous rise of Dalits from the early 1980s. It proposes that rather than looking from the vantage point of the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP), Dalit assertion must be seen through non-BSP factors and broader socio-economic and demographic changes happening before the 1980s in the state. Thus, the article delves into the lives of All India Backward (SC, ST, and OBC) and Minority Communities Employees Federation (BAMCEF), Dalit Panthers, Ambedkarite social activists and Ravidasis-Buddhists. It argues that Dalit assertion is about the deepening of formal democracy, increment in substantive democracy and a demand for greater civility. Dalit movement is not ethnic, rather, it is universal, and the article explores it through secondary literature and fieldwork-based observations in Uttar Pradesh.
BacchettaP. (1999). Militant Hindu nationalist women reimagine themselves: Notes on mechanisms of expansion/adjustment. Journal of Women’s History, 10(4), 126–147.
2.
Bellwinkel-SchemppM. (2007). From Bhakti to Buddhism: Ravidas and Ambedkar. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(23), 2177–2183.
3.
BéteilleA., & GuptaD. (2005). Anti-utopia: Essential writings of Andre Beteille. Oxford University Press.
4.
CiottiM. (2009). The conditions of politics: Low-caste women’s political agency in contemporary North Indian society. Feminist Review, 91(1), 113–134.
5.
CiottiM. (2010). Retro modern India: Forging the low caste self. Routledge.
6.
CorbridgeS., & HarrisJ. (2001). Reinventing India: Liberalization, Hindu nationalism and popular democracy. Oxford University Press.
7.
DumontL. (1970). Homo hierarchicus: The caste system and its implications. OUP.
8.
FullerC. J., & BénéïV. (2001). The everyday state and society in modern India. Social Science Press.
9.
GooptuN. (1997). The urban poor and militant Hinduism in early twentieth-century Uttar Pradesh. Modern Asian Studies, 31(4), 879–918.
10.
GuptaA. (2006). Blurred boundaries: The discourse of corruption, the culture of politics, and the imagined state. In GuptaA. & SharmaA. (Eds.), The anthropology of the state: A reader (pp. 211–242). Blackwell.
11.
HabibI. (2007). Medieval India: The study of a civilisation. National Book Trust.
12.
HansenT. B. (1999). The saffron wave: Democracy and Hindu nationalism in modern India. Princeton University Press.
13.
HasanZ. (2000). Representation and redistribution: The new lower caste politics of North India. In FrancineH. B. (Ed.), Transforming India: Social and political dynamics of democracy. Oxford University Press.
14.
HusainZ. (2015). Bahujan Samaj Party in Uttar Pradesh: A village level sociological understanding [Unpublished MPhil dissertation]. CSSSC.
15.
JaffrelotC. (1998). The Bahujan Samaj Party in North India: No longer just a Dalit party?Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the middle east (formerly South Asia Bulletin), 18(1), 35–52.
16.
JaoulN. (2007). Political and ‘non-political’ means in the Dalit movement. In PaiS. (Ed.), Political process in Uttar Pradesh: Identity, economic reforms, and governance (pp. 191–220). Pearson Longman.
17.
JaoulN. (2012). The making of a political stronghold: A Dalit neighbourhood’s exit from the Hindu Nationalist riot system. Ethnography, 13(1), 102–116.
18.
JaoulN. (2015). A strong law for the weak: Dalit activism in a district court in Uttar Pradesh. In DanielaB. & BordiaD. (Eds.), Regimes of legality: Ethnography of criminal cases in South Asia (pp. 171–201). Oxford University Press.
19.
JaoulN. (2016). Citizenship in religious clothing? Navayana Buddhism and Dalit emancipation in late 1990s Uttar Pradesh. FocaalJournal of Global and Historical Anthropology, (76), 46–68. 10.3167/fcl.2016.760104
JefferyR., LercheJ., & JeffreyC. (2014). Development failure and identity politics in Uttar Pradesh. SAGE.
22.
JuergensmeyerM. (1982). Religion as social vision. The movement against untouchability in 20th-century Punjab. University of California Press.
23.
KarlT. L. (1990). Dilemmas of democratization in Latin America. Comparitive Politics, 23(1), 1–21.
24.
KhareR. S. (1984). The untouchable as himself: Ideology, identity, and pragmatism among the Lucknow Chamars. Cambridge University Press.
25.
KumarS. (2018). Badalta gaon, badalta dehat: Nayi samajikta ka uday. Oxford University Press.
26.
LercheJ., & JeffreyC. (2001). Dimensions in dominance: Class and state in Uttar Pradesh. In FulleC. J. & BénéïV. (Eds.), The everyday state and society in modern India (pp. 91–115). Social Science Press.
27.
LynchO. M. (1969). The politics of untouchability: Social mobility and social change in a city of India. National Publishing House.
28.
MitchellT. (1991). The limits of the state: Beyond statist approaches and their critics. American Political Science Review, 85(1), 77–96.
29.
MouffeC. (2000). The democratic paradox. Verso.
30.
NarayanB. (2006). Women heroes and Dalit assertion in North India: Culture, identity and politics. SAGE.
31.
OmvedtG. (2005). Ambedkar: Towards an enlightened India. Penguin.
32.
PaleyJ. (2002). Toward an anthropology of democracy. The Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 469–496. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4132889
33.
PatnaikP. (2005). Affirmative action and representation of weaker sections: Participation and accountability in Orissa’s panchayats. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(44/45), 4753–4761.
34.
PhillipsA. (1994). Democracy and representation: Or, why should it matter who our representatives are? 63–76. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/87071/
35.
PhillipsA. (1995). The politics of presence: The political representation of gender, ethnicity and race. Clarendon Press.
36.
PitkinH. F. (1972). The concept of representation. University of California Press.
37.
PlattnerM. F. (1998). Liberalism and democracy: Can’t have one without the other. Foreign Affairs, 77(2), 171–180.
38.
RoutS., & PatnaikP. (2014). Institutional exclusion and tribal interest: Decentralized government in the context of conflicts over development in India. Journal of Developing Societies, 30(2), 115–143.
39.
ThoratA. (2010). Ethnicity, caste and religion: Implications for poverty outcomes. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(51), 47–53.
40.
ThoratS. (1979). Passage to adulthood: Perceptions from below. In KakarS. (Ed.), Identity and adulthood (pp. 65–81). Oxford University Press.
41.
ViaudC. G. (2015). Civility and democracy. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 7(1). 10.4000/ejpap.372
42.
WaghmoreS. (2013). Civility against caste: Dalit politics and citizenship in western India. SAGE.
43.
WaghmoreS. (2017). From hierarchy to Hindu politeness: Caste atrocities and Dalit protest in rural Marathwada. In JodhkaS. S., & ManorJ. (Eds.), Contested hierarchies, persisting influence: Caste and power in twenty-first century India (pp. 111–139). Orient BlackSwan.
