In this research, we utilize a refined model for carbon emissions, known as the Stochastic Frontier Approach (SFA), to measure the extent of the carbon rebound effect across a sample of 231 urban areas in China, spanning the years 2011 through 2019. Additionally, the study explores the impact that policies associated with the advancement of new urbanization have had on the aforementioned carbon rebound phenomenon. The findings of this thesis indicate that this policy can reduce carbon emission volumes effectively; however, there is also a significant carbon rebound effect, making the reduction less efficient than expected. After several robustness tests, the main conclusions remain consistent and reliable. Our investigation into the underlying mechanisms reveals that policies aimed at fostering new urbanization may attenuate the carbon rebound effect by enhancing the efficiency and composition of industrial sectors. However, technological advancements and the degree of energy efficiency remain pivotal in potentially escalating the carbon rebound effect. The analysis of variations across different scenarios demonstrates that the policy’s impact on the carbon rebound effect is subject to variation depending on several factors, including geographical contexts like provincial boundaries, the administrative hierarchy of cities, transportation infrastructure, and the constraints imposed by resource availability. As a multi-target policy, although this policy has a carbon rebound effect, it also has a significant social welfare effect, which coincides with the development goal of China. Ultimately, some suggestions are offered to enhance the role of this policy in promoting carbon emission reduction and to foster a virtuous interaction between this policy and economic growth.
AdetutuMOGlassAJWeyman-jonesTG (2016) Economy-wide estimates of rebound effects: evidence from panel data. Energy Journal37(3): 251–270. DOI: 10.5547/01956574.37.3.
2.
AliRBakhshKYasinMA (2019) Impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions in emerging economy: evidence from Pakistan. Sustainable Cities and Society48: 101553. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101553.
3.
BraunerhjelmPLappiE (2023) Employees’ entrepreneurial human capital and firm performance. Research Policy52: 104703. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2022.104703.
4.
ChenYHCaiQFLinHH (2022). Does government-driven urbanization enhance the innovation activities of enterprises within the region? —Empirical findings and policy considerations based on the “county-to-district” reform. Economics Quarterly, 22(02), 465–484. DOI: 10.13821/j.cnki.ceq.2022.02.06. (In Chinese).
5.
ChenWWangGXuN, et al. (2023) Promoting or inhibiting? New-type urbanization and urban carbon emissions efficiency in China. Cities140: 104429. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104429.
6.
CuiHCaoY (2023) China’s cities go carbon neutral: how can new-type urbanization policies improve urban carbon performance?Sustainable Production and Consumption42: 74–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2023.09.011.
7.
DengZLZhangKY (2020). Why does spatial differentiation in China’s economic growth exist? An explanation from spatial economics. Economic Research Journal, 55(4), 20–36. (In Chinese).
8.
ElvidgeCDSuttonPCGhoshT, et al. (2009) A global poverty map derived from satellite data. Computers & Geosciences35(8): 1652–1660. DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2009.01.009.
9.
ElvidgeCDZhizhinMGhoshT, et al. (2021) Annual time series of global VIIRS nighttime lights derived from monthly averages: 2012 to 2019. Remote Sensing13: 922. DOI: 10.3390/rs13050922.
10.
FengYYuanHLiuY, et al. (2023) Does new-type urbanization policy promote green energy efficiency? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Energy Economics124: 106752. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106752.
11.
GeLMZhengHYSunPB, et al. (2024). Low-carbon empowerment and efficiency enhancement: the impact of low-carbon city pilot policy on environmental welfare performance. Statistical Research, 41(2), 100–113. DOI: 10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2024.02.009. (In Chinese).
12.
JiaRNShaoSDuKR, et al. (2022) Spatial-temporal pattern, dynamic evolution, and driving factors of carbon rebound effect in China: based on improved SFA model of carbon emission. China Soft Sci12: 23–34, in Chinese.
13.
JiangJZhuSWangW, et al. (2022) Coupling coordination between new urbanisation and carbon emissions in China. Science of the Total Environment850: 158076. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158076.
14.
LeSAKrollMJWaltersBA (2013) Outside directors’ experience, TMT firm-specific human capital, and firm performance in entrepreneurial IPO firms. Journal of Business Research66: 533–539. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.01.001.
15.
LiBQChenYFZhangGL (2017) Technological progress and rebound effect in China’s nonferrous metals industry: an empirical study. Energy Policy109: 520–529. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.031.
16.
LiGSunJWangZ (2019) Exploring the energy consumption rebound effect of industrial enterprises in the Beijing -Tianjin-Hebei region. Energy Efficiency12: 1007–1026. DOI: 10.1007/s12053-018-9743-4.
17.
LiGHNiuMMXiaoJ, et al. (2023) The rebound effect of decarbonization in China’s power sector under the carbon trading scheme. Energy Policy177: 113543. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113543.
18.
LiddleB (2004) Demographic dynamics and per capita environmental impact: using panel regressions and household decompositions to examine population and transport. Population and Environment26(1): 23–39. DOI: 10.1023/B:POEN.0000039951.37276.f3.
19.
LinBZhuPH (2021) Measurement of the direct rebound effect of residential electricity consumption: an empirical study based on the China family panel studies. Applied Energy301: 117409. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117409.
20.
LiuJMaXZhangJ, et al. (2023) New-type urbanization construction, shiftshare of employment, and CO2 emissions: evidence from China. Environmental Science & Pollution Research30: 26472–26495. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-23880-2.
21.
LlorcaMJamasbT (2017) Energy efficiency and rebound effect in European road freight transport. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice101: 98–110. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.002.
22.
LuYChenX (2023) Digital economy, new-type urbanization, and carbon emissions: evidence from China. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy42: e14045. DOI: 10.1002/ep.14045.
23.
MaoNSunWZYangYJ, et al. (2022). The impact of transportation infrastructure construction on corporate digital transformation: an empirical study of China’s high-speed railway. Quantitative Economics and Technical Economics Research, 39(10), 47–67. DOI: 10.13653/j.cnki.jqte.20220920.003. (In Chinese).
24.
MarkakiMBelegri-RoboliASarafidisY, et al. (2017) The carbon footprint of Greek households (1995–2012). Energy Policy100(January): 206–215. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.031.
25.
OreaLLlorcaMFilippiniM (2015) A new approach to measuring the rebound effect associated to energy efficiency improvements: an application to the US residential energy demand. Energy Economics49: 599–609. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.03.016.
26.
RenY-SLiuP-ZKleinT, et al. (2024) Does the low-carbon pilot cities policy make a difference to the carbon intensity reduction?Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization217: 227–239. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2023.10.032.
27.
SaundersHD (1992) The Khazzoom-Brookes postulate and neoclassical growth. Energy Journal13(4): 131–148. DOI: 10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol13-no4-7.
28.
SaundersHD (2008) Fuel conserving (and using) production functions. Energy Economics30(5): 2184–2235. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2007.11.006.
29.
ShaoSHuangTYangLL (2014) Using latent variable approach to estimate China’s economy-wide energy rebound effect over 1954-2010. Energy Policy72: 235–248. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.041.
30.
ShaoSGuoLFYuML, et al. (2019) Does the rebound effect matter in energy import-dependent mega-cities? Evidence from Shanghai (China). Applied Energy241: 212–228. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.007.
31.
ShengPFGuoXH (2015) The long-run and short-run impacts of urbanization on carbon dioxide emissions. Economic Modelling53(53): 208–215. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2015.12.006.
32.
ShiKFChenYLiLY, et al. (2018) Spatiotemporal variations of urban CO2 emissions in China: a multiscale perspective. Applied Energy211: 218–229. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.11.042.
33.
SunCWYuanXYaoX (2016) Social acceptance towards the air pollution in China: evidence from public’s willingness to pay for smog mitigation. Energy Policy92(5): 313–324. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.02.025.
34.
TangWWangY (2015) Administrative division adjustment and urbanization of population: empirical evidence from the county-to-district reform. Economic Research Journal, 50(9), 72-85. (In Chinese).
35.
Velez-henaoJAGarcia-mazoCMFreire-GonzalezJ, et al. (2020) Environmental rebound effect of energy efficiency improvements in Colombian households. Energy Policy145: 111697. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111697.
36.
WangZChuE (2024) The path toward urban carbon neutrality: how does the low-carbon city pilot policy stimulate low-carbon technology?Economic Analysis and Policy82: 954–975. DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2024.04.029.
37.
WangYTangXM (2021) Research on structural transformation and industrial upgrading in new structural economics: quantitative facts and theoretical progress. Economic Review42(01): 3–17. doi: 10.19361/j.er.2021.01.01.
38.
WuLPChenYFeylizadehMR, et al. (2018) Estimation of China’s macro-carbon rebound effect: method of integrating data envelopment analysis production model and sequential malmquist-luenberger index. Journal of Cleaner Production198: 1431–1442. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.034.
39.
XiaoYHuangHQianX, et al. (2023) Can new-type urbanization reduce urban building carbon emissions? New evidence from China. Sustainable Cities and Society90: 104410. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104410.
40.
XiongXYuXWangY (2022) Interaction between New Urbanization and Industrial Structure of Double-City Economic Circle in Chengdu and Chongqing. Economic System Reform40(02): 42–49, in Chinese.
41.
XuASongMWuY, et al. (2024) Effects of new urbanization on China’s carbon emissions: a quasi-natural experiment based on the improved PSM-DID model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change200: 123164. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123164.
42.
XueQWangHJiX, et al. (2023) Local government centralization and corporate ESG performance: evidence from China’s county-to-district reform. China Journal of Accounting Research16(3): 100314. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjar.2023.100314.
43.
YangXJiaZYangZ (2023a) How new-type urbanization pilots reduce carbon emissions: a technology progress paths perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production401: 136663. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136663.
44.
YangSSDuanZCJiangXK (2023b) Spatial dynamics and influencing factors of carbon rebound effect in tourism transport: evidence from the Yangtze-river delta urban agglomeration. Journal of Environmental Management344: 118431. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118431.
45.
YangLSLiZ (2017) Technology advance and the carbon dioxide emission in China: empirical research based on the rebound effect. Energy Policy101: 150–161. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.020.
46.
YangLLShaoS (2015) Theoretical evolution and empirical evidence of energy rebound effect: a literature review. Journal of Financial Economics8: 19–38, in Chinese. DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2015.08.003.
47.
YaoXLKouDShaoS, et al. (2018) Can urbanization process and carbon emission abatement be harmonious? New evidence from China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review71: 70–83. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2018.04.005.
48.
YuB (2021) Ecological effects of new-type urbanization in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews135: 110239. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110239.
49.
YuWLiangWYaoX (2024) The effect of the county-to-district conversion policy on energy efficiency of enterprises: evidence from China. Energy Economics134: 107618. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107618.
50.
ZengSJinGTanK, et al. (2023) Can low-carbon city construction reduce carbon intensity? Empirical evidence from low-carbon city pilot policy in China. Journal of Environmental Management332: 117363. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117363.
51.
ZhangJ (2017) High-speed rail construction and county economic development: a study based on satellite nighttime light data. Economic Research Journal16(4): 1533–1562, (In Chinese). DOI: 10.13821/j.cnki.ceq.2017.03.12.
52.
ZhangYJLiuZQinCX, et al. (2017) The direct and indirect CO2 rebound effect for private cars in China. Energy Policy100: 149–161. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.010.
53.
ZhaoYWangJPanW (2023) Regional characteristics and impact mechanisms of new urbanization and green development level in China at the provincial level. Economic Geography43(09): 1–9. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2023.09.001.
54.
ZhengYFanMCaiY, et al. (2024) Spatio-temporal pattern evolution of carbon emissions at the city-county-town scale in Fujian Province based on DMSP/OLS and NPP/VIIRS nighttime light data. Journal of Cleaner Production442: 140958. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140958.
55.
ZhouJXuNZhangW, et al. (2024) Can agricultural low-carbon development benefit from urbanization? Empirical evidence from China’s new-type urbanization pilot policy. Journal of Cleaner Production435: 140388. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140388.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
