Various spatial indices have been used by scholars to evaluate the built environment of towns. However, previous analysis has fallen short in systematically addressing the distribution of green space in future town planning. This paper fills the gap by integrating green space indices in an expanded urban intensity framework and comparing existing conditions (2018) and future planning schemes (2030) of eleven towns in Zhejiang Province, China. In this paper, we computed spatial indices in ARCGIS and FRAGSTATS, used correlation analysis in STATA for statistical analysis, and adopted demographic, economic, and environmental variables to validate the selected indices. The results show that: (1) The future planning schemes can result in either reduction of green spaces in town centers or uneven distribution of green spaces; (2) Validation of green space indicators reveals observable association with the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), which implies that the chosen framework can effectively reflect the condition of greenery; and (3) The regulatory detailed planning does not always improve the future spatial layout of towns, especially after considering green space distributions. These findings emphasize the importance of suitable spatial layouts of green spaces over large monolithic blocks for effective planning. Moreover, achieving optimal urban intensity necessitates a balanced distribution of the built and green spaces. Finally, the integration of green space factors and the adoption of a comprehensive approach, as highlighted in this study, can serve as a valuable guide for town planners and policymakers in different jurisdictions to achieve more desirable spatial layouts.
AhlfeldtGMPietrostefaniE (2019) The economic effects of density: a synthesis. Journal of Urban Economics111: 93–107. DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2019.04.006.
2.
BloomfieldLSMcIntoshTLLambinEF (2020) Habitat fragmentation, livelihood behaviors, and contact between people and nonhuman primates in Africa. Landscape Ecology35(4). DOI: 10.1007/s10980-020-00995-w
3.
CarthyPLyonsSNolanA (2020) Characterising urban green space density and footpath-accessibility in models of BMI. BMC Public Health20(1): 760. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-08853-9.
4.
CerveroRKockelmanK (1997) Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment2(3): 199–219. DOI: 10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6.
5.
ChenPWangWQianC, et al. (2024) Gravity-based models for evaluating urban park accessibility: why does localized selection of attractiveness factors and travel modes matter?Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science51(4): 904–922. DOI: 10.1177/23998083231206168.
6.
ChironFLorrillièreRBessa-GomesC, et al. (2024) How do urban green space designs shape avian communities? testing the area–heterogeneity trade-off. Landscape and Urban Planning242: 104954. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104954.
7.
DonyCCDelmelleEMDelmelleEC (2015) Re-conceptualizing accessibility to parks in multi-modal cities: A Variable-width Floating Catchment Area (VFCA) method. Landscape and Urban Planning143: 90–99. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.06.011
8.
ElldérE (2020) What kind of compact development makes people drive less? the “ds of the built environment” versus neighborhood amenities. Journal of Planning Education and Research40(4): 432–446. DOI: 10.1177/0739456X18774120.
9.
EwingRCerveroR (2017) “Does compact development make people drive less?” the answer is yes. Journal of the American Planning Association83(1): 19–25. DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2016.1245112.
10.
FormanRTT (2016) Urban ecology principles: are urban ecology and natural area ecology really different?Landscape Ecology31(8): 1653–1662. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-016-0424-4.
11.
GuanCRowePG (2016) The concept of urban intensity and China’s townization policy: cases from Zhejiang province. Cities55: 22–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2016.03.012.
12.
GuanCWangYKeithM, et al. (2022) Does local planning of fast-growing medium-sized towns lead to higher urban intensity or to sprawl? cases from Zhejiang province. Cities130: 103869. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103869.
13.
GuanCZhouY (2024) Exploring environmental equity and visitation disparities in peri-urban parks: A mobile phone data-driven analysis in Tokyo. Landscape and Urban Planning248. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105104
14.
HaalandCvan den BoschCK (2015) Challenges and strategies for urban green-space planning in cities undergoing densification: a review. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening14(4): 760–771. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.009.
15.
HeJLiLLiJ (2022) Generating inclusive health benefits from urban green spaces: an empirical study of Beijing Olympic forest park. Buildings12(4): 397. DOI: 10.3390/buildings12040397.
16.
HuXWuQXuW, et al. (2022) Specialty towns in China: towards a typological policy approach. Land Use Policy114: 105933. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105933.
17.
JamesPHartJEBanayRFLadenF (2016) Exposure to greenness and mortality in a nationwide prospective cohort study of women. Environmental health perspectives124(9): 1344–1352.
18.
JiangLDengXSetoKC (2013) The impact of urban expansion on agricultural land use intensity in China. Land Use Policy35: 33–39. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.04.011.
19.
JiangGWenqiuMDeqiWDingyangZRuijuanZTaoZ (2017) Identifying the internal structure evolution of urban built-up land sprawl (UBLS) from a composite structure perspective: a case study of the Beijing metropolitan area, China. Land Use Policy62: 258–267. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.12.014.
20.
LehmannS (2019) Understanding and quantifying urban density toward more sustainable city form. In The Mathematics of Urban Morphology. Berlin: Springer International Publishing, 547–556. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-12381-9_30.
21.
LiangHChenDZhangQ (2017) Assessing urban green space distribution in a compact megacity by landscape metrics. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management25(1): 64–74. DOI: 10.3846/16486897.2016.1210157.
22.
LynchK (1960) The Image of the City. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: The MIT Press.
23.
MaMHietalaRKuussaariM, et al. (2013) Impacts of edge density of field patches on plant species richness and community turnover among margin habitats in agricultural landscapes. Ecological Indicators31: 25–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.07.012.
24.
MargaritisEKangJ (2017) Relationship between green space-related morphology and noise pollution. Ecological Indicators72: 921–933. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.09.032
25.
McDonaldRIAronsonMFJBeatleyT, et al. (2023) Denser and greener cities: green interventions to achieve both urban density and nature. People and Nature5(1): 84–102. DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10423.
26.
McFarlaneC (2016) The geographies of urban density. Progress in Human Geography40(5): 629–648. DOI: 10.1177/0309132515608694.
27.
McGarigalKCushmanSA (2002) Comparative evaluation of experimental approaches to the study of habitat fragmentation effects. Ecological Applications12(2): 335–345. DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0335:CEOEAT]2.0.CO;2.
28.
NæssP (2022) Meta-analyses of built environment effects on travel: No new platinum standard. Journal of Planning Education and Research42(2): 199–205. DOI: 10.1177/0739456X19856425.
29.
OgashawaraIBastosV (2012) A quantitative approach for analyzing the relationship between urban heat islands and land cover. Remote Sensing4(11): 3596–3618. DOI: 10.3390/rs4113596.
30.
PanW (2021) What type of mixed-use and open? A critical environmental analysis of three neighborhood types in China and insights for sustainable urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning216: 104221. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104221.
31.
Pinelo SilvaJ (2020) Park access policies: measuring the effects of the introduction of fees and women-only days on the volume of park visitors and physical activity in Bahrain. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability14(2): 204–221. DOI: 10.1080/17549175.2020.1801489.
32.
QiaoRWuZJiangQ, et al. (2024) The nonlinear influence of land conveyance on urban carbon emissions: an interpretable ensemble learning-based approach. Land Use Policy140: 107117. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107117.
33.
SemenzatoPCostaACampagnaroT (2023) Accessibility to urban parks: comparing GIS based measures in the city of Padova (Italy). Urban Forestry and Urban Greening82: 127896. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127896.
34.
SevtsukAEkmekciONixonFAmindarbariR (2013) Capturing urban intensity. In: Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 2013), Singapore, 15-18 May 2013, 551–560.
35.
SongYLongYWuP, et al. (2018) Are all cities with similar urban form or not? redefining cities with ubiquitous points of interest and evaluating them with indicators at city and block levels in China. International Journal of Geographical Information Science32(12): 2447–2476. DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2018.1511793.
StahleA (2010) More green space in a denser city: critical relations between user experience and urban form. Urban Design International15(1): 47–67. DOI: 10.1057/udi.2009.27.
38.
StonorT (2019) Measuring intensity – describing and analysing the “urban buzz”. International Journal Architecture and Planning7: 240–248. DOI: 10.15320/ICONARP.2019.87.
39.
WangJZhouWWangJ, et al. (2019) From quantity to quality: enhanced understanding of the changes in urban greenspace. Landscape Ecology34(5): 1145–1160. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-019-00828-5.
40.
WellmannTSchugFHaaseD, et al. (2020) Green growth? on the relation between population density, land use and vegetation cover fractions in a city using a 30-years Landsat time series. Landscape and Urban Planning202: 103857. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103857.
41.
ZhangPYangDQinM, et al. (2020) Spatial heterogeneity analysis and driving forces exploring of built-up land development intensity in Chinese prefecture-level cities and implications for future Urban Land intensive use. Land Use Policy99: 104958. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104958.
42.
ZhouQKonijnendijk van den BoschCCChenZ, et al. (2021) China’s Green space system planning: development, experiences, and characteristics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening60: 127017. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127017.
43.
ZhouYGuanCWuL, et al. (2024) Visitation-based classification of urban parks through mobile phone big data in Tokyo. Applied Geography167: 103300. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2024.103300.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
