Using multiday continuous smartcard data in 2020, we investigate group-based travel in Hong Kong metro system by identifying metro riders intentionally traveling in groups (ITGs). ITGs serve as our proxies for citywide physical social interactions. Considering ITG members are interrelated through group-based trips, we construct a social network (an ITG network) formed by ITGs to explore the network properties and structures of ITG activities. Examining ITGs both before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, we measure the spatial patterns of ITGs and their dynamics across locales and over time. We find that the degree of the ITG network follows a heavy-tailed distribution. The network size and interconnections vary across time. Some ITG members are more influential vertices than others in maintaining the networks’ topological properties. We illustrate how new data and methods can be used to explore in-person interactions and social activity patterns in transit-reliant cities.
AlbertRJeongHBarabásiA-L (2000) Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature406(6794): 378–382.
2.
BarabâsiA-LJeongHNédaZ, et al. (2002) Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications311(3-4): 590–614.
3.
BaymNKZhangYBLinM-C (2004) Social interactions across media:interpersonal communication on the internet, telephone and face-to-face. New Media & Society6(3): 299–318.
4.
BenzellSGCollisANicolaidesC (2020) Rationing social contact during the COVID-19 pandemic: transmission risk and social benefits of US locations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America117(26): 14642–14644.
5.
BlockPHoffmanMRaabeIJ, et al. (2020) Social network-based distancing strategies to flatten the COVID-19 curve in a post-lockdown world. Nature Human Behaviour4(6): 588–596.
6.
BoessenAHippJRButtsCT, et al. (2018) The built environment, spatial scale, and social networks: do land uses matter for personal network structure?Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science45(3): 400–416.
7.
CarrascoJAHoganBWellmanB, et al. (2008a) Agency in social activity interactions: the role of social networks in time and space. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie99(5): 562–583.
8.
CarrascoJAHoganBWellmanB, et al. (2008b) Collecting social network data to study social activity-travel behavior: an egocentric approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design35(6): 961–980.
9.
CerveroRMurakamiJ (2009) Rail and property development in Hong Kong: experiences and extensions. Urban Studies46(10): 2019–2043.
10.
ChouW-PWangP-WChenS-L, et al. (2020) Voluntary reduction of social interaction during the COVID-19 pandemic in Taiwan: related factors and association with perceived social support. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health17(21): 8039.
11.
DouB-LWangX-GZhangS-Y (2010) Robustness of networks against cascading failures. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications389(11): 2310–2317.
12.
DunbarRI (1993) Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences16(4): 681–694.
13.
DunbarRISpoorsM (1995) Social networks, support cliques, and kinship. Human Nature6: 273–290.
14.
EagleNPentlandALazerD (2009) Inferring friendship network structure by using mobile phone data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America106(36): 15274–15278.
15.
FarberSNeutensTCarrascoJ-A, et al. (2014) Social interaction potential and the spatial distribution of face-to-face social interactions. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design41(6): 960–976.
HuangJLevinsonDWangJJinH (2019) Job-worker spatial dynamics in Beijing: insights from smart card data. Cities86: 83–93.
19.
HuangJLevinsonDWangJZhouJWangZ (2018) Tracking job and housing dynamics with smartcard data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115(50): 12710–12715.
20.
KillickRFearnheadPEckleyIA (2012) Optimal detection of changepoints with a linear computational cost. Journal of the American Statistical Association107(500): 1590–1598.
21.
KimJRasouliSTimmermansHJ (2018) Social networks, social influence and activity-travel behaviour: a review of models and empirical evidence. Transport Reviews38(4): 499–523.
22.
KissfazekasK (2022) Circle of paradigms? Or ‘15-minute’neighbourhoods from the 1950s. Cities123: 103587.
23.
KroenckeLHarariGMBackMD, et al. (2023) Well-being in social interactions: examining personality-situation dynamics in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology124(2): 437–460.
24.
LalBDwivediYKHaagM (2023) Working from home during Covid-19: doing and managing technology-enabled social interaction with colleagues at a distance. Information Systems Frontiers25(4): 1333–1350.
25.
LeeJHLuchettiMAschwandenD, et al. (2022) Perceived changes in social contact during COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Personal Relationships29(1): 59–76.
26.
LooBPFanZ (2023) Social interaction in public space: spatial edges, moveable furniture, and visual landmarks. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science50(9): 2510–2526.
27.
Loukaitou-SiderisA (2003) Children’s common grounds: a study of intergroup relations among children in public settings. Journal of the American Planning Association69(2): 130–143.
28.
OtteERousseauR (2002) Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science28(6): 441–453.
29.
ParadyGTKatayamaGYamazakiH, et al. (2019) Analysis of social networks, social interactions, and out-of-home leisure activity generation: evidence from Japan. Transportation46(3): 537–562.
30.
PetherickAGoldszmidtRAndradeEB, et al. (2021) A worldwide assessment of changes in adherence to COVID-19 protective behaviours and hypothesized pandemic fatigue. Nature Human Behaviour5(9): 1145–1160.
31.
SarkarSWuHLevinsonDM (2020) Measuring polycentricity via network flows, spatial interaction and percolation. Urban Studies57(12): 2402–2422.
32.
SunLAxhausenKWLeeD-H, et al. (2013) Understanding metropolitan patterns of daily encounters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America110(34): 13774–13779.
33.
SutcliffeADunbarRBinderJ, et al. (2012) Relationships and the social brain: integrating psychological and evolutionary perspectives. British Journal of Psychology103(2): 149–168.
34.
TaoSHeSY (2021) Job accessibility and joint household travel: a study of Hong Kong with a particular focus on new town residents. Transportation48(3): 1379–1407.
35.
TilahunNLevinsonD (2011) Work and home location: possible role of social networks. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice45(4): 323–331.
36.
TilahunNLevinsonD (2017) Contacts and meetings: location, duration and distance traveled. Travel Behaviour and Society6: 64–74.
37.
van den BergPArentzeTTimmermansH (2010) Location-type choice for face-to-face social activities and its effect on travel behavior. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design37(6): 1057–1075.
38.
van den BergPSharmeenFWeijs-PerréeM (2017) On the subjective quality of social Interactions: influence of neighborhood walkability, social cohesion and mobility choices. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice106: 309–319.
39.
VeitchJBallKRiveraE, et al. (2022) What entices older adults to parks? Identification of park features that encourage park visitation, physical activity, and social interaction. Landscape and Urban Planning217: 104254.
40.
XiaoYLoHK (2016) Day-to-day departure time modeling under social network influence. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological92: 54–72.
41.
ZhangYMartensKLongY (2018) Revealing group travel behavior patterns with public transit smart card data. Travel Behaviour and Society10: 42–52.
42.
ZhangNJiaWWangP, et al. (2021) Changes in local travel behaviour before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Hong Kong. Cities112: 103139.
43.
ZhaoXCuiMLevinsonD (2022) Exploring temporal variability in travel patterns on public transit using big smart card data. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science50(1): 198–217.
44.
ZhouJYangYMaH, et al. (2020) “Familiar strangers” in the big data era: an exploratory study of Beijing metro encounters. Cities97: 102495.
45.
ZhouMZhouJ (2023) Structural change and spatial pattern of intentional travel groups: a case study of metro riders in Hong Kong. Applied Geography152: 102885.
46.
ZhouMZhouJZhouJLeiSZhaoZ (2023) Introducing social contacts into the node-place model: a case study of Hong Kong. Journal of Transport Geography107: 103532.
47.
ZhuKYinHQuY, et al. (2021) Group travel behavior in metro system and its relationship with house price. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications573: 125957.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
