Interest in mass transit investment and transit-oriented development (TOD) is growing as a way to promote smart growth. These investments and policy changes may imply new housing demands, which are not well understood. Using Kitchener-Waterloo, Canada, as a case study, we address the following questions: (1) Do households in this mid-sized region show preferences for TOD neighborhoods? How do preferences for transit accessibility vary across space? (2) What household characteristics are associated with the demand for housing and neighborhood characteristics? With a combined dataset of household survey and housing transactions, we present a novel application of the two-stage hedonic model to understand the housing demand structure impacted by transit policies. This study provides evidence of demand for TOD and LRT accessibility by households with a range of socio-demographics. We thus recommend the region build complete TODs to satisfy a variety of housing needs.
AlonsoW (1964) Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
2.
AnderssonHJonssonLÖgrenM (2010) Property prices and exposure to multiple noise sources: Hedonic Regression with road and railway noise. Environmental and Resource Economics45(1): 73–89.
3.
AnselinL (2022) Chapter 6: Spatial Econometrics. In: ReySJFranklinR (eds). Handbook of Spatial Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 101–122.
4.
AnselinLFloraxRReySJ (eds), (2004) Advances in Spatial Econometrics: Methodology, Tools and Applications. Springer Science and Business Media.
5.
BabinRM (2016) Estimating Homebuyer Preferences under Intensification: Hedonic Modelling of Open Space and Multimodal Transit Amenities Preceding Light Rail in Kitchener-Waterloo. Master’s thesis: University of Waterloo.
6.
BajariPBenkardCL (2005) Demand Estimation with Heterogeneous Consumers and Unobserved Product Characteristics: A Hedonic Approach. Journal of Political Economy113(6): 1239–1276.
7.
BajariPKahnME (2005) Estimating Housing Demand with an Application to Explaining Racial Segregation in Cities. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics23(1): 20–33.
8.
BillingsSB (2011) Estimating the value of a new transit option. Regional Science and Urban Economics41(6): 525–536.
CaoXHoughJA (2012) Hedonic Value of Transit Accessibility: An Empirical Analysis in a Small Urban Area. Journal of the Transportation Research Forum47(3): 171–183.
11.
CerveroRDuncanM (2002) Transit’s Value-Added Effects: Light and Commuter Rail Services and Commercial Land Values. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
CrespoRGret-RegameyA (2013) Local hedonic house-price modelling for urban planners: Advantages of using local regression techniques. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design40(4): 664–682.
15.
DuanJTianGYangL, et al. (2021) Addressing the macroeconomic and hedonic determinants of housing prices in Beijing Metropolitan Area, China. Habitat International113: 102374.
16.
DuncanM (2011) The impact of transit-oriented development on housing prices in San diego, CA. Urban Studies48(1): 101–127.
17.
DziauddinMF (2019) Estimating land value uplift around light rail transit stations in Greater Kuala Lumpur: An empirical study based on geographically weighted regression (GWR). Research in Transportation Economics74: 10–20.
18.
DziauddinMFPoweNAlvanidesS (2015) Estimating the Effects of Light Rail Transit (LRT) System on Residential Property Values Using Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR). Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy8(1): 1–25.
19.
Ellis-YoungMDoucetBJZ, et al. (2021) From“Big Small Town” to“Small Big City ”: Resident Experiences of Gentrification along Waterloo Region’s LRT Corridor. Diabetes and metabolic Syndrome15: 1–6.
20.
FotheringhamASOshanTM (2016) Geographically weighted regression and multicollinearity : dispelling the myth. Journal of Geographical Systems18(4): 303–329.
21.
FotheringhamASCharltonMEBrunsdonC (1998) Geographically weighted regression: a natural evolution of the expansion method for spatial data analysis. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space30(11): 1905–1927.
22.
FotheringhamASBrunsdonCCharltonM (2003) Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships. John Wiley and Sons.
23.
GolubAGuhathakurtaSSollapuramB (2012) Spatial and Temporal Capitalization Effects of Light Rail in Phoenix: From Conception, Planning, and Construction to Operation. Journal of Planning Education and Research32(4): 415–429.
24.
GuthrieAFanY (2016) Developers’ perspectives on transit-oriented development. Transport Policy51: 103–114.
25.
HigginsCKanaroglouP (2016) Forty years of modelling rapid transit s land value uplift in North America moving beyond the tip of the iceberg. Transport Reviews36(5): 610–634.
26.
HigginsCFergusonMKanaroglouP (2014) Light Rail and Land Use Change: Rail Transit’ s Role in Reshaping and Revitalizing Cities. Journal of Public Transportation17(2): 93–112.
27.
HuangY (2020) Analyzing Housing Market Dynamics and Residential Location Choices Concurrent with Light-Rail Transit Investment in Kitchener-Waterloo. Canada. PhD thesis: University of Waterloo.
28.
HuangYParkerDMinakerL (2021) Identifying latent demand for transit-oriented development neighbourhoods : Evidence from a mid-sized urban area in Canada. Journal of Transport Geography90: 102940.
29.
JensenCUPanduroTELundhedeTH, et al. (2021) Who demands peri-urban nature ? A second stage hedonic house price estimation of household’s preference for peri-urban nature. Landscape and Urban Planning207: 104016.
30.
JinTChengLLiuZ, et al. (2022) Nonlinear public transit accessibility effects on housing prices: Heterogeneity across price segments. Transport Policy117: 48–59.
31.
KilpatrickJAThroupeRLCarruthersJI, et al. (2007) The impact of transit corridors on residential property values. Journal of Real Estate Research29(3): 303–320.
LewisPGBaldassareM (2010) The Complexity of Public Attitudes Toward Compact Development. Journal of the American Planning Association76(2): 219–237.
34.
LiangXLiuYQiuT, et al. (2018) The effects of locational factors on the housing prices of residential communities: The case of Ningbo, China. Habitat International81: 1–11.
35.
LiaoFHFarberSEwingR (2015) Compact development and preference heterogeneity in residential location choice behaviour: A latent class analysis. Urban Studies52(2): 314–337.
36.
LuBCharltonMHarrisP, et al. (2014) Geographically weighted regression with a non-Euclidean distance metric: A case study using hedonic house price data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science28(4): 660–681.
37.
MulleyCMaLCliftonG, et al. (2016) Residential property value impacts of proximity to transport infrastructure: An investigation of bus rapid transit and heavy rail networks in Brisbane, Australia. Journal of Transport Geography54: 41–52.
38.
MulleyCTsaiCHPMaL (2018) Does residential property price benefit from light rail in Sydney?Research in Transportation Economics67: 3–10.
NetusilNRChattopadhyaySKovacsKF (2010) Estimating the demand for tree canopy: A second-stage hedonic price analysis in Portland, Oregon. Land Economics86(2): 281–293.
41.
OrfordS (2002) Valuing locational externalities: A GIS and multilevel modelling approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design29(1): 105–127.
42.
OslandL (2010) An application of spatial econometrics in relation to hedonic house price modeling. Journal of Real Estate Research32(3): 289–320.
43.
PáezALongFFarberS (2008) Moving window approaches for hedonic price estimation: An empirical comparison of modelling techniques. Urban Studies45(8): 1565–1581.
44.
PanQ (2019) The impacts of light rail on residential property values in a non-zoning city: A new test on the Houston METRORail transit line. Journal of Transport and Land Use12(1): 241–264.
45.
PanduroTEJensenCULundhedeTH, et al. (2018) Eliciting preferences for urban parks. Regional Science and Urban Economics73: 127–142.
ParkerDValaei SharifSWebberK (2023) Why did the ‘Missing Middle’ miss the train? Exploring barriers to intensified family housing in Waterloo Region, Canada. Land12(2): 434.
48.
ParkerDCValaei SharifSWaddellPAet al. (2022) Incorporating price expectations into agent-based representations of land developer decision models. Proceedings of the Social Simulation Conference: Promoting Social Simulation and Computational Social Science.
49.
Region of Waterloo (2018) Kitchener-Cambridge-Waterloo Central Transit Corridor (CTC) Monitoring Program. Monitoring Change in the CTC. Waterloo, Canada: Region of Waterloo.
50.
RosenS (1974) Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition. Journal of Political Economy82(1): 34–55.
51.
SeoKGolubAKubyM (2014) Combined impacts of highways and light rail transit on residential property values: a spatial hedonic price model for Phoenix, Arizona. Journal of Transport Geography41: 53–62.
52.
SpierlerC (2018) Trains, Buses, People: An Opinionated Atlas of US Transit. Island press.
SunZAllanAZouX, et al. (2022) Scientometric Analysis and Mapping of Transit- Oriented Development Studies. Planning Practice and Research37(1): 35–60.
56.
TaylorLO (2017) Hedonics. In: ChampPABoyleKJBrownTC (eds), The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources. Springer Science and Business Media.
57.
ToblerWR (1970) A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region. Economic Geography46 (sup1): 234–240.
58.
von GraevenitzK (2018) The amenity cost of road noise. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management90: 1–22.
59.
YenBTHMulleyCShearerH, et al. (2018) Announcement, construction or delivery: When does value uplift occur for residential properties? Evidence from the Gold Coast Light Rail system in Australia. Land Use Policy73: 412–422.
60.
YuhengLDetottoCPrunettiD, et al. (2022) Unveiling spatial and temporal patterns of second home dynamics: a Bayesian spatiotemporal analysis for a Mediterranean island. Spatial Economic Analysis17(1): 10–33.
61.
ZhangWWangFBarchersC, et al. (2021) The Impact of Transit-oriented Development on Housing Value Resilience: Evidence from the City of Atlanta. Journal of Planning Education and Research41(4): 396–409.
62.
ZhongHLiW (2016) Rail transit investment and property values: An old tale retold. Transport Policy51: 33–48.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
