This study examines the extent and determinants of urban land expansion and fragmentation for 104 U.S. metropolitan areas for the time period 2001-2019. It leverages temporally and spatially consistent, satellite-based data. The analysis distinguishes among four different intensity levels of urban development and makes use of a number of landscape fragmentation metrics. Estimation relies on two-way fixed-effects panel techniques. Our time fixed-effects indicate that high-intensity urban developments grew by about 25% from 2001 to 2019, low-intensity developments by about 5%. The percentage increases for the corresponding fragmentation statistics are higher, at about 40% and 15%, respectively. Higher gasoline prices are associated with less urban land expansion and fragmentation.
AngelSParentJCivcoDL, et al. (2012) Atlas of Urban Expansion. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
2.
BimonteSStabileA (2017) Land consumption and income in Italy: A Case of inverted EKC. Ecological Economics131: 36–43.
3.
BruecknerJKFanslerDA (1983) The economics of urban sprawl: Theory and evidence on the spatial sizes of cities. Review of Economics and Statistics65(3): 479–482.
4.
BurchfieldMOvermanHGPugaD, et al. (2006) Causes of sprawl: A portrait from space. Quarterly Journal of Economics121(2): 587–633.
5.
DebbageNBereitschaftBShepherdJM (2017) Quantifying the spatiotemporal trends of urban sprawl among large US metropolitan areas via spatial metrics. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy10(3): 317–345.
6.
DempseyJAPlantingaAJ (2013) How well do urban growth boundaries contain development? Results for Oregon using a difference-in-difference estimator. Regional Science and Urban Economics43(6): 996–1007.
7.
DengXHuangJRozelleS, et al. (2008) Growth, population and industrialization, and urban land expansion of China. Journal of Urban Economics63(1): 96–115.
8.
DonaldsonDStoreygardA (2016) The view from above: Applications of satellite data in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives30(4): 171–198.
9.
EhrlichMVHilberCASchöniO (2018) Institutional settings and urban sprawl: Evidence from Europe. Journal of Housing Economics42: 4–18.
10.
Garcia-LópezM (2019) All roads lead to Rome and to sprawl? Evidence from European cities. Regional Science and Urban Economics79: 103467.
11.
GielenERiutort-MayolGMiralles i GarciaJL, et al. (2021) Cost assessment of urban sprawl on municipal services using hierarchical regression. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science48(2): 280–297.
12.
GeshkovMVDeSalvoJS (2012) The effect of land-use controls on the spatial size of U.S. urbanized areas. Journal of Regional Science52(4): 648–675.
13.
GyourkoJMolloyR (2015) Chapter 19 - Regulation and Housing Supply. In: DurantonGHendersonJVStrangeWC (eds), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Netherland: Elsevier, volume 5, pp. 1289–1337.
14.
HamidiSEwingR (2014) A longitudinal study of changes in urban sprawl between 2000 and 2010 in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning128: 72–82.
15.
HilberCARobert-NicoudF (2013) On the origins of land use regulations: Theory and evidence from US metro areas. Journal of Urban Economics75: 29–43.
16.
HurstNBWestSE (2014) Public transit and urban redevelopment: The effect of light rail transit on land use in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Regional Science and Urban Economics46: 57–72.
17.
JaegerJASchwickC (2014) Improving the measurement of urban sprawl: Weighted urban proliferation (WUP) and its application to Switzerland. Ecological Indicators38: 294–308.
18.
LeeRJSenerIN (2017) The effect of light rail transit on land use in a city without zoning. Journal of Transport and Land Use10(1): 541–556.
19.
McGarigalKMarksBJ (1995) FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-351. Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
20.
McGrathDT (2005) More evidence on the spatial scale of cities. Journal of Urban Economics58(1): 1–10.
21.
MustafaARompaeyAVCoolsM, et al. (2018) Addressing the determinants of built-up expansion and densification processes at the regional scale. Urban Studies55(15): 3279–3298.
22.
NechybaTJWalshRP (2004) Urban Sprawl. Journal of Economic Perspectives18(4): 177–200.
23.
OueslatiWAlvanidesSGarrodG (2015) Determinants of urban sprawl in European cities. Urban Studies52(9): 1594–1614.
24.
PatacchiniEZenouY (2009) Urban sprawl in Europe. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs10: 125–142., no.
25.
PaulsenK (2012) Yet even more evidence on the spatial size of cities: Urban spatial expansion in the US, 1980–2000. Regional Science and Urban Economics42(4): 561–568.
26.
PaulsenK (2014) Geography, policy or market? New evidence on the measurement and causes of sprawl (and infill) in US metropolitan regions. Urban Studies51(12): 2629–2645.
27.
SaizA (2010) The geographic determinants of housing supply. Quarterly Journal of Economics125(3): 1253–1296.
28.
SongYZenouY (2006) Property tax and urban sprawl: Theory and implications for US cities. Journal of Urban Economics60(3): 519–534.
29.
SpiveyC (2008) The Mills-Muth model of urban spatial structure: Surviving the test of time?Urban Studies45(2): 295–312.
30.
WassmerRW (2006) The influence of local urban containment policies and statewide growth management on the size of United States urban areas. Journal of Regional Science46(1): 25–65.
31.
WassmerRW (2016) Further empirical evidence on residential property taxation and the occurrence of urban sprawl. Regional Science and Urban Economics61: 73–85.
32.
WickhamJStehmanSVSorensonDG, et al. (2021) Thematic accuracy assessment of the NLCD 2016 land cover for the conterminous United States. Remote Sensing of Environment257: 112357.
33.
WilliamsonT (2008) Sprawl, spatial location, and politics: How ideological identification tracks the built environment. American Politics Research36(6): 903–933.
34.
YoungMTanguayGALachapelleU (2016) Transportation costs and urban sprawl in Canadian metropolitan areas. Research in Transportation Economics60: 25–34.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
