Parking is often overlooked by urban researchers even though parking consumes large proportions of a city’s physical footprint and imposes a significant impediment to more sustainable travel. Underpinning this lack of attention is suitable data and methods capable of capturing the complex dynamics of parking. Here we redress this gap by drawing on an emergent source of parking data and deploying empirical techniques to unpack this complexity. Data from 3542 on-street parking sensors observed over a 9-year period are used to delineate the first typology of parking routines before using a fixed-effects logistic regression model to explain how nearby land-use types and land-use mix shapes tempo and timing of parking utilisation. The benefit of our approach lies in its capacity to discriminate broad types of temporal rhythms associated with parking dynamics at particular places, how these change over time and how these rhythms are associated with different types and mixes of nearby land use. This knowledge is important to inform policies seeking to optimise the use of on-street parking and invoke more sustainable patterns of mobility.
BarterPA (2015) A parking policy typology for clearer thinking on parking reform. International Journal of Urban Sciences19(2): 136–156. DOI: 10.1080/12265934.2014.927740.
5.
BattyM (2020) The smart city. In: LeGatesRTStoutF (eds), The City Reader. 7th edition. Oxon: Routledge, pp. 503–515.
BrunsdonC (2017) Quantitative methods III: scales of measurement in quantitative human geography. Progress in Human Geography42(4): 610–621.
9.
ButtonK (2006) The political economy of parking charges in “first” and “second-best” worlds. Transport Policy13(6): 470–478. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2006.05.004.
CaoYYangZZZuoZY, et al. (2017) The effect of curb parking on road capacity and traffic safety. European Transport Research Review9(4): 1–10. DOI: 10.1007/s12544-016-0219-3.
12.
ChamberlainG (1980) Analysis of covariance with qualitative data. Review of Economic StudiesXLVII: 225–238.
13.
ChesterMVFraserAMMatuteJM, et al. (2015) Parking infrastructure: A constraint on or opportunity for urban redevelopment? A study of Los Angeles county parking supply and growth. Journal of the American Planning Association81(4): 268–286. DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2015.1092879.
14.
ChristiansenPEngebretsenØFearnleyN, et al. (2017) Parking facilities and the built environment: Impacts on travel behaviour. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice95: 198–206. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.10.025.
CorcoranJZahnowRKimptonA, et al. (2019) The temporality of place: Constructing a temporal typology of crime in commercial precincts. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science48(1): 9–24. DOI: 10.1177/2399808319846904.
18.
De CerreñoAL (2004) Dynamics of on-street parking in large central cities. Transportation Research Record; 1898: 130–137. National Research Council. DOI: 10.3141/1898-16.
EdquistJRudin-BrownCMLennéMG, et al. (2012) The effects of on-street parking and road environment visual complexity on travel speed and reaction time. Accident Analysis and Prevention45: 759–765. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.10.001.
21.
ElliotEM (2016). Brisbane City Council worker allegedly parks on yellow no stopping line at Wynnum Rd, Wynnum West. Quest News. URLhttps://tinyurl.com/s2zjzazf
22.
FullerP (2018). Residents form protest group against Brisbane City Council plans to charge for residential parking permits. The Courier Mail. URLhttps://tinyurl.com/2p94dyvd
23.
GlazerANiskanenE (1992) Parking fees and congestion. Regional Science and Urban Economics22(1): 123–132. DOI: 10.1016/0166-0462(92)90028-Y.
24.
González-GonzálezENoguésSSteadD, et al. (2020) Parking futures: preparing European cities for the advent of automated vehicles. Land Use Policy91: 104010.
25.
GuoZRenS (2013) From minimum to maximum: Impact of the London parking reform on residential parking supply from 2004 to 2010?Urban Studies50(6): 1183–1200. DOI: 10.1177/0042098012460735.
26.
HendersonJ (2013) Street Fight: The Politics of Mobility in San Francisco. Boston: University of Massachusetts Press.
27.
InciE (2015) A review of the economics of parking. Economics of Transportation4(1–2): 50–63. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecotra.2014.11.001.
28.
InciELindseyR (2015) Garage and curbside parking competition with search congestion. Regional Science and Urban Economics54: 49–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2015.07.003.
29.
JacksT (2018) Dead space in the city: the true scale of vacant car parking revealed. URL: https://tinyurl.com/bdzuu8js
30.
JakleJSculleKA (2004) Lots of Parking: Land Use in a Car Culture. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
31.
KaufmanLRousseeuwPJ (1990) Partitioning around medoids (program PAM). In: KaufmanLRousseeuwPJ (eds) Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Vol. 344, 68–125. DOI: 10.1002/9780470316801.ch2.
32.
KimptonACorcoranJWickesR, et al. (2017) Greenspace and crime: an analysis of greenspace types, neighboring composition, and the temporal dimensions of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency54(3): 303–337. DOI: 10.1177/0022427816666309.
33.
KimptonAPojaniDRyanC, et al. (2021) Contemporary parking policy, practice, and outcomes in three large Australian cities. Progress in Planning153: 100506. DOI: 10.1016/j.progress.2020.100506.
34.
KirschnerFLanzendorfM (2020) Parking management for promoting sustainable transport in urban neighbourhoods. A review of existing policies and challenges from a German perspective. Transport Reviews40(1): 54–75. DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2019.1666929.
35.
KleinGMoonB (2006) Making sense of sensemaking 1: alternative perspectives. IEEE Intelligent Systems21(4): 70–73. DOI: 10.1109/MIS.2006.75.
36.
KobusMBWGutiérrez-I-PuigarnauERietveldP, et al. (2013) The on-street parking premium and car drivers’ choice between street and garage parking. Regional Science and Urban Economics43(2): 395–403. DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2012.10.001.
37.
LimN (2014) Clash over caravans: call for laws to restrict parking. South East Advertiser.
38.
LitmanT (2006) Parking Management Best Practices. Chicago, IL: American Planning Association.
39.
Loukaitou-SiderisALiggettRSungHG, et al. (2007) Death on the crosswalk: a study of pedestrian-automobile collisions in Los Angeles. Journal of Planning Education and Research26(3): 338–351. DOI: 10.1177/0739456X06297008.
40.
MarsdenG (2006) The evidence base for parking policies-a review. Transport Policy13(6): 447–457. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2006.05.009.
McCahillCTGarrickN (2014) Parking supply and urban impacts. In: IsonSMulleyC (eds) Parking Issues and Policies (Transport and Sustainability). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Vol. 5, 33–55. DOI: 10.1108/S2044-994120140000005017.
44.
MeyerMDMcShaneM (1983) Parking policy and downtown economic development. Journal of Urban Planning and Development109(1): 27–43. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9488(1983)109:1(27).
45.
MontgomeryC (2013) Happy City: Transforming Our Lives through Urban Design. New York: Macmillan.
46.
MoranME (2021) What’s your angle? Analyzing angled parking via satellite imagery to aid bike-network planning. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science48(7): 1912–1925.
47.
NajmiABostanaraMGuZ, et al. (2021) On-street parking management and pricing policies: an evaluation from a system enhancement perspective. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice146: 128–151. DOI: 10.1016/J.TRA.2021.02.009.
48.
O’SullivanMGladstoneN (2019). Parking fines reap Sydney councils $650m in four years. The Sydney Morning Herald.
49.
PapaEFerreiraA (2018) Sustainable accessibility and the implementation of automated vehicles: Identifying critical decisions. Urban Science2(1): 5.
50.
PierceGShoupDC (2013) Getting the prices right. Journal of the American Planning Association79(1): 67–81. DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2013.787307.
51.
PojaniDCorcoranJSipeN, et al. (2019) Parking: An International Perspective. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/C2017-0-02976-2.
52.
ScharnhorstE (2018) Quantified parking: comprehensive parking inventories for five U.S. cities. URLhttps://tinyurl.com/2p9xrmak
53.
ShoupDC (1999) The trouble with minimum parking requirements. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice33(7–8): 549–574. DOI: 10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00007-5.
54.
ShoupDC (2005) Parking Cash Out. Washington, DC: American Planning Association.
55.
ShoupDC (2006) Cruising for parking. Transport Policy13(6): 479–486. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2006.05.005.
56.
SpeckJ (2012) Walkable City : How Downtown Can Save America, One Step at a Time. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
57.
TaylorEJ (2014) Fight the towers! Or kiss your car park goodbye”: How often do residents assert car parking rights in Melbourne planning appeals?Planning Theory & Practice15(3): 328–595. DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2014.929727.
WeinbergerR (2012) Death by a thousand curb-cuts: Evidence on the effect of minimum parking requirements on the choice to drive. Transport Policy20: 93–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.08.002.
60.
YangSQianZS (2017) Turning meter transactions data into occupancy and payment behavioral information for on-street parking. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies78: 165–182. DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2017.02.022.
61.
YenBTMulleyCBurkeM, et al. (2020) Parking and restaurant business: Differences in business perceptions and customer travel behaviour in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Land Use Policy92: 103818. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.021.
62.
YoungWMilesCF (2015) A spatial study of parking policy and usage in Melbourne, Australia. Case Studies on Transport Policy3(1): 23–32. DOI: 10.1016/J.CSTP.2014.07.003.
63.
YousifSPurnawan (2004) Traffic operations at on-street parking facilities. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Transport157(3): 189–194. DOI: 10.1680/tran.2004.157.3.189.
64.
ZakharenkoR (2016) The time dimension of parking economics. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological91: 211–228. DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2016.04.008.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
