Quantifying urban forms to explore urban compactness or sprawl has become increasingly popular in multiple fields in the past decades. However, previous studies predominantly analyze the multidimensional phenomenon at large-area levels such as metropolitan areas, concealing variations that probably occur at small-area levels. Canadian studies measuring urban forms are usually conducted at the regional level with inconsistent indicators and approaches, hindering meaningful comparisons of compactness or sprawling between different regions. This study bridges a previous gap by applying Bayesian multivariate spatial factor analysis to construct a new composite urban compactness index for all Census Tracts (CT) in Canada. Nine urban form indictors representing four dimensions, density, centering, land use, and street connectivity are used in developing the index. Posterior probability is used to detect CTs that are most compact or sprawling. Results indicate that gross population and employment densities best characterize urban compactness at the CT level while land-use mix is the least central indictor to define the multi-faceted concept. Notable differences of urban compactness are detected across Canada and among different Census Metropolitan Areas (CMA). The most compact CTs usually locate in downtown or city center areas of a CMA. Larger and more populous CMAs, which also capture a larger extent of periphery areas, are not necessarily more compact and vice versa, suggesting the need to measure local variations of urban compactness. The constructed composite index allows direct urban compactness comparisons across different Canadian regions. Findings from this study can be used to guide smart and sustainable urban development in Canada.
AbellanJJFechtDBestN, et al. (2007) Bayesian analysis of the multivariate geographical distribution of the socio-economic environment in England. Environmetrics18: 745–758. DOI: 10.1002/env.
2.
Arribas-BelDNijkampPScholtenH (2011) Multidimensional urban sprawl in Europe: A self-organizing map approach. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems35(4): 263–275. DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.10.002.
3.
Arribas-BelDSchmidtCR (2013) Self-organizing maps and the US urban spatial structure. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design40(2): 362–371. DOI: 10.1068/b37014.
4.
BesagJYorkJMolliA (1991) Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics43(1): 1–20. DOI: 10.1007/BF00116466.
5.
ColaninnoNTroncosoJCCladeraJR (2011) Spatial patterns of land use: morphology and demography, in a dynamic evaluation of urban sprawl phenomena along the Spanish Mediterranean coast. ERSA conference papers, 776.
6.
CutsingerJGalsterGWolmanH, et al. (2005) Verifying the multi-dimensional nature of metropolitan land use: Advancing the understanding and measurement of sprawl. Journal of Urban Affairs27(3): 235–259. DOI: 10.1111/j.0735-2166.2005.00235.x.
7.
DuncanEWWhiteNMMengersenK (2017) Spatial smoothing in Bayesian models: a comparison of weights matrix specifications and their impact on inference. International Journal of Health Geographics16(1): 47. DOI: 10.1186/s12942-017-0120-x.
8.
EwingRBrownsonRBerriganD (2006) Relationship between urban sprawl and weight of United States youth. American Journal of Preventive Medicine31(6): 464–474. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.08.020.
9.
EwingRDumbaughE (2009) The built environment and traffic safety. Journal of Planning Literature23(4): 347–367. DOI: 10.1177/0885412209335553.
10.
EwingRHamidiS (2014) Measuring Urban Sprawl and Validating Sprawl Measures.
11.
EwingRHamidiS (2015) Compactness versus Sprawl. Journal of Planning Literature30(4): 413–432. DOI: 10.1177/0885412215595439.
12.
EwingRMeakinsGHamidiS, et al. (2014) Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity, and morbidity - Update and refinement. Health & Place26: 118–126. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.12.008.
13.
EwingRSchmidTKillingsworthR, et al. (2003) Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity, and morbidity. American Journal of Health Promotion: AJHP18(1): 47–57.
14.
FengLDuPZhuL, et al. (2016) Investigating sprawl along China's urban fringe from a spatio-temporal perspective. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy9(2): 233–250. DOI: 10.1007/s12061-015-9149-z.
15.
FrenkelAAshkenaziM (2008) Measuring urban sprawl: how can we deal with it?Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design35(1): 56–79. DOI: 10.1068/b32155.
16.
FrumkinH (2002) Urban sprawl and public health. Public Health Reports117(3): 201–217. DOI: 10.1177/1476127005050030.
17.
FurbergDBanY (2012) Satellite monitoring of Urban sprawl and assessment of its potential environmental impact in the Greater Toronto Area between 1985 and 2005. Environmental Management50(6): 1068–1088. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-012-9944-0.
18.
GalsterGHansonRRatcliffeMR, et al. (2001) Wrestling sprawl to the ground: defining and measuring an elusive concept. Housing Policy Debate12(4): 681–717. DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2001.9521426.
19.
GelmanA (2006) Prior distribution for variance parameters in hierarchical models. Bayesian Analysis1(3): 515–533. DOI: 10.1214/06-BA117A.
20.
GielenERiutort-MayolGMiralles i GarciaJL, et al. (2021) Cost assessment of urban sprawl on municipal services using hierarchical regression. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science48(2): 280–297.
21.
GielenERiutort-MayolGPalencia-JiménezJS, et al. (2018) An urban sprawl index based on multivariate and Bayesian factor analysis with application at the municipality level in Valencia. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science45(5): 888–914. DOI: 10.1177/2399808317690148.
22.
GriffinBAEibnerCBirdCE, et al. (2013) The relationship between urban sprawl and coronary heart disease in women. Health & Place20: 51–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.11.003.
23.
HamidiS (2020) Urban sprawl and the emergence of food deserts in the USA. Urban Studies57(8): 1660–1675. DOI: 10.1177/0042098019841540.
24.
HanAT (2019) The implication of regional and local growth management policies on sprawl: A case of the Calgary Metropolitan Area. Journal of Urban Affairs41(8): 1103–1122. DOI: 10.1080/07352166.2019.1569467.
25.
JaegerJAGBertillerRSchwickC, et al. (2010) Suitability criteria for measures of urban sprawl. Ecological Indicators10(2): 397–406. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.07.007.
26.
JaegerJAGSchwickC (2014) Improving the measurement of urban sprawl: Weighted Urban Proliferation (WUP) and its application to Switzerland. Ecological Indicators38: 294–308. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.022.
27.
JatMKGargPKKhareD (2008) Monitoring and modelling of urban sprawl using remote sensing and GIS techniques. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation10(1): 26–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2007.04.002.
28.
KnaapG-JSongYEwingR, et al. (2005) Seeing the elephant : multi-disciplinary measures of urban sprawl. Landscape Ecology1–46. https://doi.org/Yes.
29.
KoziatekODragićevićS (2019) A local and regional spatial index for measuring three-dimensional urban compactness growth. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science46(1): 143–164. DOI: 10.1177/2399808317703983.
30.
KwanM-P (2012) The uncertain geographic context problem. Annals of the Association of American Geographers102(5): 958–968. DOI: 10.1080/00045608.2012.687349.
31.
LowryJHLowryMB (2014) Comparing spatial metrics that quantify urban form. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems44: 59–67. DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.11.005.
32.
LuanHLawJLysyM (2018) Diving into the consumer nutrition environment: a Bayesian spatial factor analysis of neighborhood restaurant environment. Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology24: 39–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.sste.2017.12.001.
33.
LuanHMinakerLMLawJ (2016) Do marginalized neighbourhoods have less healthy retail food environments? An analysis using Bayesian spatial latent factor and hurdle models. International Journal of Health Geographics15(1): 29. DOI: 10.1186/s12942-016-0060-x.
34.
MalikAAbdallaR (2017) Agent-based modelling for urban sprawl in the region of Waterloo, remove|retainOntario, Canada. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment3(1): 0. DOI: 10.1007/s40808-017-0271-6.
35.
MaohHFKoroniosMKanaroglouPS (2010) Exploring the land development process and its impact on urban form in Hamilton, remove|retainOntario. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien54(1): 68–86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0064.2009.00303.x.
36.
Marí-Dell’OlmoMMartínez-BeneitoMABorrellC, et al. (2011) Bayesian factor analysis to calculate a deprivation index and its uncertainty. Epidemiology22(3): 356–364. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182117747.
National Cancer Institute (2020) County Level Urban Sprawl Indices. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. https://gis.cancer.gov/tools/urban-sprawl/ (accessed 11 July 2019).
39.
NazarniaNSchwickCJaegerJAG (2016) Accelerated urban sprawl in Montreal, Quebec City, and Zurich: Investigating the differences using time series 1951-2011. Ecological Indicators60: 1229–1251. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.09.020.
40.
Nedovic-BudicZKnaapGJShahumyanH, et al. (2016) Measuring urban form at community scale: Case study of Dublin, Ireland. Cities55: 148–164. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2016.02.014.
41.
QuickMLuanH (2020) The spatial structure of socioeconomic disadvantage: a Bayesian multivariate spatial factor analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Science35(1): 63–83. DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2020.1759807.
42.
RichardsonSThomsonABestN, et al. (2004) Interpreting posterior relative risk estimates in disease-mapping studies. Environmental Health Perspectives112(9): 1016–1025. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.6740.
43.
RossNATremblaySKhanS, et al. (2007) Body mass index in urban Canada: neighborhood and metropolitan area effects. American Journal of Public Health97(3): 500–508. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.060954.
44.
SarzynskiAGalsterGStackL (2014) Evolving United States metropolitan land use patterns. Urban Geography35(1): 25–47. DOI: 10.1080/02723638.2013.826468.
45.
SkrondalARabe-HeskethS (2007) Latent variable modelling: a survey*. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery: Sjs: Official Organ for the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society34(4): 712–745. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9469.2007.00573.x.
46.
SongYPopkinBGordon-LarsenP (2013) A national-level analysis of neighborhood form metrics. Landscape and Urban Planning116: 73–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.04.002.
47.
SunHForsytheWWatersN (2007) Modeling urban land use change and urban sprawl: Calgary, AB, Canada. Networks and Spatial Economics7(4): 353–376. DOI: 10.1007/s11067-007-9030-y.
48.
TorrensPM (2008) A toolkit for measuring sprawl. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy1(1): 5–36. DOI: 10.1007/s12061-008-9000-x.
WolmanHHansonRFurdellK, et al. (2005) The fundamental challenge in measuring sprawl: which land should be considered?Professional Geographer57(1): 94–105. DOI: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.2005.00462.x.
51.
YehAGLiX (2001) Measurement and monitoring of urban sprawl in a rapidly growing region using entropy. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing67(1): 83–90.
52.
YueWLiuYFanP (2013) Measuring urban sprawl and its drivers in large Chinese cities: The case of Hangzhou. Land Use Policy31: 358–370. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.07.018.
53.
ZengCHeSCuiJ (2014) A multi-level and multi-dimensional measuring on urban sprawl: a case study in Wuhan metropolitan area, central China. Sustainability6(6): 3571–3598. DOI: 10.3390/su6063571.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
