Adaptive and anti-adaptive neighbourhoods: Investigating the relationship between individual choice and systemic adaptability

Abstract

Recent work on ‘anti-adaptive’ neighbourhoods has highlighted a number of common features, including scale of design, number of designers, mono-functionality, percentage of public space, planning rules and system of ownership. This article aims to provide a more general conceptual analysis of adaptability and anti-adaptability in terms of degrees of individual choice, where an individual’s choice set is understood as a combination of individual freedoms, both physical and normative, and of individual normative powers. Individual choice is constitutive of adaptability, and its ‘non-specific’ value helps to explain why adaptability is itself seen in a positive light. Thus, the article points to a potentially unifying explanatory factor that can help us to better understand the various common features of anti-adaptive neighbourhoods highlighted in the recent literature. The final part of the article discusses some of the implications of this reasoning for policy and design.

Keywords

Freedom anti-adaptive neighbourhoods individual choice adaptability complexity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akbar

(1988) Crisis in the Built Environment. Singapore: ConceptMedia Pte Ltd.

Alfasi

Portugali

(2007) Planning rules for a self-planned city. Planning Theory 6(2): 164–182.

Alfasi

Shnizik

Davidson

, et al. (2020) Anti-adaptive urbanism: Long-term implications of building inward-turned neighborhoods in Israel. Journal of Urbanism 13(4): 387–409.

Alian

Wood

(2019) Stranger adaptations: Public/private interfaces, adaptations, and ethnic diversity in Bankstown, Sydney. Journal of Urbanism 12(1): 83–102.

Blečić

Cecchini

(2017) On the antifragility of cities and of their buildings. City, Territory and Architecture 4(1): 1–11.

Boccalatte

(2013) Nel condominio la proprietà privata ci sta stretta. IBL Briefing paper, n. 121. Available at: www.brunoleoni.it (accessed 8 June 2021).

Budd

(1998) Be Reasonable! How Community Associations Can Enforce Rules without Antagonizing Residents, Going to Court, or Starting World War III. Alexandria, Egypt: CAI.

Carter

(1999) A Measure of Freedom. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Carter

(2004) Choice, freedom, and freedom of choice. Social Choice and Welfare 22: 61–81.

10.

Carter

(2008) How are power and unfreedom related? In: Laborde C and Maynor J (eds) Republicanism and Political Theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

11.

Carter

(2009) Respect for persons and the interest in freedom. In: de Wijze SA, Kramer MH amd Carter I (eds) Hillel Steiner and the Anatomy of Justice. New York, NY: Routledge.

12.

Cohen

(2008) Freedom and money. In: Thomas L (ed.) Contemporary Debates in Social Philosophy. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

13.

Conejos

(2013) Optimisation of future building adaptive reuse design criteria for urban sustainability. Journal of Design Research 11(3): 225–242.

14.

Conejos

Langston

Smith

(2015) Enhancing sustainability through designing for adaptive reuse from the outset. Facilities 33(9/10): 531–552.

15.

Cozzolino

(2020) The (anti) adaptive neighbourhoods. Embracing complexity and distribution of design control in the ordinary built environment. Environment and Planning B 47(2): 203–219.

16.

Cozzolino

Moroni

(2021) Multiple agents and self-organisation in complex cities: The crucial role of several property. Land Use Policy 103: 105297.

17.

Dovey

Wood

(2015) Public/private urban interfaces. Journal of Urbanism 8(1): 1–16.

18.

Gosling

Sassi

Naim

, et al. (2013) Adaptable buildings: A systems approach. Sustainable Cities and Society 7: 44–51.

19.

Hakim

(2014) Mediterranean Urbanism. Berlin, Germay: Springer.

20.

Hayek

A (1960) The Constitution of Liberty. London, UK: Routledge.

21.

Hayek

(1967) Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. London, UK: Routledge.

22.

Heidrich

Kamara

Maltese

, et al. (2017) A critical review of the developments in building adaptability. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation 35(4): 284–303.

23.

Hohfeld

(1923/2001) Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning. Dartmouth, UK: Ashgate.

24.

Hyatt WS (1975) Condominium and home owner associations: Formation and development. Emory Law Journal 24: 977--1008.

25.

Hyatt WS (1978) Community associations: How to draft documents that work. Real Estate Law Journal 7(26): 26--37.

26.

Jacobs

(1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York, NY: Random House.

27.

Kramer

(1998) Rights without trimmings. In: Kramer

Simmonds

Steiner

(eds) A Debate over Rights. Philosophical Enquiries. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

28.

Kramer

(2003) The Quality of Freedom. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

29.

MacCallum

Jr. (1967) Negative and positive freedom. The Philosophical Review 76: 312–334.

30.

Manewa

Siriwardena

Ross

, et al. (2016) Adaptable buildings for sustainable built environment. Built Environment Project and Asset Management 6(2): 135–158.

31.

Mill

(1859/1989) On liberty. In: Mill JS (ed) On Liberty and Other Writings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

32.

Moroni

(2010) Rethinking the theory and practice of land-use regulation: Towards nomocracy. Planning Theory 9(2): 137–155.

33.

Moroni

(2014) Towards a general theory of contractual communities. In: Andersson D and Moroni S (eds) Cities and Private Planning. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp.38–65.

34.

Moroni

(2015) Complexity and the inherent limits of explanation and prediction. Planning Theory 14(3): 248–267.

35.

Moroni

(2019) Critically reconsidering orthodox ideas: Planning as teleocratic intervention and planning as a rational decision method. Planning Theory & Practice 20(3): 323–338.

36.

Moroni

Cozzolino

(2019) Action and the city. Cities 90: 42–51.

37.

Moroni

Buitelaar

Sorel

, et al. (2020) Simple planning rules for complex urban problems. Journal of Planning Education and Research 40(3): 320–331.

38.

Nelson

(2009) Private neighborhood governance. In: Holcombe

RG and

Powell

(eds) Housing America. New Brunswick, Canada: Transaction.

39.

Pafka

Dovey

(2017) Permeability and interface catchment: Measuring and mapping walkable access. Journal of Urbanism 10(2): 150–162.

40.

Pettit

(1997) Republicanism. A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

41.

Pinder

Schmidt

Austin

, et al. (2017) What is meant by adaptability in buildings? Facilities 35(1/2): 2–20.

42.

Popper

(1957) The Poverty of Historicism. London, UK: Routledge.

43.

Porqueddu

(2018a) Detecting and directing emergent urban systems. Cosmos & Taxis 5(3): 32–50.

44.

Porqueddu

(2018b) Toward the open city: Design and research for emergent urban systems. Urban Design International 23(3): 236–248.

45.

Portugali

(2012) Complexity theories of cities: Achievements, criticism and potentials. In: Portugali J, Meyer H, Stolk E, et al. (eds) Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age. Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp.47–62.

46.

Rauws

De Roo

(2016) Adaptive planning: Generating conditions for urban adaptability. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 43(6): 1052–1074.

47.

Ross

Chen

Conejos

, et al. (2016) Enabling adaptable buildings. Procedia Engineering 145: 420–427.

48.

Sadafi

Zain

MFM

Jamil

(2014) Design criteria for increasing building flexibility: Dynamics and prospects. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 13(2): 407–417.

49.

Sen

(1985) Well-being, agency and freedom. Journal of Philosophy 82: 169–221.

50.

Sen

(1999) Development as Freedom. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

51.

Sengupta

Rauws

de Roo

(2016) Planning and complexity: Engaging with temporal dynamics, uncertainty and complex adaptive systems. Environment and Planning B 43(6): 970–974.

52.

Slaughter

(2001) Design strategies to increase building flexibility. Building Research & Information 29(3): 208–217.

53.

Steiner

(1994) An Essay on Rights. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

54.

van Hees

(2000) Legal Reductionism and Freedom. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.