This work presents a study on the urban configuration of a number of Italian metropolitan areas and their development over time, with the aim of evaluating the size and shape of urban areas expansion. Raster data are used, produced by the European Environmental Agency within the COoRdination of INformation on the Environment land cover project. The study is based on a version of spatial entropy measures proposed and validated by a recent series of papers, aimed at the evaluation of spatial data heterogeneity; the methods assess the efficiency of the spatial configuration of urban areas. An innovative combination of two entropy measures is the tool for evaluating the urban development in Italy. Results allow both conclusive comments about each metropolitan area and comparisons across areas over space and time.
BurtonE (2002) Measuring urban compactness in UK towns and cities.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design29(2): 219–250.
16.
ChengJMasserI (2004). Understanding spatial and temporal processes of urban growth: Cellular automata modelling. Environment and Planning B31(2): 167–194.
17.
ChongCHS (2017) Comparison of spatial data types for urban sprawl analysis using Shannon’s entropy. Dissertation, University of Southern California, USA.
18.
CoverTMThomasJA (2006) Elements of Information Theory. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
19.
DadashpoorHAziziPMoghadasiM (2019) Land use change, urbanization, and change in landscape pattern in a metropolitan area.Science of the Total Environment655: 707–719.
20.
EEA (1994) CLC methodology and nomenclature (Tech. Rep.). (Published by Commission of the European Community). Available at: http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications (accessed 19 April 2021).
Eurostat (2010) Results on EU land cover and use published for the first time. (Tech. Rep.). (Eurostat news release, Eurostat Press Office). Available at: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ (accessed 19 April 2021).
23.
EwingRHamidiS (2015) Compactness versus sprawl. A review of recent evidence from the United States. Journal of Planning Literature30: 413–432.
24.
HeikkilaEJHuL (2006) Adjusting spatial-entropy measures for scale and resolution effects. Environment and Planning B33(6): 845–861.
25.
HeroldMGoldsteinNCClarkeKC (2003) The spatiotemporal form of urban growth: Measurement, analysis and modeling.Remote Sensing of Environment86(3): 286–302.
26.
JaegerJAGBertillerRSchwickC, et al. (2010). Suitability criteria for measures of urban sprawl. Ecological Indicators28: 427–441.
27.
JiangFLiuSYuanH, et al. (2007). Measuring urban sprawl in Beijing with geospatial indices. Journal of Geographical Sciences17: 469–478.
28.
LeiboviciDG (2009) Defining spatial entropy from multivariate distributions of co-occurrences. In: HornsbyKS, et al. (eds) COSIT 2009, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin: Springer, Vol. 5756, pp. 392–404.
29.
LeiboviciDGClaramuntC (2019) On integrating size and shape distributions into a spatio-temporal information entropy framework. Entropy21(11): 1112.
30.
LeiboviciDGClaramuntCLeGuyaderD, et al. (2014) Local and global spatio temporal entropy indices based on distance ratios and co-occurrences distributions. International Journal of Geographical Information Science28: 1061–1084.
31.
MedinaCDMonclùsJ (2018) Urban Visions: From Planning Culture to Landscape Urbanism. Cham: Springer.
32.
O’NeillRV, et al. (1988) Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology1: 153–162.
33.
PacioneM (2009) Urban Geography: A Global Perspective. Abingdon: Routledge.
34.
TaubenböckHEschTFelbierA, et al. (2012). Monitoring urbanization in mega cities from space.Remote Sensing of Environment117: 162–176.
35.
TongDPlaneD (2014) A new spatial optimization perspective on the delineation of metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas. Geographical Analysis46: 230–249.
36.
TorrensP (2008) A toolkit for measuring sprawl. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy1: 5–36.
37.
YamuCFrankhauserP (2015) Spatial accessibility to amenities, natural areas and urban green spaces: Using a multiscale, multifractal simulation model for managing urban sprawl. Environment and Planning B42(6): 1054–1078.
38.
YehALiX (2001) A constrained CA model for the simulation and planning of sustainable urban forms by using GIS. Environment and Planning B28(5): 733–753.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
