Urban peripherality is a multidimensional phenomenon, requiring operational tools for analysis and policy design. In this paper, we explore if and how the concept of walkability can be employed as an indicator of peripherality. For this purpose, we employ the capability-wise walkability score (CAWS) to assess neighbourhoods of two case study cities to classify them into four classes (periphery, semi-periphery, semi-core, core). In comparing neighbourhoods on both walkability and a set of neighbourhood-level socioeconomic variables, we argue that walkability should be incorporated as part of a comprehensive framework for the analysis of processes of peripherilisation, since walkability should be seen as one relevant factor of urban capabilities, and hence the lack thereof fits into the definition of urban periphery.
BlečićICecchiniACongiuT, et al. (2015)
Evaluating walkability: A capability-wise planning and design support system. International Journal of Geographical Information Science29: 1350–1374.
4.
BlečićICecchiniATaluV (2013) The capability approach in urban quality of life and urban policies: Towards a conceptual framework. In: SerreliS (ed) City Project and Public Space.
Heidelberg:
Springer.
5.
BlečićICecchiniATrunfioGA (2018) Towards automatic assessment of perceived walkability. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer, pp. 351–365.
6.
CappCJMaghelalPK (2011)
A review of existing pedestrian indices. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association23(2): 5–19.
7.
CarrLJDunsigerSIMarcusBH (2010)
Walk score™ as a global estimate of neighbourhood walkability. American Journal of Preventive Medicine39: 460–463.
8.
CecchiniACongiuTTaluV, et al. (2018)
Mobility policies and Extra-Small projects for improving mobility of people with autism spectrum disorder. Sustainability10(9): 3256.
9.
CerveroRDuncanM (2003)
Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay area. American Journal of Public Health93(9): 1478–1483.
10.
CliftonKJSmithADLRodriguezD (2007)
The development and testing of an audit for the pedestrian environment. Landscape and Urban Planning80: 95–110.
11.
EwingRHandyS (2009)
Measuring the unmeasurable: Urban design qualities related to walkability. Journal of Urban Design14(1): 65–84.
12.
ForsythAHearstMOakesM, et al. (2008)
Design and destinations: Factors influencing walking and Total Physical Activity. Urban Studies45(9): 1973–1996.
13.
FrankLDSallisJFSaelensBE, et al. (2009)
The development of a walkability index: Application to the neighbourhood quality of life study. British Journal of Sports Medicine29: 1–38.
14.
FriedmannJ (1973) A theory of polarized development. In: FriedmannJ (ed) Urbanization, Planning, and National Development.
Beverly Hills:
Sage, pp. 41–67.
15.
HallCMHarrisonDWeaverD, et al. (2013)
Vanishing peripheries: Does tourism consume places?Tourism Recreation Research38(1): 71–92.
16.
HerrschelT (2011) Regional development, peripheralisation and marginalisation – And the role of governance. In: HerrschelTTallbergP (eds) The Role of Regions? Networks, Scale, Territory.
Kristianstad:
Boktryckeri, pp. 85–102.
17.
HillsJLe GrandJPiachaudD (2002) Understanding Social Exclusion.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
18.
IndovinaF (2009) Dalla Città Diffusa All’arcipelago Metropolitano.
Milano:
Franco Angeli.
19.
JacobsJ (1961) Death and Life of Great American Cities.
New York:
Random House.
20.
KaufmannVBergmanMMJoyeD (2004)
Motility: Mobility as Capital. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research28(4): 745–756.
21.
KirbyAModarresA (2010a)
The suburban question: An introduction. Cities27: 65–67.
22.
KirbyAModarresA (2010b)
The suburban question: Notes for a research program. Cities27: 114–121.
23.
KrizekKJ (2003)
Operationalizing neighbourhood accessibility for land use-travel behavior research and regional modeling. Journal of Planning Education and Research2(3): 270–287.
LiviADCliftonKJ (2004) Issues and methods in capturing pedestrian behaviours, attitudes and perceptions: Experiences with a community based walkability survey. Transportation Research Board, Annual Meeting, 2004.
26.
LucasK (2012)
Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now?Transport Policy20: 105–113.
27.
LynchK (1960) Image of the City.
Cambridge:
Harvard University Press.
28.
MartensK (2012)
Justice in transport as justice in accessibility: Applying walzer’s ‘spheres of justice’ to the transport sector. Transportation39(6): 1035–1053.
29.
NaumannMFischer-TahirA (eds) (2013) Peripheralization: The Making of Spatial Dependencies and Social Injustice.
Wiesbaden:
Springer.
30.
NussbaumM (2011) Creating Capabilities. The Human Development Approach.
London:
Belknap Press.
31.
PaezA (2013)
Mapping travelers attitudes: does space matter?Journal of Transport Geography26: 117–125.
32.
PezziMGUrsoG (2017)
Coping with peripherality: Local resilience between policies and practices. Editorial note. Italian Journal of Planning Practice7(1): 1–23.
33.
PortaSRenneJL (2005)
Linking urban design to sustainability: Formal indicators of social urban sustainability field in Perth, Western Australia. Urban Design International10(1): 51–64.
34.
RietveldPRouwendalJvan der VlistAJ (2007) Equity issues in the evaluation of transport policies and transport infrastructure projects. In: Van GeenhuizenMReggianiARietveldP (eds) Policy Analysis of Transport Networks.
Aldershot:
Ashgate, pp. 19–36.
35.
SaelensBEHandySL (2008)
Built environment correlates of walking: A review. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise40(7): S550–S566.
36.
SaelensBESallisJFBlackJB, et al. (2003)
Neighbourhood-based differences in physical activity: An environment scale evaluation. American Journal of Public Health93(9): 1552–1558.
37.
SamuelsJ (2005) Removing Unfreedoms: Citizens as Agents of Change in Urban Development.
London:
ITDG.
38.
SenAK (1992) Inequality Reexamined.
Cambridge:
Harvard University Press.
39.
SenAK (1993) Capability and well-being. In: SenAKNussbaumM (eds) The Quality of Life.
New York:
Oxford University Press.
40.
SenAK (1999) Development as Freedom.
New York:
Knopf Press.
41.
SenAK (2009) The Idea of Justice.
Cambridge:
Harvard University Press.
42.
SpeckJ (2012) Walkable City: How Downtown Can Save America, One Step at a Time.
New York:
Macmillan.
43.
TalenEAnselinL (1998)
Assessing spatial equity: An evaluation of measures of accessibility to public playgrounds. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space30(4): 595–613.
44.
TalenEKoschinskyJ (2013)
The walkable neighbourhood: A literature review. International Journal of Sustainable Land Use and Urban Planning1(1): 42–63.
45.
TaluV (2013)
Qualità della vita urbana e approccio delle capacità. Archivio di Studi Urbani e Regionali107: 52–73.
46.
TaluV (2014) Qualità Della Vita Urbana e Approccio Delle Capacità. Perché e Come Promuovere le Capacità Urbane Degli Abitanti Più Svantaggiati.
Milano:
FrancoAngeli.
Van WeeBGeursK (2011)
Discussing equity and social exclusion in accessibility evaluations. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research11(4): 350–367.
49.
WacquantL (1999)
Urban marginality in the coming millennium. Urban Studies36(10): 1639–1647.
50.
WacquantLHoweJ (2008) Urban Outcasts: A Comparative Sociology of Advanced Marginality.
Cambridge:
Polity Press.
51.
WolffJDe-ShalitA (2007) Disadvantage.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press on Demand.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
