Bus stops are considered “risky places” given their propensity to generate opportunities for crime and attract would-be offenders. In this study we examine crime across a large network of bus stops (n = 7170) in Brisbane, Australia. We use smart card and land use data to measure the influence of passenger presence and features of the immediate bus stop environs on theft and property damage at bus stops during peak and off-peak travel periods. We find that when more passengers are present at stops, there is greater risk of theft but there is no effect of passenger presence on property damage. We conclude that factors associated with crime at bus stops vary based on time of day.
AdamsWHerrmannCRFelsonM (2015) Crime, transportation and malignant mixes. In: Ceccato V and Newton A (eds) Safety and Security in Transit Environments. Berlin: Springer, pp.181–195.
3.
BernascoWBlockR (2011)
Robberies in Chicago: A block-level analysis of the influence of crime generators, crime attractors, and offender anchor points. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency48(1): 33–57.
4.
BlockRBlockC (2000) The Bronx and Chicago: Street robbery in the environs of rapid transit stations. In: GoldsmithVMcGuirePMollenkopfJ, et al. (eds) Analyzing Crime Patterns; Frontiers of Practice.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications, pp.137–152.
5.
BlockRDavisS (1996)
The environs of rapid transit stations: A focus for street crime or just another risky place. Crime Prevention Studies6: 237–257.
6.
BoessenAHippJR (2015)
Close-ups and the scale of ecology: Land uses and the geography of social context and crime. Criminology53: 399–426.
7.
BowersK (2014)
Risky facilities: Crime radiators or crime absorbers? A comparison of internal and external levels of theft. Journal of Quantitative Criminology30: 389–414.
8.
BrantinghamPBrantinghamP (1993a)
Environment, routine and situation: Toward a pattern theory of crime. Advances in Criminological Theory5: 259–294.
9.
BrantinghamPBrantinghamP (1993b)
Nodes, paths and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology13: 3–3.
10.
BrantinghamPBrantinghamP (1995)
Criminality of place. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research3: 5–26.
11.
Bursik R and Grasmick HG (1993) Economic deprivation and neighborhood crime rates, 1960-1980. Law Society Review 27(2): 263--284.
12.
CeccatoVCatsOWangQ (2015) The geography of pickpocketing at bus stops: An analysis of grid cells. In: CeccatoVNewtonA (eds) Safety and Security in Transit Environments: An Interdisciplinary Approach.
London:
Palgrave Macmillan, pp.76–98.
13.
CeccatoVUittenbogaardAC (2014)
Space–time dynamics of crime in transport nodes. Annals of the Association of American Geographers104: 131–150.
14.
ChenCChenJBarryJ (2009)
Diurnal pattern of transit ridership: A case study of the New York city subway system. Journal of Transport Geography17: 176–186.
15.
CohenLEFelsonM (1979)
Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review44: 588–608.
16.
CorcoranJKimptonAZahnowR, et al. (2019) The temporality of place: Constructing a temporal typology of crime in commercial precincts. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science. Epub ahead of print 3 May 2019. DOI: 10.1177/2399808319846904.
17.
CornishDBClarkeRVG (1986) The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending.
New York:
Springer-Verlag.
18.
DaviesTBowersK (2018) Street networks and crime. In: BruinsmaGJohnsonS (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Criminology. New York, USA: Oxford University Press, pp. 545--578. DOI:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190279707.013
19.
DengTNelsonJD (2010)
The impact of bus rapid transit on land development: A case study of Beijing, China. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology66: 1196–1206.
20.
Department for Transport (2010) Estimated Costs to Society of Crime on Public Transport in England in 2006/07: Final Report on Findings.
London:
Department for Transport.
21.
EckJEClarkeRVGueretteRT (2007)
Risky facilities: Crime concentration in homogeneous sets of establishments and facilities. Crime Prevention Studies21: 225.
22.
FelsonM (2003)
The process of co-offending. Crime Prevention Studies16: 149–168.
23.
FelsonMBoivinR (2015)
Daily crime flows within a city. Crime Science4: 31.
24.
FranquezJJHagalaJLimS, et al. (2013)
We be drinkin’: A study of place management and premise notoriety among risky bars and nightclubs. Western Criminology Rev14: 34.
25.
GarnettN (2012)
The people paradox. University of Illinois Law Review43: 43–48.
26.
GauJMPrattTC (2010)
Revisiting broken windows theory: Examining the sources of the discriminant validity of perceived disorder and crime. Journal of Criminal Justice38: 758–766.
27.
GerellM (2018)
Bus stops and violence, are risky places really risky?European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research24: 351–371.
28.
GrannisR (2009) From the Ground Up: Translating Geography into Community Through Neighbor Networks.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
29.
GroffERLockwoodB (2014)
Criminogenic facilities and crime across street segments in Philadelphia: Uncovering evidence about the spatial extent of facility influence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency51: 277–314.
30.
HaggertyLJ (1982)
Differential social contact in urban neighborhoods: Environmental vs. sociodemographic explanations. The Sociological Quarterly23: 359–372.
31.
HartTCMietheTD (2015)
Configural behavior settings of crime event locations: Toward an alternative conceptualization of criminogenic microenvironments. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency52: 373–402.
32.
Herrmann CR (2015) The dynamics of robbery and violence hot spots. Crime Science 4(33). DOI: 10.1186/s40163-015-0042-5
33.
Irvin-EricksonYLa VigneN (2015)
A spatio-temporal analysis of crime at Washington, DC metro rail: Stations’ crime-generating and crime-attracting characteristics as transportation nodes and places. Crime Science4: 14.
34.
KooiBR (2013)
Assessing the correlation between bus stop densities and residential crime typologies. Crime Prevention and Community Safety15: 81–105.
35.
La VigneN (2010) Security by design on the Washington Metro. In: ClarkeRV (ed.) Situational Crime Prevention.
Boulder, CO:
Lynne Rienner Publishers, pp.283–299.
36.
La VigneN (2015) Crime in and around metro transit stations: Exploring the utility of opportunity theories of crime. In: CeccatoVNewtonA (eds) Safety and Security in Transit Environments: An Interdisciplinary Approach.
London:
Palgrave Macmillan, pp.251–269.
37.
LiggettRLoukaitou-SiderisAIsekiH (2001)
Bus-stop environment connection: Do characteristics of the built environment correlate with bus stop crime?Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board1760: 20–27.
38.
Loukaitou-SiderisA (1999)
Hot spots of bus stop crime. Journal of the American Planning Association65: 395–411.
39.
Loukaitou-SiderisA (2014)
Fear and safety in transit environments from the women’s perspective. Security Journal27: 242–256.
40.
Loukaitou-SiderisALiggettRIsekiH, et al. (2001)
Measuring the effects of built environment on bus stop crime. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design28: 255–280.
41.
Loukaitou-SiderisALiggettRIsekiH (2002)
The geography of transit crime: Documentation and evaluation of crime incidence on and around the green line stations.Journal of Planning Education and Research22: 135–151.
42.
MadensenTDEckJ (2012) Crime places and crime management. In: CullenFTWilcoxP (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Criminological Theory. CA: Thousand Oaks, p. 28.
43.
NewtonA (2004)
Crime on public transport: ‘Static’ and ‘Non-Static’ (moving) crime events. Western Criminology Review5(3): 26--42.
44.
NewtonA (2008)
A study of bus route crime risk in urban areas: The changing environs of a bus journey. Built Environment34(1): 88–103.
45.
NewtonA (2014) Crime on public transport. In: Bruinsma G and Weisburd D (eds) Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. New York, NY: Springer, pp.709–720. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2
46.
NewtonA (2018) Crime at the intersection of rail and retail. In: CeccatoVArmitageR (eds) Retail Crime: International Evidence and Prevention.
London:
Palgrave McMillan, pp. 271--295.
47.
NewtonABowersK (2007)
The geography of bus shelter damage: The influence of crime, neighbourhood characteristics and land use. Internet Journal of Criminology4.
48.
NewtonAPartridgeHGillA (2014)
Above and below: Measuring crime risk in and around underground mass transit systems. Crime Science3: 1.
49.
PáezATrépanierMMorencyC (2011)
Geodemographic analysis and the identification of potential business partnerships enabled by transit smart cards. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice45: 640–652.
50.
QuickMLawJLiG (2019) Time-varying relationships between land use and crime: A spatio-temporal analysis of small-area seasonal property crime trends. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 46(6): 1018--1035. DOI: 10.1177/2399808317744779.
51.
ReynaldD (2014) Informal guardianship. In: BruinsmaGWeisburdD (eds) Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice.
New York:
Springer, pp.2480–2489.
52.
ReynaldDElffersH (2009)
The future of Newman’s defensible space theory: Linking defensible space and the routine activities of place. European Journal of Criminology6: 25–46.
53.
RobinsonJGoridanoL (2011) Spatial interplay: Interaction of land uses in relation to crime incidents around transit stations. In: AndresenMKinneyB (eds) Patterns, Prevention, and Geometry of Crime.
London:
Routledge, pp.175–199.
54.
SongGLiuLBernascoW, et al. (2018)
Theft from the person in urban China: Assessing the diurnal effects of opportunity and social ecology. Habitat International78: 13–20.
55.
StuckyTDSmithSL (2017)
Exploring the conditional effects of bus stops on crime. Security Journal30: 290–309.
56.
TuWCaoRYueY, et al. (2018)
Spatial variations in urban public ridership derived from GPS trajectories and smart card data. Journal of Transport Geography69: 45–57.
57.
WeisburdD (2015)
The law of crime concentration and the criminology of place. Criminology53: 133–157.
58.
WuschkeKKinneyJB (2018) Built environment, land use and crime. In: BruinsmaGJohnsonS (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Criminology. New York, USA: Oxford University Press, pp. 475--496.
59.
YavuzNWelchEW (2010)
Addressing fear of crime in public space: Gender differences in reaction to safety measures in train transit. Urban Studies47: 2491–2515.
60.
Ziegler E (2009) The case for metropolitan growth management in the 21st century: Regional urban planning and sustainable development in the United States. Urban Lawyer 41(1): 147--182. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27895702
