Nature has inspired generations of urban designers and planners in pursuit of harmonious and functional built environments. Research regarding self-organisation has encouraged urbanists to consider the role of bottom-up approaches in generating urban order. However, the extent to which self-organisation-inspired approaches draw directly from nature is not always clear. Here, we examined the biological basis of urban research, focusing on self-organisation. We conducted a systematic literature search of self-organisation in urban design and biology, mapped the relationship between key biological terms across the two fields and assessed the quality and validity of biological comparisons in the urban design literature. Finding deep inconsistencies in the mapping of central terms between the two fields, a preponderance for cross-level analogies and comparisons that spanned molecules to ecosystems, we developed a biotic framework to visualise the analogical space and elucidate areas where new inspiration may be sought.
AdamatzkyAAllardOJonesJ, et al. (2017)
Evaluation of French motorway network in relation to slime mould transport networks. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science44(2): 364–383.
2.
AladosCAichAKomacB, et al. (2007)
Self-organized spatial patterns of vegetation in alpine grasslands. Ecological Modelling201(2): 233–242.
3.
AlexanderCIshikawaSSilversteinM, et al. (1977) A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings and Construction.
New York:
Oxford University Press.
4.
AllenPSanglierMEngelenG, et al. (1985)
Towards a new synthesis in the modeling of evolving complex systems. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design12(1): 65–84.
5.
AshbyW (1960) Design for a Brain: The Origin of Adaptive Behaviour.
New York:
Wiley.
6.
AveryOMacLeodCMcCartyM (1944)
Studies on the chemical nature of the substance inducing transformation of pneumococcal types. Journal of Experimental Medicine79(2): 137–158.
7.
AviseJ (2001)
Evolving genomic metaphors: A new look at the language of DNA. Science294: 86–88.
8.
BarkeJSeipkeRGrüschowS, et al. (2010)
A mixed community of actinomycetes produce multiple antibiotics for the fungus farming ant acromyrmex octospinosus. BMC Biology8: 109.
9.
BarkerD (2012)
Slime mold cities. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design39(2): 262–286.
10.
BattyM (1998)
Urban evolution on the desktop: Simulation with the use of extended cellular automata. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space30(11): 1943–1967.
11.
BattyM (2007) Cities and Complexity: Understanding Cities with Cellular Automata, Agent-Based Models, and Fractals.
Cambridge:
MIT Press.
12.
BattyM (2012)
Building a science of cities. Cities29: S9–S16.
13.
BattyMLongleyP (1994) Fractal Cities: A Geometry of Form and Function.
New York:
Academic Press.
14.
BattyMXieY (1997)
Possible urban automata. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design24: 175–192.
15.
BebberDHynesJDarrahP, et al. (2007)
Biological solutions to transport network design. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences274(1623): 2307–2315.
16.
BelousovB (1951) A Periodic Chemical Reaction and Its Mechanism. Oscillations and Travelling Waves in Chemical Systems.
New York:
Wiley.
17.
BennettJCooperMHunterM, et al. (2003) London’s Leonardo: The Life and Work of Robert Hooke.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
BigelowSCanhamC (2015)
Litterfall as a niche construction process in a Northern hardwood Forest. Ecosphere6(7): 117–114.
20.
BoelensL (2014)
Delta governance: The DNA of a specific kind of urbanization. Built Environment40(2): 169–183.
21.
CabanesGvan WilgenburgEBeekmanM, et al. (2014)
Ants build transportation networks that optimize cost and efficiency at the expense of robustness. Behavioral Ecology26(1): 223–231.
22.
CamazineSDeneubourgJ-LFranksN, et al. (2001) Self-organization in Biological Systems.
Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
23.
Chettiparamb A (2006) Metaphors in complexity theory and planning. Planning Theory 5(1): 71--91.
24.
CookZFranksDRobinsonE (2014)
Efficiency and robustness of ant colony transportation networks. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology68(3): 509–517.
25.
CoxDHudsonHShanahanD, et al. (2017)
The rarity of direct experiences of nature in an urban population. Landscape and Urban Planning160: 79–84.
26.
CreanzaNFogartyLFeldmanM (2015)
Cultural niche construction of repertoire size and learning strategies in songbirds. Evolutionary Ecology30(2): 285–305.
27.
DawkinsR (1982) The Extended Phenotype.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
28.
de BruijnEGerritsL (2018)
Epistemic communities in urban self-organization: A systematic review and assessment. Journal of Planning Literature33(3): 310–328.
29.
DiasCSarviMShiwakotiN, et al. (2013)
Investigating collective escape behaviours in complex situations. Safety Science60: 87–94.
30.
EllisE (2015)
Ecology in an anthropogenic biosphere. Ecological Monographs85(3): 287–331.
31.
FreireM (2015)
Nontemplate-driven polymers: Clues to a minimal form of organization closure at the early stages of living systems. Theory in Biosciences134(1–2): 1–18.
32.
FrenkelA (2004)
Land-use patterns in the classification of cities: The Israeli case. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design31: 711–730.
33.
FurtadoBEttemaDRuizR, et al. (2012)
A cellular automata intraurban model with prices and income-differentiated actors. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design39(5): 897–924.
34.
GeddesP (1915) Cities in Evolution.
London:
Williams & Norgate.
35.
GirardL (2014)
Creative initiatives in small cities management: The landscape as an engine for local development. Built Environment40(4): 475–496.
GoldbeterALefeverR (1972)
Dissipative structures for an allosteric model: Application to glycolytic oscillations. Biophysical Journal12(10): 1302–1315.
38.
GolubiewskiN (2012)
Is there a metabolism of an urban ecosystem? An ecological critique. AMBIO41(7): 751–764.
39.
GreenBBarduniasPTurnerJ, et al. (2017)
Excavation and aggregation as organizing factors in de novo construction by mound-building termites. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences284(1856): 20162730–20162714.
40.
HakenH (1977) Synergetics: An Introduction.
Berlin:
Springer.
41.
HakenHPortugaliJ (1996) Synergetics, Inter-Representation Networks and Cognitive Maps, in the Construction of Cognitive Maps Ed J Portugali.
Dordrecht:
Springer.
42.
HelbingDFarkasIMolnarP, et al. (2001)
Self-organizing pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design28: 361–383.
43.
Janssen-JansenL (2013)
Delivering urban intensification outcomes in a context of discontinuous growth: Experiences from The Netherlands. Built Environment39(4): 422–437.
44.
KarsentiE (2008)
Self-organization in cell biology: A brief history. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology9(3): 255–262.
45.
KellerE (2008)
Organisms, machines, and thunderstorms: A history of Self-Organization, part one. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences38(1): 45–75.
46.
KellerE (2009)
Organisms, machines, and thunderstorms: A history of Self-Organization, part two. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences39(1): 1–31.
47.
KendalJTehraniJOdling-SmeeF (2011)
Human niche construction in interdisciplinary focus. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences366(1566): 785–792.
48.
KropfK (2014)
Ambiguity in the definition of built form. Urban Morphology18(1): 41–57.
49.
KropfK (2017) The Handbook of Urban Morphology.
Chichester:
Wiley.
50.
LalandKBrownG (2006)
Niche construction, human behavior, and the adaptive-lag hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews15(3): 95–104.
51.
LalandKOdling-SmeeFFeldmanM (2001)
Cultural niche construction and human evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Biology14: 22–33.
52.
LalandKOdling-SmeeFMylesS (2010)
How culture shaped the human genome: Bringing genetics and the human sciences together. Nature Reviews Genetics11(2): 137–148.
53.
LattyTBeekmanM (2010)
Food quality and the risk of light exposure affect patch-choice decisions in the slime mold.Ecology91(1): 22–27.
54.
Le Corbusier (1947) Concerning Town Planning.
London:
The Architectural Press.
55.
LentonTDainesSDykeJ, et al. (2018)
Selection for Gaia across multiple scales. Trends in Ecology & Evolution33(8): 633–645.
56.
LotkaA (1909)
Contribution to the theory of periodic reactions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry14(3): 271–274.
57.
LotkaA (1925) Elements of Physical Biology.
Baltimore:
Williams and Wilkins.
58.
MandelbrotB (1982) The Fractal Geometry of Nature.
San Francisco:
WH Freeman and Co.
59.
MarshallS (2009) Cities, Design and Evolution.
Abingdon:
Routledge.
Maynard-Smith J and Szathmáry E (1995) The Major Transitions in Evolution. Oxford: Freeman.
62.
MehaffyMPortaSRofèY, et al. (2010)
Urban nuclei and the geometry of streets: The ‘emergent neighborhoods’ model. URBAN DESIGN International15(1): 22–46.
63.
MehmoodA (2010)
On the history and potentials of evolutionary metaphors in urban planning. Planning Theory9(1): 63–87.
64.
MoroniS (2015)
Complexity and the inherent limits of explanation and prediction: Urban codes for self-organising cities. Planning Theory14(3): 248–267.
65.
MumfordL (1938) The Culture of Cities.
New York:
Harcourt, Brace and World Inc.
66.
MumfordL (1961) The City in History. Its Origins, Its Transformations, and Its Prospects.
San Diego:
Harcourt, Brace and Company.
67.
MurrayJ (1988)
How the leopard gets its spots. Science246: 614–621.
68.
NientiedP (2016)
Metaphor and urban studies-a crossover, theory and a case study of SS Rotterdam. City, Territory and Architecture3(1): 1–10.
69.
Odling-SmeeFLalandKFeldmanM (2003) Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution.
Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
70.
PasqueroCZaroukasE (2016) Design prototype. In: Research Based Education 2016. London: The Bartlett School of Architecture, UCL.
71.
PennATurnerJ (2018)
Can we identify general architectural principles that impact the collective behaviour of both human and animal systems?Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences373: (1753) 20180253–20180212.
PrigogineINicolisG (1967)
On symmetry-breaking instabilities in dissipative systems. The Journal of Chemical Physics46: 3542.
74.
RauwsWde RooG (2016)
Adaptive planning: Generating conditions for urban adaptability. Lessons from Dutch organic development strategies. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design43(6): 1052–1074.
75.
ReidCLattyTDussutourA, et al. (2012)
Slime mold uses an externalized spatial ‘memory’ to navigate in complex environments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences109(43): 17490–17494.
76.
RogersR (1998) The evolution of London. In: Evolution, Society, Science and the Universe Ed A Fabian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77.
RoviraS (2008)
Metaphors of DNA: A review of the popularisation processes. Journal of Science Communication7(1): 1–8.
78.
SalingarosN (2010)
Complexity and urban coherence. Journal of Urban Design5(3): 291–316.
79.
SharpeWWallockL (1987) Visions of the Modern City.
Baltimore:
Johns Hopkins University Press.
80.
SilvaP (2016)
Tactical urbanism: towards an evolutionary cities approach?Environment and Planning B43(6): 1040–1051.
81.
SilvestroI (2016)
A metaphorical history of DNA patents. RIFL2: 49–63.
82.
SoriayMataA (1998) The linear city. In: Le Gates R and Stout F (eds) Selected Essays. London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press.
83.
SteadmanP (2008) The Evolution of Designs: Biological Analogy in Architecture and the Applied Arts – A Revised Edition.
Abingdon:
Routledge.
84.
TabonyJ (2006)
Historical and conceptual background of self-organization by reactive processes. Biology of the Cell98(10): 589–602.
85.
Takeuchi N and Hogeweg P (2009) Multilevel selection in models of prebiotic evolution II: A direct comparison of compartmentalization and spatial self-organization. PLoS Computational Biology 5(10): e1000542--17.
86.
TippettJ (2010) Going beyond the metaphor of the machine: Complexity and participatory ecological design. In: de Roo G and Silva E (eds) A planner's encounter with complexity. Farnham: Ashgate.
87.
TuringA (1952)
The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B237(641): 1–37.
Turner J S and Soar R C (2008) Beyond biomimicry: What termites can tell us about realizing the living building. In: Wallis I, Bilan L, Smith M, et al. (eds) Industrialised, Integrated, Intelligent Sustainable Construction (I3CON BSRIA), pp. 233--248.
90.
Vanoutrive T, Van Damme I and De Block G (2016) On the rationality of network development: the case of the Belgian motorway network. In: Hein C (ed.) International Planning History Society Proceedings, 17th IPHS Conference, History-Urbanism-Resilience, TU Delft, 17--21 July 2016, V.03, pp. 235--246.
91.
VogelS (1998) Cat's Paws and Catapults.
New York:
Norton and Company.
92.
WhittinghillLRoweD (2011)
The role of green roof technology in urban agriculture. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems27(4): 314–322.
93.
WienerN (1948) Cybernetics, or, Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine.
Cambridge:
MIT Press.
Wu N and Silva EA (2011) Urban DNA: exploring the biological metaphor of urban evolution with DG-ABC Model. In: Proceedings The 14th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science. Utrecht University.
96.
YamuCFrankhauserP (2015)
Spatial accessibility to amenities, natural areas and urban green spaces: Using a multiscale, multifractal simulation model for managing urban sprawl. Environment and Planning B42: 1054–1078.
97.
ZhabotinskyA (1964)
Periodical oxidation of malonic acid in solution (a study of the belousov reaction kinetics). Biofizika9: 306–311.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
