In this paper, we explore the potential use of automated pedestrian walk count data in urban design research. The Center City District (CCD) research group used computer vision to collect automated pedestrian walk data from Dilworth Park, Philadelphia. By comparing the count data and participant observations of social activities in the park, we found that the frequencies of social activities in the park could be predicted by the pedestrian count when considering the outdoor thermal comfort index and the types of events taking place in Dilworth Park. By examining correlations among multiple sensors, we found that the entry–exit correlation is a useful indicator to assess how people use public space by estimating the ratio of necessary-to-optional activities.
AlS (ed.) (2016) Mall City: Hong Kong’s Dreamworlds of Consumption.
Pokfulam:
Hong Kong University Press.
2.
Ameli SH, Hamidi S, Garfinkel-Castro A, and Ewing R (2015) Do better urban design qualities lead to more walking in Salt Lake City, Utah?. Journal of Urban Design 20(3): 393–410.
3.
ArensEBosselmannP (1989)
Wind, sun and temperature – Predicting the thermal comfort of people in outdoor spaces.Building and Environment24(4) 315–320.
4.
American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, Air-Conditioning Engineers, & American National Standards Institute (ASHRAE) (2004) Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy (Vol. 55, No. 2004).
5.
BakerN (2013) Cultural responses to primitive needs. In: Beyond Environmental Comfort. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 47–59.
6.
Banerjee T (2001) The future of public space: beyond invented streets and reinvented places. Journal of the American planning association 67(1): 9–24.
7.
Ben-JosephE (2012) ReThinking a Lot: The Design and Culture of Parking.
Vol. 7.
Cambridge:
MIT press.
8.
Bodor R, Jackson B and Papanikolopoulos N (2003, June) Vision-based human tracking and activity recognition. In: Proc. of the 11th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (Vol. 1).
9.
BosselmannP (1998) Representation of Places: Reality and Realism in City Design.
Berkeley:
University of California Press.
10.
BuchNVelastinSAOrwellJ (2011)
A review of computer vision techniques for the analysis of urban traffic.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems12(3): 920–939.
11.
CarrLDunsigerSMarcusB (2010)
Validation of walk scores for estimating access to walkable amenities.British Journal of Sports Medicine45(14): 1144–1148.
12.
CarrSStephenCFrancisM, et al. (1992) Public Space.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
13.
CekanderEJ (1994) Design of a computer controlled turnstile. In: Idea/Microelectronics, Conference Record, WESCON/94, San Diego, CA, pp. 444–448. New York: IEEE.
14.
CollinsGCollinsC (1986) Camillo Sitte: The Birth of Modern City Planning.
Mineola:
Dover Publication Inc.
15.
Cooper-MarcusCFrancisC (eds) (1997) People Places: Design Guidelines for Urban Open Space.
New York:
John Wiley & Sons.
DimoudiANikolopoulouM (2003)
Vegetation in the urban environment: Microclimatic analysis and benefits.Special Issue on Urban Research35(1): 69–76.
18.
DumbaughERaeR (2009)
Safe urban form: Revisiting the relationship between community design and traffic safety.Journal of the American Planning Association75(3): 309–329.
19.
DuncanDAldstadtJWhalenJ, et al. (2011)
Validation of Walk Score® for estimating neighborhood walkability: An analysis of Four US metropolitan areas.International Journal of Respiratory Public Health8(11): 4160–4179.
20.
EliassonIKnezIWesterbergU, et al. (2007)
Climate and behavior in a Nordic City.Landscape and Urban Planning82: 72–84.
21.
EwingRClementeO (2013) Measuring Urban Design: Metrics for Livable Places.
London:
Island Press.
22.
EwingRHHandyS (2009)
Measuring the unmeasurable: Urban design qualities related to walkability.Journal of Urban Design14(1): 65–84.
23.
FangerPO (1982) Thermal Comfort. Analysis and Application in Environment Engineering.
New York:
McGraw Hill Book Company.
24.
FrackeltonAGrossmanAPalinginisE, et al. (2013)
Measuring walkability: Development of an automated sidewalk quality assessment tool.Suburban Sustainability1(1): 4.
25.
FramptonASolomonJDWongC (2012) Cities Without Ground: A Hong Kong Guidebook.
Hong Kong:
Oro Editions.
26.
GehlJ (1987) Life between Buildings: Using Public Space.
New York:
Van Nostrand Reinhold.
27.
GehlJSvarreB (2013) How to Study Public Life.
Washington:
Island Press.
28.
GivoniJNoguchiMSaaroniH, et al. (2003)
Outdoor thermal comfort research issues.Energy and Buildings35(1): 77–86.
Greene-RoeselRDiogenesMCRaglandDR, et al. (2008) Effectiveness of a commercially available automated pedestrian counting device in urban environments: Comparison with manual counts. UC Berkeley: Safe Transportation Research & Education Center. pp.1–15. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2n83w1q8
31.
HillMR (1982) Spatial structure and decision-making of pedestrian route selection through an urban environment. PhD Thesis, University Microfilms International.
32.
HinkleDEWiersmaWJursSG (2003) Applied Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. 5th ed.
Boston:
Houghton Mifflin.
33.
JacobsAB (1995) Great Streets.
Cambridge:
MIT Press.
34.
Jacobs J (1961) The death and life of great American cities. New-York, NY: Vintage.
35.
KimAM (2015) Sidewalk City: Remapping Public Space in Ho Chi Minh City.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
KimYKimTHErgünT (2015)
The instability of the Pearson correlation coefficient in the presence of coincidental outliers.Finance Research Letters13: 243–257.
37.
LeeCMoudonA (2006)
Correlates of walking for transportation or recreation purposes.Journal of Physical Activity and Health3(s1): S77–S98.
38.
LiSSayedTZakiM, et al. (2012) Automated collection of pedestrian data through computer vision techniques. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2299(1) pp.121–127.
39.
LinTP (2009)
Thermal perception, adaptation, and attendance in a public square in hot and humid regions.Building and Environment44: 2017–2026.
40.
Loukaitou-SiderisAEhrenfeuchtR (2009) Sidewalks: Conflict and Negotiation Over Public Space.
Cambridge:
MIT Press.
41.
MarshallWEGarrickNW (2011)
Does street network design affect traffic safety?Accident Analysis and Prevention43(3): 769–781.
42.
MehtaV (2007)
Lively streets: Determining environmental characteristics to support social behavior.Journal of Planning Education and Research27: 165–187.
43.
MehtaV (2013) The Street: A Quintessential Social Public Space.
New York:
Routledge.
44.
MehtaVBossonJK (2018) Revisiting lively streets: Social interactions in public space. Journal of Planning Education and Research. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X18781453 (accessed 2 August 2019).
45.
MoudonAV (1986) Built for Change: Neighborhood Architecture in San Francisco.
Cambridge:
MIT Press.
46.
NikolopoulouMBakerNSteemersK (2001)
Thermal comfort in outdoor urban spaces: Understanding the human parameter.Solar Energy70: 227–235.
47.
PingaliGSJeanYCarlbomI (1998) Real time tracking for enhanced tennis broadcasts. In: Proceedings. 1998 IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 260–265. Piscataway: IEEE.
48.
Project for Public Spaces (2000) How to Turn a Place Around: A Handbook for Creating Successful Public Spaces.
New York:
Project for Public Spaces.
49.
SantamourisMPapanikolaouNLivadaI, et al. (2001)
On the impact of urban climate on the energy consumption of buildings.Urban Environment70(3): 201–216.
50.
SenevarantePNMorallJF (1986)
Analysis of factors affecting the choice of route of pedestrians.Transportation Planning and Technology10; 147–159.
51.
Sexton G, Zhang X, Redpath G, et al. (1995) Advances in automated pedestrian counting. In: European Convention on Security and Detection, IEE Conference Publication (No. 408), pp. 106–110. https://doi.org/10.1049/cp:19950479
52.
Shach-PinslyDGanorT (2014)
Security sensitivity index: Evaluating urban vulnerability.Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Urban Design and Planning168(3): 115–128.
53.
ShiraziMR (2018)
Mapping neighbourhood outdoor activities: Space, time, gender and age.Journal of Urban Design24: 715–737.
54.
StathopoulosTWuHZachariasJ (2004)
Outdoor human comfort in an urban climate.Building and Environment39(3): 297–305.
55.
WernerCMBrownBBStumpT, et al. (2018)
Street use and design: Daily rhythms on four streets that differ in rated walkability.Journal of Urban Design23: 603–619.
56.
WhyteW (1980) The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces.
New York:
Project for Public Spaces.
57.
WhyteWH (1988) City: Rediscovering the Center.
Philadelphia:
University of Pennsylvania Press.
58.
YanWForsythDA (2005) Learning the behavior of users in a public space through video tracking. In: 2005 Seventh IEEE workshops on applications of computer vision (WACV/MOTION'05) – Volume 1, pp. 370–377. Piscataway: IEEE.
59.
YaoRLiBLiuJ (2009)
A theoretical adaptive model of thermal comfort adaptive predicted mean vote (aPMV).Building and Environment44: 2089–2096.
60.
YoosJJamesV (2016) Parallel Cities: The Multilevel Metropolis.
New York:
Walker Art Center.
61.
ZachariasJStathopoulos TWuH (2004)
Spatial behavior in San Francisco’s Plazas: The effect of microclimate, other people, and environmental design. Environment and Behavior36: 638–658.
