This study explores the effect of the spatial configuration of street networks on movement patterns of users of a cycling monitoring app, employing crowdsourced information from OpenStreetMap and Strava Metro. Choice and Integration measures from Space Syntax were used to analyse the street network’s configuration for different radiuses. Multiple linear regression models were fitted to explore the influence of these measures on cycling activity at the street segment level after controlling other variables such as land use, household density, socio-economic status, and cycling infrastructure. The variation of such influence for different time periods (weekday vs. weekend) and trip purposes (commuting vs. sports) was also analysed. The results show a positive significant association between normalised angular choice (NACH) and cycling activity. Although the final regression model explained 5.5% of the log-likelihood of the intercept model, it represents an important improvement compared with the base (control-only) model (3.8%). The incidence rate ratio of NACH’s Z scores was 1.63, implying that for an increase of one standard deviation of NACH, there is an expected increment of about 63% in the total cyclist counts while keeping all other variables the same. These results are of interest for researchers, practitioners, and urban planners, since the inclusion of Space Syntax measures derived from available public data can improve movement behaviour modelling and cycling infrastructure planning and design.
AkaikeH (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. In: Parzen E, Tanabe K and Kitagawa G (eds) Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike. Germany: Springer, pp. 215–222.
2.
Al-SayedKTurnerAHillierB, et al. (2014) Space Syntax Methodology. London: Bartlett School of Architecture, UCL.
3.
Arsanjani J, Zipf A and Mooney P et al. (2019) An Introduction to OpenStreetMap in Geographic InformationScience: Experiences, Research, and Applications. In: Arsanjani J, Zipf A and Mooney P et al. (ed.), OpenStreetMap in GIScience: experiences, research, and applications. Berlin: Springer International Publishing, pp. 1–18.
4.
BattyM (2013)
Big data, smart cities and city planning.Dialogues in human geography3(3): 274–279.
5.
BirchCPDOomSPBeechamJA (2007)
Rectangular and hexagonal grids used for observation, experiment and simulation in ecology.Ecological Modelling206(3–4): 347–359.
6.
BoltonTFrancisNFroyF (2017) The impact of Space Syntax on urban policy making: Linking research into UK policy. In: Proceedings of the 11th space syntax symposium, Lisbon, Portugal, 3-7 July, pp. 48.1–48.13. Lisbon: Instituto Superior Técnico, Departamento de Engenharia Civil, Arquitetura e Georrecursos.
7.
BurdziejJ (2019)
Using hexagonal grids and network analysis for spatial accessibility assessment in urban environments – A case study of public amenities in Toruń.Miscellanea Geographica23(2).
8.
ChangHLChangHW (2009)
Exploring recreational cyclists’ environmental preferences and satisfaction: Experimental study in Hsinchu technopolis.Environment and Planning B, Planning & Design36(2): 319–335.
9.
ChenCMaJSusiloY, et al. (2016)
The promises of Big Data and small data for travel behavior (aka human mobility) analysis.Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies68: 285–299.
10.
ChiaradiaAHillierBSchwanderC (2009) Spatial economics of crime. In: Proceedings of 7th international space syntax symposium, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden, 8-11 June, 2009.
11.
FagnantDJKockelmanK (2016)
A direct-demand model for bicycle counts: The impacts of level of service and other factors.Environment and Planning B, Planning & design43(1): 93–107.
12.
GuerraECaudilloCMonkkonenP, et al. (2018)
Urban form, transit supply, and travel behavior in Latin America: Evidence from Mexico’s 100 largest urban areas.Transport Policy69: 98–105.
13.
HeeschKCLangdonM (2016)
The usefulness of GPS bicycle tracking data for evaluating the impact of infrastructure change on cycling behaviour.Health Promotion Journal of Australia27(3): 222–229.
14.
HeinenEvan WeeBMaatK (2010)
Commuting by bicycle: An overview of the literature.Transport Reviews30(1): 59–96.
15.
HermidaCCorderoMOrellanaD (2019) Analysis of the influence of urban built environment on pedestrian flow in an intermediate-sized city in the Andes of Ecuador. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 13(10): 777–787.
16.
HillierB (2007) Space is the machine.
London:
Space Syntax Ltd.
17.
HillierBHansonJ (1984) The Social Logic of Space.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
18.
HillierBIidaS (2005) Network and psychological effects in urban movement. In: Cohn AG, Mark DM (eds) Spatial Information Theory. Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005, pp. 475–490.
19.
HoehnerCMSoaresJParra PerezD, et al. (2008)
Physical activity interventions in Latin America: A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine34(3): 224–233.
20.
INEC (2011) Censo de Población y Vivienda (2010) Ecuador en Cifras. Available at: www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec (accessed 1 May 2017).
21.
JesticoBNelsonTWintersM., (2016)
Mapping ridership using crowdsourced cycling data. JTRG52: 90–97.
22.
KassRERafteryAE (1995)
Bayes factors.Journal of the American Statistical Association90(430): 773–795.
23.
KitchinR (2014)
Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts.Big Data & Society1(1): 1–12.
24.
KolovouIGilJKarimiK, et al. (2017) Road centre line simplification principles for angular segment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 11th space syntax symposium, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 163.1–163.16. Lisbon: Instituto Superior Técnico, Departamento de Engenharia Civil, Arquitetura e Georrecursos.
25.
KrennPJOjaPTitzeS (2015)
Development of a bikeability index to assess the bicycle-friendliness of urban environments.Open Journal of Civil Engineering5(04): 451–459.
26.
LawSSakrFLMartinezM (2014)
Measuring the changes in aggregate cycling patterns between 2003 and 2012 from a space syntax perspective.Behavioral Sciences4: 278–300.
27.
LlactaLAB (2018) Encuesta Nacional del Perfil del Ciclista Urbano. Cuenca: Universidad de Cuenca.
28.
LovelaceRGoodmanAAldredR, et al. (2017)
The propensity to cycle tool: An open source online system for sustainable transport planning.Journal of Transport and Land Use10(1): 505–2.
MaRLamPTILeungCK (2018) Big Data in urban planning practices: Shaping our cities with data. In: Proceedings of the 21st international symposium on advancement of construction management and real estate, Singapore, 14-17 December 2016, pp.365–373. Berlin: Springer.
31.
MuellerNRojas-RuedaDSalmonM, et al. (2018)
Health impact assessment of cycling network expansions in European cities.Preventive Medicine109: 62–70.
32.
MusakwaWSelalaKM (2016)
Mapping cycling patterns and trends using Strava Metro data in the city of Johannesburg, South Africa.Data in Brief9: 898–905.
33.
OpenStreetMap (2016) OpenStreetMap. Available at: www.openstreetmap.org (accessed 1 July 2019)
34.
OrellanaDOsorioP (2014)
Segregación socio-espacial urbana en Cuenca, Ecuador. Analitika, Journal of Statistical Analysis8(2): 27–38.
35.
OrellanaDQuezadaAAndradeS, et al. (2017) Metodología para definición de conglomerados de muestreo espacial en el entorno urbano basados en caminabilidad y factores socioeconómicos, In: Proceedings of V congreso REDU (Universidad de Cuenca), 5-6 October, pp.487–491. Cuenca.
36.
ParkingJWarmanMPageM (2008)
Estimation of the determinants of bicycle mode share for the journey to work using census data.Transportation1(35): 93–109.
37.
RaeASingletonA (2015)
Putting Big Data in its place: A regional studies and regional science perspective.Regional Studies, Regional Science2(1): 1–5.
38.
RafordNChiaradiaAJGilJ (2007) Space Syntax: The Role of Urban Form in Cyclist Route Choice in Central London.
UC Berkeley:
Safe Transportation Research & Education Center.
39.
R Core Team (2016) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.
Vienna, Austria:
R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
40.
RodríguezDABrissonEMEstupiñánN (2009)
The relationship between segment-level built environment attributes and pedestrian activity around Bogota’s BRT stations.Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment14(7) 470–478.
41.
RoyANelsonTAFotheringhamAS, et al. (2019)
Correcting bias in crowdsourced data to map bicycle ridership of all bicyclists.Urban Science3(2): 62.
42.
RybarczykGWuC (2014)
Examining the impact of urban morphology on bicycle mode choice.Environment and Planning B, Planning & design41(2): 272–288.
43.
SadaranganiKPVon OetingerACristi-MonteroC, et al. (2018)
Beneficial association between active travel and metabolic syndrome in Latin-America: A cross-sectional analysis from the Chilean National Health Survey 2009–2010.Preventive Medicine107: 8–13.
44.
SaelensBESallisJFFrankLD (2003)
Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures.Annals of behavioral medicine: A publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine25(2): 80–91.
45.
ShannonCEWeaverW (1964) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Illinois: The University of Illinois Press – Urbana.
SunYMobasheriA (2017)
Utilizing crowdsourced data for studies of cycling and air pollution exposure : A case study using strava data.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health14(274): 1–2.
48.
TaoSCorcoranJMateo-BabianoI, et al. (2014)
Exploring bus rapid transit passenger travel behaviour using Big Data.Applied Geography53: 90–104.
49.
TurnerA (2007)
From axial to road-centre lines: A new representation for space syntax and a new model of route choice for transport network analysis.Environment and Planning B, Planning & Design34(3): 539–555.
50.
VuongQH (1989)
Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses.Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society57(2): 307.
51.
WintersMBrauerMSettonEM, et al. (2013)
Mapping bikeability: A spatial tool to support sustainable travel.Environment and Planning B, Planning & Design40(5): 865–883.
52.
XieXWongKAghajanH, et al. (2013) Analyzing cyclists’ behaviors and exploring the environments from cycling tracks. In: Cycling data challenge (CDC) workshop (AGILE - 2013), 14 May.
53.
YeboahGAlvanidesS (2015) Route choice analysis of urban cycling behaviors using OpenStreetMap: Evidence from a British urban environment. In: Jokar Arsanjani J, Zipf A, Mooney P, Helbich M (eds) OpenStreetMap in GIScience. Cham: Springer, pp.189–210.
54.
YeboahGAlvanidesSThompsonEM (2015) Everyday cycling in urban environments: Understanding behaviors and constraints in space-time. In: HelbichMJokar ArsanjaniJLeitnerM (eds) Computational Approaches for Urban Environments.
Cham:
Springer International Publishing, pp. 185–210.
55.
ZhouXYehAGOLiW, et al. (2018)
A commuting spectrum analysis of the jobs–housing balance and self-containment of employment with mobile phone location Big Data.Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science45(3): 434–451.
56.
ZieffSGMusselmanEASarmientoOL, et al. (2018) Talking the walk: Perceptions of neighborhood characteristics from users of open streets programs in Latin America and the USA. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 95(3): 899–912.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
