The loss of accuracy in vector-raster conversion has always been an issue for land use change models, particularly for raster based Cellular Automata models. Here we describe a vector-based cellular automata (CA) model that uses land parcels as the basic unit of analysis, and compare its results with a raster CA model. Transition rules are calibrated using an artificial neural network (ANN) and historical land use data. Using Ipswich City in Queensland, Australia as the study area, the simulation results show that the vector and raster CA models achieve 96.64% and 93.88% producer’s spatial accuracy, respectively. In addition, the vector CA model achieves a higher kappa coefficient and more consistent frequency of misclassification, while also having faster processing times. Consequently, the vector-based CA model can be applied to explore regulations of land use transformation in urban growth process, and provide a better understanding of likely urban growth to inform city planners.
AlmeidaCGlerianiJCastejonEF, et al. (2008)
Using neural networks and cellular automata for modelling intra-urban land-use dynamics.International Journal of Geographical Information Science22: 943–963.
4.
Barreira-GonzálezPBarrosJ (2017)
Configuring the neighbourhood effect in irregular cellular automata based models. International Journal of Geographical Information Science31: 617–636.
5.
Barreira-GonzálezPAguilera-BenaventeFGómez-DelgadoM (2019)
Implementation and calibration of a new irregular cellular automata-based model for local urban growth simulation: The MUGICA model.Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 46: 243--263.
6.
Barreira-GonzálezPGómez-DelgadoMAguilera-BenaventeF (2015)
From raster to vector cellular automata models: A new approach to simulate urban growth with the help of graph theory.Computers, Environment and Urban Systems54: 119–131.
7.
BattyM (2009) Urban modeling. In ThriftNKitchinR (eds) International Encyclopedia of Human Geography.
Oxford:
Elsevier.
8.
BattyMXieY (1994)
From cells to cities.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design21: S31–S48.
9.
CaoMTangGaShenQ, et al. (2015)
A new discovery of transition rules for cellular automata by using cuckoo search algorithm.International Journal of Geographical Information Science29: 806–824.
10.
CivcoDL (1993)
Artificial neural networks for land-cover classification and mapping.International Journal of Geographical Information Science7: 173–186.
11.
ClarkeKCHoppenSGaydosL (1997)
A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design24: 247–261.
12.
CohenJ (1960)
A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales.Educational and Psychological Measurement20: 37–46.
13.
CouclelisH (1989)
Macrostructure and microbehavior in a metropolitan area.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design16: 141–154.
14.
FengYTongX (2018a)
Calibration of cellular automata models using differential evolution to simulate present and future land use.Transactions in GIS22: 582–601.
15.
FengYTongX (2018b)
Dynamic land use change simulation using cellular automata with spatially nonstationary transition rules. GIScience & Remote Sensing55: 678–2.
16.
FengYLiuYTongX, et al. (2011)
Modeling dynamic urban growth using cellular automata and particle swarm optimization rules.Landscape and Urban Planning102: 188–196.
17.
FlacheAHegselmannR (2001)
Do irregular grids make a difference? Relaxing the spatial regularity assumption in cellular models of social dynamics. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation4: 6.1--6.27.
18.
GeertmanSToppenFStillwellJ (2013) Planning Support Systems for Sustainable Urban Development.
London:
Springer.
19.
GuanQWangLClarkeKC (2005)
An artificial-neural-network-based, constrained CA model for simulating urban growth.Cartography and Geographic Information Science32: 369–380.
20.
HanJHayashiYCaoX, et al. (2009)
Application of an integrated system dynamics and cellular automata model for urban growth assessment: A case study of Shanghai, China.Landscape and Urban Planning91: 133–141.
21.
HuangBXieCTayR, et al. (2009)
Land-use-change modeling using unbalanced support-vector machines.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design36: 398–416.
JantzCAGoetzSJShelleyMK (2004)
Using the SLEUTH urban growth model to simulate the impacts of future policy scenarios on urban land use in the Baltimore-Washington metropolitan area.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design31: 251–271.
25.
KlostermanREPettitCJ (2005)
An update on planning support systems.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design32: 477–484.
26.
LiXLiuX (2008)
Embedding sustainable development strategies in agent‐based models for use as a planning tool.International Journal of Geographical Information Science22: 21–45.
27.
LiXYehAG-O (2002a)
Neural-network-based cellular automata for simulating multiple land use changes using GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science16: 323–343.
28.
LiXYehAG-O (2002b)
Urban simulation using principal components analysis and cellular automata for land-use planning. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing68: 341–351.
29.
LiXLiuXLiS (2010) Intelligent GIS and Spatial Optimization.
Beijing:
Science Press.
30.
LiXYehAG-OLiuX, et al. (2007) Geographical Simulation Systems: Cellular Automata and Multi-Agents.
Beijing:
Science Press.
31.
LiangXLiuXLiX, et al. (2018)
Delineating multi-scenario urban growth boundaries with a CA-based FLUS model and morphological method.Landscape and Urban Planning177: 47–63.
32.
LiuY (2008) Modelling Urban Development with Geographical Information Systems and Cellular Automata.
Boca Raton:
CRC Press.
33.
LiuXLiXLiuL, et al. (2008)
A bottom‐up approach to discover transition rules of cellular automata using ant intelligence.International Journal of Geographical Information Science22: 1247–1269.
34.
LiuXLiXShiX, et al. (2010)
Simulating land-use dynamics under planning policies by integrating artificial immune systems with cellular automata.International Journal of Geographical Information Science24: 783–802.
35.
LiuXLiangXLiX, et al. (2017)
A future land use simulation model (FLUS) for simulating multiple land use scenarios by coupling human and natural effects.Landscape and Urban Planning168: 94–116.
36.
LiuYFengYPontiusRG (2014)
Spatially-explicit simulation of urban growth through self-adaptive genetic algorithm and cellular automata modelling.Land3: 719–738.
37.
LongYWuK (2017)
Simulating block-level urban expansion for national wide cities.Sustainability9: 879.
38.
LongYZhangY (2015)
Land-use pattern scenario analysis using planner agents.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design42: 615–637.
39.
LuYCaoMZhangL (2015)
A vector-based Cellular Automata model for simulating urban land use change.Chinese Geographical Science25: 74–84.
40.
MahinyASClarkeKC (2012)
Guiding SLEUTH land-use/land-cover change modeling using multicriteria evaluation: Towards dynamic sustainable land-use planning.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design39: 925–944.
41.
MénardAMarceauDJ (2005)
Exploration of spatial scale sensitivity in geographic cellular automata.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design32: 693–714.
42.
MorenoNWangFMarceauDJ (2009)
Implementation of a dynamic neighborhood in a land-use vector-based cellular automata model.Computers, Environment and Urban Systems33: 44–54.
43.
O‘SullivanD (2001)
Graph-cellular automata: A generalised discrete urban and regional model.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design28: 687–705.
44.
PettitCJ (2005)
Use of a collaborative GIS-based planning-support system to assist in formulating a sustainable-development scenario for Hervey Bay, Australia.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design32: 523–545.
45.
PettitCJKlostermanREDelaneyP, et al. (2015)
The online What if? Planning Support System: A land suitability application in Western Australia.Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy8: 93–112.
ShahumyanHMoeckelR (2017)
Integration of land use, land cover, transportation, and environmental impact models: Expanding scenario analysis with multiple modules.Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science44: 531–552.
49.
StimsonRBellMCorcoranJ, et al. (2012)
Using a large scale urban model to test planning scenarios in the Brisbane‐South East Queensland region.Regional Science Policy & Practice4: 373–392.
50.
VerburgPHVeldkampA (2001)
The role of spatially explicit models in land-use change research: A case study for cropping patterns in China.Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment85: 177–190.
51.
VerburgPHde NijsTCvan EckJR, et al. (2004a)
A method to analyse neighbourhood characteristics of land use patterns.Computers, Environment and Urban Systems28: 667–690.
52.
VerburgPHSchotPPDijstMJ, et al. (2004b)
Land use change modelling: Current practice and research priorities.GeoJournal61: 309–324.
53.
VieraAJGarrettJM (2005)
Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa statistic.Family Medicine37: 360–363.
54.
WangF (1994)
The use of artificial neural networks in a geographical information system for agricultural land-suitability assessment.Environment and Planning A26: 265–284.
55.
WangFMarceauDJ (2013)
A patch‐based cellular automaton for simulating land‐use changes at fine spatial resolution.Transactions in GIS17: 828–846.
56.
WangFHasbaniJ-GWangX, et al. (2011)
Identifying dominant factors for the calibration of a land-use cellular automata model using Rough Set Theory.Computers, Environment and Urban Systems35: 116–125.
57.
WhiteREngelenGUljeeI (1997)
The use of constrained cellular automata for high-resolution modelling of urban land-use dynamics.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design24: 323–343.
58.
WuF (2002)
Calibration of stochastic cellular automata: The application to rural-urban land conversions.International Journal of Geographical Information Science16: 795–818.
59.
WuFWebsterCJ (1998)
Simulation of land development through the integration of cellular automata and multicriteria evaluation.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design25: 103–126.
60.
YangJLiuWLiY, et al. (2018)
Simulating intraurban land use dynamics under multiple scenarios based on fuzzy cellular automata: A case study of Jinzhou District, Dalian.Complexity2018;
17.
61.
YangJSuJChenF, et al. (2016)
A local land use competition cellular automata model and its application.ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information5: 106.
62.
YangJTang GaCaoM, et al. (2013)
An intelligent method to discover transition rules for cellular automata using bee colony optimisation.International Journal of Geographical Information Science27: 1849–1864.
63.
YaoYLiuXLiX, et al. (2017)
Simulating urban land-use changes at a large scale by integrating dynamic land parcel subdivision and vector-based cellular automata. International Journal of Geographical Information Science31: 2452–2.
64.
YehAG-OLiX (2006)
Errors and uncertainties in urban cellular automata.Computers, Environment and Urban Systems30: 10–28.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
