This essay critically re-evaluates the concept of resource frontiers in Morocco’s solar energy landscape to ask: how does the 800 MW Noor solar installation under construction in Midelt challenge or extend the resource frontiers laid down by the colonial legal and bureaucratic apparatus created to facilitate conventional mining? How are the scalar politics associated with large-scale solar (LSS) in Morocco respatialized through contestations over resource frontiers? I argue that these resource frontiers are persistent but not simple relics or failures of a colonial state that did not quite finish the process of commodifying new resources and territorializing its power in Morocco. Such frontiers are made and remade by the opacity built into legal and bureaucratic frameworks that have been largely maintained post-independence. We need empirical attention to those colonial pathways to comprehensively document the contemporary injustices of energy projects. This article examines the quotidian operations of bureaucratic procedure and legal frameworks rooted in colonial mining legislation as constituting resource frontiers in the peripheral spaces slated for one of the world’s most aggressive renewable energy rollouts.
African Development Bank Group (2019) Midelt Solar Power Complex – Phase 1: Land Acqusition Plans 1,2 and 3. Côte d’Ivoire: African Development Bank.
2.
AmoussouR (2018) Conservation foncière la superficie immatriculée en hausse de près de 50 %. https://www.challenge.ma/95518-95518/ (accessed 19 September 2022).
BadissiRA (2016) Essai de biographie historique de Jean Epinat, fondateur de la Compagnie des Transports et Tourisme marocain (C.T.M.) et de l’Omnium Nord-africain (O.N.A.): intinéraire d’un « homme nouveau » au Protectorat français au Maroc, 1919-1956. Mémoire de M1Histoire, Université Paris I.
5.
BediHP (2018) ‘Our energy, our rights': national extraction legacies and contested energy justice futures in Bangladesh. Energy Research and Social Science41: 168–175. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.009
6.
BediHP (2022) Solar power for some? Energy transition injustices in Kerala, India. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space5(3): 1146–1163. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486211046963
7.
BernsteinH (2006) Is there an agrarian question in the 21st century?Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue Canadienne d’études Du Développement27(4): 449–460. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2006.9669166
8.
BogaertK (2015) The revolt of small towns: the meaning of Morocco's history and the geography of social protests. Review of African Political Economy42(143): 124–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2014.918536
BrownK (2018) Gone Home: Race and Roots through Appalachia. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
11.
Bureau Chérifien de Recherches et Participation Minières (1937a) Note au sujet de l'application de l'article 14 du règlement minier aux fonctionnaires indigènes d'autorité, 5 Juin 1937. In: Box F-F189: Conseil d’Administration Bureau Chérifien de Recherches et Participation Minières. Rabat: Archives du Maroc.
12.
Bureau Chérifien de Recherches et Participation Minières (1937b) Procès-verbal de la 44ème séance du Conseil d'Administration du Bureau de Recherches et Participation Minières, tenue à Rabat au Secrétariat Général du Protectorat, le Lundi 31 Mai 1937 à 15 heures. In: Box F-F189: Conseil d’Administration Bureau Chérifien de Recherches et Participation Minières. Rabat: Archives du Maroc.
13.
CantoniRRignallK (2019) Kingdom of the Sun: A Critical, Multiscalar Analysis of Morocco’s Solar Energy Strategy. Energy Research and Social Science51: 20–31. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.012
14.
Carr-WilsonSPattanayakSKWeinthalE (2024) Critical mineral mining in the energy transition: a systematic review of environmental, social, and governance risks and opportunities. Energy Research and Social Science116: 103672. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103672
15.
ChagnonCWDuranteFGillsBK, et al. (2022) From extractivism to global extractivism: the evolution of an organizing concept. Journal of Peasant Studies49(4): 760–792. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2069015
16.
ContrerasJSRuizAMCampos-CeldaorA, et al. (2023) Energy colonialism: a category to analyse the corporate energy transition in the Global South and North. Land12(6): 1241. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/land12061241
17.
Da SilvaSNielsenKBBediHP (2020) Land use planning, dispossession and contestation in Goa, India. Journal of Peasant Studies47(6): 1301–1326. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1822822
18.
DavisD (2007) Resurrecting the Granary of Rome: Environmental History and French Colonial Expansion in North Africa. Athens: Ohio University Press.
19.
El AtillahASouhassouMEl Abidine el MorjaniZ (2018) Le cadre législatif de l’exploration et la recherche minière au Maroc entre le Dahir de 1951 et la loi 33-13. International Review of Economics, Management and Law Research1(1): 1–20.
20.
el GlaouiT (1931) Lettre d’el Hadj Thami El Glaoui à S.E. Lucien Saint, Ministre Plénipotentiaire, Commissaire Résident Général de la République Française; addendum Liste des sociétés interesées par le pacha de Marrkech dans la société d’exploitation des gisements de cobalt marocains, le 7 Octobre 1931. Box F-190 Industrie Minière au Maroc, 1931-1946-plans, cartes. Rabat: Archives du Maroc.
21.
El KahlaouiSBogaertK (2019) Politiser le regard sur les marges: le cas du mouvement 'sur la voie 96' d’Imider. L'Année du Maghreb21: 181–191. https://doi.org/10.4000/anneemaghreb.5555
22.
Empire Chérifien/Protectorat de la République Française au Maroc (1914) Dahir portant réglementation pour la recherche et l’exploitation des mines dans la zone du Protectorat français de l’Empire Chérifien. Troisième Année. Bulletin Officiel, Édition Française, 55–63.
23.
GirardBShokrgozarSSareenS (2024) The meaning of solar energy: political imaginaries of solar energy in contemporary India. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space8(1): 476–496. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486241302185
24.
GuntonCMarkeyS (2021) The role of community benefit agreements in natural resource governance and community development: issues and prospects. Resources Policy73: 102152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102152
25.
GurolJJenssARodríguezF, et al. (2023) Authoritarian power and contestation beyond the state. Globalizations21(6): 1009–1022. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2022.2162290
HangerSKomendantovaNSchinkeB, et al. (2016) Community acceptance of large-scale solar energy installations in developing countries: evidence from Morocco. Energy Research and Social Science14: 80–89. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.01.010
29.
HarveyD (2004) The ‘new’ imperialism: accumulation by dispossession. Socialist Register40: 63–87.
30.
HoweC (2014) Anthropocenic ecoauthority: the winds of Oaxaca. Anthropological Quarterly87(2): 381–404. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2014.0029
31.
JalbertKWillowACasagrandeD, et al. (eds) (2017) ExtrACTION: Impacts, Engagements, and Alternative Futures. Abingdon: Routledge.
32.
JenssASchützeB (2023) Prefiguring politics: transregional energy infrastructures as a lens for the study of authoritarian practices. Globalizations21(6): 1076–1091. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2023.2181545
33.
KirschS (2014) Mining Capitalism: The Relationship between Corporations and their Critics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
34.
KnuthSBehrsinILevendaA, et al. (2022) New political ecologies of renewable energy. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space5(3): 997–1013. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486221108164
35.
KopytoffI (ed) (1987) The African Frontier: The Reproduction of Traditional African Societies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
36.
LantenoisR (1937) Note de Mr. Lantenois, Inspecteur Général du règlement des droits coutumiers des indigènes dans les territoires ouverts à la prospection, à la recherche ou à l’exploitation minière-Cas des mines de manganèse de l’Imini, Question politique-Question administrative, le 28 Mai 1937. In Box F-F189: Conseil d’Administration Bureau Chérifien de Recherches et Participation Minières.Rabat: Archives du Maroc.
37.
MatanzimaJ (2025) “Disempowered by the transition”: Manipulated and coerced agency in displacements induced by accelerated extraction of energy transition minerals in Zimbabwe. Energy Research and Social Science117. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103727
MooreJW (2015) Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. London: Verso.
40.
MooreS (2019) Sustainable Energy Transformations, Power and Politics: Morocco and the Mediterranean. Abingdon: Routledge.
41.
Moroccan Agency for Solar Energy (2017) Projet de Complexe d’énergie solaire de 500 MW à Midelt – Maroc: Plan d’Acquisition de Terrain. Rabat: Moroccan Agency for Solar Energy.
42.
MüllerF (2024) Energy colonialism. Journal of Political Ecology31(1): 707–717.
43.
MulvaneyD (2024) Embodied energy injustice and the political ecology of solar power. Energy Research and Social Science115: 103607. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103607
44.
NewellPPriceRDaleyF (2024) Landscapes of (in)justice: reflecting on voices, spaces and alliances for just transitions. Energy Research and Social Science116: 103701. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103701
45.
OubenalM (2022) Agriculture d’exportation et transformations socio-économiques dans le Sous, Asinag. 39–61.
46.
OzenH (2024) Why is ‘clean’ energy opposed? the resistances to geothermal energy projects in Turkey. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space7(4): 1580–1600. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486241254684
47.
PelusoN (2017) Plantations and mines: resource frontiers and the politics of the smallholder slot. Journal of Peasant Studies44(4): 834–869. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2017.1339692
48.
PeyronM (1976) Habitat rural et vie montagnarde dans le Haut Atlas de Midelt (Maroc). Revue de géographie alpine64(3): 327–363. https://doi.org/10.3406/rga.1976.2051
49.
PowellD (2017) Landscapes of Power: Politics of Energy in the Navajo Nation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
50.
RignallK (2016) Solar power, state power, and the politics of energy transition in pre-Saharan Morocco. Environment and Planning A48: 540–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x15619176
51.
RignallK (2021) An Elusive Common: Land, Politics, and Agrarian Rurality in a Moroccan Oasis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
52.
RivetD (1979) Mines et politiques au Maroc, 1907-1914 (D’après les archives du Quai d’Orsay). Revue d’historie modern et contemporaine4(26e): 549–578.
53.
RivetD (2000) Lyautey et l’Institution du Protectorat Français au Maroc, 1912-1925. Paris: Editions L’Harmattan.
54.
Royaume du Maroc (2013) Note de présentation du projet de loi no 33-13 relative aux mines. Rabat: Ministère de l’Energie, des Mines, de l’Eau et de l’Environnement.
55.
SalimeZ (2022) A gendered counter-archive: mining and resistance in Morocco. Development and Change53(5): 1035–1058. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12726
56.
SareenSShokrgozarS (2022) Desert geographies: Solar energy governance for just transitions. Globalizations23(1): 105–121. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2022.2095116
57.
ScheidelASormanAHAvilaS, et al. (2023) Renewables grabbing: land and resource appropriations in the global energy transition Land and Resource Appropriations in the Global Energy Transition. Routledge Handbook of Global Land and Resource Grabbin, edited by Andreas Neef, Chanrith Ngin, Tsegaye Moreda, Sharlene Mollett. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003080916
58.
Service de la Conservation de la Propriété Foncière (1931) Instruction pour l’application du règlement minier au Maroc. In Box F-F188: Dossier général du BCRPM, 1922-1938, relatif aux activités du Bureau Chérifien de Recherches et Participations Minières. Rabat: Archives du Maroc.
59.
Service de Mines (1938) Note de Service. In Box F-F188 : Dossier général du BCRPM, 1922-1938, relatif aux activités du Bureau Chérifien de Recherches et Participations Minières. Rabat: Archives du Maroc.
60.
ShadeLSchwartzmanGRignallK, et al. (2025) Afterlives of coal: land and transition dynamics in Central Appalachia. Environmental Research: Energy2: 015015. https://doi.org/10.1088/2753-3751/adb1ea
61.
ShahA (2024) Rethinking ‘just transitions’ from coal: the dynamics of land and labour in anti-coal struggles. The Journal of Peasant Studies50(6): 2145–2164. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2142568
62.
ShokrgozarSRemmeDStockR (2024) “We have to convince Them whatever it takes:” The climate necropolitics of energy transitions in India and Zambia. Geoforum153(July): 10394. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.103945
63.
SinghD (2022) ‘This is all waste’: emptying, cleaning and clearing land for renewable energy dispossession in borderland India. Contemporary South Asia30(3): 402–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/09584935.2022.2099812
64.
SovacoolB (2021) Who are the victims of low-carbon transitions? Toward a political ecology of climate change mitigation. Energy Research and Social Science73(2): 101916. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.101916
65.
StockRSovacoolB (2024) Blinded by sunspots: Revealing the multidimensional and intersectional inequities of solar energy in India. Global Environmental Change. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102796
66.
TaylorBHuffordMBilbreyK (2017) A green new deal for Appalachia: economic transition, coal reclamation costs, bottom-up policy-making (Part 1). Journal of Appalachian Studies23(1): 8–28. https://doi.org/10.5406/jappastud.23.1.0008
67.
Van de GriftECuppenE (2022) Beyond the public in controversies: a systematic review on social opposition and renewable energy actors. Energy Research and Social Science91: 102749. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102749
68.
VeltmeyerHPetrasJ (eds) (2014) The New Extractivism: A Post-neoliberal Development Model or Imperialism of the twenty-first Century?London: Zed Books.
69.
WilliamsR (1973) The Country and the City. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
