This paper explores London’s continuous cruising community through Polanyi’s double movement theory, analysing how boat dwellers navigate between market commodification of waterways and collective practices of protection and re-embedding. Drawing on seven months of ethnographic research, participant observation, and reflexive thematic analysis, we explore how itinerant liveaboards negotiate semi-off-grid living as both a technical infrastructure withdrawal and a vernacular resistance to the housing market. Our paper reveals mobile precarity as a governance condition produced by strategic neglect of infrastructure, the removal of mooring spaces, rising license fees, and intensified enforcement. The commercialisation strategy through Water Safety Zones and “eco-mooring” schemes demonstrates how environmental discourse legitimises displacement. Yet community responses transcend simple coping through practices of mutual aid, cross-class solidarity, and collective resistance that we theorise as everyday decommodification. The paper makes three contributions: extending Polanyian analysis to mobile housing contexts; reframing off-grid living as mundane politics rather than spectacular lifestyle; and positioning dignity as an analytical bridge between precarity and value transformation. By disrupting the terra-centric/aquatic divide that structures urban theory, we reveal how spatial assumptions about land-as-property versus water-as-flow sustain both the metabolic rift and housing inequality. The paper demonstrates that inclusive urban futures require recognising waterways as legitimate dwelling spaces deserving of infrastructural rights, not mere leisure commodities subject to market pricing.
AlexanderS (2014) Ted trainer and the simpler way: a sympathetic critique. Capitalism Nature Socialism25(2): 95–111.
3.
AshleyLMcDonaldI (2024) When the Penny Drops: understanding how social class influences speciality careers in the UK medical profession. Social Science & Medicine348: 116747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116747
4.
AteljevicI (2020) Transforming the (tourism) world for good and (re)generating the potential ‘new normal. Tourism Geographies22(3): 467–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1759134
BowlesB (2024) Boaters of London: Alternative Living on the Water. Berghahn.
9.
BowlesBKaaristoMRogelja CafN (2019) Dwelling on and with water – materialities, (im)mobilities and meanings. Introduction to the special issue. Anthropological Notebooks25(2): 5–12.
10.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
11.
BraunVClarkeV (2022) Toward good practice in thematic analysis: avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health24(1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597
Cabrales SalazarOMárquez VargasFGarzón PascagazaE (2021) Circular economy and reducing consumption from a decolonial approach. Cuadernos De Administración37(70).
CaprottiFCowleyRDattaA, et al. (2017) The New Urban Agenda: key opportunities and challenges for policy and practice, Urban Research & Practice10(3): 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2016.1275618
ChatzidakisA (2022) Chronotopic dilemmas: Space–time in consumer movements of the Greek crisis. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space38(2): 325–344.
18.
ChatzidakisAMaclaranPVarmanR (2021) The regeneration of consumer movement solidarity. Journal of Consumer Research48(2): 289308. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucab007
CowanDHardyB (2023) Charitable purposes and the shaping effects of money. International Journal of Law in Context19: 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552322000313
DóciGVasileiadouE (2015) “Let's do it ourselves” individual motivations for investing in renewables at the community level. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews49(C): 41–50.
27.
DoolingS (2009) Ecological gentrification: a research agenda exploring justice in the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research33(3): 621–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00860.x
28.
Edwards-DashtiN (2022) Chasing the Tipping Point: Static for Too Long. Springer booksFinTech Women Walk the Talk. Springer, 85–100. chapter 0.
FordJGomz-LanierL (2017) Are tiny homes here to stay? A review of literature on the tiny house movement. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal45(4): 394–405. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.12205
32.
FosterJB (1999) Marx’s theory of metabolic rift: classical foundations for environmental sociology. American Journal of Sociology105(2): 366–405. https://doi.org/10.1086/210315
33.
GaluszkaJ (2024) Boats as housing in Oxford, UK: trajectories of informality in a high‐income context. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research48(1): 126–144.
34.
GelleriK (2009) Chiemgauer regiomoney: theory and practice of a local currency. International Journal of Community Currency Research13: 61–75.
35.
GiddensA (1987) Social Theory and Modern Sociology. Polity Press.
36.
GieslerMVeresiuE (2014) Creating the responsible consumer: moralistic governance regimes and consumer subjectivity. Journal of Consumer Research41(3): 840–857. https://doi.org/10.1086/677842
37.
GoodwinG (2018) Rethinking the double movement: expanding the frontiers of Polanyian analysis in the global south. Development and Change49(5): 1268–1290. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12419
38.
GraeberD (2007) Possibilities: Essays on Hierarchy, Rebellion, and Desire. AK Press.
39.
HaighM (2012) Deconstructing myth: low-carbon sustainability. Social Semiotics23(2): 47–66, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2280050
HaneyTJMorrowA (2024) “We’re still on that treadmill”: privilege, reflexivity, and the disruptive potential of permaculture. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism35(2): 96–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2023.2285458
42.
HermanAYarwoodR (2024) Nuanced locked out? Navigating the geographies of precarity on Britain's waterways. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12671
43.
HughesH (1999) Crony capitalism and the East Asian currency and financial ‘crises’ policy: a. Journal of Public Policy and Ideas15(3): 3–9.
KambouriN (2024) Affect, precarity and feminised labour in Airbnb in London. In: MezzadraSCuppiniNFrapportiM, et al. (eds) Capitalism in the Platform Age. Springer Studies in Alternative Economics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49147-4_10
47.
KimN (2020) A comparative legal study to improve the legal status of platform workers. Oebeop44(4): 227–246.
48.
LateganLCilliersE (2017) Considering urban green space and informal backyard rentals in South Africa: disproving the compensation hypothesis. Town and Regional Planning69: 1–11.
49.
LemanskiC (2023) Broadening the landscape of post-network cities: a call to research the off-grid infrastructure transitions of the non-poor. Landscape Research48(2): 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2021.1972952
50.
LincolnYGubaE (1986) But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation1986(30): 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1427
51.
LloverasJMarshallAPVandeventerJJ, et al. (2022) Sustainability marketing beyond sustainable development: towards a degrowth agenda. Journal of Marketing Management38: 2055–2077. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2022.2084443
52.
MacnaughtonGFreyD (2018) Challenging neoliberalism: ILO, human rights, and public health frameworks on decent work. Health Human Rights20(2): 43–55.
McMichaelP (2023) Updating Karl Polanyi’s ‘double movement’ for critical agrarian studies. The Journal of Peasant Studies50(6): 2123–2144. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2023.2219978
56.
MitlinDBennettJHornP, et al. (2019) Knowledge matters: the potential contribution of the co-production of research to urban transformation. In: GDI Working Paper 2019-039. The University of Manchester.
OnaranÖOyvatCFotopoulouE (2022) A macroeconomic analysis of the effects of gender inequality, wages, and public social infrastructure: the case of the UK. Feminist Economics28(2): 152–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2022.2044498
60.
O’NeillB (2024) Off-grid: trading infrastructure for atmosphere in Bucharest, Romania. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space43(5): 882–897. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544241293561
61.
PaulSBardhanS (2022) Landscapes to eco-scapes: prescriptive transitions for urban waterways for an Indian megacity. Urban Water Journal20(10): 1361–1374. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2022.2086883
62.
PenfoldHWaittGMcGuirkP (2018) Portrayals of the tiny house in electronic media: challenging or reproducing the Australian dream home. Australian Planner55(3–4): 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2019.1632360
63.
Pérez-MartínezJPérez FernándezR (2021) English narrowboats: from industrial revolution to the urban housing problem, International Journal of Maritime Engineering163(A1): 131–137. https://doi.org/10.3940/ijme.2021.a1.684
64.
PolanyiK (2024) The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of our Time. London: Penguin. First. Ed, 1944, New York: Rinehart.
65.
PopescuISHitajCBenettoE (2021) Measuring the sustainability of investment funds: a critical review of methods and frameworks in sustainable finance. Journal of Cleaner Production314(10): 128016.
66.
PrudhamS (2013) Men and things: Karl Polanyi, primitive accumulation, and their relevance to a radical green political economy. Environment and Planning A45: 1569–1587.
RozanovVFrančiškovićTMarinićIMacarencoMaMLetica-CrepuljaMMužinićLJayatungeRSisaskMVeveraJWiederholdBWiederholdMMillerIPagkalosG (2019) Mental health consequences of war conflicts. In: JavedAFountoulakisK (eds). Advances in Psychiatry. Cham: Springer. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70554-5_17
69.
ScalesIR (2014) Green consumption, ecolabelling and capitalism's environmental limits. Geography Compass8: 477–489.
70.
SelwynBMiyamuraS (2014) Class Struggle or Embedded Markets? Marx, Polanyi and the Meanings and Possibilities of Social Transformation. New Political Economy19(5): 639–661. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2013.844117, In this issue.
SovacoolBKBrisboisMC (2019) Elite power in low-carbon transitions: a critical and interdisciplinary review. Energy Research & Social Science57: 101242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101242
75.
SylvesterRUnderhillH (2024) Freedoms ebb and flow: boaters’ experiences of water and sanitation insecurity on the inland waterways of England & Wales. Water Alternatives17(1): 94–120.
76.
ThompsonCKumarA (2018) Beyond consumer responsibilization: slow food’s actually existing neoliberalism. Journal of Consumer Culture21(2): 317–336. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/146954051881863
77.
ThorleifssonC (2019) Pursuit of purity: Populist Nationalism and the Racialization of Difference. Identities - Global Studies in Culture and Power.
VanniniPTaggartJ (2016) Onerous consumption: the alternative hedonism of offgrid domestic water use. Journal of Consumer Culture16(1): 80–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540513509642
80.
Velandia-MoralesARodríguez-BailónRMartínezR (2022) Economic inequality increases the preference for status consumption. Frontiers in Psychology12: 809101.
