Most models for international environmental governance acknowledge that the participation of non-state actors is critical; however, this participation is limited to a pre-political level in which scientific communities have a predominant role and indigenous ontologies are often marginalized. This article contextualizes these discussions by examining how ontological differences are incorporated or excluded in the international environmental governance of the Amazon rainforest. By exploring the interactions between Indigenous peoples and scientific communities, it examines the prospects of institutionalizing these interactions within the Amazonian Cooperation Treaty Organization (ACTO). The article relies on research during the years 2021-2024 involving semi-structured interviews and the comparative analysis of the the Science Panel for the Amazon (SPA) procedures and reports with the main international scientific platforms dedicated to the environment: the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). The article argues that the inclusion of Indigenous peoples in these panels is not about knowledge co-production. Scientists conceive these panels through their Western universalist ontology as apolitical sites to collect, systematize, and diffuse scientific knowledge. In contrast, for Indigenous peoples, these are spaces for political exchanges on which they seek to formulate their political ontology and the proper ways to protect their world. Based on these findings, the article proposes reimagining scientist platforms and international decision-making forums as spaces for ‘pluriversal governance’.
AokiC (2018) Worlding the study of global environmental politics in the Anthropocene: Indigenous voices from the amazon. Global Environmental Politics18(4): 25–42.
4.
BalaAGhevergheseJoseph G (2007) Indigenous knowledge and western science: the possibility of dialogue. Race & Class49(1): 39–61.
5.
BeckSEsguerraABorieM, et al. (2014) Towards a reflexive turn in the governance of global environmental expertise. The cases of the IPCC and the IPBES. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society23(2): 80–87.
6.
BerglundOSchmidtD (2020) Extinction Rebellion and Climate Change Activism. Breaking the Law to Change the World. Springer.
7.
BlaserM (2014) Ontology and indigeneity: on the political ontology of heterogeneous assemblages. Cultural Geographies21(1): 49–58.
8.
BrownM (2018) Global environmental governance. International Studies Review14(1): 125–130.
9.
CarrithersMCandeaMSykesK, et al. (2010) Ontology is just another word for culture: Motion tabled at the 2008 meeting of the group for debates in anthropological theory. University of Manchester. Critique of anthropology30(2): 152–200.
10.
ChandlerDReidJ (2019) Becoming Indigenous: Governing Imaginaries in the Anthropocene. Rowman and Littlefield.
11.
ClementCDenevanWMHeckenbergerMJ, et al. (2015) “The Domestication of Amazonia before European Conquest”. Proceedings of the Royal Society B282(282): 20150813.
12.
COICA (2011) Primera Cumbre Regional Amazónica Saberes Ancestrales, Pueblos y Vida Plena en Armonía con los Bosques (August 15 – 18, 2011). In: “Somos Pueblos Sin Dueños, Igual Que La Vida”. Mandato de Manaus: Acción Indígena por la Vida. Available: https://www.servindi.org/actualidad/49866
ConwayPR (2020) The folds of coexistence: towards a diplomatic political ontology, between difference and contradiction. Theory, Culture & Society37(3): 23–47.
17.
DePuyWWegerJFosterK, et al. (2021) Environmental governance: broadening ontological spaces for a more livable world. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space5: 2–975.
18.
DescolaP (2013) Beyond Nature and Culture (J. Lloyd, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.
19.
DryzekJ (2000) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford University Press.
20.
DryzekJPickeringJ (2019) The Politics of the Anthropocene. Oxford Academic.
21.
EckersleyR (2004) The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty. MIT Press.
22.
EphraimL (2018) Who Speaks for Nature? On the Politics of Science. University of Pennsylvania Press.
23.
EscobarAFryeD (2020) Pluriversal Politics: The Real and the Possible. Duke University press.
24.
FitzGeraldM (2022) Care and the pluriverse: Rethinking global ethics. Policy Press.
25.
HaasP (2015) Epistemic Communities, Constructivism, and International Environmental Politics. 1st edition. Routledge.
26.
HartzF (2022) Leaking the IPCC: a question of responsibility?WIREs Climate Change14: e814.
27.
HirdCDavid-ChavezDMGionSS, et al. (2023) Moving beyond ontological (worldview) supremacy: indigenous insights and a recovery guide for settler-colonial scientists. Journal of Experimental Biology226(12): jeb245302.
28.
HughesH (2024) The IPCC and the Politics of Writing Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
29.
IPBES (2019a). Report of the first ILK dialogue workshop for the IPBES assessment of the diverse conceptualizations of multiple values of nature: framing the assessment. IPBES.
30.
IPBES (2019b) Report of the second ILK dialogue workshop the IPBES assessment of the diverse conceptualizations of multiple values of nature. IPBES.
31.
IPBES (2021). Report of the third ILK dialogue workshop for the IPBES values assessment: reviewing the draft summary for policymakers and second order draft of the assessment. IPBES.
IPBES (2023). Report of the second Indigenous and local knowledge dialogue workshop for the IPBES assessment of the nexus of biodiversity, food, water, and health: reviewing the first order draft. IPBES.
KohnE (2013) How Forests Think. Toward an Anthropology Beyond the Human. University of California Press.
36.
LathrapD (1970) The Upper Amazon: Ancient Peoples and Places. Thames and Hudson.
37.
LatourB (2004) Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Harvard University Press.
38.
LatourBPorterC (2017) (Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. Polity, Trans). Polity Press.
39.
LatulippeNKlenkN (2020) Making room and moving over: knowledge co-production, Indigenous knowledge sovereignty and the politics of global environmental change decision-making. Current opinion in environmental sustainability42: 7–14.
40.
LawresNRSangerMC (2022) Recentering the turn: bringing native philosophy into ontological studies. General Anthropology29(2): 7–10.
41.
LeffE (2025) Diálogo De Saberes: La Transición Histórica Hacia La Sustentabilidad De La Vida. Enrique Leff: CLACSO.
42.
LudwigD (2016) Overlapping ontologies and Indigenous knowledge. From integration to ontological self-determination. Studies in history and philosophy of science part A59: 36–45.
43.
McElweePFernández‐LlamazaresÁAumeeruddy‐ThomasY, et al. (2020) Working with Indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) in large‐scale ecological assessments: reviewing the experience of the IPBES Global Assessment. Journal of Applied Ecology57(9): 1666–1676.
44.
MerinoR (2022) Conflicting sovereignties: global conservation, protected areas, and Indigenous Nations in the Peruvian Amazon. Global Environmental Politics22(2): 95–116.
45.
MerinoR (2024) Indigenous sovereignties in international governance: envisioning a plurinational amazon. Globalizations22(4): 569–589.
46.
MerinoRGustafssonM (2021) Localizing the Indigenous environmental steward norm: the making of conservation and territorial rights in Peru. Environmental Science & Policy124: 627–634.
47.
MillerG (2004) Sustaining the Earth. 6th edition. Thompson Learning.
48.
MooreJW (2022) Anthropocene, capitalocene & the flight from world history: Dialectical universalism & the geographies of class power in the capitalist world-ecology, 1492-2022. Nordia Geographical Publications51(2): 123–146.
49.
NobreCASampaioGBormaLS, et al. (2016) Land-use and climate change risks in the Amazon and the need of a novel sustainable development paradigm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences113(39): 10759–10768.
50.
NugkuagE (1994) El desarrollo indígena autónomo en la Amazonía luego de 500 años. Amérique Indienne93: 195–208.
51.
QuerejazuATicknerAB (2020) The rights of mother Earth: a pluriversal reading of climate change governance. In: TeoAWynne-HughesE (eds) Postcolonial Governmentalities: Rationalities, Violences and Contestations. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 217–238.
52.
QuintanillaMJosseJGuzmánA (2022) La Amazonía a contrarreloj: un diagnóstico regional sobre dónde y cómo proteger el 80% al 2025. Available: https://amazonia80x2025.earth/
53.
RashidiPLyonsK (2022) Democratizing global climate governance? The case of Indigenous representation in the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC). In: Economics and Climate Emergency. Routledge, 284–299.
54.
ReisingerAMeinshausenMManningM (2011) Future changes in global warming potentials under representative concentration pathways. Environmental Research Letters6: 2.
55.
Santos-GraneroF (2009) Vital enemies: Slavery, predation, and the Amerindian political economy of life. Univ. of Texas Press, Vol. 1.
56.
SchellyCGagnonVArolaK, et al. (2021) Cultural imaginaries or incommensurable ontologies? Relationality and sovereignty as worldviews in socio-technological system transitions. Energy Research & Social Science80: 102242.
57.
SmithLT (2012) Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. 2nd edition. Zed Books.
SulimanSFarbotkoCRansan-CooperH, et al. (2019) Indigenous (im)mobilities in the anthropocene. Mobilities14(3): 298–318.
60.
SundbergJ (2014) Decolonizing posthumanist geographies. Cultural Geographies21(1): 33–47.
61.
TorresCVerschoorV (2020) Re- imagining environmental governance: gold dredge mining vs. territorial health in the Colombian Amazon. Geoforum117: 124–133.
62.
TurnhoutE (2018) The politics of environmental knowledge. Conservation and Society16(3): 363–371.
63.
TurnhoutENevesKde LijsterE (2014) ‘Measurementality’in biodiversity governance: knowledge, transparency, and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem Services (IPBES). Environment & Planning A46(3): 581–597.
64.
Van der SluijsJVan EstRRiphagenM (2010) Beyond consensus: reflections from a democratic perspective on the interaction between climate politics and science. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability2(5–6): 409–415.
65.
Viveiros de CastroE (2004) Exchanging perspectives: the transformation of objects into subjects in Amerindian ontologies. Common Knowledge10(3): 463–465.
66.
Viveiros de CastroE (2015) The relative native: essays on Indigenous conceptual worlds. HAU Books.
67.
WhyteK (2018) What do Indigenous knowledges do for Indigenous Peoples? In: NelsonMKShillingD (eds) Traditional Ecological Knowledge. Cambridge University Press, 57–82.
68.
WieglebVBrunsA (2023) Working the boundary: Science–Policy interactions and uneven knowledge politics in IPBES. Sustainability Science18: 1069–1084.
69.
WoodsWIMcCann (2001) El origen y la persistencia de las tierras negras de la Amazonía. In: JMHiraokaMMoraS (eds) Desarrollo Sostenible En La Amazonía. ¿Mito O Realidad?. Amazon. 23–30.
70.
YatesJSHarrisLMWilsonNJ (2017) Multiple ontologies of water: politics, conflict and implications for governance. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space35(5): 797–815.
