This article investigates the dialectical relationship between conviviality and commoning in the management of public spaces whose accessibility has been compromised. Through commoning, new relationships are established or re-established among individuals who collaborate in collective actions aimed at enhancing the conviviality of a neighbourhood despite lacking strong pre-existing social ties. Conviviality, meant as the festive and relational dimension of space, is based on mutual recognition among participants and is intrinsically connected to the capacity to decommodify spaces. This process of decommodification and conviviality liberates public space from purely economic and commercial logics and promotes collective use of space, reflected in models of collaborative governance. The article draws on qualitative data gathered over three years of participant observation and 30 semi-structured interviews. The case of Villa Giaquinto, a public park in Caserta (Italy), which was initially occupied, became subject of the collaboration agreement between citizens and the public administration. The analysis reveals how effective governance enables these spaces to fulfil their role as forums for discussion, participation and social interaction by encouraging and sustaining collective initiatives for the reuse of spaces. This dynamic can succeed even when formal agreements with public authorities are not effectively implemented in practice, potentially reducing the agreement to a mere instrument for delegating public functions to citizens.
AminA (2008) Collective culture and urban public space. City12(1): 5–24.
2.
ArenaG (2003) Users, customers, allies: new perspectives in relations between citizens and public administrations. In: ArenaGChitiMP (eds) Public Administration, Competitiveness and Sustainable Development. Firenze University Press, 9–16.
3.
ArenaG (2020) I custodi della bellezza. Prendersi cura dei beni comuni. Un patto per l’Italia fra cittadini e istituzioni. Touring Club Italiano.
4.
ArendtH (2006) [1963] On Revolution. Penguin.
5.
BanerjeeT (2001) The future of public space: beyond invented streets and reinvented places. Journal of the American Planning Association67(1): 9–24.
6.
BarberaFBellE (2025) Commons, Citizenship and Power: Reclaiming the Margins. Bristol University Press.
7.
BifulcoL (2013) Citizen participation, agency and voice. European Journal of Social Theory16(2): 174–187.
8.
BloklandT (2017) Community as Urban Practice. Polity Press.
9.
BoillerDHelfrichS (eds) (2012) The Wealth of the Commons: A World Beyond Market and State. Levellers Press.
10.
BollierD (2014) Think like a Commoner. A Short Introduction to the Life of the Commons. New Society Publishers.
11.
BonvinJMThelenL (2003). Deliberative democracy and capabilities, the impact and significance of capability for voice. In: Paper presented at the Third Conference on Capabilities. 7-9 September, 2003, Pavia (IT).
12.
BorchCKornbergerM (2015) Urban Commons: Rethinking the City. Routledge.
13.
BresnihanPByrneM (2015) Escape into the city: everyday practices of commoning and the production of urban space in Dublin. Antipode47(1): 36–54.
14.
CaoL (2022) Participatory governance in China: ‘Informal public participation’ through neighbourhood mobilisation. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space40(08): 1693–1710.
15.
CitroniS (2020) Civil society events: ambiguities and the exertion of cultural power. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology7(2): 150–171.
16.
ÇobanA (2018) Ecological commons and enclosure policies in Turkey. In: ErdoğanEYüceNÖzbayÖ (eds). The Politics of the Commons: From Theory to Struggle. Netcopy Center, 29–52.
17.
Della PortaDDianiM (2020) Social Movements. An Introduction. III ed.John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
18.
Dellenbaugh-LosseMZimmermanNde VriesN (2020) The Urban Commons Cookbook: Strategies and Insights for Creating and Maintaining Urban Commons. https://www.urbancommonscookbook.com/
19.
DéloyeYHaegelF (2019) La politisation: du mot à l’écheveau conceptual. Politix3(127): 59–83.
20.
ForesterJF (ed) (2021) How Spaces Become Places. Place Makers Tell Their Stories. New Village Press.
21.
FosterSR (2011) Collective action and the urban commons. Notre Dame Law Review87(1): 57–134.
GierynTF (2000) A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology26: 463–496.
24.
HamidiC (2023) Cherry picking and politics: conceptualizing ordinary forms of politicization. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society36: 57–75.
25.
HarveyD (2012) Rebel Cities. From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. Verso.
26.
HeilT (2015) Conviviality: (Re)negotiating minimal consensus. In: VertovecS (ed) International Handbook of Diversity Studies. Routledge, 317–324.
27.
Heinkelmann-wildTZanglBRittbergerB, et al. (2023) Blame shifting and blame obfuscation: the blame avoidance effects of delegation in the European Union. European Journal of Political Research62: 221–238.
28.
HessCOstromE (2007) Understanding Knowledge as a Commons. from Theory to Practice. The MIT Press.
29.
HoodC (2002) The risk game and the blame game. Government and Opposition37(1): 15–37.
30.
HowlettM (2012) The lessons of failure: learning and blame avoidance in public policymaking. International Political Science Review33(5): 539–555.
31.
HuronA (2015) Working with strangers in saturated space: reclaiming and maintaining the urban commons. Antipode47(4): 963–979.
32.
HuronA (2017) Theorising the urban commons: new thoughts, tensions and paths forward. Urban Studies54(4): 1062–1069.
33.
IllichI (1973) Tools for Conviviality. Harper & Row.
34.
KarnerCParkerD (2011) Conviviality and conflict: pluralism, resilience and hope in inner city Birmingham. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies37(3): 355–372.
35.
KazepovJCefaloR (2020) The territorial dimension of social policies. Parolechiave 2/2020: 85-99.
36.
KnoblauchHLöwM (2020) The re-figuration of spaces and refigured modernity – concept and diagnosis. Historical Social Research45(2): 263–292.
37.
KohnM (2004) Brave New Neighborhoods. The Privatization of Public Space. Routledge.
38.
Labsus (2022) Rapporto sull’amministrazione condivisa dei beni comuni. Roma.
39.
LangstraatFVan MelikR (2013) Challenging the “end of public space”: a comparative analysis of publicness in British and Dutch Urban Spaces. Journal of Urban Design18(3): 429–448.
40.
LatourB (2005) Reassembling the Social. Oxford University Press.
41.
Le GalèsP (2022) The rise of local politics: a global review. Annual Review of Political Science2021(24): 345–363.
42.
Le GalèsPVitaleT (2013) Governing the large metropolis. A research agenda. Cahiers de recherche du Programme Cities are Back in Townn. 2013-8.
43.
LeitheiserSTrellE-MHorlingsI, et al. (2022) Toward the commoning of governance. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space40(3): 744–762.
44.
LichtermanPEliasophN (2014) Civic action. American Journal of Sociology120(3): 798–863.
45.
LoflandLH (1998) The Public Realm: Exploring the City’s Quintessential Social Territory. Aldine de Gruyter.
46.
LowSM (2023) Why Public Space Matters. Oxford University Press.
47.
MorelliN (2019) Creating urban sociality in middle-class neighborhoods in Milan and Bologna: a study on the social streets phenomenon. City & Community18(3): 834–852.
48.
NealSBennettKCochraneA, et al. (2019) Community and conviviality? Informal social life in multicultural places. Sociology53(1): 69–86.
49.
NémethJSchmidtS (2011) The privatization of public space: modeling and measuring publicness. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design38(1): 5–23.
50.
OstromE (1990) Governing the Commons. the Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.
51.
OstromE (2005) Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press.
52.
PeattieL (1998) Convivial cities. In: DouglassMFriedmannJ (eds) Cities for Citizens: Planning and the Rise of Civil Society in a Global Age. John Wiley & Sons, 247–253.
53.
PerkinsDDZimmermanMA (1995) Empowerment theory, research, and application. American Journal of Community Psychology23(5): 569–579.
54.
PolanyiK (2001) [or. 1944] The Great Transformation. The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Beacon Press.
55.
PolkoACzornikMOchojskiA (2021) Understanding the Urban Commons. Economics and Governance. Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
56.
RappaportJSeidmanE (eds) (2000) Handbook of Community Psychology. Springer.
57.
Rigkos-ZitthenIKapitsinisN (2024) Exploring commoning in the anthropocene. Introducing the concept of the election commons as a response to socio-ecological crisis. The case of Skouries, Greece. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space43(4): 1–17.
58.
RodotàS (2012) Il diritto di avere diritti. Laterza.
59.
RosolM (2012) Community volunteering as neoliberal strategy? Green space production in Berlin. Antipode44(1): 239–257.
SampsonRJ (2012) Great American City. Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect. University of Chicago Press.
62.
SennettR (2018) Building and Dwelling. Ethics for the City. Allen Lane Penguin.
63.
SimmelG (1997) La socievolezza. In: TurnaturiG (ed) Roma: Armando Editore Die Geselligkeit. Beispiel der Reinen oder Formalen Soziologie, «Grundfragen der Soziologie (Individuum und Gesellschaft)». IV ed.de Gruyter, 48–68.
64.
StuddertDWalkerdineV (2016) Being in community: Re-visioning sociology. The Sociological Review64: 613–621.
65.
ThévenotL (2014) Voicing concern and difference: from public spaces to common-places. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology1(1): 7–34.
66.
TrontoJC (2013) Caring Democracy: Markets, Equality, and Justice. New York University Press.
67.
VidalL (2024) Urban commons in practice: housing cooperativism and city-making. In: MartínezMA (ed) Research Handbook on Urban Sociology. Edward Elgar Publishing.
68.
VitaleT (2010) Building a shared interest. Olinda, Milan: social innovation between strategy and organisational learning. In: MoulaertF (ed), Can Neighbourhoods save the City?Routledge, 97–108.
69.
VitaleT (2024) Prefazione. Spazi pubblici come servizi comuni: una sociologia comparata delle modalità di regolazione per la convivialità urbana. In: BuriniC (ed) Governare lo spazio pubblico nelle città italiane. Patti di collaborazione e imprese di comunità tra convivialità ed efficacia collettiva. Franco Angeli, 9–24.
70.
WidmerH (2023) Conviviality in public squares: how affordances and individual factors shape optional activities. Urban Planning8(4): 17–30.
71.
WiseANobleG (2016) Convivialities: an orientation. Journal of Intercultural Studies37: 423–431.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
