This article explores how the medium of ‘para-legal’ performance art offers scope to experiment with legal conventions pertaining to climate change using the case study of the Court for Intergenerational Climate Crimes. Through a series of performative trials, staged in Framer Framed gallery in Amsterdam, Netherlands, the Court for Intergenerational Climate Crimes proposed comradeship as a legal concept to foster the emergence of intergenerational, intragenerational and interspecies solidarities. I argue that actors involved in the performance of the Court ‘carve space’ to realise these solidarities through distinct practices of spatial production and re-organisation. However, by engaging with interviewees’ accounts of the trial performances, I suggest that comradeship was expressed lopsidedly – with focus predominantly on the intragenerational inequalities implicated in climate change. Through critical reflection on the material and performative spatialities of the Court for Intergenerational Climate Crimes, I contribute to discussions surrounding the political capacities of art in times of climate breakdown, and emerging legal possibilities for climate justice.
BeauregardCCarlsonDRobinsonS, et al. (2021) Climate justice and rights-based litigation in a post-Paris world. Climate Policy21(5): 652–665.
7.
BellLDesaiD (2011) Imagining otherwise: connecting the arts and social justice to envision and act for change: special issue introduction. Equity & Excellence in Education44(3): 287–295.
8.
BonnettA (1992) Art, ideology, and everyday space: subversive tendencies from Dada to postmodernism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space10: 69–86.
9.
BoydD (2017) The Rights of Nature: A Legal Revolution that Could Save the World. Toronto, ON: ECW Press.
10.
BullardRWrightB (2009) Race, Place, and Environmental Justice after Hurricane Katrina. New York: Routledge.
11.
CarlenP (2018) Struggling for justice. Griffith Law Review27(2): 176–181.
12.
CelermajerD (2021) Multispecies justice: theories, challenges, and a research agenda for environmental politics. Environmental Politics30(1-2): 119–140.
13.
ChakrabartyD (2017) The politics of climate change is more than the politics of capitalism. Theory, Culture & Society34(2-3): 25–37.
14.
ChapronGEpsteinYLópez-BaoJ (2019) A rights revolution for nature. Science363(6434): 1392–1393.
15.
ClarksonC (2013) Drawing the Line: Toward an Aesthetics of Transitional Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ConnonIHallE (2021) It’s not about having a back-up plan; it’s always being in back-up mode’: rethinking the relationship between disability and vulnerability to extreme weather. Geoforum126: 277–289.
D'SouzaR (2018) What's Wrong with Rights? Social Movements, Law and Liberal Imaginations. London: Pluto.
25.
DaviesM (2017) Law Unlimited: Materialism, Pluralism and Legal Theory. New York: Routledge.
26.
DavisHTurpinE (2015) Art in the Anthropocene: Encounters Among Aesthetics, Politics, Environments and Epistemologies. London: Open Humanities Press.
27.
de Sousa SantosB (2017) Towards a socio-legal theory od indignation. In: BaxiUMcCruddenCPaliwalaA (eds) Law's Ethical, Global and Theoretical Contexts: Essays in Honor of William Twining. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 115–142.
28.
DeanJ (2019) Comrade: An Essay on Political Belonging. London: Verso.
EstesN (2019) Our History Is the Future: Standing Rock versus the Dakota Access Pipeline, and the Long Tradition of Indigenous Resistance. London: Verso.
31.
FullerMWeizmanE (2021) Investigative Aesthetics: Conflicts and Commons in the Politics of Truth. London: Verso Books.
32.
GalafassiDKaganSMilkoreitM, et al. (2018) Raising the temperature’: the arts on a warming planet. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability31: 71–79.
33.
GardinerS (2011) A Perfect Moral Storm: The Ethical Tragedy of Climate Change. New York: Oxford University Press.
34.
GiannachiG (2012) Representing, performing and mitigating climate change in contemporary art practice. Leonardo45(2): 124–131.
35.
GoldbergR (1979) Performance: Live Art 1909 to the Present. New York: Harry N. Abrams.
36.
GondaN (2019) Re-politicizing the gender and climate change debate: the potential of feminist political ecology to engage with power in action in adaptation policies and projects in Nicaragua. Geoforum106: 87–96.
37.
GregoryD (2001) (Post)colonialism and the production of Nature. In: CastreeNBraunB (eds) Social Nature: Theory, Practice and Politics. Oxford: Blackwell.
38.
GuayasaminJ, et al. (2021) Biodiversity conservation: local and global consequences of the application of “rights of nature” by Ecuador. Neotropical Biodiversity7(1): 541–545.
39.
HallegatteSRozenbergJ (2017) Climate change through a poverty lens. Nature Climate Change7: 250–256.
40.
HamiltonT (2022) Beyond Fossil Law: Climate, Courts and the Fight for the Future. London.OR Books.
41.
HansenJ (2017) Young people's burden: requirement of negative CO2 emissions. Earth System Dynamics8: 577–616.
42.
HarnawanT (2023) Geological science and the making of colonial oil frontiers on the east coast of Sumatra, 1890-1930. Lembaran Sejarah19(2): 101–118.
43.
HickelJ (2020) Quantifying national responsibility for climate breakdown: an equality-based attribution approach for carbon dioxide emissions in excess of the planetary boundary. The Lancet Planetary Health4(9): e399–404.
44.
HuberM (2022) Climate Change as Class War: Building Socialism on a Warming Planet. London: Verso.
45.
JafryTMikulewiczMHelwigK (2019) Routledge Handbook of Climate Justice. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
46.
JeffreyA (2019) Legal geography I: court materiality. Progress in Human Geography43(3): 565–573.
47.
JeffreyA (2020) Legal geography II: bodies and law. Progress in Human Geography44(5): 1004–1016.
48.
JeffreyCDysonJ (2021) Geographies of the future: prefigurative politics. Progress in Human Geography45(4): 641–658.
49.
KauffmanCMartinP (2021) The Politics of Rights of Nature: Strategies for Building a More Sustainable Future. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
50.
LaastadS (2020) Nature as a subject of rights? National discourses on Ecuador’s constitutional rights of nature. Forum for Development Studies47(3): 401–425.
51.
LandauFTolandA (2022) Towards a sensory politics of the Anthropocene: exploring activist-artistic approaches to politicizing air pollution. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space40(3): 629–647.
52.
LewisB (2018) Environmental human rights and climate change. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
53.
LoickD (2023) On Tribunalism: Should Artists Use the Court Form?E-Flux Journal, 135.
54.
LüttickenS (2018) Actors and Directors: Sven Lütticken on the Congo Tribunal. Texte Zur Kunst.
55.
M'GonigleM (2013) The liberal limits of environmental law: a green legal critique. Pace Environmental Law Review30(3): 1005–1115.
56.
MaatH (2001) A History of Agricultural Science in the Netherlands and its Colonies 1863-1986 Doctoral Thesis. Wageningen, NL: Wageningen University and Research.
57.
MalmA (2016) Fossil Capital: The Rise of Steam Power and the Roots of Global Warming. London: Verso.
MeijersT (2023) Climate change and intergenerational justice. In: PellegrinoGDi PaolaM (eds) Handbook of the Philosophy of Climate Change. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature, 623–646.
60.
MulcahyL (2011) Legal Architecture: Justice, Due Process and the Place of Law. Abingdon: Routledge.
61.
NeimanisA (2019) The weather underwater: Blackness, White feminism, and the breathless sea. Australian Feminist Studies34(102): 490–508.
62.
NewellPSrivastavaSNaessL, et al. (2021) Toward transformative climate justice: an emerging research agenda. WIREs Climate Change12(6): e733.
63.
NixonR (2011) Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.
64.
NurmisJ (2016) Visual climate change art 2005-2015: discourse and practice. WIREs Climate Change7(4): 501–516.
65.
O'DonnellEPoelinaAPelizzonA, et al. (2020) Stop burying the Lede: the essential role of Indigenous law(s) in creating rights of nature. Transnational Environmental Law9(3): 403–427.
66.
OostindieG (2021) Colonialism and Slavery: An Alternative History of the Port City of Rotterdam. Leiden: Leiden University Press.
67.
PauwPMbevaKvan AsseltH (2019) Subtle differentiation of countries’ responsibilities under the Paris Agreement. Palgrave Communications5: 86.
68.
PecharromanL (2018) Rights of nature: rivers that can stand in court. Resources7(1): 1.
69.
PeelJLinJ (2019) Transnational climate litigation: the contribution of the Global South. Amercian Journal of International Law113(3): 1.
70.
PeelJOsofskyH (2018) A rights turn in climate change litigation?Transnational Environmental Law7(1): 67.
71.
PickerillJChattertonP (2006) Notes towards autonomous geographies: creation, resistance and self-management as survival tactics. Progress in Human Geography30(6): 730–746.
72.
PotterW (2011) Green Is the New Red. San Francisco, CA: City Lights Books.
73.
PouikliE (2022) Editorial: a short history of the climate change litigation boom across Europe. ERA Forum22: 569–586.
74.
PrakMLuiten van ZandenJ (2023) Pioneers of Capitalism: The Netherlands 1000–1800. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
75.
PutzerALambooyTJeurissenR, et al. (2022) Putting the rights of nature on the map. A quantitative analysis of rights of nature initiatives across the world. Journal of Maps18(1): 89–96.
76.
QuirozDStravensMAchterbergE (2022) Art & Climate Justice: Voices for Just Climate Action. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Profundo.
RiceJCohenDLongJ, et al. (2019) Contradictions of the climate-friendly city: new perspectives on eco-gentrification and housing justice. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research44(1): 145–165.
79.
RiceJLongJLevendaA (2021) Against climate apartheid: confronting the persistent legacies of expendability for climate justice. Environment and Planning: Nature and Space1: 625–645.
80.
RosenbloomJ (1997) Social ideology as seen through courtroom and courthouse architecture. Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts22: 463–523.
81.
SanzTRodriguez-LabajosB (2021) Does artistic activism change anything? Strategic and transformative effects of arts in anti-coal struggles in Oakland, CA. Geoforum122: 41–54.
82.
SchlosbergD (2016) Environmental management for the Anthropocene. In: GabrielsonTHallCMeyerJ, et al. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 193–210.
83.
SchweitzerJMixTFlemingO (2024) We will continue to fight for our lands … it is Mother Nature that we value. In: Idle No More, the Rights of Nature Social Movement Frame, and Anti-Capitalist Ecologist Discourse. Globalizations.
84.
SetzerJBenjaminL (2020) Climate litigation in the Global South: constraints and innovations. Transnational Environmental Law9(1): 77–101.
85.
SetzerJHighamC (2023) Global Trends in Climate Change Litigation: 2023 Snapshot. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.
86.
SkillingtonT (2017) Climate Justice and Human Rights. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
87.
SkillingtonT (2019) Climate Change and Intergenerational Justice. London: Routledge.
88.
StaeheliL (2011) Political geography: where's citizenship?Progress in Human Geography35(3): 393–400.
89.
SultanaF (2022a) Critical climate justice. The Geographical Journal188(1): 118–124.
90.
SultanaF (2022b) The unbearable heaviness of climate coloniality. Political Geography99: 1–16.
91.
TáíwòO (2022) Reconsidering Reparations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
92.
TheodorouESpyrouSChristouG (2023) The future is now from before: youth climate activism and intergenerational justice. Journal of Childhood Studies48(1): 59–72.
93.
TigarM (2000) Law and the Rise of Capitalism. New York: NYU Press.
94.
Timmons-RobertsJParksB (2006) A Climate of Injustice: Global Inequality, North-South Politics, and Climate Policy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
95.
Tolia-KellyD (2019) Rancière and the re-distribution of the sensible: the artist Rosanna Raymond, dissensus and postcolonial sensibilities within the spaces of the museum. Progress in Human Geography43(1): 123–140.
96.
TschakertPSchlosbergDCelermajerD, et al. (2020) Multispecies justice: climate-just futures with, for and beyond humans. WIREs Climate Change12(2): 1–10.
97.
ValladaresCBoelensR (2017) Extractivism and the rights of nature: governmentality, ‘convenient communities’ and epistemic pacts in Ecuador. Environmental Politics26(6): 1015–1034.
98.
VerlieB (2022) Climate justice in more-than-human worlds. Environmental Politics31(2): 297–319.
